HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Arts & Humanities » Philosophy (Group) » Philosophy isn't dead yet

Mon May 27, 2013, 06:07 PM

Philosophy isn't dead yet

In 2010 Stephen Hawking, in The Grand Design, announced that philosophy was "dead" because it had "not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics". He was not referring to ethics, political theory or aesthetics. He meant metaphysics, the branch of philosophy that aspires to the most general understanding of nature of space and time, the fundamental stuff of the world. If philosophers really wanted to make progress, they should abandon their armchairs and their subtle arguments, wise up to maths and listen to the physicists.

This view has significant support among philosophers in the English-speaking world. Bristol philosopher James Ladyman, who argues that metaphysics should be naturalised, and who describes the accusation of "scientism" as "badge of honour", is by no means an isolated case.

But there could not be a worse time for philosophers to surrender the baton of metaphysical inquiry to physicists. Fundamental physics is in a metaphysical mess and needs help. The attempt to reconcile its two big theories, general relativity and quantum mechanics, has stalled for nearly 40 years. Endeavours to unite them, such as string theory, are mathematically ingenious but incomprehensible even to many who work with them. This is well known. A better-kept secret is that at the heart of quantum mechanics is a disturbing paradox the so-called measurement problem, arising ultimately out of the Uncertainty Principle which apparently demonstrates that the very measurements that have established and confirmed quantum theory should be impossible. Oxford philosopher of physics David Wallace has argued that this threatens to make quantum mechanics incoherent which can be remedied only by vastly multiplying worlds.

Beyond these domestic problems there is the failure of physics to accommodate conscious beings. The attempt to fit consciousness into the material world, usually by identifying it with activity in the brain, has failed dismally, if only because there is no way of accounting for the fact that certain nerve impulses are supposed to be conscious (of themselves or of the world) while the overwhelming majority (physically essentially the same) are not. In short, physics does not allow for the strange fact that matter reveals itself to material objects (such as physicists).


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/27/physics-philosophy-quantum-relativity-einstein

3 replies, 1786 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Philosophy isn't dead yet (Original post)
ismnotwasm May 2013 OP
Tuesday Afternoon May 2013 #1
ismnotwasm May 2013 #2
rrneck May 2013 #3

Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2013, 06:14 PM

1. it's magic, Hawking

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #1)

Mon May 27, 2013, 07:15 PM

2. LoL

It's allll magic, when viewed a certain way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)

Mon May 27, 2013, 11:10 PM

3. Philosophy will never die

as long as people ask why.


Giorgio de Chirico
1914
85 x 69 cm
Oil on Canvas

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread