Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Endorsement results in "defunding" of Planned Parenthood (Original Post) kenn3d Jan 2016 OP
Go Bernie! Segami Jan 2016 #1
Indeed screw all those poor... one_voice Jan 2016 #4
PP isn't the only game in town. progressoid Jan 2016 #5
That takes care of 3% of PP's business. (n/t) Dale Neiburg Jan 2016 #21
Fund Abortion Now is a small org without the means to offer sufrommich Jan 2016 #26
It is the only game in many states BainsBane Jan 2016 #64
PP provides MANY more services than that. RandySF Jan 2016 #98
yeah, screw people giving their money to others because the organization they thought they could roguevalley Jan 2016 #13
I know RandySF Jan 2016 #53
and a member of the oligarchy too comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #91
I feel your pain...it's just too nuanced for the Queen's courtiers Proserpina Jan 2016 #82
Yes sir... one_voice Jan 2016 #85
Just donate to the healthcare-providing PP instead of its PAC that endorsed Clinton. nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #89
Kid Pro Quo mhatrw Jan 2016 #19
It's THEIR money to use as THEY decide. 99Forever Jan 2016 #55
Of course it's their money.. one_voice Jan 2016 #65
Take your gripes up with those that CHOSE to speak out of turn... 99Forever Jan 2016 #67
Speak out of turn? one_voice Jan 2016 #83
Maybe PP leadership should have put the needs of the poor Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #81
this is what bothers me the most questionseverything Jan 2016 #104
Part of me is disappointed this is happeninng to PP HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #2
I felt that way, too, until this: Punkingal Jan 2016 #3
Yeah I saw that HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #8
No surprise there. bvf Jan 2016 #12
Stinking corruption. Thanks for the link. n/t Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #56
Planned Parenthood made a mistake. earthside Jan 2016 #54
Excellent analysis. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #57
Truth right there. Hillary is no better on womens issues than Bernie or O'Malley Autumn Jan 2016 #80
Riiiight. That'll show 'em. oasis Jan 2016 #6
How? By donating to the Clinton Foundation? Fuddnik Jan 2016 #18
I am sorry they chose sides, Kelvin Mace Jan 2016 #7
People have a right to do with their money what they please. HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #9
Clinton found the fake video "disturbing" eridani Jan 2016 #10
don't fret it 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #11
If Komen sucked and got slagged for what they did, this is no different. The 1% are learning finally roguevalley Jan 2016 #14
It is way different than Komen. There is no logic in your argument. HERVEPA Jan 2016 #40
I am going to double murielm99 Jan 2016 #15
That's the spirit. oasis Jan 2016 #16
So am I... Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #58
Who needs Republicans? They figured out how to defund themselves! Fuddnik Jan 2016 #17
Planned Parenthood is going to have PDittie Jan 2016 #20
I'm going to be increasing my contributions to PP Dale Neiburg Jan 2016 #22
That's the spirit! ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #23
Despicable! Alfresco Jan 2016 #24
That's really sick. I donate monthly to PP and there's absolutely sufrommich Jan 2016 #25
"Bernie's army sure has a lot of childish assholes." quickesst Jan 2016 #29
+1 Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #45
Those claiming to withhold their funds are not real Sanders supporters, but rather geek tragedy Jan 2016 #70
+1,000 Hekate Jan 2016 #72
Talk about ignorant... brooklynite Jan 2016 #27
That doesn't matter to me,they think they're hurting PP and sufrommich Jan 2016 #30
How idiotic! The rest of us will triple our donations. leftofcool Jan 2016 #28
Absolutely! BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #31
Under the Bus! Revenge! Payback! Boycott! Start supporting PP's competitors instead! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #32
+1000 JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #34
Maybe Clinton supporters should try to make up the slack. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #36
any proof of that dsc Jan 2016 #43
And it is the Hillary camp that's for women's health. Bernie may have comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #92
What has Bernie to say about his supporters behavior? Democrats want to know. Alfresco Jan 2016 #33
