Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie speaks to 31,000 in Iowa!!!! (Original Post) BigBearJohn Jan 2016 OP
I hope those 31,000 gave Bernie saltpoint Jan 2016 #1
Wow, that's like 30,000 more than his competitor gets. nt valerief Jan 2016 #2
I'd Say about 31,500 MORE Than The Corporate/Oligarchy Anointed "FrontRunner" Gets CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #4
Well, if everyone else supports him, I guess I should? brooklynite Jan 2016 #3
NOT The Point... CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #8
In that case you have nothing to worry about... brooklynite Jan 2016 #10
Yeah, she sure doesn't need the salary that pays less than an hour's speaking. Plucketeer Jan 2016 #50
I really like that Hill-Bill tag greiner3 Jan 2016 #44
We don't expect you to support someone who is not in your best interest. artislife Jan 2016 #18
If I voted my best interest, I'd support Sanders... brooklynite Jan 2016 #36
How do I know any of this is true? artislife Jan 2016 #38
My identity isn't hidden...feel free to check my FEC filings brooklynite Jan 2016 #39
I don't believe your conversations artislife Jan 2016 #53
I suppose I could be making it up...but why would I? brooklynite Jan 2016 #54
The difference is that Clinton and her supporters don't obsess over crowd sizes. They're too busy.. George II Jan 2016 #30
K&R Historic NY Jan 2016 #31
What does greiner3 Jan 2016 #45
What is the biggest crowd Hill has got so far? madokie Jan 2016 #48
Cool. bigwillq Jan 2016 #5
Isn't Sanders repeating the same mistake Hillary made in 08? Crowd sizes != delegates... tia uponit7771 Jan 2016 #6
Romney had a crowd of 30,000 in Ohio the night before the election lunamagica Jan 2016 #7
Yes, but wait!! Karl Rove is in Ohio saltpoint Jan 2016 #9
Of course he lost. When the choice is the crazy GOP nc4bo Jan 2016 #11
rMoney have ... 99Forever Jan 2016 #12
Thank you for your kind words and feelings. Such a kind heart. lunamagica Jan 2016 #14
And thank you for proving my point. 99Forever Jan 2016 #21
Its funny how some of you talk to yourselves R B Garr Jan 2016 #23
I see. 99Forever Jan 2016 #25
LMAO! The article says, "NOT in one crowd" R B Garr Jan 2016 #26
So you've got nothing. 99Forever Jan 2016 #27
There you go again. Completely misdirect and talk to R B Garr Jan 2016 #32
I understand that truth... 99Forever Jan 2016 #34
Yes, back to your insults and name-calling. R B Garr Jan 2016 #42
Same ol same ol. 99Forever Jan 2016 #43
Yeah, your self-declared morals and so-called truths R B Garr Jan 2016 #46
Blah blah blah. 99Forever Jan 2016 #47
Foghorn. R B Garr Jan 2016 #52
Has Sanders had "any crowds of over 30,000 during the primaries"? George II Jan 2016 #29
As I recall, he bused them in (and probably paid them) Proserpina Jan 2016 #16
That's Trump no Bernie.....Bernie's to honest for that..... Pauldg47 Jan 2016 #33
It was Romney Proserpina Jan 2016 #51
Where was this rally? I'm not seeing this reported sufrommich Jan 2016 #13
Never happened. As Bernie CORRECTLY states, he has drawn 31,000 Iowans to different events Luminous Animal Jan 2016 #17
Well,that explains why it's not being reported. sufrommich Jan 2016 #19
That's how I always understood it too.... Pauldg47 Jan 2016 #35
You are incorrect. As Bernie himself has said, since the campaign has begun Luminous Animal Jan 2016 #15
You are correct! Duval Jan 2016 #41
Actually, the crowd at the Red Oak event was 400, not 31,000 onenote Jan 2016 #20
Why are you folks making him a liar or something? Pauldg47 Jan 2016 #37
We had @400 in Muscatine Tuesday - an amazing crowd for Muscatine rurallib Jan 2016 #22
You should probably point out that Ring of Fire sufrommich Jan 2016 #24
Very disappointed to see R of F do this. riversedge Jan 2016 #49
A bit deceiving - that's 31,000 (actually I read 34,000) since APRIL, or about..... George II Jan 2016 #28
K&R nt Duval Jan 2016 #40

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
1. I hope those 31,000 gave Bernie
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 12:57 PM
Jan 2016

their best ears, and that among them were people of all ages.

