Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 06:29 PM Dec 2015

National horse race polls are meaningless, and robo-call polls are the worst, but if you must talk

about the new national robo-call horse race poll by Emerson College, you should at least talk about this:

Sanders is up 6% and Clinton is down 3% since the last meaningless national robo-call horse race poll by Emerson College


18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National horse race polls are meaningless, and robo-call polls are the worst, but if you must talk (Original Post) Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 OP
All polls matter. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #1
Except the ones that put Sanders ahead on NH, because white people Scootaloo Dec 2015 #6
Those matter too, as they reflect one state polling. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #8
Not in this series of posts, at least. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #9
Which one did I deny? JaneyVee Dec 2015 #11
The point is towards Clinton supporters at large Scootaloo Dec 2015 #17
Robocalls are bad, online are not scientific Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #2
If you search you'll probably find some other upaloopa Dec 2015 #3
Iowa and New Hampshire likely voter polling with a good sample size and a reliable methodology Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #4
Hillary's lead is similar in all national polls upaloopa Dec 2015 #5
Except ... no that's not correct at all. Her lead in the NBC/WSJ poll is LESS THAN HALF her lead in Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #7
This poll was post-debate. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #10
Are you deliberately misrepresenting or are you unable to interpret what you are commenting about? Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #12
And ending on December 20th. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #13
And when was the debate? When was most of the data gathered? What were you representing? Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #15
The debate was on the 19th. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #16
So 3/4 of the data was gathered before the debate, right? Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #18
K&R NCTraveler Dec 2015 #14
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
6. Except the ones that put Sanders ahead on NH, because white people
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 07:07 PM
Dec 2015

and of course except for the ones in Iowa that nudge Sanders in the lead, because caucuses make Iowa a fascist dictatorship hellhole that doesn't count.

And the polls conducted online, even if they're not the self-selection variety. because the internet doesn't matter. Not like landlines and lonely retirees who - apparently - make up 42% of the voting public.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
17. The point is towards Clinton supporters at large
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 07:37 PM
Dec 2015

I've seen New Hampshire dismissed as meaningless "because of demographics" (i.e., because it's predominantly white.) I've seen Iowa dismissed for the same reason, and also because 'caucuses don't count." And yeah, the endless panning of every internet poll, no matter the methodology (by the same people who think sampling elders 65+ at 42% is representative and strong methodology)

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. If you search you'll probably find some other
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 06:35 PM
Dec 2015

subsets that are in Bernie's favor.

Most likely Bernie wins in the most click poll clickers polled.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
4. Iowa and New Hampshire likely voter polling with a good sample size and a reliable methodology
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 06:54 PM
Dec 2015

will start to become closer to predictive (but still as much as 10% or more divergent from the actual results) as we progress into the latter half of January.

Until then, the polls are a snapshot in time capturing a moment when the voters are not voting (and in the case of national polls, capturing a moment in time for a hypothetical vote that will never occur).

If you must fixate on the national polls, you should ask why does Clinton do so much better in robo-call polls (like Emerson's) compared to how she does in live-phone (cell and landline) polls conducted by pollsters who conduct the most polling according to the most well established methods:



Clinton has almost a 40% lead in the Emerson robo-call poll but she has only a 17% lead in the most frequent national horse race pollsters who do live phone polls of likely voters.

This is a fairly consistent phenomenon (and it applies to Trump and Clinton).

What is behind the phenomenon that Clinton consistently does better in robo-call polls as compared to more traditional live phone polls?

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
5. Hillary's lead is similar in all national polls
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 07:03 PM
Dec 2015

I think if all polls are similar then they all are pointing in the same direction.

Nationally Hillary is around 55% to 60% and Bernie is around 30%. It's been that way for months now.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
7. Except ... no that's not correct at all. Her lead in the NBC/WSJ poll is LESS THAN HALF her lead in
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 07:16 PM
Dec 2015

the Emerson robo-call poll.

A 20% spread between one poll and the other means that both polls cannot be even close to correct. One poll (or perhaps both) are certainly garbage (and both are meaningless in that they are taking a snapshot of a national vote that will never occur).

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
12. Are you deliberately misrepresenting or are you unable to interpret what you are commenting about?
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 07:27 PM
Dec 2015

The Emerson robo-call poll is based on data gathered beginning on December 17 (mostly before the debate).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»National horse race polls...