Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:34 PM Jan 2016

Ralph Nader: Hillary Clinton a “corporatist” and “militarist”

While speaking at a D.C. bookstore, former Green Party presidential candidate and consumer advocate Ralph Nader criticized Hillary Clinton for not being the same person she was “at 30 years old,” also calling her a “corporatist” and “militarist.”

“I think Hillary is not the Hillary of when she was 30 years old,” he told his listeners. “She made peace with the power structure and she is a deep corporatist and a deep militarist. One can almost forgive the corporatism. She moved to New York with Bill because that’s where the power is and Wall Street, but her militarism is absolutely shocking.”

Nader also took to criticizing her decisions as Secretary of State, particularly regarding the War in Libya.

“She almost singlehandedly did the uh, Libyan War. The Defense Department was against it, [Robert] Gates; She persuaded the White House that it was an easy topple without knowing that in a tribal society with nothing to replace it you would have a civil war, sectarian killings spilling into Africa, weapons everywhere, Mali, central Africa and she’s being accused of Benghazi. The big thing is the huge amount of geography that has been destabilized because of the Libyan overthrow.”

Read more at the link: http://rare.us/story/ralph-nader-hillary-clinton-a-corporatist-and-militarist/

278 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ralph Nader: Hillary Clinton a “corporatist” and “militarist” (Original Post) JRLeft Jan 2016 OP
Ah, this groundhog appears. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #1
If a friend of my enemy condemns my enemy that makes him what? leveymg Jan 2016 #29
Sancho Panza? enid602 Jan 2016 #87
Sanders doesn't like Nader pengu Jan 2016 #150
Correction, they don't agree on some things. Eg, Nader thinks Sanders should not have run sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #265
His groundhog buddy popped up a few days ago. MADem Jan 2016 #151
Lol, speaking of groundhogs. Btw, she proved him right just today when she undermined President sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #263
Complete confirmation. JRLeft Jan 2016 #264
Ralph Nader Admitted Wanting To Elect George W. Bush in 2000 onehandle Jan 2016 #2
thank you. MBS Jan 2016 #62
Bingo. nt SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #67
Ugh. I had not read that before. JudyM Jan 2016 #276
This from the guy Gman Jan 2016 #3
If you think it was for his ego, you missed the big picture Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #61
No, I'm sure it was because he thought he had a real chance of winning. Downtown Hound Jan 2016 #240
Thanks Ralph, you are the old fool who made a bundle trashing the best car I ever had, Corvair. Hoyt Jan 2016 #4
I often rode in a neighbor's Corvair when I was a kid. onehandle Jan 2016 #9
It was a very cool car, small for the time, with good gas mileage. Very different from large gas Hoyt Jan 2016 #17
All rear-engine cars have the same problem Corvairs have jmowreader Jan 2016 #99
Supreme Court Justice Ralph Nader. OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #81
Well, if his preference in Bush v. Gore was Bush, that's a fair accusation. MADem Jan 2016 #153
Omg the room is spinning DVRacer Jan 2016 #250
That's funny. Having lived in 8 decades, I bet I've eerienced more than you and learned from it. :) Hoyt Jan 2016 #254
Why would that vile person think anyone cares what he has to say? Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #5
What did he say that wasn't true? JRLeft Jan 2016 #6
Thanks. elleng Jan 2016 #23
Your welcome. The man is telling the truth. JRLeft Jan 2016 #24
Yes he is, elleng Jan 2016 #27
The responders to my post know this too; which is why they are attacking the messenger and not the JRLeft Jan 2016 #34
It's always easier to be intellectually dishonest dorkzilla Jan 2016 #75
So true. JRLeft Jan 2016 #77
Fine. I'll play. Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #45
A militarist is a warhawk and a corporatist, is someone who is JRLeft Jan 2016 #46
What is a "warhawk and a corporatist?" More buzzwords! She isn't "owned" by anyone. MADem Jan 2016 #158
If some are looking to alienate Democrats, they certainly are doing a good still_one Jan 2016 #179
Really--it makes no sense! MADem Jan 2016 #197
Lol still_one Jan 2016 #200
Good post. MADem Jan 2016 #157
Hillary proved him right today. JRLeft Jan 2016 #266
Hello There... Nothing Here Can Be Disputed.. K and R! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #51
Not a darn thing. FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #260
He did not lie. 840high Jan 2016 #56
He's not vile, unless you think the US electoral system is vile. delrem Jan 2016 #112
There's no reason to have ill feelings toward Nader. Maedhros Jan 2016 #235
Who cares what he thinks about anything? Empowerer Jan 2016 #7
Ralph Nader is an arrogant idiot. Nice of you to drag him to DU. leftofcool Jan 2016 #8
What did he say in the article that wasn't true? JRLeft Jan 2016 #11
He's a huge hypocrite. Pls read the link brush Jan 2016 #188
The four-year cicada is back? TheCowsCameHome Jan 2016 #10
I'll say it--Nader is correct. Now everyone can get back to obliterating the messenger. nt DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #12
Funny how none of them have refuted the man. JRLeft Jan 2016 #13
Here you go brush Jan 2016 #189
While I am not a Nader fan, that does not debunk Nader's point Recursion Jan 2016 #262
He's quite the hypocrite brush Jan 2016 #192
Nothing on that site refuted Hillary being a corporatist. JRLeft Jan 2016 #258
Nader is indeed correct on this one. Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2016 #210
Shocking militarism? Interesting words from a man who helped inflict George W. Bush on the country Eugene Jan 2016 #14
Are you denying her militarism? JRLeft Jan 2016 #16
no more, no less than any Democratic president of the last 100 years wyldwolf Jan 2016 #252
That simply isn't true. But you knew that. 99Forever Jan 2016 #19
Read this link about hypocrite Nader brush Jan 2016 #191
Screw that. 99Forever Jan 2016 #202
Okay, stay uninformed about hypocrite Nader. brush Jan 2016 #204
I choose the person with actual credibility. 99Forever Jan 2016 #207
Hillary notwithstanding, you really should read it and find out about Nader. brush Jan 2016 #208
No I will not read your smear propaganda. 99Forever Jan 2016 #215
It's not smear propaganda. There are quotes from former employees of his . . . brush Jan 2016 #216
Just give it up. 99Forever Jan 2016 #219
God! Talk about inflexible. brush Jan 2016 #233
Dog! Talk about incoherent. 99Forever Jan 2016 #241
It is easier to ignore the ones who won't reason. Vincardog Jan 2016 #245
I personally love to... 99Forever Jan 2016 #247
Stop lying. 840high Jan 2016 #57
that man is called Jeb Bush MisterP Jan 2016 #66
Why? Isn't anyone who meets the criteria allowed to run? artislife Jan 2016 #125
Aren't you conveniently forgetting the SCOTUS and their illegal unconstitutional role? Vincardog Jan 2016 #246
Well, even granting that, it's not a refutation of his argument Recursion Jan 2016 #269
Ralph Nader??? BooScout Jan 2016 #15
Nader's agenda remains the same as in 2000. Hand the WH over to the GOP. oasis Jan 2016 #18
Roe v. Wade is one vote away from being history Gothmog Jan 2016 #22
His pathetic attempt at becoming "relevant" again. oasis Jan 2016 #25