Let them drive home from the rally talking about what they heard and how it affects the country they live in.

I hope many of the young people at the rally met other young people they never knew before and that plans were struck to get together to volunteer for the campaign, and afterward, enjoy each other's company over a pizza.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
4. I'd Say about 31,500 MORE Than The Corporate/Oligarchy Anointed "FrontRunner" Gets
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:08 PM
Jan 2016

The foundation she be a crumbling...

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
3. Well, if everyone else supports him, I guess I should?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

I'm sure that if Hillary Clinton had a large rally turnout, Sanders supporters would join her campaign for the same reason?

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
8. NOT The Point...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jan 2016

The Point is... Hillary is NOT getting any turnout in the exact same areas that Bernie is... Derived from that and in TOTAL Contradiction to the erroneous BS MSM publicized ad nauseum "Poll" results... The Momentum/ENTHUSIASM from the people themselves is monumental for Bernie in comparison to HillBill. That is the point.

THIS is why Hill has to bring out Bill which by my observation of video of events thus far is decidedly UNderwhelming as the people NOW understand what Bill was about much more than they did when he was in office... passing NAFTA, Ending Glass Steagal and signing the Commodities Modernization Act etc.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
50. Yeah, she sure doesn't need the salary that pays less than an hour's speaking.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

And she will be able to catch up on her house cleaning and kitting booties for Chelsea's next effort right after the primaries

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
36. If I voted my best interest, I'd support Sanders...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jan 2016

...as most likely to lose to the Republicans. And as for your lazy stereotype, why did I support Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown and Russ Feingold (who told me "if Sanders wins we're in trouble&quot ?

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
39. My identity isn't hidden...feel free to check my FEC filings
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jan 2016

...and if you don't believe I'm credible, why do you believe I'm a 1%er who's voting his personal interest?

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
53. I don't believe your conversations
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:15 PM
Jan 2016

I believe you think you are influential and privy..to the inner sanctum and love it. I just have no way of knowing if Russ..actually said that. You could be completely making this shit up.

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
54. I suppose I could be making it up...but why would I?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:40 PM
Jan 2016

...to become popular? Not much chance of that happening.

...to depress support for Sanders? What happens on an anymous blog has no impact on the real world, so why bother?

Bottom line, I don't care if you believe me or not. I'll keep reporting what happens. You can accept it or not.

George II

(67,782 posts)
30. The difference is that Clinton and her supporters don't obsess over crowd sizes. They're too busy..
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jan 2016

....registering voters and canvassing.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
11. Of course he lost. When the choice is the crazy GOP
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

And the saner Left......the left won.

But we're talking primary now.



R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
23. Its funny how some of you talk to yourselves
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

and then pass it off as dialogue. It's not. Little to nothing of what you post matches what anyone says to you.

That's hilarious that you pass yourself off as a truth teller when little of your responses are on topic. So, no, your "truth" doesn't hurt. Your so-called truth is your problem, but it's definitely NOT definitive.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
25. I see.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jan 2016

So then you will now post a link to all of the rMoney primary rallies that had more than 30,000 in attendance. I'm waiting with bated breath.

Step right up to the plate and knock it out of the park!

Embarrass me!

I double-dog dare you.


(My guess is that you'll sling some more juvenile, pathetic attempts at insults toward me or threaten with your "angry" husband's wrath again. Fucking bring it on.)

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
26. LMAO! The article says, "NOT in one crowd"
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jan 2016

So, lol. I'm sure Romney talked to 30 000 people ----over two days--------not in one crowd.

