Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ismnotwasm

(41,976 posts)
1. Probably one of ones I just trashed
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:19 AM
Jul 2014

Fall out from the hobby lobby ruling and embedded Libertarians around here is my guess

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
4. Too true.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 02:05 AM
Jul 2014

Although it was pointed out that you can't serve on a jury for someone on your ignore list, so I try to keep my ignore list empty.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. But you can serve on juries of group posts you have on Ignore. Seemed odd until Skinner explained.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 02:12 AM
Jul 2014
I use Ignore for health. And I refuse to be abused.

ismnotwasm

(41,976 posts)
14. I ignore two people
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 02:31 PM
Jul 2014

One because I'm convinced he's a troll and posts constant OP's, and the other for constant OP's. I should take one off again-- see if I can stand it

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
15. There are trolls who know they are trolls. Others don't realize it yet. Everyone is suspect, LOL!
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jul 2014

I see the embedded Libertarians and those are being converted.

I keep thinking of the scene with Schwarzenegger where the kid says:

'It could be a tumor.'

To which Arnie says:

'It's NOT a tumor!'

Some don't yet know they are tumors, er, trolls...



The only troll I like. Have pictures of the family climbing up there. Good times.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
7. Yes, I did the same thing for that reason
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 02:28 AM
Jul 2014

If enough people put the bad posters on ignore, they'll skate through juries. It could explain why the mildest of attacks by good DUers are hidden while other egregious ones from trolls are allowed to stand. I see it too often not to wonder.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
8. there have been a bunch of hides that were not deserved while ignorant offensive crap
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 04:04 AM
Jul 2014

have remained.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
9. For all the claims of a
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 05:39 AM
Jul 2014

swarm originating here and hiding posts to make sure men aren't allowed to post anything anywhere, I notice feminists are always the ones getting hidden for far lesser offenses, and sometimes no offense at all, while misogynistic crap tends to stick around and stink.

Even though callout posts aren't particularly uncommon, I don't think I've seen anyone that wasn't a feminist get hidden for a post calling someone out in a while. Apparently being a feminist is enough to make linking to a thread someone posted an unbearable insult.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
10. Check out what Agschmid did: reposted one of sea's posts that she was hidden for, word for word,
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:27 AM
Jul 2014

under a different name, and survived a jury 5-2.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=46779

Proves the accuracy of your post.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
12. I think Agschmid deserves a hand for that one.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:33 AM
Jul 2014


Of course there was a poster who said that it didn't prove anything and it needed to be replicated (probably over and over) before it was worth talking about.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
13. Ah yes, the painfully obvious one who self-deleted.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:39 AM
Jul 2014

So blatantly obvious, but no doubt thinks he's being oh so clever.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Is it just me, or has it ...