What did he say that was wrong? JRLeft Jan 2016 #74
If you vouch for his word, that's on you. Personally I oasis Jan 2016 #107
Nader is a sad person who no one pays any attention to now Gothmog Jan 2016 #20
KingFlorez: Nader a "crackpot" and "senile" KingFlorez Jan 2016 #21
Is Hillary not a militarist and a corporatist? JRLeft Jan 2016 #26
History Will Not Remember One Fondly cantbeserious Jan 2016 #32
LOL still_one Jan 2016 #28
Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations, Banks And Their Media Minions And MIC Henchmen cantbeserious Jan 2016 #30
And so is Ralphie boy. A huge hypocrite. Pls read this link brush Jan 2016 #193
An Enemy To Whom - Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks - More Power To Him cantbeserious Jan 2016 #211
I see you didn't read it brush Jan 2016 #213
I Did - All Accusations - A Character Assassination Piece cantbeserious Jan 2016 #217
Oh yeah, that's gonna help. MH1 Jan 2016 #31
Ever More Anti-Ralph Obfuscation cantbeserious Jan 2016 #33
Notice no one is denying what he said. JRLeft Jan 2016 #35
With Anti-Ralphers - It's All About Ad Hominem - Never The Facts cantbeserious Jan 2016 #36
Blind hate without reason. JRLeft Jan 2016 #37
Roger That On All Accounts And Particulars cantbeserious Jan 2016 #38
It's absolutely ridiculous, unreasonable, unsubstantiated garbage. JRLeft Jan 2016 #39
Here are some facts on Nader himself. He's a huge hypocrite and does many of the things . . . brush Jan 2016 #194
All Accusation - No Substance cantbeserious Jan 2016 #212
I see you didn't read it either brush Jan 2016 #214
I Did - All Accusations - A Character Assassination Piece cantbeserious Jan 2016 #218
*sigh* RandySF Jan 2016 #40
What did he say that was incorrect? JRLeft Jan 2016 #41
Fuck Ralph Nader. Adrahil Jan 2016 #42
I will ask you, what did he say that was incorrect? JRLeft Jan 2016 #43
He opened his stupid mouth rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #155
The fact that he is speaking. Shut up Ralph. Adrahil Jan 2016 #168
Fuck Nader. n/t JTFrog Jan 2016 #44
Ralph Nader: Responsible for all of the corporatism and militarism since 2001. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #47
Actually that would be corporate democrats and republicans. JRLeft Jan 2016 #48
Actually, no. It's people like you that claim there is no difference between the parties. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #49
No democrats who sell out to multinational corporations are the problem. JRLeft Jan 2016 #52
I voted for Gore in 2000. Did you? Renew Deal Jan 2016 #54
Yes I did. I wish I didn't now, he was part of the problem. JRLeft Jan 2016 #60
You saw the outcome of 8 years of Bush and you now wish you hadn't voted for Gore? Renew Deal Jan 2016 #64
Yeah, we needed real change 15 years ago after the damage Bill Clinton left behind. JRLeft Jan 2016 #68
Sure. Bill stole the W from your keyboard. okasha Jan 2016 #117
Deregulation, Nafta, telecommunications act, etc. Let's not pretend he didn't have a hand in the JRLeft Jan 2016 #120
Let's not pretend okasha Jan 2016 #124
It was a combination of Congress and 4 presidents. JRLeft Jan 2016 #128
It was the Republicans, and Nader helped them do it. baldguy Jan 2016 #147
Why? artislife Jan 2016 #129
I pretend the ineffectual are too powerful also-- LanternWaste Jan 2016 #273
From the asshole that helped elect George W Bush ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #50
It's Nader's fault Gore couldn't carry his own state? JRLeft Jan 2016 #53
Gore won in 2000 Gore1FL Jan 2016 #58
It wasn't the butterfly ballots? artislife Jan 2016 #131
If the votes were actuallyu counted accross FL Gore won Gore1FL Jan 2016 #163
Not really artislife Jan 2016 #166
Nader was a factor. That's my point. n/t Gore1FL Jan 2016 #172
Not as nearly big as everyone likes to pin on him. That was my point.nt artislife Jan 2016 #174
Nader is not worth defending brush Jan 2016 #195
I am defending the idea of a Nader. artislife Jan 2016 #196
Wrong. TekGryphon Jan 2016 #229
You have to be against real democracy to think only two parties can choose who runs for office. nt artislife Jan 2016 #230
Thank you, Captain Non-Sequitur TekGryphon Jan 2016 #231
I will give you a Ross Perot and Bill Clinton win to finish. nt artislife Jan 2016 #234
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #59
Nader couldn't carry his own state either , but his goal was for BUsh to be President JI7 Jan 2016 #126
If Ralph Nader had any moral fiber left in his body... iandhr Jan 2016 #55
It was only inevitable that the weasel who virtually elected george bush would show up.... George II Jan 2016 #63
I have no interest in Nader's opinion regarding the Democratic primary. SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #65
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #69
This thread was a great chance for me to figure out who to put on my ignore list Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #70
Those who blame Nader for the 2000 theft are morons and morningfog Jan 2016 #72
Um, what? JudyM Jan 2016 #79
I think he posted "shit for brains" not sure...better reread... artislife Jan 2016 #133
Ha, yep. Nt JudyM Jan 2016 #161
Yep they've forgotten the election was stolen. JRLeft Jan 2016 #80
True end result, but would it have been such a close skirmish if Nader hadn't taken votes? JudyM Jan 2016 #84
Nader didn't force those people to vote for him. JRLeft Jan 2016 #85
Of course not. The fact remains: he threw the election to Shrub without having a snowball's chance JudyM Jan 2016 #162
I do not blame him for the 2000 theft. SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #100
I'm putting a few on my list right now. nt Nyan Jan 2016 #73
Read this and tell me if you're still pro-Nader. He's a huge hypocrite brush Jan 2016 #198
i loved nader until his attacks against Gore and the Democratic party MariaThinks Jan 2016 #71
What's the big deal? This much is true! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #76
Wow...Missing the point much? Nyan Jan 2016 #78
Hey - authoritarians react very negatively when the object of their adulation and obedience Maedhros Jan 2016 #238
Thanks for the Iraq war Ralph redstateblues Jan 2016 #82
You should thank Hillary, Nader didn't vote for Iraq. JRLeft Jan 2016 #83
No, but Nader got 95,000 Florida voters to vote for him instead of Al Gore. pnwmom Jan 2016 #86
Those people made the decision, not Nader. JRLeft Jan 2016 #90
If Nader hadn't been running, most of the voters said to pollsters they would have voted for pnwmom Jan 2016 #92
Hell, half of the registered Democrats in Florida didn't even bother to vote. progressoid Jan 2016 #220
Nader was the SINGLE progressive who took 95K FL votes that Nader could pnwmom Jan 2016 #223
See? It's easier to punch Nader than 200,000 Democrats. progressoid Jan 2016 #226
Each of them deserves one punch; he deserves 95,000. pnwmom Jan 2016 #228
A bunch of Naderites in FL did redstateblues Jan 2016 #91
Hillary voted for the war, you're thanking the wrong person. JRLeft Jan 2016 #93
I love to hear Naders defenders redstateblues Jan 2016 #97
Blah, blah, blah, blah, corporatist. Blah, blah, blah, Wall Street. betsuni Jan 2016 #88
Progress, you admit she's a corporatist and a warhawk. JRLeft Jan 2016 #95
And in Nader's execrable judgment, Al Gore and Bush were Tweedledee and Tweedledum. pnwmom Jan 2016 #89
I disagree with your assessment of Nader. Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #96
LOL n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #103
