2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew Republic cover story: "Yes She Can". Coming November 29th.
by Michael E. Dyson: https://newrepublic.com/minutes/124641/obama-will-probably-go-history-one-greatest-presidents-weve-had-just-dont-think-issue-race-will-earn-kudos
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)(And a wonderful cover photo, too.)
But did you notice that she's facing to the RIGHT!!! OMG!! She's facing the right side of the page!! WHAT DOES THIS MEAN??!!
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)lobodons
(1,290 posts)Hillary is staring down the GOP as if to say, Bring it biatches!! I've got my peeps back. Yes, I can!!
riversedge
(70,187 posts)the sky is falling!! facing to the Right.
And I do think she looks better in a short cut (hair).
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)It's a double rainbow! What does this mean?!!
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)oasis
(49,376 posts)'Nuff said.
http://www.commongroundfoundation.org/mdyson_bio.html
oasis
(49,376 posts)And when he speaks, his oratorical skills are among the best.
LuvLoogie
(6,992 posts)Perhaps he discusses his own discovery of Hillary Clinton, but I think that "Why Hillary Clinton will do more for black people than Obama," is a bit presumptive.
The cynic in me sees it as an opening to needless shit-stirring, placing Hillary Clinton's candidacy in the context of Mr. Dyson's past criticism's of President Obama. I think the subtitle should include Barack Obama or President Obama, his first name or his title.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Other black journalists who have already read it have called it "powerful", and "must read".
riversedge
(70,187 posts)subtitle. I do not think Hillary is going to like it--she is not in a contest with Pres. Obama over this issue.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It's already getting lots of twitter chatter, not positive. Unfortunate, I like Dyson and hope his article won't just get lost in a bad editorial stunt.
Cha
(297,154 posts)President Obama has done so much.. and I'm glad that Hillary will be doing so much too.
But, don't give me this.. "more" business.
I saw this yesterday.. and why I didn't post it in Hill's Group. Didn't like the sub-title one bit and neither did those on The Obama Diary.
I do like how MED took down Cornel West, though, for his racist slurs at the President.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Can't wait to read it!
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)I'll read this when it's available, just to see his reasoning.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Hope the article is as good.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)XD XD XD
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)lol
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Wow.....whoosh, the sound of things flying over your head
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Bernie fans have a real problem with turning everyone into their enemy. Please proceed.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Acting whacky makes you whacked. Just sayin'!
That's ok, because in the real world, Hillary is everybody's enemy. Tell us, how's those favorability numbers across America?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Certainly not an example of tolerance and open-mindedness, but like I said, please proceed. Keep being you.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Sure Janey, sure lol That's like saying "I laugh at that photo because it's funny!" but you shouldn't because the photographer who took it is AA.
Janey, Janey, Janey, go get coffee, we'll wait. I'll keep being me and calling out Hillary for things like Bosnian sniper fire, flip flopping on every issue under the sun and her love for bagels in pantsuits XD
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Good God, just when you don't think it's possible for people to sink any lower.
One criticism I have of this video is when he says that Obama will be lauded as one of the greatest presidents we've ever had but race will keep that from happening. I agree with that to a large extent, but I think that the unprecedented levels of Republican obstructionism will be an even greater hindrance to us seeing his full potential. There is nothing those people wouldn't do to stop Obama and unfortunately, that will be a big part of his legacy.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Which are both silly and immature.
The article is about race and serious issues and you decided to try to get a laugh. Please proceed.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You suddenly equate the name of a magazine to a that of an article title.
Just sayin'.
Silly and mature? I'm sorry you're so mad that I posted a picture in your OP that you didn't like.
Anything else you'd like to grandstand about?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And I'm not mad. I'm trying to help you.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Are you getting it now? http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251855394#post45
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)You wrote "silly and mature". I wrote "silly and immature".
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...and it appears that its very important for you to dig your heels in and make repeated foolish statements defending a mistake.
You were given tons and tons of rope on this one, and look what you did with it. Too bad really, you were given every opportunity to walk away from that gaffe.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)But your doubling down is really unbecoming.
Should've taken the high road.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I will give the article a read but holy butthole, that is one helluva claim to make eh?
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)I've always thought that the most important thing Obama has done for black people specifically (apart from things he did that benefit black people among all others, like ACA) was simply BEING where he is. Now little black kids can look at history and say, someone who looks a little bit like me was president of the United States.
At the same time I've always thought that precisely because he is black, he has to hold back a lot on race, since his many opponents are just looking for signs of him favoring black people over others. My impression of him is that he has a far more sophisticated understanding of race issues than he gives out. He also knows, I suspect, that if he pushes too hard, it will backfire. I could be wrong, but I think in that respect it might be easier for a white president to actually do more things that would benefit the black community. NOT because of white savior syndrome or something like that, but just because they would not face the same scrutiny when it comes to race.
Either way, Obama has been fantastic. I know how much he inspires kids in my native South Africa, for example, and I know that he and his family are wonderful role models for kids like my AA goddaughter and her siblings. For that matter, they are good role models for kids of other races too. My blonde blue eyed daughter thinks Michele Obama is wonderful, and she's right!
Regarding Hillary, she is a solid Democrat with a fairly good record (I know, not perfect) on social justice issues. As such, women and minorities have every reason to have high expectations of her, to which we should hold her if she gets elected.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Besides being a great president, Obama becoming president has been a societal good.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)IMHO. You are right, his is one of the most important presidencies for the reasons you cite.
Hillary is a 'moderate' whatever that means, and has to go on listening tours and hire groups to figure out basic moral positions on no brainer issues. I believe she has been disconnected from the 'little guy' for far too long. A quarter million dollars for a 40 minute speech will do that to a person.
Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #27)
Nonhlanhla This message was self-deleted by its author.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)It's entirely possible that Bernie will do a lot for women, simply because he is a progressive. I do not see a longstanding focus on women's issues with him, though.
And just as having a black presidents has been of immense symbolic power for black people, for women having a female president would be of immense significance. I do think that Hillary sometimes has to do things differently than a male candidate would simply because (just like Obama) she faces different expectations. As a result, there is the risk that she might overcompensate and then do less for women than a male candidate might, but I don't think the dynamics for gender are quite the same as the dynamics for gender, so I think that risk is less for her than it has been for Obama. After all, women are not an ethnic group. Given her solid track record on women's issues (e.g. her work on sex trafficking etc.) as well as the symbolic power of the first female president, I think her election would be of great benefit to women. Any time you get a "first" it breaks a barrier that makes it easier for the next person of color or the next woman to come along.
In any case, as a woman, I would be entirely comfortable with pretty much any Democrat in office, and literally fear for my life with any Republican.
---------------
(I deleted my post above and move it here. I meant to respond to Live and Learn.)
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I'd definitely pick Obama again.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)... it is going to be a disaster.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)and a cage fighter!!!
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Thanks, I needed that.
DrBulldog
(841 posts)1. The publisher is a Republican-based company. So why are they promoting Hillary? Maybe she's not electable as she claims?
2. Why are they claiming she's better for blacks than Obama? Why bother with the irrelevant comparison that begs the far more important question: would she be better for blacks than Bernie?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Yup yup.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)entity?
"Yup yup"
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)and has always been Progressive.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Definitions might vary but the National Review has been the voice of contemporary conservatism and The New Republic has been the voice of contemporary liberalism.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 28, 2015, 03:56 PM - Edit history (2)
The New Republic was founded in 1914.It has endorsed every Democratic candidate for president since 1917 with the exception of independent John Anderson in 1980. It has always been traditionally liberal.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Yes it supports democrats as it is a propaganda organ for the DLC, for "New Democrats", for "third way" Democrats, for whatthefuckever the neoliberal corporatist are calling themselves these days.
postatomic
(1,771 posts)Will have to give it a looksie after it comes out. Thanks for posting this.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)postatomic
(1,771 posts)Here and there. There and Here.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Some days it feels like it though.
mcar
(42,302 posts)I'm interested in what he has to say.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)Hillary, African Americans & The Myth of Bill Clinton
http://academic.udayton.edu/race/2008ElectionandRacism/Clinton/clinton03.htm
Why did the Clinton's back the 1990s Welfare reform, while taking down Hillarycare themselves? What happened to ClintoChildCare? They must have known the consequences to poor women? Could it be that the Clintons were promised a position in the 1%? The Clinton's are against
Glass-Steagall too.
Clinton working for the middle class, does not add up in my opinion. If she is elected, what else might she take down that she seems to be working for in the 3026 election cycle?
