Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As they used to say, it's the economy stupid. (Original Post) mmonk Jan 2016 OP
I think this kind of thinking gets us into trouble. cheapdate Jan 2016 #1
actually the best way to stimulate the economy is to give poor people money questionseverything Jan 2016 #2
Agree completely. cheapdate Jan 2016 #3
that is why we need bernie questionseverything Jan 2016 #4
Once again, agree. cheapdate Jan 2016 #5
That was true when good jobs = good economy. Now, it's a slightly different motto. winter is coming Jan 2016 #6
when we got elected reddread Jan 2016 #7
"we" didn't. People vote their wallet. those running for office forget it at their peril. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #8
I stopped using it 2naSalit Jan 2016 #9

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
1. I think this kind of thinking gets us into trouble.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 06:53 PM
Jan 2016

The reason being that the easiest, most politically expedient, and fastest way to spur the economy is to shovel money at the banks and corporations.

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
2. actually the best way to stimulate the economy is to give poor people money
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:12 PM
Jan 2016

because they will spend it

most still ends up with the corporations but at least the 99% would have some needs met

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
3. Agree completely.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:15 PM
Jan 2016

The problem is that "politically expedient" means the money is shoveled to the top instead.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
5. Once again, agree.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jan 2016

However, the difficulty of his task, should he be elected, must not be underestimated.

As you said in the OP, "It's the economy stupid." If for any reason the economy stumbles under Sanders, whether by something he does or not, he could be a one-term president and the cause of economic justice could be effectively killed for a generation.

I think it's very unlikely that Sanders would have a Democratic house, and even if he has a Democratic senate, it won't be a supermajority. He'll have to contend with fierce resistance, interminable confirmation hearings, etc., just like Obama.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»As they used to say, it's...