Heehee! brush Jan 2016 #201
Yeah, I remember when... one_voice Jan 2016 #94
It's better she slaughter innocent women and children JRLeft Jan 2016 #98
I'm pretty sure I was clear in my post.. one_voice Jan 2016 #101
You basically implied it. JRLeft Jan 2016 #102
Where did I imply one_voice Jan 2016 #105
It's better that no one listen to sexist idiots who have already given us seriously pnwmom Jan 2016 #104
fuck this sexist asshole who dismissed Roe V Wade as not being important JI7 Jan 2016 #106
Ralph DonCoquixote Jan 2016 #108
Fuck Nader. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #109
There is an interesting dynamic in this thread. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #110
No one disproved his opinion. JRLeft Jan 2016 #113
It's an opinion. You can't disprove an opinion. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #114
His opinion is a fact, she's a corporatist and warhawk. Those are proven facts. JRLeft Jan 2016 #115
Those appellations are subjective, ergo: DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #116
They're not subjective at all. Unless you are blinded by fanaticism. JRLeft Jan 2016 #118
Let's see if we can move the ball here DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #122
Correlation or causation? OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #138
Answers in bold DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #139
Hillary's Iraq war vote is correlation? OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #141
You asked my opinion. I gave it to you, Now you disrespect, dismiss, dehumanize, and denigrate me. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #142
Aww. OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #143
"The ROFL smilie is a dehumanizer." DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #144
I have no respect for those who push false narratives. OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #145
I am sorry you feel the need to disrespect me, regardless of your rationalization. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #152
You are mistaken. OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #171
That is a distinction without a difference. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #173
No, it's not. OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #176
More insults... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #178
Demand? More like a suggestion. OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #180
Others can read it... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #181
Wow. NurseJackie Jan 2016 #182
Responding to those who push false narratives and smears OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #183
HA! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #184
The only action DSB has performed has been the writing of his opinion ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #186
I started reading your post, but then I lost interest. nt OnyxCollie Jan 2016 #187
I'm not surprised ... Oh Respectful One. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #190
I won't say what I'm thinking... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #232
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #185
Here's your buddy Ralph leftofcool Jan 2016 #148
And the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. So? n/t delrem Jan 2016 #111
No. okasha Jan 2016 #121
Oh dear! A ditherer! delrem Jan 2016 #123
Well, that certainly went right over your head. okasha Jan 2016 #127
What, to debate with someone who disputes the fact that the sun rises to the east? delrem Jan 2016 #130
I'm not debating with you, sweetie. okasha Jan 2016 #132
Well, you're certainly doing your thing, "sweetie". delrem Jan 2016 #134
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author betsuni Jan 2016 #136
fuck nader Lil Missy Jan 2016 #135
Never thought I'd see the day that Nader seems behind the times. senz Jan 2016 #137
She made "peace" when she wrote "An Analysis of the Alinsky Model." joshcryer Jan 2016 #140
Nader trying to become relevant. Beacool Jan 2016 #146
I don't know what's more annoying and troubling: baldguy Jan 2016 #149
^^^^^^^This!!!!!!!^^^^^^ MADem Jan 2016 #159
It's a toss up. Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #175
Hear, hear!!! Beacool Jan 2016 #225
Ralph Nader rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #154
Seriously who cares what ole Nader thinks at this point FloridaBlues Jan 2016 #156
I am not a Nader fan, but he is right about Libya. Vattel Jan 2016 #160
Fuck the George Bush stooge Nader. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #164
Ralph Nader's Opinion Is Irrelevant in This Election. MineralMan Jan 2016 #165
What a meltdown. raouldukelives Jan 2016 #167
The Nader hate is outrageous. JRLeft Jan 2016 #169
The truth hurts. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #170
The "truth" you're referring to does not in actuality hurt. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #244
Nader didn't steal the election. The Democrats lost it. Skwmom Jan 2016 #248
You're preaching to the choir. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #249
So irrational and embraced by so many jeepers Jan 2016 #177
They label anyone who tells the truth an extremist. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #199
It's Tea Party behavior, only from Democrats. [n/t] Maedhros Jan 2016 #237
The Clinton hate is outrageous. baldguy Jan 2016 #221
ignore bait threads have taken over for flame bait threads olddots Jan 2016 #203
Oh Ralph, Ralph, Ralph ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #205
He's right. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #206
There is no denying that. nt WDIM Jan 2016 #209
trash this Bush loving Nader and horse he rode in on. n't Sheepshank Jan 2016 #222
The man who gave us 8 years of Bush isn't who I need lectures from. TekGryphon Jan 2016 #224
Thanks for Bush and the Iraq War redstateblues Jan 2016 #227
Those who fixate their hatred on Nader for the 2000 election results Maedhros Jan 2016 #236
It's almost as pathetic as those that refuse to acknowledge his role in electing Bush as president Downtown Hound Jan 2016 #242
LOL, Ralph Nader has as much credibility as Dick Cheney R B Garr Jan 2016 #239
He's more credible than Hillary Clinton. 99Forever Jan 2016 #243
Nice try. The rest of us lived through his 2000 R B Garr Jan 2016 #253
This message was self-deleted by its author 99Forever Jan 2016 #255
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2016 #256
How lame. R B Garr Jan 2016 #257
NOT handed the most powerful position in the world to an overly privileged sociopath Downtown Hound Jan 2016 #259
Hillarys Campaign manager EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #251
Hillary provided Ralph with confirmation today. JRLeft Jan 2016 #261
I guess "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" brooklynite Jan 2016 #267
Turns out he was right. JRLeft Jan 2016 #268
Funny how the same people who believe that anyone who has done anything they don't agree with at any Empowerer Jan 2016 #270
It wasn't the supreme Court? By the way Nader was right. JRLeft Jan 2016 #272
Yup. bigwillq Jan 2016 #271
but. but. but olddots Jan 2016 #274
Biggest lie ever. The Supreme Court cost us the election. JRLeft Jan 2016 #278
Ralph needs to give back all the money he's taken from Republicans DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #275
Nader should... Mike Nelson Jan 2016 #277

