2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBill Clinton's Sexual Past is 'Totally Disgraceful'
Showed a lack of morals and showed a lack of respect for the presidency and the People.
His wife should have left him, but it appears power kept her from doing the right thing?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)Bill isn't running, and Hillary's reasons for staying with him are personal and known only to her. Let's not go there.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)It goes to show the character of the people involved.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)but I stayed with him (because I still loved him and decided to forgive him) (because of the children) (because I couldn't afford to leave him) (because of reasons that are none of anybody else's business). How is that in any way a reflection on my character or morals?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I would not want you to have any power over anyone else.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)and for some reason that's nobody else's business I didn't divorce him? That means I shouldn't have any power over anybody else??? Sorry, but of all the reasons I've heard of for not wanting to vote for Hillary (and I'm a Sanders supporter), that has to be the very dumbest ever.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Please,,,, that was so embarrassing. Yeah, he made it my business. Denial is what's dumb.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)What he did was reprehensible, but the fact she decided to stay married to him for whatever reason is not. You are basically attributing Bill's dubious morals to his wife - the victim of his treachery - and that's just ridiculous.
emulatorloo
(44,112 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)That is apt, also. Thanks for including that.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)over time.
She's smarter and more self-controlled than her husband.
If people want to claim she's this feminist role model, then her husband's behavior comes into play. Sexual politics are personal--the personal is political--and this exercise of male privilege and her consistent tolerance of it set an example for younger women that you have to put up with this devaluation. That's what it is. You can't expect fidelity because you're a strong aging women and males aren't capable of fidelity. I'm sick of it. She can be faithful. So can he.
If they can leave the "role model" out of it, then I'm happy to leave him out of it. She's far more qualified. I just disagree with her politics.
The minute anybody claims she's this feminist role model, then NO. I do hold her responsible. She sets a terrible example.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)and I'm not supporting her for the nomination. I just wouldn't go as far as to blame her for her decision not to divorce him or use that as a reason not to vote for her.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I have 500 better reasons not to support Hilary, but I dont think the topic is off limits if you want to be president.
She can make it off limits, and if she loses votes, so be it.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)more openly than Clinton. Heck, my husband cheated on me and then begged forgiveness and I forgave him until he started telling me she was a better person than I was and I never screwed around with someone else's husband, so found that going to church did not make her a better person than me. ThatI could not forgive. There are things worse than cheating.
I would rather have a president that screwed around on their spouse than one who screwed around with the country. By your standards GWB was a great president because he was never caught
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Your smears, in an ill-founded attempt to protect Clinton's disgracing the office, are atrocious.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)who did I smear with unknown information - the dalliances of previous presidents are well known and were not considered so offensive. To the best of my knowledge, I believe only Harry Truman and Jimmy Carter were faithful husbands. And poor Jimmy got smeared with lusting in his heart. Super religious types apparently do not like honesty. I know about GHB's affairs, but not so much about GWB, although there is a rape allegation in his youth and a woman who was suing Bush fora rape when he was older that died the way so many bush opponents die - a bullet tothe head which was declared suicide cough cough.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)unless some kind of hard evidence is presented that shows Hillary actually did something wrong. I have seen smear pieces that read like something out of a fan fic, I don't mean that kind of evidence.
niyad
(113,253 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)but what this place has become rivals the bullshit spewed on pretty much every right wing website when it comes to Hillary.
niyad
(113,253 posts)beyond disgusting. sadly, after 2008, not entirely surprised to see the same thing here.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)But this time it's 1000 times worse. I've seen more bullshit spewed than in a cow farm. Oh, my favorite was some asshole saying that "Hillary and Bill bullied Obama to appoint her as SOS". That type of shit is ALLOWED to stand here!
Squinch
(50,944 posts)niyad
(113,253 posts)DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)He did his job as President, I don't care about his concentual affair with an adult. As to Hillary, she chose to stay. Maybe for her daughter, maybe for herself, maybe because she doesn't believe in divorce, I have no idea, it isn't my business.
He disrespected the office and the People.
Shows a lack of good character. And stupidity of thinking with the little head.
Squinch
(50,944 posts)Because your opinion on that really matters.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)As for me, I can control my penis. Some idiots can't. Wouldn't vote for them again, would you?
Squinch
(50,944 posts)Because your opinion about that really matters.
FSogol
(45,473 posts)* To the alerting squad: I could care less about candidates private lives and don't feel it should ever be an issue, but it is hypocritical to complain about some sexual indiscretions and ignore others. What consenting adults do is no business of anyone else.
RandySF
(58,741 posts)Usually, people who talk this high and mighty have the dirtiest laundry.
oasis
(49,376 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)So get over it.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
niyad
(113,253 posts)pukes who have affairs, etc.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)It was something for them to negotiate and deal with privately. Many people, both men and women stay with their cheating spouse and some of them go on to have a happy and healthy relationship.