People don't have the right to donate to whom they wish? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #35
God,what a ridiculous reply. Absolutely no one sufrommich Jan 2016 #38
How do you think Bernie feels about these attacks on PP? You think he would support them? Alfresco Jan 2016 #39
I support a persons right to chose just as I hope Bernie would. Autumn Jan 2016 #101
No different than when union leaders decide to endorse Clinton and members object. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #37
I give to PP, and will continue to give to PP because they provide a vital service to women in need. still_one Jan 2016 #41
yeah fuck the women whose lives are saved by PP dsc Jan 2016 #44
yup, that is what they are effectively saying still_one Jan 2016 #46
What do folks care about endorsements? bigwillq Jan 2016 #42
This is hard to believe. immoderate Jan 2016 #47
No one who believes in Plannd Parenthood's mission should withold funds over this Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #48
Exactly. Kentonio Jan 2016 #69
Ooooooooo ... GeorgeGist Jan 2016 #49
The lives of our sisters and mothers is not a political football. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #50
It is now that PP threw the ball, unfortunately...n/t TCJ70 Jan 2016 #59
I can not in good conscience ... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #60
Completely agree. That doesn't change the fact though that this was a very bad decision by PP. Kentonio Jan 2016 #73
I don't think anyone should withdraw their support either. That doesn't mean... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #99
Bernie needs to make a public statement and tell his supporters to chill out. Alfresco Jan 2016 #51
He won't. Since when does he care about PP? leftofcool Jan 2016 #63
I have never heard Bernie even mention PP comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #93
Now that you mention it, I never have either. Hmm.. Alfresco Jan 2016 #112
That's Obama's job...he's the Chill Out Leader Proserpina Jan 2016 #86
Yay RandySF Jan 2016 #52
That will show those uppity women. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #61
At least we see what people really care about BainsBane Jan 2016 #62
So now Bernie supporters are throwing PP under the bus!!! JoePhilly Jan 2016 #66
Not all of us, just the hateful assholes who are pretending to be Sanders supporters geek tragedy Jan 2016 #71
I think you are right. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #74
Nihilists, dude, nihilists. nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #75
yup ... JoePhilly Jan 2016 #78
You put your finger right on it, geek. They are doing terrible damage to all things progressive... Hekate Jan 2016 #76
I doubt most of them were donors to begin with, just hateful losers making noise nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #79
if people care more about their butthurt primary feelings than helping poor women they're likely geek tragedy Jan 2016 #68
+1 Hekate Jan 2016 #77
Indeed, by the fruits of their labor shall you know them... comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #94
Sanders supporter here & I think an endorsement was a big blunder for PP, CrispyQ Jan 2016 #84
so, Bernie's now providing the reproductive and family planning services bigtree Jan 2016 #87
Obviously, endorsing HRH was more imporant to PP than helping in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #88
Yea, that'll show those poor women with breast cancer a thing or two! leftofcool Jan 2016 #95
http://www.fundabortionnow.org/ in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #97
Yea, I put my zip code in and they take me right to PP leftofcool Jan 2016 #109
Planned Parenthood does a lot more than just abortions. n/t tammywammy Jan 2016 #111
No surprise. PP lost the trust of many anti-corporatists, just like the unions, Zorra Jan 2016 #90
Hillary should not have bought this endorsement. another ham handed gaffe. Doctor_J Jan 2016 #96
My guess is this post would have been booted off of the "Hillary Group" in vkkv Jan 2016 #100
No problem, they're going to get a big fat check from the Clinton Foundation tularetom Jan 2016 #102
Using poor women's healthcare as a hostage is fucking sick mwrguy Jan 2016 #103
People are sick of UglyGreed Jan 2016 #105
Meh, they can shove their money. Beacool Jan 2016 #106
Exactly! leftofcool Jan 2016 #110
Has Bernie denounced this yet? Alfresco Jan 2016 #107
If we had single payer we wouldn't need donation funded PP. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #108