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
29. If a friend of my enemy condemns my enemy that makes him what?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jan 2016

A man who doesn't know how to drive an oversteering rear-engined car. Why are we still wasting our time on this?

enid602

(8,594 posts)
87. Sancho Panza?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:26 AM
Jan 2016

But for Bernie, however this is an endorsement nonetheless. Do I sense a little bromance here? A possible VP pick, maybe? I can just see them doing a cross country whistle stop in a '61 Corvair, stopping occasionally to fight windmills.

pengu

(462 posts)
150. Sanders doesn't like Nader
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:45 AM
Jan 2016

They're not on very good terms at all. There's zero chance he'd be the VP pick.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
265. Correction, they don't agree on some things. Eg, Nader thinks Sanders should not have run
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:25 AM
Jan 2016

as a Democrat, Bernie disagrees. People can disagree without disliking each other.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
151. His groundhog buddy popped up a few days ago.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:47 AM
Jan 2016

Susan Sarandon was an ardent Naderite. This cycle she's found a new idol, and furthermore, she wants us all to know what she won't do with her fiddly bits....

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
263. Lol, speaking of groundhogs. Btw, she proved him right just today when she undermined President
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

Obama's successful peace initiatives with Iran, thank the gods, no war there as the neocons dream of.

So I guess she at least agrees with Nader on the militarization part.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. Ralph Nader Admitted Wanting To Elect George W. Bush in 2000
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:38 PM
Jan 2016
Ralph Nader 2000 Campaign Interview:
Will Ralph Nader become Al Gore's worst nightmare?


Of more immediate interest, at least to Al Gore, are Nader's respectable poll numbers: 7 to 10 percent in California as of June, 6 percent nationally. If California tips Green enough, Bush could win the state and the whole damn election.

Which, Nader confided to Outside in June, wouldn't be so bad. When asked if someone put a gun to his head and told him to vote for either Gore or Bush, which he would choose, Nader answered without hesitation: "Bush."


http://www.outsideonline.com/1837851/ralph-nader-2000-campaign-interview

And he succeeded...

Nader flew back and forth between California and Florida, finally spending the most of the last few weeks in Florida, and fulfilling his goal of a Bush Presidency.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
62. thank you.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jan 2016

I always thought that that was his preference, but hadn't seen actual confirmation before. (Certainly, his campaign alone did enough damage in itself).
Nader deserves thanks for increased car safety and other progress in consumer issues.

But his messing with the 2000 election (and later elections) has done damage to this country.

And I'm tired of his bitterness. Enough already.Please go away, Ralph. Or at least shut up.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
3. This from the guy
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:38 PM
Jan 2016

Who has the blood of everything from 9/11 to Afghanistan to Iraq to even ISIS on his hands due to his ego.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. Thanks Ralph, you are the old fool who made a bundle trashing the best car I ever had, Corvair.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:41 PM
Jan 2016

Not to mention giving us george war bush.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
17. It was a very cool car, small for the time, with good gas mileage. Very different from large gas
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jan 2016

guzzlers of the time.

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
99. All rear-engine cars have the same problem Corvairs have
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:42 AM
Jan 2016

And that is, A car with the engine behind the driver needs more tire in the back than it does in the front. You can get there two ways: by putting bigger tires in the back (as you see with top fuel dragsters, rear-engine Porsches, and Lamborghinis) or by inflating the rear tires to higher PSI than the front ones, like aircooled VWs and Corvairs. The problem was, no one who dealt with Corvairs knew that - they said to do it in the owner's manual but a lot of people ignored it. Volkswagen was different: when the car came out, they gave their dealers very specific instructions to tell their customers just how critical this was. Volkswagen Bugs are just as capable of killing their passengers as Corvairs are if you fuck up the air pressure, but Volkswagen's leadership in this held down the carnage to a reasonable amount.

Seriously guys, I could never figure out what the product development people at GM were thinking when they invented the Corvair. I can understand the impetus: the Germans were eating GM's lunch with the Beetle. Problem is, the customer was buying Beetles because they are:

* cheap to buy
* cheap to run
* easy to fix
* fun to own

and GM thought the customer was buying Beetles because:

* engine is in the back

A lot of people claim the Edsel was Detroit's Greatest Marketing Blunder. Nope, it was the Corvair. A car like the Nova, but with a cast-iron engine in it, would have been better than the Corvair.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
153. Well, if his preference in Bush v. Gore was Bush, that's a fair accusation.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:52 AM
Jan 2016

He's no mastermind, but he's like the little girl in the Shake n Bake commercial...he "hepped."

DVRacer

(707 posts)
250. Omg the room is spinning
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:21 PM
Jan 2016

I agree with you on something. My chest feels tight right now. Lmao Hoyt I read your posts shaking my head most days feeling like you have experienced very little of the real world. Then you say something like this and totally redeem yourself. Please take this with the lightheartedness it was intended.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
254. That's funny. Having lived in 8 decades, I bet I've eerienced more than you and learned from it. :)
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:41 PM
Jan 2016

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
5. Why would that vile person think anyone cares what he has to say?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:41 PM
Jan 2016

The fact that he didn't retreat in shame into a cave and never utter another word in public again should tell you everything you need to know about Ralph Nader.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
34. The responders to my post know this too; which is why they are attacking the messenger and not the
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:18 PM
Jan 2016

message.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
75. It's always easier to be intellectually dishonest
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:51 PM
Jan 2016

Than to tell the honest truth, or admit it when it's staring down at you.

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
45. Fine. I'll play.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:46 PM
Jan 2016

His "claims" are all name calling and generalities. How can an insult be "true" or "false"? I think Nader is an asshole, but as much as I'd like for that to be the objective truth, I know it's all subjective.

I have absolutely no idea what "militarist" or "corporatist" is supposed to mean. Has Clinton supported military intervention in the past? Yes, and so have a lot of good people (including Sanders). Has she made some mistakes? Again, yes. And again, so have a lot of good people. When that crosses the line into Ralph Nader's magical definition of "militarist" is anyone's guess.

That said, I don't care what he has to say. Ralph Nader could go around speaking the most inane details about the weather 24/7, and I still don't want to hear his voice ever again. He has lost all credibility and is never getting it back.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
46. A militarist is a warhawk and a corporatist, is someone who is
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:53 PM
Jan 2016

owned by industries. She owned by Monsanto, Walmart, MIC, financial services industry, etc.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
158. What is a "warhawk and a corporatist?" More buzzwords! She isn't "owned" by anyone.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:01 AM
Jan 2016

That's just silliness. She has enough money to do her own thing. When you have to drag in WALMART, where she was a token board director a million years ago, and of whom she's been critical in the intervening years, to "prove your point" it's clear you're not arguing from facts. The "etc." is a clue, too.

smh!

still_one

(92,061 posts)
179. If some are looking to alienate Democrats, they certainly are doing a good
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jan 2016

job by aligning with Nader.

This doesn't surprise me though, since there are also threads which post links from extreme right wing, anti-abortion, and anti-choice sites to defend the attacks on PP.

If they continue with this kind of nonsense, the same threats some have made regarding that they would not vote for Hillary if she is the Democratic nominee, could very easily motivate some non-Bernie supporters to take a similar stance if Bernie is the nominee.

If enough on either side decide that course, then we all lose

MADem

(135,425 posts)
157. Good post.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:57 AM
Jan 2016

One thing this election cycle has taught me is that we have a cadre of generalists who like to fling buzzwords without understanding their meaning or even having a set sense of what they are saying. I always thought our crowd was smarter, now I realize we might not be--we're just on the other side of the issues.

I think Ralph needs to shut up, too--he's already Wrecked It.

I often wonder what life would have been like after eight years of a Gore Presidency. I'll bet the air in LA would be cleaner...! I think we probably would have rehabilitated Saddam and forced him into a box. Hard to know...

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
51. Hello There... Nothing Here Can Be Disputed.. K and R!
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:08 PM
Jan 2016

She shows poor judgement at nearly every occasion where judgement of some kind is required. Clinton Inc. IS DANGEROUS! !

delrem

(9,688 posts)
112. He's not vile, unless you think the US electoral system is vile.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:40 AM
Jan 2016

His advocacy work has been a positive contribution.
Compared to any Republican, he's a bloody saint.
Compared to Hillary Clinton he's ... well, yes, he's preferable. But then just about anyone except a Republican is.

