The Safer, More Affordable Abortion Only Available in Two States

[Little Star]

Medicated abortions provided via telemedicine can help bring down costs and get women care earlier in their pregnancies, but opponents have blocked them throughout the country.

?nd8l64
Abortion opponents in Iowa protest along the campaign trail. (Jim Young/Reuters)

Were he graduating medical school today, Dr. Joel Fleischman might not have been needed in rural Alaska. Fleischman, the main character for TV’s Northern Exposure, was stuck in a small Alaskan village in order to pay off some debts and provide the town with medical care. But now, thanks to rapid advances in telemedicine, Alaskans don’t need quite so many doctors throughout the state. Though 65 percent of the state’s doctors are located in Anchorage, a woman in Alaska’s Northwest Arctic Borough can give birth aided just by a nurse guided, over video, by a doctor, some 200 miles away.

Telemedicine has made rapid advances in the past few years, expanding access to healthcare for all sorts of people. It’s not just people in rural areas either: Veterans in Virginia can now talk to therapists through their computers, avoiding the stigma of a doctor’s office, and inmates in Texas can now see specialists through a program that’s brought telemedicine into prisons.

The cost savings and improved health outcomes from telemedicine are very real. Telemedicine reduced life expectancy gaps between American Indians and whites from eight years to five years in one study. Another found that telemedicine saved Medicaid and Medicare 19 percent on costs when it helped offer hospital-level care in patients’ homes. And in Alaska, after telemedicine was first introduced in 2003, the state's Institute of Social and Economic research estimated that the practice saved doctors from taking more than 3,000 trips, worth $3 million, every year.

But there is one procedure that, though it could be easily, safely, and cheaply administered via telemedicine, is widely unavailable: the termination of a pregnancy. Fifteen states have adopted bans on telemedicine abortion since 2010. The practice was only ever available in three states—Iowa, Minnesota, and Texas—though Texas now has banned it. In Iowa telemedicine abortion continues to be available, though is being challenged in courts, and in Minnesota the legislature passed a ban, which the governor vetoed.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/10/the-safer-more-affordable-abortion-only-available-in-two-states/381321/

[F4lconF16]

1. I took a couple of things away from this.

First, we need to make abortion not just legal, but widely accessible, and the way to do that is by popular support.

"Focusing on limiting supply has proven a much more effective tactic for abortion opponents than attempting to limit demand."

Conservatives are winning this battle right now because they control the state legislatures that pass laws restricting abortion rights. However, supply-side economics never made much sense. In the end, demand is what creates supply, and progressives need to create demand (not for abortions, clearly, but for the ability to safely have one). We need to take control over local legislatures, and we need many more locally elected officials that vocally support abortion rights. If we can do that, then we stand a chance to begin influencing public opinion and laws at the ground level. Coupled with campaigns to "re-legalize" abortion, we could drum up enough support to start repealing laws passed under Republican controlled legislatures. I think the main problem right now is voter apathy (as is being discussed rather prominently in a number of threads in GD). When voters care, they will push for progressive change. This has been shown time and time again. When there is a strong (50%+ of voters support, which I believe can be found) demand for legal and safe abortions, we will have them, regardless of what the Republicans want. We just have to get the support and more importantly, public awareness of the issues.

The second thing I thought about was less related to the issue of abortion and more to the idea of telemedicine as a whole. Though I'm aware that my information is stored online in medical databases and elsewhere, I still worry about the security issues with telemedicine. When I talk to a doctor in person, I'm not worried about someone listening in. Maybe I'm paranoid (I cover my laptop camera with electrical tape already), but I'm not sure how comfortable I would be with online interviews and examinations. Any thoughts?