2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBrand new spankin Ipsos poll - Bernie Sanders ahead nationally
In the name of fairness, Bernie is ahead 34-32 over HRC.
http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR131/dates/20150808-20151202/type/smallest
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)still_one
(91,937 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Time Frame: AUG 08, 2015 - NOV 27, 2015 (5 Day Rolling)
These things reflect an interesting trend in the way people consume news and therefore, perceptions of the 5 day rolling average.
I think you'll see HRC people jump right on this because every 5 days, it's important to control the message.
I believe what we do as Americans in this important race continue to be what the we do every single day when we talk about the issues. Meanwhile, do not expect any polling data to do anything more than inflame the very persons who's task it is to control the message.
Meanwhile, I'm involved in a grass roots movement. You know... the same kind that the real members of Unions are supposed to have... NOT those who keep controlling the "message".
We have continued work to do one voter at a time, ap....
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 2, 2015, 09:37 AM - Edit history (1)
I don't think some will cit them anymore
Even though this looks good for my candiate the poll doesn't changes much.this race will be decered state by state. not national.
I say focus on winning iowa and NH.then Clinton's led will collopse like house of cards much like myth Clinton Foundation Is
charity
Clinton and Foundation. Sounds good for the name of a Laundromat.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Mark my words
retrowire
(10,345 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 2, 2015, 02:37 PM - Edit history (1)
And it says 42 Clinton and 26 Sanders.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Filter. Love it. Do you know what the number I'm looking at is? It says "overall."
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It's odd.
ismnotwasm
(41,917 posts)On-line polls with filters. It's a lot of great fun
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I see the filters, but when I click their link is shows Clinton with a commanding lead. I guess I am suppose to click filters for fun until I get what I want. Oops, polls are showing what I want.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)The numbers change easily and quickly if your cursor rolls past a date in the past.
Sam
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)With such small sample sizes, you can count on the daily numbers bouncing quite a bit. Celebrating one day's results that are very much of the average is celebrating an outlier. FWIW, your mileage obviously varies.
Tarc
(10,472 posts)A perfect time for the pickins...
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)And it is not correct. But, it feeds the fantasy.
Anyway, here's reality:
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary
Proserpina
(2,352 posts)Evidently not reproducible here--go see it!
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....Sanders gained 8 points in seven days, Clinton lost 13 points and there were 5% MORE who "wouldn't vote"?
BainsBane
(53,001 posts)The results as linked from the story on the poll page are actually Clinton 57, Sanders 29.
http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TR131/type/smallest/filters/PARTY_ID_:1/dates/20150808-20160125/collapsed/false/spotlight/1
http://polling.reuters.com