Laser focused hate-sessions aren't productive.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
235. There's no reason to have ill feelings toward Nader.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:37 PM
Jan 2016

That you do so means you are behaving in a very petty manner, and thus you belong on the ignore list.

/bye.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
262. While I am not a Nader fan, that does not debunk Nader's point
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:13 AM
Jan 2016

Nader may well be a hypocrite, but being a hypocrite doesn't mean your claims are wrong; just that your actions are out of sync with those claims.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
210. Nader is indeed correct on this one.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jan 2016

Been watching the Clintons since 1991. Closely. Have done a 180 from hardcore fan to realizing they are part and particle of what is wrong with the Democratic Party of today. I would opportunistic, to Nader's observation.

Eugene

(61,807 posts)
14. Shocking militarism? Interesting words from a man who helped inflict George W. Bush on the country
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:49 PM
Jan 2016

and the whole world.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
19. That simply isn't true. But you knew that.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jan 2016

How about you now try addressing the topic he raised?

That is, if you can.

Step up to the plate and take a swing at it. (Or just keep sniping from the locker room.)

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
202. Screw that.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jan 2016

I don't do requests for shoot the messenger spinners that don't FIRST address the topic.


Try again.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
207. I choose the person with actual credibility.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

Who hasn't had to "evolve" to be on the liberal side of issues.

brush

(53,741 posts)
216. It's not smear propaganda. There are quotes from former employees of his . . .
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jan 2016

that tried to start a union on the staff of one of his magazines for the low pay and long hours.

He squashed them with the typical hardball corporatist tactics that he rails against.

But suit yourself. Stay uninformed. Nader is not the hero many seem to think.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
247. I personally love to...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:14 PM
Jan 2016

... watch them flail about flabbergasted that someone has the audacity to not play their horseshit games.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
125. Why? Isn't anyone who meets the criteria allowed to run?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:10 AM
Jan 2016

Ross Perot split the vote which allowed Clinton to win. Do you hate him?

I voted for Bill, but Nader had a right to run.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
269. Well, even granting that, it's not a refutation of his argument
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 12:43 AM
Jan 2016

I mean, being a hypocrite doesn't mean you are wrong.

A better avenue is probably trying to unpack what "corporatist" actually means.

oasis

(49,326 posts)
18. Nader's agenda remains the same as in 2000. Hand the WH over to the GOP.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:53 PM
Jan 2016

That slimy crackpot has not ounce of credibility.

Gothmog

(144,919 posts)
22. Roe v. Wade is one vote away from being history
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:58 PM
Jan 2016

Nader can accomplish the gutting of the Voting Rights Act, Citizens United and the elimination of Roe v. Wade

oasis

(49,326 posts)
107. If you vouch for his word, that's on you. Personally I
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:56 AM
Jan 2016

don't give a damn what that POS slime bag says now, or has ever said.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
30. Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations, Banks And Their Media Minions And MIC Henchmen
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jan 2016

HRC is a pawn of the The System.

brush

(53,741 posts)
213. I see you didn't read it
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jan 2016

He does many of the things he criticizes others for, including the oligarchs, corporations (his huge stock holdings) and banks.

brush

(53,741 posts)
194. Here are some facts on Nader himself. He's a huge hypocrite and does many of the things . . .
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016

he rails against. Pls read the link.

http://www.realchange.org/nader.htm#hypocrite

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
155. He opened his stupid mouth
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:54 AM
Jan 2016

instead of crawling into a hole and shutting the hell up.

Any "democrat" who listens to a thing Nader says has Stockholm Syndrome or is a secret right winger.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
168. The fact that he is speaking. Shut up Ralph.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:30 AM
Jan 2016

I'm sick of bozos like him undermining the Democratic party through hyperbole and overstatement. Screw him.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
52. No democrats who sell out to multinational corporations are the problem.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:08 PM
Jan 2016

People like you who won't vote for someone better and someone willing to change the system are the problem. That is why wages are stagnant and jobs are sparse.

Renew Deal

(81,846 posts)
64. You saw the outcome of 8 years of Bush and you now wish you hadn't voted for Gore?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jan 2016

That statement speaks for itself.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
120. Deregulation, Nafta, telecommunications act, etc. Let's not pretend he didn't have a hand in the
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:58 AM
Jan 2016

economic collapse of 2007-2008.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
124. Let's not pretend
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:10 AM
Jan 2016

that eight years of Bush and Republicans weren't the cause of that collapse. You're way too fond of Rattus rattus.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
147. It was the Republicans, and Nader helped them do it.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:37 AM
Jan 2016

And it seems you're setting up Sanders to do it again. People who help Republicans gain power & get into office can't continue to claim to be progressive heroes.

Thankfully, Bernie's plans so far are apparently elsewhere.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
129. Why?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:14 AM
Jan 2016

There have been others who have run beside the Dems and the Repubs and yet they aren't blamed.

Is it because the election was stolen? Nader didn't do that. Is it because Gore didn't fight it? Nader didn't do that either.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
273. I pretend the ineffectual are too powerful also--
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jan 2016

I pretend the ineffectual are too powerful also-- it really helps us believe what suits our biases to do so, and from that unstable, unsupported premise, we can make up anything we want to.

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
50. From the asshole that helped elect George W Bush
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:04 PM
Jan 2016

Go to hell you son of a bitch and the assholes that voted for you in 2000.

Gore1FL

(21,098 posts)
58. Gore won in 2000
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jan 2016

Nader made FL possible to steal. He played into their hands and we got Bush.

This has nothing to do with Gore winning TN. He didn't need to win TN. He won Florida.

Gore1FL

(21,098 posts)
163. If the votes were actuallyu counted accross FL Gore won
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jan 2016

No need to count chads or butterfly ballots. Do you really want to rehash this discussion?

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
166. Not really
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

But blaming Nader for running is wrong. The loss of the election had to do with other realities.

I voted for Gore and was mad at my boss for voting for Nader, but I have had time to reflect. I used to call that election a silent coup and still think it was. If there had been no Nader, it still would have happened.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
196. I am defending the idea of a Nader.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:45 PM
Jan 2016

The two party strangle hold wouldn't be so bad if our party didn't try to force their pick instead of us deciding who to pick.

Nader didn't lose the election. I did not and would not vote for him. But he had every right, yup constitutional and otherwise, to run.

TekGryphon

(430 posts)
229. Wrong.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jan 2016

If there had been no Nader, there would have been no Bush.

Nader made it a razor-thin election that could be decided by a court. Without Nader, the margin would have been a solid win for Gore.

You have to engage in some seriously deluded conspiracy theories to think that the Republicans would still have stolen Florida or the election without Nader.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
230. You have to be against real democracy to think only two parties can choose who runs for office. nt
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:15 PM
Jan 2016

Response to JRLeft (Reply #53)

JI7

(89,239 posts)
126. Nader couldn't carry his own state either , but his goal was for BUsh to be President
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:12 AM
Jan 2016

so he still got what he was going for.

so i guess he got one up over gore on that.

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
55. If Ralph Nader had any moral fiber left in his body...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jan 2016

... he would crawl under a rock and never show is face in public again.

George II

(67,782 posts)
63. It was only inevitable that the weasel who virtually elected george bush would show up....
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:19 PM
Jan 2016

....to bash Democrats.

