Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:04 PM
109 replies, 5432 views
 109 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Hillary's Rahm Problem (Original post) |
Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | OP |
| MerryBlooms | Dec 2015 | #1 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #3 | |
| MerryBlooms | Dec 2015 | #4 | |
| Fawke Em | Dec 2015 | #56 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #93 | |
| BlueCaliDem | Dec 2015 | #101 | |
| roguevalley | Dec 2015 | #64 | |
| 99th_Monkey | Dec 2015 | #2 | |
| Thinkingabout | Dec 2015 | #5 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #6 | |
| Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | #8 | |
| Post removed | Dec 2015 | #9 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #10 | |
| Thinkingabout | Dec 2015 | #15 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #17 | |
| Thinkingabout | Dec 2015 | #21 | |
| beam me up scottie | Dec 2015 | #23 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #29 | |
| ESKD | Dec 2015 | #46 | |
| kath | Dec 2015 | #75 | |
| 840high | Dec 2015 | #103 | |
| NCTraveler | Dec 2015 | #47 | |
| roguevalley | Dec 2015 | #65 | |
| JonLeibowitz | Dec 2015 | #78 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Dec 2015 | #81 | |
| Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | #18 | |
| beam me up scottie | Dec 2015 | #20 | |
| Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | #12 | |
| beam me up scottie | Dec 2015 | #13 | |
| ejbr | Dec 2015 | #40 | |
| raindaddy | Dec 2015 | #63 | |
| beam me up scottie | Dec 2015 | #74 | |
| JonLeibowitz | Dec 2015 | #77 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Dec 2015 | #79 | |
| kath | Dec 2015 | #106 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #24 | |
| Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | #28 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #35 | |
| Fawke Em | Dec 2015 | #11 | |
| strategery blunder | Dec 2015 | #19 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #22 | |
| strategery blunder | Dec 2015 | #32 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #94 | |
| Truprogressive85 | Dec 2015 | #37 | |
| strategery blunder | Dec 2015 | #38 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #91 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #92 | |
| strategery blunder | Dec 2015 | #97 | |
| jfern | Dec 2015 | #27 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #30 | |
| morningfog | Dec 2015 | #52 | |
| beam me up scottie | Dec 2015 | #34 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #95 | |
| Truprogressive85 | Dec 2015 | #31 | |
| morningfog | Dec 2015 | #51 | |
| Cheese Sandwich | Dec 2015 | #73 | |
| ViseGrip | Dec 2015 | #100 | |
| Cheese Sandwich | Dec 2015 | #102 | |
| NorthCarolina | Dec 2015 | #7 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #14 | |
| Doctor_J | Dec 2015 | #16 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #25 | |
| NCTraveler | Dec 2015 | #48 | |
| Motown_Johnny | Dec 2015 | #26 | |
| WillyT | Dec 2015 | #33 | |
| WillyT | Dec 2015 | #36 | |
| bvf | Dec 2015 | #39 | |
| zentrum | Dec 2015 | #41 | |
| Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | #42 | |
| zentrum | Dec 2015 | #45 | |
| kath | Dec 2015 | #107 | |
| 840high | Dec 2015 | #104 | |
| MaggieD | Dec 2015 | #43 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #44 | |
| MaggieD | Dec 2015 | #50 | |
| Bjorn Against | Dec 2015 | #54 | |
| Fawke Em | Dec 2015 | #60 | |
| MaggieD | Dec 2015 | #68 | |
| Fawke Em | Dec 2015 | #80 | |
| MaggieD | Dec 2015 | #84 | |
| MaggieD | Dec 2015 | #67 | |
| morningfog | Dec 2015 | #53 | |
| forest444 | Dec 2015 | #49 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #57 | |
| forest444 | Dec 2015 | #71 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #89 | |
| DhhD | Dec 2015 | #61 | |
| forest444 | Dec 2015 | #69 | |
| ibegurpard | Dec 2015 | #88 | |
| Thespian2 | Dec 2015 | #55 | |
| AzDar | Dec 2015 | #58 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #59 | |
| Fawke Em | Dec 2015 | #62 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #90 | |
| winter is coming | Dec 2015 | #96 | |
| Bread and Circus | Dec 2015 | #98 | |
| SHRED | Dec 2015 | #66 | |
| Fearless | Dec 2015 | #70 | |
| Cheese Sandwich | Dec 2015 | #72 | |
| hrmjustin | Dec 2015 | #76 | |
| hrmjustin | Dec 2015 | #82 | |
| kath | Dec 2015 | #83 | |
| hrmjustin | Dec 2015 | #85 | |
| kath | Dec 2015 | #86 | |
| hrmjustin | Dec 2015 | #87 | |
| winter is coming | Dec 2015 | #99 | |
| 840high | Dec 2015 | #105 | |
| Bernblu | Dec 2015 | #108 | |
| kath | Dec 2015 | #109 |
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:08 PM
MerryBlooms (11,269 posts)
1. I read earlier today that Clinton is distancing herself from Rahm, that would be the smart move.
Response to MerryBlooms (Reply #1)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:10 PM
3. They shouldn't be associated with him anyway
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #3)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:12 PM
MerryBlooms (11,269 posts)
4. Yeah, I hear ya. :(
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #56)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:39 AM
101. Yeah, I thought that was a bad choice, too. But "No Drama Obama" needed an attack dog
Response to MerryBlooms (Reply #1)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:53 PM
64. I loathe the expression 'deeply troubled'. it usually means they aren't.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #5)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:17 PM
8. Sorry, but it is not Bernie who is saying a guy who covered up a murder "Loves Chicago"
Response to Post removed (Reply #9)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:28 PM
10. That is either a mistake on your part or a lie.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #21)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:58 PM
23. He voted against it because he believed background checks should be handled by the states:
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #21)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:02 PM
29. you lied about saying he doesn't support background checks.