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
4. Indeed screw all those poor...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:12 AM
Jan 2016

women that use planned parenthood.

I use poor in the most literal sense.

Whoo-hoo score one for Bernie! I'm sure he'd be pleased as punch. You know income inequality and all...

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
26. Fund Abortion Now is a small org without the means to offer
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:58 AM
Jan 2016

women the same services PP does.This is the worse thing I've seen democratic candidate supporters do,ever. Sick.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
64. It is the only game in many states
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jan 2016

The only place where women can receive reproductive services in great swaths of this country. That is a fact. Caring about that, however, would mean those women's lives actually matter. It has been made quite clear, however, that the only thing that matters is Bernie's political career. There is scarcely a leftist organization or cause that hasn't been thrown overboard. First Black Lives Matter, then one union after another, now NARAL and Planned Parenthood.
It's interesting how many entrants on that enemies list are also targeted by the GOP.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
13. yeah, screw people giving their money to others because the organization they thought they could
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:56 AM
Jan 2016

trust is corrupt. Nothing like supporting corruption. How is it that they don't give a shit about the people -those in charge of PP- and they get a pass from a lot of people here with the comment WELL, THINK ABOUT THOSE PEOPLE NOT GETTING STUFF! when they were the f-ers that did this to themselves. They are so corrupt at a certain level in this country they can't see that the limb they are sawing off with their bullshit is the one they're sitting on. Spare me outrage they brought on and don't give a shit about anyway.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
82. I feel your pain...it's just too nuanced for the Queen's courtiers
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jan 2016

Reality-based, logical reactions are something they just can't handle...because there can't be any other way than Her Way, 3rd way (what about the other two ways, hmm?).

She bought that endorsement, fair and square! How DARE we contest her slightest details in her grand scheme of things?

The fastest, surest, longest-lasting way to help for the poor and dispossessed in this country is to elect Bernie Sanders as President and have his followers in the 99% fill Congress with supporters of his revolution. This we must do, for ourselves and generations to come.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
85. Yes sir...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:53 PM
Jan 2016

so those women should pay the price for the fucked up decision? We're not smarter than that? How about shining a light on this, via the news, internet, etc. Shame them. Make them **have** to answer. There are ways to handle this without making the women that depend on Planned Parenthood suffer.

Planned Parenthood won't suffer, the women that depend on them will. Why in the world would any liberal make them suffer for something they didn't do. I don't understand this. I understand the anger. I don't making them pay.

I'm not supporting corruption. I'm saying find another way. Find a way that doesn't impact the women that NEED & DEPEND on the services.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
55. It's THEIR money to use as THEY decide.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jan 2016

Planned Parenthood fucked up and chose nepotism over democracy. No problem. The donations PP thought they were entitled to, they aren't, any more than the corporate establishment's chosen candidate is entitled to our vote or support.

Enough is enough, we're DONE with you.

#FeeltheBern

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
65. Of course it's their money..
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016

they should what they wish with it. I never said otherwise.

It's MY OPINION and I shall speak it where ever & when ever I wish. You're quite right, enough is enough. Time to stop taking anger out on people that didn't have anything to do with what caused it. I will not apologize for calling people out that want to make vulnerable people suffer because THEIR damn feelings were hurt.

There's another group of people of that wants Planned Parenthood defunded as well. Who don't give a shit about the poor women that use their services. That are all about satisfying their itch. Look whose company you keep.

we're DONE with you.


I have no idea what this means ^^^ done with me? What does that mean?

Who is done with me?

Now you're talking out of turn. You're making assumptions about me. Par for the course though....



99Forever

(14,524 posts)
67. Take your gripes up with those that CHOSE to speak out of turn...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jan 2016

... and let THEIR use of nepotism to feather their OWN nests, instead of just being decent and honest and waiting until AFTER the primaries as they ALWAYS have in the past to endorse a candidate.

In case in your tone deafness you haven't noticed, it pisses people off when you presume they are too stupid to see when they are getting screwed by establishment cronies. I'd suggest you wake up and smell the Revolution.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
83. Speak out of turn?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jan 2016

What the heck does that mean?

I'm pretty sure I didn't say people didn't have a right to be pissed. I'm pretty sure what I said was that it should be taken out on the same people that your so called revolution is about.

So how's about you read what I actually wrote and stop putting words in my mouth & assuming shit about me. Cuz you know what they say about people that assume. It pisses me off when people presume shit about me.

For the record, I'm able to do two things at once, care about the people you're so joyfully cutting off and be pissed.

I'm not willing to go back hangers & back alleys to prove a point. Apparently you are. So you go on with your revolution...that's nothing I want any part of.

I'm an O'Malley supporter. If he's not our nominee I will have to choose between Hillary and Bernie....way to represent.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
81. Maybe PP leadership should have put the needs of the poor
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jan 2016

and women above political aspirations.