I know. I witnessed it with my own parents. They came through more committed and loving than I had ever seen them.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)an American's life. When it was in seedy, or fix-me-up Bubba...is one thing. At least there was some element of shame. But day in and day out, he walked in and out of that office knowing that everyone knew...what hutzpah.
Hillary...yeah, she stayed for the politics, of that I'm convinced. But now she's got to run against a Bernie Sanders who doesn't want to play the dirty attack games. She could probably beat most anyone in that particular arena.
So, what's she going to do...other than send Bill out to campaign? She's got all these endorsements because of her years and background, but Bernie has the personal character that shows through.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Bernie has it. He will show respect for the office.
FSogol
(45,473 posts)get to consenting adults screwing around.
Politically sacred?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)That's like saying the church deserves no special respect because preachers and priests have so despoiled it. Sorry. Doesn't wash.
Yes, a trip to the White House Oval Office...for normal people...is often a chance of a lifetime. And here, kiddies, is where all the bad things happen...Not.
FSogol
(45,473 posts)all of it sacredness.
Fainting hanky? You're the puritan who is outraged, not me. The Oval Office is where Nixon committed his crimes, W started unnecessary wars to help his friends earn a profit, Reagan ran a drug war to sell weapons to our enemies, and Nancy screwed Frank.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)FSogol
(45,473 posts)oral sex with interns.
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)Given her rep as a starlet, I'd have thought she would have given him one of her famous blow jobs.
emulatorloo
(44,112 posts)Nor are you qualified to ascribe motives to her decision.
I hate to break it to you, sometimes spouses forgive infidelity and choose to preserve and strengthen their marriages. It is honestly nobody's fucking business but the couple involved.
Squinch
(50,944 posts)FSogol
(45,473 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)This OP is a disgrace.
This last month is going to suck, I really wish we could just get voting and see what happens.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The post feels like a "let's make the people who prefer someone other than Hillary look ridiculous and discredit them" to me.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)If we believe that for LGBTs, we need to believe it for straights. Their relationship, their business.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Edit
JudyM
(29,225 posts)vulnerable to blackmail. That is serious.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The same beloved president who deflowered a nineteen year old virgin intern and compelled her to provide oral favors to his friends and tried to get her to provide oral favors to his youngest brother. The same president who as a senator was carrying on an affair with a East German spy at the height of the Cold War. His wife never left him
Of all my pet peeves my biggest peeve is the fundamental unfairness of judging different people by different standards.
JudyM
(29,225 posts)to blackmail.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Pavlov's dog - jumping with excitement at the thought of getting him on something like that. But, I don't want to be too judgmental or make a political issue out of it.
"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." - John 8 : 7
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)As a lapsed Baptist these are my two favorite Biblical quotes:
For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
Matthew 7:2
-Matthew 7:3
I wonder how many of our own lives could withstand such scrutiny. I know mine couldn't.
jehop61
(1,735 posts)He who is without sin, shall cast the first stone
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)The OP is casting stones at the sinner's wife for no reason other than that she decided not to dump him. I don't get that at all.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Bill dropped bombs on those poor people then Hill voted to invade and drop more bombs. Like I say, lack of character.
RandySF
(58,741 posts)Squinch
(50,944 posts)The assholery is astonishing.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Do you know if they had an open marriage, and rules for this sort of thing? Do you know what went on between them?
Fuck no you don't.
This OP is "totally disgraceful" and should be self-deleted.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And now wanting me to vote for a Clinton, again? I don't think so. If they just faded away, I wouldn't have posted this.
bigtree
(85,986 posts)...criticizing a spouse for remaining in the marriage after their partner's infidelity is presumptuous bull.
The public has as little credible insight on 'the right thing' involving the Clinton's marriage as they did the consensual sexual affair.
TacoD
(581 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:35 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Bill Clinton's Sexual Past is 'Totally Disgraceful'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251996694
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
No comments added by alerter
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:38 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not sure it belongs in GP-P, moderator could have it moved to another forum. Not alert worthy.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The poster is commenting on a possible reason for a candidate's actions.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Absurd crap. I am a sanders supporter, but we don't need this discourse.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The alerter almost certainly wants this kept, hence the lack of comment. But this is the kind of shit OP that I am happy to vote to hide. This reads like it was lifted right off of a right-wing site.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Also dear alerter, add a comment next time.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)So calls that it doesn't belong are kinda dumb?
I get that it makes some upset. Sure upsets me that the couple have the audacity to ask us to vote for more of the same.
I vote to hide the Clintons!
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)Someone could call Hillary a whore and the "fair" jury would allow it. Oh wait that already happened.
This place has turned into a cesspool.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Spouses are attacked.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Book mark it!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)oasis
(49,376 posts)By doing so, she preserved the office of the Presidency and protected the will of the voters who elected Bill Clinton to office.
If Hillary would have turned away, the American public would have also abandoned him. The President's removal would occur following the fraudulent impeachment.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)This is way, way at the bottom of my list. In fact, it's not on it. Her decision to stay with Bill is none of our business. And honestly I can't imagine a male politician being criticized for choosing to stay with his spouse. As a Sanders supporter, I'd prefer we not go there.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,669 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)and THIS shit is allowed on DU ... oh I mean BU?
emulatorloo
(44,112 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)And I adore you!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)Because if not, I'm not sure I want to see what's worse that this one.
