History of Feminism
Related: About this forumA Letter To All Women Who Have Been Told To Quieten Down, Speak Softer and Be Less Angry
You thought if you spoke less, and in a softer voice he wouldnt notice the anger oozing out of your lungs in the form of words.
You feel like fire in an ocean.
Most days you question yourself. Interrogate yourself as if you are a felon on trial for having a big mouth.
You question whether you are too loud, too opinionated and too damn angry.
You have been taught to accommodate, absorb, and the back of your neck aches sometimes from nodding so much.
Every question you ask in class begins with sorry.
http://thefeministwire.com/2013/11/a-letter-to-all-women-who-have-been-told-to-quieten-down-speak-softer-and-be-less-angry/
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)but when she reaches middle age, and ESPECIALLY Old Age, just TRY to shut her up.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)xulamaude
(847 posts)to be told (in one way or another) to STFU.
Sheri
(310 posts)i am just not sure about that.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)To the woman who has been told to quieten down, speak softer and be less angry all of her life, you are my heart in human form. I wouldnt want to be in a world where you dont exist.
well. is that something. i will say, that i did decide i just would not lower my eyes one more time. but, there comes a price. for sure.
i tell people, the easy way is to stay quiet. in all ways.
it is hard to speak out when the easy way is so handy.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,546 posts)Does this situation exist for women younger than say 40?
ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)qui·et·en (kw-tn)
tr. & intr.v. qui·et·ened, qui·et·en·ing, qui·et·ens Chiefly British
To make or become quiet.
And yes
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)think a gotcha with "quieten" adn if so, i think it is pretty obvious the conditioning starts immediately. so i ask, why are you asking this question "women younger than say 40? ". i do not get it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,546 posts)Because I wondered if it was typo or something. As for the second question I base that on my own experience. My wife and I raised our daughter in an atmosphere that did not stifle her (I hope). And she and all of her friends I have met certainly do not interact with the world in that fashion. she is in her early 30's
In the headline I mean quieten
ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)That's very good to hear.
The letter is to those who internally question their right to speak their minds, but not necessarily the ones who are too afraid to. Many women overcome inhibitions especially in certain fields, say.
Some women speak up from the beginning. Some never learn to.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)of experience. ask... what happens and how she is made to feel. not those that stay silent, but even in the speaking up, does she have this conversation with herself.
you have a comfortable receptive environment where speaking up is rewarded. that is not our reality and what we face in most of the real world.
xulamaude
(847 posts)goes a long way but it does not negate entirely the effects of an entire world.
I was raised to believe that I could do and be anything I wanted to be but it rarely turned out that way, like for most people - it's just a whole lot harder for girls.
Triana
(22,666 posts)"Too Angry for What?"
. . .
Just as it was fear that motivated my white male acquaintances to belittle rap and hip hop in ways that starkly contradicted the rest of their musical preferences, I think it is most often fear that makes people label women too angry too. When I think of women society labels as too angry, Roseanne is the first to come to mind. (Personally, I found her rendition of The Star Spangled Banner, and subsequent crotch grabbing and spitting, at that baseball game, to be one of the most brilliant performances in history and I still get chills thinking about the pure genius she has displayed over the years). Gloria Steinem is called too angry. Feminist author bell hooks is labeled too angry. Very intelligent women, who are notably full of genius and vision, have been and currently are, labeled too angry. Basically, if you are an outspoken feminist, you *will* be labeled too angry. It is guaranteed. But why? Why is it impossible to be an outspoken feminist without the too angry name calling? I think it is because using the too in front of the angry has an inherent judgment to it, and that the label too angry is used more often to control women, than as constructive behavioral criticism.
So lets see here . . . Feminists are too angry. People of color are too angry. Funny thing, it seems disempowerment and abuse breeds anger. When I look at who is labeled too angry, I realize I am in good company. I do not want to be in, or support, the status quo or middle class. If I scare patriarchy enough to warrant the too angry label, it means I am effective. You have got to look at who is calling you too angry and why. The political use of the too angry label has been hurled in the past at Malcolm X, Black Panthers, famous feminists throughout history, anarchists, rap artists . . .basically anyone who threatens to upset the status quo. Even the Dr. Rev. M.L.King, jr., who many view as too pacifist, was called too angry as a way to try to neutralize his influence within the status quo.
Am I too angry? Too angry for what? Too angry to fight for an end to homelessness and hunger? Nope. Too angry to fight for womens equality? Nope. Too angry to stand up for what I know is right even amidst a sea of armored pigs waving sticks and spraying chemicals? Nope. Too angry to fight rape? Nope. Too angry to fight for childrens rights? Nope. Too angry to fight to save our eco-systems? Nope. Too angry to fight against third world exploitation by first world countries? Nope. Too angry to formulate coherent arguments and persuasive articles on these issues and my anger? Nope. What am I too angry for? I am too angry for the status quo. Yes, I admit that. But is that a bad thing? I am not convinced that is so. Who draws the line between enough anger and too much anger? Who can we trust with such judgments?
THE REST:
http://www.sevenbowie.com/2012/12/too-angry-for-what/
The article was written not by me, but rather by Kirsten Anderberg: http://www.amazon.com/Kirsten-Anderberg/e/B004M3MZM2