Response to NCTraveler (Reply #47)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:56 PM
65. how about clinton voting for the war that should have never happened?
Response to NCTraveler (Reply #47)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:25 AM
78. A better reason not to mention it is because it is an outright fabrication.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #15)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:48 PM
18. You said he opposed background checks, that is a lie
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #15)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:54 PM
20. You said he opposes background checks and that is a lie, see post 13.
Response to Post removed (Reply #9)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:37 PM
13. That is a lie. He has voted for background checks and assault weapons bans.
Response to Post removed (Reply #9)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:51 PM
63. "Sander's wants guns in the streets"
Response to raindaddy (Reply #63)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:14 AM
74. I think I'm going to add that to the big book of smears.
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #74)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:23 AM
77. They certainly try to outdo each other though! Keep up the good work on the book of smears. n/t
Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #79)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 03:30 AM
106. Despite the name, that one is not much of a thinker.
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:58 PM
24. Is it proven beyond a doubt Rahm was part of the cover up?
Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #24)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:02 PM
28. A five million dollar settlement was handed out in this case
|
Last edited Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:46 AM - Edit history (1) |
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #28)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:04 PM
35. Interesting. We live in a very corrupt world.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #5)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:31 PM
11. And that has nothing to do with why Rahm is on the hot seat.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #5)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:53 PM
19. Chicago gun violence is more of a problem for corrupt Chicago politicians.
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #19)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:56 PM
22. Oh she worked closely with him long before that
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #22)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:04 PM
32. I did say I was barely scratching the surface in that post ;)
|
I know they also worked together before that on assorted Democratic congressional campaign committees but I trust you understand that I do not want to spend my Friday night wading into that cesspool.
Suffice it to say that I knew Rahm's "promotion" from congresscritter to CoS was a very, very bad idea immediately upon the appointment. Sure enough, it turned out to be a very, very bad idea.  |
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #32)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:09 AM
94. Rahm Emanuel worked for Bill Clinton
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #19)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:06 PM
37. So ignore a possible cover up and focus on gun violence right?
Response to Truprogressive85 (Reply #37)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:10 PM
38. Those are two separate issues
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #19)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:06 AM
91. And then they use $5,000,000 of taxpayer money to cover up the crime. Crazy.
Response to strategery blunder (Reply #19)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:07 AM
92. The Clinton's and Rahm go way back (way before Obama)
Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #92)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:26 AM
97. Yeah I was speaking from my experience living there
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #5)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:01 PM
27. What the hell does gun control have to do with
Response to jfern (Reply #27)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:04 PM
34. That's their default position, whenever they don't have a defense they bring up gunz!
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #5)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:03 PM
31. Gun violence is a problem in Chicago yes but
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:38 PM
14. I was there at the Chicago protests on the Friday after Thanksgiving... they really wanted...
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 09:59 PM
25. If you cover up a known murder, doesn't that make you and accomplice to the crime?
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #26)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:04 PM
33. + 1,000,000,000 - What You Said !!!
|
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:37 PM
zentrum (9,864 posts)
41. Rahm Knew. Here's why.
|
Last edited Sat Dec 5, 2015, 10:23 PM - Edit history (1) |
Response to zentrum (Reply #41)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:44 PM
42. Yes, I think that settlement is the smoking gun that ties Rahm to this
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #42)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 03:39 AM
107. Yep, sure seems like a smoking gun to me. What about the Board of Alderman - wouldn't they have
Response to MaggieD (Reply #43)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 10:53 PM
44. Why can't she come out and forcefully denounce Rahm and call for his ouster?
Response to MaggieD (Reply #50)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:34 PM
54. Bernie has called for Emanuel to resign
Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #54)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:43 PM
60. That poster tends to mouth-off first and find out real info later.
|
Thanks for calling her on it.
 |
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:24 PM
49. The DEMOCRATS as a whole have a Rahm problem.
|
Last edited Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:02 AM - Edit history (1) |
Response to forest444 (Reply #49)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:41 PM
57. Exactly. It's all this third way bullshit and this "nothing matters as long as we win" myopic...
Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #57)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:06 AM
71. And worst of all, it all seems to have been narrowed down to a choice between that
Response to forest444 (Reply #71)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:03 AM
89. It is kind of like that... it's almost a bind between cynicism and softcore fascism
Response to forest444 (Reply #49)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:45 PM
61. Did Clinton support Rahm on shutting down Chicago public schools? Please read how to sell of
Response to DhhD (Reply #61)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:01 AM
69. Great reading. Thank you!
|
Profitization of public assets seems to be in style these days.
 |
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:36 PM
55. Gonna' have to put on some running shoes...
|
to get enough distance away from Ram Emanuel...a person (?) who should never have been given any public office, but managed to screw over large segments of the population...
 |
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:41 PM
59. I was at the Chicago protests, I have some good pics, what's a good site to post them and link?
Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #59)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:45 PM
62. Start a thread in General Discussion and post them on DU.
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #62)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:04 AM
90. Can I just upload them directly to DU from my phone?
Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #90)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:22 AM
96. Pretty sure you'll have to host them somewhere, like photobucket. n/t
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:04 AM
70. Problem is that she's not serious.
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #82)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:36 AM
83. Why don't you tell us again, like you just did but deleted, that "you guys would vote for the
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #85)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:42 AM
86. Sorry I didn't get the wording right - read it right before it disappeared,but knew that it was some
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #82)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 01:30 AM
99. "She knows Mayor Emanuel loves Chicago, and is sure he wants to do all he can...
Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 04:11 AM
108. Of course she's not serious about BLM. Politics is more important. She is not going to throw Rahm