Seriously, when did Henry Hyde's ghost join DU?
Squinch
(50,944 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)entitled to an opinion?
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)other day and then got bombarded with comparisons of Clinton's "morals" and whether or not slavery was moral. It was as bizarre as it was offensive. Desperate to boot.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
bvf
(6,604 posts)is entirely between them, as far as I'm concerned.
That said, the fact that Bill Clinton went all Risky Business when he knew what might be the consequences, remains the concern of the country that elected him.
Popular as president? Solidly, with job approval averaging about 60% his final year in office.
Trustworthy and honest? The majority of voting-age Americans considered him to be neither as he finished his second term.
Hillary's handlers obviously think he'll be of benefit on the stump, as long as nobody brings up what everyone remembers.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)It says so much about a man when he figures out a way to smear a woman for her cheating husband.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)This one wants to be the president. And her husband as president smeared the People with his philandering.
Hey, who let the swarm out? I never saw such want for censorship and trash talk reaction to an expression of opinion about someone who wants to be MY president. It is if some of you are kindergartners on recess playing bully. Shameful exposition.
ETA: Oh, and for 'some' reason I can only see half the replies in this thread when I am logged in!
one_voice
(20,043 posts)You're continuing to blame her for what her husband did. Speaking of shameful...
For the record: I'm an O'Malley suppoter & I would never censor this...please let all this hang out.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Let it all out.
delrem
(9,688 posts)So I guess it takes all kinds.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)came from a bitter divorced guy who thought that was how it should have gone for him. He respected Hillary for putting up with Bill's philandering the way his ex didn't.
I worry about a sister who is unlikely to leave an abusive husband. Thanks in no small part to the fact that our mother stayed with our dad.
As far as feminist role models go, not having adopted the Tammy Wynette motto should be a litmus test.
Scruffy1
(3,255 posts)My father had several affairs, and even a child by one, and yet my mother loved him. They were married til death and loved each other. some are not good at monogamy. It doesn't make them all bad.
doc03
(35,325 posts)and the reasons are none of anybody else's god damn business.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But bad for the country.
No one is happy with this situation. But it is history and it does show what type of characters we are dealing with.
If the Clintons just went away such posts as this, which makes everyone unconformable, would never even appear, and the deniers would not show their dumb posts in their foolish attempts to make it go away. You can bet the republicans will be bring it up if, gawd forbid, Hillary gets the nom.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Gives me hope for DU.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Mentioned, yes. Recommeded, no.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Somehow they just keep turning out to be narrow-minded moralist wannabe authoritarians. Take your poutrage at someone else's sexual and marital life and stick it where the sun don't shine.
I say this not on behalf of Bill Clinton or his wife, but for myself - I don't want to be badgered by people who feel the need to make commentaries on the relationships of others, and I especially don't want to be badgered by people who falsely claim to be doing so on behalf of everyone else. I am a liberal precisely because I believe that consenting adults should be able to conduct themselves as they see fit.
Way back when Bill Clinton was head honcho over the entire USA and there were tons of "interns", there was also an ambient awareness that company policy should discourage sex for favors between the powerful and powerless, since the transaction was often both coercive and "sexist".
That awareness, that suggestion, had something to do with that archaic thing, "the feminist movement".
I put these words in quotes because it's to laugh, isn't it? Strange outmoded terms recalling strange outmoded ideas that, in this day and age of the annunciated Hillary Rodham Clinton, no longer exist. No more than truth does.
All I have to say is that the Clinton's give a different meaning to the phrase "trickle down politics".
delrem
(9,688 posts)up here in Canada defended Bill Clinton, and they all derided me as as being bloody ignorant when I tried to defend Bill Clinton by saying "The Republican are out to get him!"
They all, every one of them, said I didn't get the point. That I was a dinosaur.
treestar
(82,383 posts)He was, and that was quit cheating. Geez.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Sure feels that way sometimes.
Three Minutes Hate on Hillary is pretty strong around here.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)Mr. Earl. Doesn't this just add to the abuse laid down by Trump? This smacks like an abused woman who when needing help, gets further abused. Victim blaming. I think you're wrong about this.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and it is unseemly to attribute motives to her, especially to try and score a political point.
Neither you nor I can ever know Hillary's motives. They are hers and hers alone. Those of us who have ever been married know that the relationship is complex and very personal. When there are children to consider, that brings in even more complications. Few of us truly understand our own motives in matters like this, much less someone else's.
There are plenty of reasons to criticize Hillary Clinton. This is not one of them. Please, leave it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)With a full running start.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)This really got to you, eh?
The people with all the power, with the influence and money who support the democratic party right now will leave before they would support a candidate like Sanders.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)That's all it is to me. No clue what the rest has to do with anything.