PP turned their patients into political pawns, not their donors.

questionseverything

(9,652 posts)
104. this is what bothers me the most
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jan 2016

surely ms richards would of known what a backlash this would cause between democratic supporters

did she decide hc's campaign was more important than all of us...evidently so

or even worse ,she is such a child of privilege that she does not know the millions of us are out here

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
2. Part of me is disappointed this is happeninng to PP
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:54 AM
Jan 2016

But the other part of me is saying, "Well, that's what you get." I wish they hadn't endorsed anybody. All of the dem candidates are excellent on women's issues.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
54. Planned Parenthood made a mistake.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jan 2016

By making a political endorsement they've opened themselves up for even more questions and suspicion from the public.

This is a strategic error bigger than the presidential campaign of 2016 -- endorsing a partisan candidate makes them legitimately open to deeper scrutiny and attacks from those who question and/or oppose government funding for Planned Parenthood.

PP will have to accept the consequences -- that is real life -- I am hesitant to make further contributions right now if this is the way the political action committee wants to behave. Sanders, Clinton, O'Malley are all good on choice and reproductive issues; to choose one over the other speaks to deeper problems at PP.

The momentum is shifting to Sanders ... the only redeeming thing for PP is that Sanders is the type of quality individual who will not hold PP's error against them after he is elected President.

On the other hand, Planned Parenthood will have to labor for years and years with the charge of being a partisan political organization now.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
57. Excellent analysis.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jan 2016

What could possibly be gained for PP as a whole to give Clinton a quick lift that may not even change one primary result?

Autumn

(45,064 posts)
80. Truth right there. Hillary is no better on womens issues than Bernie or O'Malley
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jan 2016

and that they chose to do this now after Hillary's 'hire' instead of waiting until the nominee is chosen after their long history really disgusts me. They have always remained above the fray. This was a blunder of epic proportions.

oasis

(49,379 posts)
6. Riiiight. That'll show 'em.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:45 AM
Jan 2016

Meanwhile , Hillary's donors will more than make up for the short fall needed to fend off the future GOP attacks on Planned Parenthood.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
9. People have a right to do with their money what they please.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:52 AM
Jan 2016

I agree with you, but PP made a bad decision here.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
10. Clinton found the fake video "disturbing"
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:54 AM
Jan 2016

That is an absolutely gutless approach to defending reproductive rights.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
11. don't fret it
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:06 AM
Jan 2016

People are just showing their opinion on their political action in the only terms understood anymore- money. I'm sure financial supporters of pp will get back with their support soon and pp will have learned that they should not let themselves be bought.

Like someone else said; they should not have endorsed until after the primaries. Perhaps when they get rid of whoever decided to put them up for sale, things will get back to normal.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
14. If Komen sucked and got slagged for what they did, this is no different. The 1% are learning finally
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:57 AM
Jan 2016

who really is boss now.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
40. It is way different than Komen. There is no logic in your argument.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:17 AM
Jan 2016

I say this as a Bernie supporter, a long-time PP volunteer escort, and someone who is pissed off about the endorsement.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
58. So am I...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:39 AM
Jan 2016

So is my daughter, so are several of my coworkers.

In fact, I took care of it last night. This petulant exhibition is disgraceful.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
17. Who needs Republicans? They figured out how to defund themselves!
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:55 AM
Jan 2016

Clinton Incorporated is painting themselves into a corner with this shit. And taking down a lot of good people with them.

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
20. Planned Parenthood is going to have
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:49 AM
Jan 2016

another really terrible year, it appears. So many self-inflicted wounds (yes, I'm saying they looked ghoulish in the sting videos).

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
25. That's really sick. I donate monthly to PP and there's absolutely
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:53 AM
Jan 2016

nothing they would ever do to stop me from doing that.Millions of women rely on PP,many of them are poor and wouldn't be able to afford the care they get without donations to PP.Throwing them away in a temper tantrum blows my mind. Bernie's army sure has a lot of childish assholes.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
29. "Bernie's army sure has a lot of childish assholes."
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:10 AM
Jan 2016

They are taking their ball and going home. When it comes to hurting Hillary Clinton, everything else takes a backseat.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
70. Those claiming to withhold their funds are not real Sanders supporters, but rather
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jan 2016

the "burn the witch" types.

brooklynite

(94,513 posts)
27. Talk about ignorant...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:05 AM
Jan 2016

Planned Parenthood's reproductive health program is separate from the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the political arm which made the endorsement. But I'm sure anyone who loses access to services will understand the confusion.