Going through trust issues with Obama over the last 7 years, I distrust Hillary even more that in 2008. They are into third way and are a part of the New Democrat move to the Right.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)Perhaps you may be referring to this white, educated, wealthier group of conservative Assholes that worship and support the % and are the 1%:
Free Republic is a moderated Internet forum for activists, and chat site for self-described conservatives, primarily within the United States.[2] It presents articles and comments posted pseudonymously by registered members, known as "Freepers",[3] using screen names. The site is supported entirely by donations, with pledge drives known as "Freepathons" held each quarter.
Free Republic has been involved in several organized conservative campaigns including against CBS anchor Dan Rather and against the Dixie Chicks for their antiwar statements.[4] Freepers were instrumental in raising the question of a lack of authenticity in the so-called "Killian memos".
Contents [hide]
1 Local chapters and forum policies
2 History
2.1 19962000: Clinton Administration
2.2 2001-2004: Bush's first term and Killian documents
2.2.1 MD4Bush Incident
2.3 2005-2009: Bush's second term
2.3.1 Dixie Chicks boycott
2.3.2 Allegations of unfair treatment of Giuliani supporters and others who digress from popular opinions
2.3.3 Influencing online polls
2.4 2009: Obama administration
3 References
4 External links
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)a Slogan of 'We' in the Last presidency to 'She' in the upcoming... The Future is starting to sound really Lonely.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Autumn
(45,056 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)As long it doesn't interfere with corporate power or profits.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I am not even sure she 'can' to be honest, I don't think there is any will on her part to better the lives of any color except green.
There will be some crumbs and fancy rhetoric - but it'll be same as it ever was.
I look forward to reading the article - I am skeptical of his skeptical journey.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)From helping desegregate churches in the South as a teen, to marching with Sharpton and calling the cops who killed Diallo "murderers", to building coalitions with black community leaders, to helping fight AIDS in Africa.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)that doesn't mean she will do what has to be done. Hillary has a been known to say and do what polls well. Hence the constant "evolving".
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)You owe me a Coke.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)Would that mean that Lee accepts the 1% support for the campaign of Hillary Clinton? And Clinton's Flip Flop on issues is acceptable? Lee did a flip when she helped construct a bill to impeach President Bush, then later chose not to question the Order of the Bush War.
Seems like there is little difference between New Democrats and Republicans just as many Americans claim.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Probably because they could use a good course in political science.
I blame our education system.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)You are right. To me, this article in the OP, does little to bring help to the poor and poor African Americans of the OP. Perhaps the 1% will ride in to the rescue, as in Trickle-Down, if Clinton is elected.
http://www.blackpressusa.com/is-black-america-better-off-under-obama/#sthash.FF0BSGG1.dpbs
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Me, I'm an agnostic.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Damn... that is fairly explosive.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)... I don't hold the President responsible for lack of progress on any front domestically since after two years, his agenda was essentially stopped by the GOP. He managed to put enough in place to get the economy going again, and the rest of his accomplishments the first two years.
We will never know what he could have accomplished on a number of fronts without the extreme obstructionism by the GOP. The other side of that is, I am not sure what anyone else will be able to accomplish in 2017-2023 given at least a Republican House, which is what I have been saying to Bernie supporters.
Number23
(24,544 posts)That is quite an explosive charge. And I'm sure that by discussing it, we are doing exactly what the author of that title wants us to do!
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)He starts off completely lambasting the 2008 campaign tactics, but goes on to write a rather basic view of Clinton as the Great Bureaucrat, the Policy Wonk. I never understood why black folk could so easily forgive that stuff back in 2008 or be critical of Obama (he's also critical of Obama in the piece on timid race relations work). But I think I understand better now. Dyson wants actual policy shit to be implemented and thinks Clinton can do it because unlike Bill or Obama, she's being pressured by BLM to do it.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Dyson's title is so explosive that I almost feel that I have to.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's an account of the last couple of months, with giant photos, and to make a long story short, he expresses disappointment in Barack's slowness and optimism in Hillary's chances of passing legislation that will address the problems BLM is currently drawing attention to.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I'm always interested in what he has to say.
I credit BLM with bringing specific policy proposals to the fore.
Every democrat should embrace their policy proposals, not just at the federal level but also at local and State levels where they are sorely needed.
Cha
(297,154 posts)has to deal with . I hate it when anyone sits in from of their computer and think they have one fucking clue.
But, I do feel Hillary will be a huge help with #BLM.
Thanks ucr
Number23
(24,544 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Given her supporters call anything resembling actual governing 'Ponies and rainbows'.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Publication and has been since around 1974.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)She can and will.
Good Morning.