The clown has no conscience.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
65. I have no interest in Nader's opinion regarding the Democratic primary.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jan 2016

Or anything else regarding party politics.

Response to JRLeft (Original post)

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
70. This thread was a great chance for me to figure out who to put on my ignore list
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jan 2016

After all was said and done, there are only three responses on this thread that I can see. These anti Nader HRC people make it so easy for me to delete them.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
72. Those who blame Nader for the 2000 theft are morons and
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jan 2016

Lack critical thought. They also give bush ligitimacy with that bullshit. Takes shit for brains to not understand that.

JudyM

(29,192 posts)
162. Of course not. The fact remains: he threw the election to Shrub without having a snowball's chance
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:25 AM
Jan 2016

of winning.

There wouldn't have been the need to do a recount.

brush

(53,741 posts)
198. Read this and tell me if you're still pro-Nader. He's a huge hypocrite
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:45 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.realchange.org/nader.htm#hypocrite

He under pays and overworks his workers and has even busted their attempts to form a union.

http://www.realchange.org/nader.htm#hypocrite

MariaThinks

(2,495 posts)
71. i loved nader until his attacks against Gore and the Democratic party
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:29 PM
Jan 2016

now I have nothing but contempt for this self indulgent fool

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
78. Wow...Missing the point much?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jan 2016

Pay attention to what Nader said about Libya bombing, people. And Clinton's role in it, which is absolutely abhorrent.
And no. Nader doesn't get to take the blame than the Bush family and Gore.
It's reactionary, and cowardice to go after him.
Jeb and George rigged the election together, and Gore didn't put up a fight when he should have.
It's all been very convenient for them to have 3rd party candidate to take the blame for everything.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
238. Hey - authoritarians react very negatively when the object of their adulation and obedience
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:46 PM
Jan 2016

(the Party) is defied.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
86. No, but Nader got 95,000 Florida voters to vote for him instead of Al Gore.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:24 AM
Jan 2016

Lying about there being no differences between the two candidates, claiming that Gore and Bush were Tweedledee and Tweedledum.

And if a small fraction of Nader's dupes had voted for Gore instead, he would have had a solid win, out of the reach of the Supreme Court.

So we can thank Nader for his helping Bush get elected and everything he did after that.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
92. If Nader hadn't been running, most of the voters said to pollsters they would have voted for
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:35 AM
Jan 2016

Gore over Bush.

They chose to vote, but he was the one who decided to fun, and to campaign his hardest in the swing states -- even while many of his supporters were urging him not to.

progressoid

(49,945 posts)
220. Hell, half of the registered Democrats in Florida didn't even bother to vote.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:09 PM
Jan 2016

There are lots of reasons Gore lost.

If the Natural Law party, the Workers World party, the Libertarians, the Socialists, etc had voted for Gore...

If the butterfly ballot (designed by a Democrat) hadn't been used and given Pat Buchannan over three thousand votes...

If Katherine Harris and Choice Point hadn't illegally purged thousands of minority voters...

If over 200,000 Democrats hadn't voted for Bush...




Yes, Nader is an asshole, but the blame lies in many places. I suppose he's an easier punching bag though.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
223. Nader was the SINGLE progressive who took 95K FL votes that Nader could
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:20 PM
Jan 2016

have recommended be cast for Gore -- as many of his supporters were urging him to. They didn't want him to campaign in the swing states, but he campaigned there the hardest.

Each of your 200K controlled only one vote. Nader diverted 95,000.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
228. Each of them deserves one punch; he deserves 95,000.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jan 2016

Most of those "Democrats" were people who had switched parties during the Reagan era -- the famous Reagan Democrats -- and never changed their registrations.

No one expected them to vote for Gore.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
91. A bunch of Naderites in FL did
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jan 2016

Bush would have never been elected without Nader and his"not a dimes worth of difference" once again: Thanks for the Iraq war Ralph and the people in FL that voted for him.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
97. I love to hear Naders defenders
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:39 AM
Jan 2016

Try to deny that his narcissistic run had far reaching catastrophic effects.

betsuni

(25,377 posts)
88. Blah, blah, blah, blah, corporatist. Blah, blah, blah, Wall Street.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:27 AM
Jan 2016

Blah, blah, blah, blah, militarist.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, war.
Tra la la la, tra la la la la, both parties are the same.
Tra la la la, tra la la la la, WE GET IT, YOU DO NOT LIKE HILLARY CLINTON.

Same song every day.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
89. And in Nader's execrable judgment, Al Gore and Bush were Tweedledee and Tweedledum.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jan 2016

Nader was either a self-serving liar or profoundly stupid.

In either case, progressives should have learned to ignore his political opinions long ago.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
94. Yeah, I remember when...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:36 AM
Jan 2016

he had the bright idea of recruiting billionaires for a 3rd party run in 2016. And when he told Janet Yellen she should let her husband tell her how to do her job.

And this shit:

“This is the problem of women trying to overcompensate in becoming more aggressive and macho so they are not accused of being soft on the need to kill and war, right? Instead of taking the tradition of women of peace, and turning into a muscular waging of peace of conflict and prevention, she did the reverse, and Albright did the reverse and Anne Marie Slaughter did the reverse and some of Obama’s advisers did the reverse.”


WTF? is that. Maybe we should pop out babes while we're ironing hubby's shirt. Fuck that noise & fuck Nader.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
101. I'm pretty sure I was clear in my post..
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:43 AM
Jan 2016

and I know I didn't say that shit. No wonder you're a fan of Nader.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
105. Where did I imply
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:51 AM
Jan 2016

and I quote:

one_voice (16,530 posts)
94. Yeah, I remember when...

he had the bright idea of recruiting billionaires for a 3rd party run in 2016. And when he told Janet Yellen she should let her husband tell her how to do her job.

And this shit:

“This is the problem of women trying to overcompensate in becoming more aggressive and macho so they are not accused of being soft on the need to kill and war, right? Instead of taking the tradition of women of peace, and turning into a muscular waging of peace of conflict and prevention, she did the reverse, and Albright did the reverse and Anne Marie Slaughter did the reverse and some of Obama’s advisers did the reverse.”


WTF? is that. Maybe we should pop out babes while we're ironing hubby's shirt. Fuck that noise & fuck Nader.


JRLeft (3,741 posts)
98. It's better she slaughter innocent women and children

than to be peaceful?




I implied no such thing. What I implied what was Nader was a sexist asshole.

Bye now.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
104. It's better that no one listen to sexist idiots who have already given us seriously
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:47 AM
Jan 2016

poor advice.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
108. Ralph
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:24 AM
Jan 2016

I can giuve you credit for what you have done, but the fact is, YOU, yes YOU, and all the people that voted for you, are responsible for this. Go ahead and rattle about the Reagan Democrats in Florida, the fact is, if you did not come to Florida for the express purpose of trying to be a spoiler, Bush would never have been president. period. The numbers do not lie, they did nto lie, and they never will lie no matter how many people flip themselves into pretzels forgetting that they could have stiopped it, but chose not to because they wanted an ego high.