Actually, I'm pretty sure there's been no actually cutback in funding notwithstanding what a blog I've never heard of before says.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
30. That doesn't matter to me,they think they're hurting PP and
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:15 AM
Jan 2016

doing it anyway.Of course,they justify it by imagining that this whole huge org moved to support Clinton because Ann Richards granddaughter works for her. If you thought Sanders support was top heavy with males before,my guess is you ain't seen nothing yet.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
32. Under the Bus! Revenge! Payback! Boycott! Start supporting PP's competitors instead!
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:27 AM
Jan 2016

Uh, wait, uh... well, uh... hang on...

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
36. Maybe Clinton supporters should try to make up the slack.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:00 AM
Jan 2016

Or are they not the ones donating to PP to begin with?



I guess we know which camp really is good for women's health and which one isn't.


comradebillyboy

(10,144 posts)
92. And it is the Hillary camp that's for women's health. Bernie may have
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jan 2016

a fine message on wealth inequality but I haven't heard him say anything about his positions on family planning or reproductive rights. Bashing wall street doesn't address those important matters.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
35. People don't have the right to donate to whom they wish?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:59 AM
Jan 2016

I think you are missing the fact that Sanders' supporters were the ones donating to PP in the first place.

A better question is why Hillary supporters are not increasing their donations to PP. Or couldn't you think of that one?

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
38. God,what a ridiculous reply. Absolutely no one
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:03 AM
Jan 2016

said you don't have a right to donate to anyone. You can donate to Right To Life if you want,that would really show 'em!

Autumn

(45,064 posts)
101. I support a persons right to chose just as I hope Bernie would.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:05 PM
Jan 2016

What a wonderful thing is freedom of choice here. Making the choice not to donate, oe to donate to any organization is a choice we all have. I learned that very early in life as a child of proud Democrats. Are you saying that Democrats have to follow their leader??? Most Democrats are Democrats because they are smart and capable of thought not lemmings. As a woman, as a Democrat I would never in a fucking million years behave as any politicians told me to, that's for republicans. Fuck that shit.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
37. No different than when union leaders decide to endorse Clinton and members object.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:02 AM
Jan 2016

The pattern is clear.


still_one

(92,182 posts)
41. I give to PP, and will continue to give to PP because they provide a vital service to women in need.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:20 AM
Jan 2016

That some folks seemed so bent out of shape by this speaks volumes.

What would have been the response if PP came out and endorsed Bernie Sanders?

For me it wouldn't matter, I would still donate

I would also congratulate Sanders and his supporters on the endorsement.

Interesting, the pettiness of some folks

dsc

(52,160 posts)
44. yeah fuck the women whose lives are saved by PP
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:22 AM
Jan 2016

all because they had the audacity to not agree with them on politics.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
42. What do folks care about endorsements?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:20 AM
Jan 2016

Seems silly to "defund" an organization that helps so many people because they didn't endorse one's candidate.

I post very little in endorsement threads because endorsements mean little to me.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
48. No one who believes in Plannd Parenthood's mission should withold funds over this
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:37 AM
Jan 2016

Having said that, foolish or not, people are people and some people tend to over react and not always respond appropriately. That is true regardless of the issue or of who one supports for political office. Some blow back could have been predicted. I too wish Planned Parenthood had not endorsed among our Democratic candidates before a single vote was cast since all of our candidates are strongly supportive of the work that they do. By not waiting until the General Election they made their endorsement a political rather than an issue based act. To support the Democratic candidate against the Republican candidate is a clear recognition of which Party lines up with them on the issues. To support one Democrat against other Democrats who also line up with them on the issues primarily (pun intended)makes it an overtly partisan and political statement. That is not the type of positioning of Planned Parenthood that is in the long term interests of PP (obviously in my opinion).

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
60. I can not in good conscience ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

I can not in good conscience withdraw my support and jeopardize the health of American women over a political endorsement, the lion's share of whom had nothing to do with the decision. That would be as wrong as withdrawing support over an edited video.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
99. I don't think anyone should withdraw their support either. That doesn't mean...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:55 PM
Jan 2016

...that this was a good move by PP or that people can't be upset by it.

Alfresco

(1,698 posts)
51. Bernie needs to make a public statement and tell his supporters to chill out.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jan 2016

I doubt he will but one can hope.

comradebillyboy

(10,144 posts)
93. I have never heard Bernie even mention PP
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:53 PM
Jan 2016

Maybe PP endorsed Hillary because she has been an advocate and loyal supporter for decades.

RandySF

(58,786 posts)
52. Yay
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jan 2016

A few people are petty enough to withhold donations to help women because PP endorsed a woman. Hooray for them!!!

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
62. At least we see what people really care about
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:13 PM
Jan 2016

The notion that one politician's career takes precedence over the work done by an organization that has provided reproductive services for women for 100 years is astounding. Clearly, none of our lives could possibly compare to the far more important goal of one man's political success. Women and girls could be be denied reproductive healthcare, birth control, cancer screenings and abortion. That could affect generations of families. Yet none of that is nearly as important as Bernie's career.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
71. Not all of us, just the hateful assholes who are pretending to be Sanders supporters
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jan 2016

but whose real motivation is a fierce, burning hatred of all things Clinton.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
74. I think you are right.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:38 PM
Jan 2016

I figured some folks would be unhappy about that endorsement, but I was still surprised by the attacks which have followed it.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
78. yup ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jan 2016

... its that segment who seems to think the US economy has to be destroyed, so that their version of Utopia rises from the ashes.

Hekate

(90,660 posts)
76. You put your finger right on it, geek. They are doing terrible damage to all things progressive...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jan 2016

...and hiding behind Sanders to do it.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
68. if people care more about their butthurt primary feelings than helping poor women they're likely
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jan 2016

not very progressive, nor are they people who share Bernie Sanders's values

This is really appalling.

CrispyQ

(36,460 posts)
84. Sanders supporter here & I think an endorsement was a big blunder for PP,
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

but, I will NEVER pull my support from PP. I don't think Bernie would want us to, either. Just sayin'. And yeah, yeah, I've heard the argument that Bernie's Single Payer, or Medicare for all will eliminate the need for PP, but what about now?

bigtree

(85,992 posts)
87. so, Bernie's now providing the reproductive and family planning services
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:04 PM
Jan 2016

...that those supporters of his are threatening?

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
88. Obviously, endorsing HRH was more imporant to PP than helping
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:16 PM
Jan 2016

women. They knew the backlash they would get. This is the first time in 100 years they've endorsed a candidate. There's a reason they chose to do this now during one of the most contentious primaries ever . It's unfortunate they will lose funding, but they did it to themselves knowing full well what would happen.

PROGRESSIVE women can just donate to Bernie who is far better on women's rights/issues than HRH ever has been and OTHER organizations that offer the same services as PP. They aren't the only game in town. Hey, HRH got her endorsement! That's all that matters, right? That's what's important here, right?

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
95. Yea, that'll show those poor women with breast cancer a thing or two!
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:00 PM
Jan 2016

Ya'll go for it! With hold those funds!

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
109. Yea, I put my zip code in and they take me right to PP
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:34 PM
Jan 2016

They don't have clinics, no breast screenings and at my age I don't need a free abortion

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
90. No surprise. PP lost the trust of many anti-corporatists, just like the unions,
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 02:22 PM
Jan 2016

legislators, and other organizations who have endorsed the candidate for Dem nomination who is, unquestionably, preferred over Bernie by a majority of banksters and the 1%.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
96. Hillary should not have bought this endorsement. another ham handed gaffe.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:03 PM
Jan 2016

She just can't seem to play fair. As for those who cancelled their donations, I can see their point. Pp has never before made such an endorsement, then Hillary hires ms Richards, then Clinton gets their first ever endorsement. It just smacks of entitlement. "An endorsement from pp would be nice. I'll just go ahead and buy one". Very bad optics. Low class.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
100. My guess is this post would have been booted off of the "Hillary Group" in
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

less time than it takes to say "We worship only Hillary Rodham Clinton".

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
103. Using poor women's healthcare as a hostage is fucking sick
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jan 2016

And that is exactly what these "defunders" are doing.

No different than when the fundies do it.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
106. Meh, they can shove their money.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:18 PM
Jan 2016

If Republicans weren't able to destroy Planned Parenthood, neither will some disgruntled Sanders' supporters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Endorsement results in "d...