Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPA Voter ID Law relies on 1869 case that warned of "rogues," "strumpets," and "wandering Arabs"
By Nicole Flatow on Sep 11, 2012 at 3:51 pm
"As the Pennsylvania Supreme Court prepares to review the constitutionality of the states photo ID law, a University of Pittsburgh law professor flagged the flimsy and offensive precedent upon which the lower court relied when it upheld the law. In rejecting the plaintiffs argument that the law violates the state Constitutions guarantee of free and equal elections, the court cited the 1869 case of Patterson v. Barlow, which, Professor Jessie Allen points out, serves as a blatant example of the anti-democratic voter suppression alleged by plaintiffs in the current voter ID case.:
"The law approved in Patterson enacted a complicated set of registration procedures for Philadelphia (with its large working-class and immigrant populations) and a simpler procedure for the rest of the state. . . . The opinion justifies a tougher process for Philadelphia voters because rogues and strumpets do not nightly traverse the deserted highways of the farmer. Low inns, restaurants, sailors boarding-houses and houses of ill fame do not abound in rural precincts, ready to pour out on election day their pestilent hordes.
For good measure, the court explained that to overturn the tighter procedures for Philadelphia voters would be to place the vicious vagrant, the wandering Arabs, the Tartar hordes of our large cities, on a level with the virtuous and good man.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/09/11/829841/decision-upholding-pennsylvania-voter-id-law-relied-on-1886-case-warning-of-rogues-strumpets-and-wandering-arabs/?mobile=nc
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1301 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PA Voter ID Law relies on 1869 case that warned of "rogues," "strumpets," and "wandering Arabs" (Original Post)
powergirl
Sep 2012
OP
I'm surprised they missed the opportunity to completely disenfranchise women
Lucy Goosey
Sep 2012
#1
Lucy Goosey
(2,940 posts)1. I'm surprised they missed the opportunity to completely disenfranchise women
This case is from before women were allowed to vote, and it would fit nicely into the Republican war on women, right? Sadly, I'm sure there are plenty of Repubs who actually believe women shouldn't be allowed to vote.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)2. Strumpets! Rogues!
How about Ne'er-Do-Wells, scalawags and soiled doves?
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)3. There's never a good strumpet around...
...when I need one!
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)4. The only house of "ill fame" we have right now is in the same building with the PA Senate.
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)5. So, stumpets can't vote, but Tarts and Hussies can?
Seem's remarkably inconsistent...