GO TO HELL, Ralph.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
110. There is an interesting dynamic in this thread.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:34 AM
Jan 2016

Mr. Nader offered his opinion on Ms. Clinton and many posters offered their opinion of Mr. Nader. Opinions are subjective in nature, yet only the former's opinion is treated as being sacrosanct.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
114. It's an opinion. You can't disprove an opinion.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:48 AM
Jan 2016

It is my opinion Sugar Ray Leonard would have easily dispatched of Floyd Mayweather Jr. the way he dispatched of his father, Floyd Mayweather Sr.

That is an opinion that can no more be verified or refuted than Mr. Nader's opinion(s) about Ms. Clinton.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
116. Those appellations are subjective, ergo:
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:51 AM
Jan 2016
Subjective is the opposite of objective, which refers to things that are more clear-cut. That Earth has one moon is objective — it's a fact. Whether the moon is pretty or not is subjective — not everyone will agree. Facts are objective, but opinions are subjective.
subjective - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com
www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/subjective

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
122. Let's see if we can move the ball here
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:05 AM
Jan 2016

The predicate:


Subjective vs Objective
Subjective information is one person's opinion. In a newspaper, the editorial section is the place for subjectivity. It can be based on fact, but it is one person's interpretation of that fact. In this way, subjective information is also analytical.

Student research papers are usually subjective, in that the writer formulates a thesis statement and uses sources that support that thesis. Bear in mind that there is usually another equally valid viewpoint that can be supported with other sources.

Objective information reviews many points of view. It is intended to be unbiased. News reporters are supposed to be objective and report the facts of an event. Encyclopedias and other reference materials provide objective information

https://www.lib.odu.edu/genedinfolit/1infobasics/subjective_vs_objective.html


I will make two statements and you can please tell me which statement is objective and which statement is subjective:

Hillary Clinton was born on October 26, 1947.

Subjective or objective ?

Ralph Nader is a vainglorious megalomaniac whose ill thought out candidacy gave us eight years of George Walker Bush and two unwinnable wars.


Subjective or objective?

Thank you in advance.


 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
138. Correlation or causation?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:03 AM
Jan 2016
Hillary Clinton voted to give George W. Bush permission to attack Iraq.

Correlation or causation?

The Supreme Court decided that the state of Florida could not come up with a timely, consistent manner of counting ballots, thereby ending the vote count and handing the Presidency to George W. Bush.

Correlation or causation?

"Ralph Nader is a vainglorious megalomaniac whose ill thought out candidacy gave us eight years of George Walker Bush and two unwinnable wars."

Correlation or causation?

Thank you in advance.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
139. Answers in bold
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:09 AM
Jan 2016
Hillary Clinton voted to give George W. Bush permission to attack Iraq.

Correlation or causation? You actually gave me an incomplete hypothetical. It's actually more of a statement.

The Supreme Court decided that the state of Florida could not come up with a timely, consistent manner of counting ballots, thereby ending the vote count and handing the Presidency to George W. Bush.

Correlation or causation? For elaboration please see previous answer.

"Ralph Nader is a vainglorious megalomaniac whose ill thought out candidacy gave us eight years of George Walker Bush and two unwinnable wars."

Correlation or causation?

Thank you in advance.


Did the candidacy of Ralph Nad(i)r sic lead or did it not lead to the sequela of events that led to the election being decided by the Supreme Court?

Thank you in advance.

Respectfully,
DSB


 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
141. Hillary's Iraq war vote is correlation?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:18 AM
Jan 2016


Nader's responsible for the Iraq war, but Hillary isn't? Bullshit.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
142. You asked my opinion. I gave it to you, Now you disrespect, dismiss, dehumanize, and denigrate me.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:26 AM
Jan 2016
Hillary's Iraq war vote is correlation?


Nader's responsible for the Iraq war, but Hillary isn't? Bullshit.




-OnyxCollie




You asked my opinion. I gave it to you, Now you disrepect, dismiss, dehumanize, and denigrate me. I used to think empathy was the sine qua non of liberalism. That is what made us different from right wingers, used to.






Respectfully,
DSB
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
143. Aww.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:40 AM
Jan 2016

The ROFL smilie is a dehumanizer.

Maybe Hillary Clinton thought that Saddam Hussein had stockpiled ROFL smilies when she voted for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, giving George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq, eliminate Saddam, and create a political vacuum which led to the creation of ISIS.

Or, maybe it was the prospect of creating new business opportunities in Iraq.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
144. "The ROFL smilie is a dehumanizer."
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:45 AM
Jan 2016
Aww.
The ROFL smilie is a dehumanizer.

-OnyxCollie


Is laughing at someone and dismissing his or her opinions as "bullshit" an effective method of validating other human beings and letting them know they are worthy of respect?

Is or is not treating other human beings with love, kindness and respect a laudable goal?

Thank you in advance.


Respectfully,
DSB



 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
145. I have no respect for those who push false narratives.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:04 AM
Jan 2016

Or those who try to blame Ralph Nader for everything through some Rube Goldberg concatenation, while exempting those with the legitimately-recognized authority who are truly responsible.

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
171. You are mistaken.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:26 PM
Jan 2016

I'm not disrespecting you; your actions are not worthy of respect.

That's your problem.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
173. That is a distinction without a difference.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jan 2016

But it is easy to disrespect people on the internet.

Out of the blue you engaged me in a global discussion on correlation, causation, opinion, fact, subjectivity, and objectivity and when I gave you a response you didn't like you insulted me. It is what it is.

I am not walking away from this discussion until you apologize or withdraw from our tête-à-tête.


The choice, sir or madame, is yours.

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
176. No, it's not.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jan 2016

Respect is earned, not given.

If you're so easily upset, delicate flower, stay off of message boards.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
178. More insults...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jan 2016
No, it's not.
View profile
Respect is earned, not given.

If you're so easily upset, delicate flower, stay off of message boards.

-Onyx Collie



More insults and now a command. The latter is making me shudder while the former is making me sad.




Respectfully,
DSB



 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
180. Demand? More like a suggestion.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jan 2016

Here's another suggestion: Keep ginning up the faux outrage and playing the victim, it suits you well.

Here's a demand: Don't bother responding. I'm putting you on ignore.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
181. Others can read it...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:17 PM
Jan 2016
No, it's not.
View profile
Respect is earned, not given.

If you're so easily upset, delicate flower, stay off of message boards.

-Onyx Collie



OnyxCollie
180. Demand? More like a suggestion.
View profile
Here's another suggestion: Keep ginning up the faux outrage and playing the victim, it suits you well.

Here's a demand: Don't bother responding. I'm putting you on ignore.

-OnyxCollie



I can't put my finger on the discordance between the two responses but I know it's there.

Respectfully,
DSB

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
182. Wow.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:24 PM
Jan 2016

It appears that you are the one who first engaged DSB. When you didn't like his responses, you insulted him, put him on ignore to immediately shut-down the conversation. The word "unfair" doesn't seem quite right, but it's pretty close (and one that should pass jury scrutiny.)

If you're so easily upset, delicate flower, stay off of message boards.
... or just putting people on ignore is a much easier option, eh?
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
183. Responding to those who push false narratives and smears
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

is my civic duty, but engaging in volley of posts with someone who borrows RW tactics of feigning outrage and playing the victim instead of defending his position is a waste of my time, as is explaining my actions to cohorts of said poster.