But a previous thread was locked before I could answer your little "truth" teller self-congratulations. So the comments about your contrived "truths" still stand

AGAIN, you are attacking someone for what you misread. This is a pattern you might want to work on.

And my husband still does not like internet threats, so sue him.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
27. So you've got nothing.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jan 2016

Like always.

Nobody threatened anyone except you. Hubby and you have that going for you.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
32. There you go again. Completely misdirect and talk to
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jan 2016

yourself. There's another one who does this, too, so don't feel alone. But it's very obvious. And, lol, at the copying technique. You are not alone in that tactic either.

And Hillary has talked to A HUNDRED MILLION people --- several hundred million people --- over 20 years. Prove me wrong!!!

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
34. I understand that truth...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jan 2016

... is in short supply at Camp Weathervane, however, using it isn't a "tactic," it's the moral, honest way to be.

I'm not at all surprised the a Hillary fan would see it like you do.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
42. Yes, back to your insults and name-calling.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jan 2016

And back to your phony morals. And your phony self-congratulatory "truths". So far your record is far from the "truth "as you called me a liar for something you misread. You just attacked someone, but you misconstrued the article so your attack was invalid.

Most of what I've read from Bernie supporters here are how superior your morals are. Your so-called "issues" are nothing more than badgering people with how much better you are. No wonder his message is so limited. That kind of self-importance only goes so far. People have their own values and yours are no better.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
46. Yeah, your self-declared morals and so-called truths
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:46 PM
Jan 2016

are absolutely a broken record. And funny too, since you attack people over something you have misread! I think I see the problem..... WINK



Pauldg47

(640 posts)
33. That's Trump no Bernie.....Bernie's to honest for that.....
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jan 2016

....by the way, I thought Bernie had over 30,000 a few times or more out west, didn't he.....california ....right? They are waiting for him.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
17. Never happened. As Bernie CORRECTLY states, he has drawn 31,000 Iowans to different events
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jan 2016

since the beginning of his campaign.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
15. You are incorrect. As Bernie himself has said, since the campaign has begun
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:33 PM
Jan 2016

he has spoken to 31,000 Iowans. He never has had a crowd of 31,000 Iowans at any single event.

onenote

(42,581 posts)
20. Actually, the crowd at the Red Oak event was 400, not 31,000
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

It would have been tough getting 31,000 people into the Red Coach Inn and Restaurant.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/12/23/bernie-sanders-likens-his-politics-those-bobby-kennedy/77803818/

Not sure why someone would write such a misleading story. As Bernie himself said on December 22, 31,000 is the total number of people who have attended Bernie events in Iowa since his campaign started.

"Since we began this campaign we have spoken to over 31,000 people in the state of Iowa," Sanders told a crowd of about 1,500 at Iowa Western Community College Tuesday evening.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/12/22/sanders-am-getting-very-good-feeling-iowa/77780920/

Stories like the one suggesting 31,000 attended a single rally not only are misleading, they put an emphasis on crowd size that is misguided. It's the GOTV effort that matters.

Pauldg47

(640 posts)
37. Why are you folks making him a liar or something?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jan 2016

.....I always new it. The biggest crowd was at Iowa State wasn't it. Iowa is to small of a state w small communities to have real large crowds like he had out west. Didn't he have a humongous crowd at Bob Jones University which was an eye raiser?

Look at this....he tells the truth...he does not lie.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017310060

rurallib

(62,377 posts)
22. We had @400 in Muscatine Tuesday - an amazing crowd for Muscatine
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 01:55 PM
Jan 2016

But the best part of it was that the crowd was young, very young. Many parents with young children.
Most rallies I have been to recently in Iowa feature a lot of gray hair. I would say only @ 10% Tuesday.

And around here I know probably half of the folks in the crowd - at this one I knew @ 10 people.

Struck up a conversation with a college student. This was his first political event ever. By the end he was really excited and ready to call all his buddies.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie speaks to 31,000 i...