Welcome to ignore.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
186. The only action DSB has performed has been the writing of his opinion ...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jan 2016

Unless you are shocked that DSB can type and/or put together a sentence, or otherwise communicate his opinion, this is nothing that would seem to enter the realm of respect/disrespect. (Given the context of the exchange, that seems unlikely)

So ... Don't you mean ...

You are not disrespecting DSB; his OPINIONs are not worthy of respect?
(which would put you squarely in the camp of disrespecting his opinion; and therefore, him)


okasha

(11,573 posts)
121. No.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:03 AM
Jan 2016

That's how Earth rotates. The sun doesn't move.

Note the difference between unthinking cliches and facts.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
123. Oh dear! A ditherer!
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:10 AM
Jan 2016

You'd have got me but relative to any observer on earth, for whom the terms "east" and "west" apply, the sun rises in the East.

Bloody idiots!
Jeez christmas! The stupidity of some people with their "gotcha's".

delrem

(9,688 posts)
130. What, to debate with someone who disputes the fact that the sun rises to the east?
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:15 AM
Jan 2016

No.
I don't think so.

Response to JRLeft (Original post)

Response to Post removed (Reply #119)

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
137. Never thought I'd see the day that Nader seems behind the times.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:38 AM
Jan 2016

I thought everybody knew by now that Hillary is a corporatist and militarist. Her supporters adore her for it and the rest of us don't. Maybe Nader should read DU more often?

He says, "The big thing is the huge amount of geography that has been destabilized because of the Libyan overthrow." He mentions "weapons everywhere" following the destabilization of Libya; did any of those weapons come of Hillary's agreements with weapon sellers while SOS? An even bigger "thing" is the massive destabilization and death that followed the Iraqi invasion, which she voted for. But she is far more directly responsible for Libya than Iraq. Poor Obama; I wonder how much he regrets having to give her the SOS position? Glad he has Kerry now.

Hillary is the queen of bad judgement. Not what we need in a president.

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
140. She made "peace" when she wrote "An Analysis of the Alinsky Model."
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:11 AM
Jan 2016

I thought this was common knowledge? Clinton has, for some 40 years, been political, in the system, part of the status quo, an overachiever, big time political wonk.

As far as blaming Clinton for Libya, had the UN not got involved, then Libya would unquestionably look like Syria right now. Syria did not have any major defections, there was no large territory taken in the early phases of the war, and it still resulted in 250k dead civilians. R2P was invoked for the first time in Libya and it resulted in a much less unstable scenario to where it's safer than a lot of Latin American countries.

Anyone who blames the UN for the actions in Libya must explain how Libya would be better than Syria when Syria had no major military defections but Libya did. When Syria had no major arms depots raided but Libya did. When Syria had no besieged cities freed from outside sources but Libya did (Misrata).

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
146. Nader trying to become relevant.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 04:37 AM
Jan 2016

He already did enough damage in 2000. I have zero interest in any opinion he may have on any issue.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
149. I don't know what's more annoying and troubling:
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:53 AM
Jan 2016

Nader poking his head up to attack a Democrat like some malignant groundhog, or the supposed "progressives" defending him.

Fuck Nader.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
160. I am not a Nader fan, but he is right about Libya.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:05 AM
Jan 2016

That debacle is another foreign policy blunder by Clinton.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
165. Ralph Nader's Opinion Is Irrelevant in This Election.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:49 AM
Jan 2016

That is all I will say about Ralph Nader, out of respect for the sensibilities of many on this website.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
167. What a meltdown.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jan 2016


Some blame Nader, some blame those who were in power and others blame those who put them into power.

And they are all right.

Some much more so than others in my mind. But hey, that is only because I rely on empirical evidence.
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
244. The "truth" you're referring to does not in actuality hurt.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:59 PM
Jan 2016

The "truth" you're referring to is that Ralph Nader, in the eyes of most of DU, is an asshole election stealing non-relevant so-and-so. And while you're free to think that, the actual "victim" here, if there is such a thing, is the truth that Nader told. Because Clinton is a militarist and a corporatist. So you can give the trite response "truth hurts", but there's only really one truth that has been suppressed in this thread.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
248. Nader didn't steal the election. The Democrats lost it.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:50 PM
Jan 2016

The Democrats would have won the election if Bill Clinton hadn't sold out the middle class, working class, and poor. Why do you think he lost so many seats in Congress?



 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
249. You're preaching to the choir.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jan 2016

I was listing the DU commonly-agreed-upon attitude about Nader. I don't hate him. I don't love him. He has a voice like everyone else, and a right to run for President. And he was right about Hillary when he said she's a corporatist and a militarist.

jeepers

(314 posts)
177. So irrational and embraced by so many
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jan 2016

An idea sold to us by both the democratic and republican parties to distract us while they pulled off a political coup that brought perpetual war and financial ruin down on all of us as the investors made billions. And we are focused on the shiny object a third party run by an American icon. The willfull ignorance expressed here by so many is shamefull.

TekGryphon

(430 posts)
224. The man who gave us 8 years of Bush isn't who I need lectures from.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jan 2016

Fuck you, Nader. You're one of the few people I can name who the world would be far better off if you had never been born.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
227. Thanks for Bush and the Iraq War
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 06:53 PM
Jan 2016

Without Nader voters in FL there would not have been no Bush Presidency and no Iraq War-Bottom line. "Not a dimes worth of difference" ?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
236. Those who fixate their hatred on Nader for the 2000 election results
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:43 PM
Jan 2016

are the shallowest of political thinkers, best ignored. They are interested only in lashing out at a designated external enemy, having been led by the nose to do so by Democratic Party apparatchiks working to deflect blame from the incredibly poor performance of their candidate.

It's so staid and boring that I have no time for refuting it anymore.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
242. It's almost as pathetic as those that refuse to acknowledge his role in electing Bush as president
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:55 PM
Jan 2016

Actually, no. It's really not anywhere near as pathetic as that.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
253. Nice try. The rest of us lived through his 2000
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jan 2016

bullshit and see how laughable his campaign lies were.

Anyone who can buy Ralphie's lies has no credibility judging Clinton, so I'll laugh at your slice and dice little videos.

Response to R B Garr (Reply #253)

Response to R B Garr (Reply #239)

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
259. NOT handed the most powerful position in the world to an overly privileged sociopath
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 05:58 PM
Jan 2016

and caused untold death, misery, and destruction. That right there gives him a 1up on Nader.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
251. Hillarys Campaign manager
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:24 PM
Jan 2016

Owns a lobbying firm that represents arms manufacturers and Saudi Arabia.

That's who she choose to represent her.

Empowerer

(3,900 posts)
270. Funny how the same people who believe that anyone who has done anything they don't agree with at any
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:39 AM
Jan 2016

point in their lives is forever tarnished and unworthy of any consideration or respect, now cite Ralph Nader as a credible source and ally because he shares their loathing of Hillary Clinton, while shrugging their shoulders and saying, "Sure, he almost single-handedly delivered this country eight years of Bush-Cheney, but other than that, he's a really great guy . . ."

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
275. Ralph needs to give back all the money he's taken from Republicans
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jan 2016

in all his sham campaigns since 2000. Until then he can pipe down.

Mike Nelson

(9,944 posts)
277. Nader should...
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:55 PM
Jan 2016

...shut up, lose the envy - and, then, he might be applauded for the early activisms. Alas, he's not interested.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ralph Nader: Hillary Clin...