Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumHave the hair-on-fire "OMG He's a Commie!" geniuses explained yet...
....how Bernie Sanders can be both a dictator-loving Communist AND a Koch Bros ally all at the same time?
What's scarier to me than a "communist" is someone who will believe literally ANYthing someone else tells them (even if it's logistically impossible and totally nonsensical) -- and then goes and votes accordingly. THAT'S scary.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)is embracing a person that would tell bald face lies on national television while at the same time expect us to trust them.
dchill
(38,474 posts)David Brock must be off work.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)ie: Social media is where I've seen it.
Edit to add that they were saying that - some of them - even before that.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)What about the role of the political parties? Particularly our OWN.
Roosevelt, Henry Wallace and even Truman used to EDUCATE the voter. ("Gluttons of greed and privilege." anyone?)
And... back to schools: who is it that ultimately determines PS curriculum ? Who tells teachers what they can and cannot teach?
*P O L I T I C I A N S.*
Triana
(22,666 posts)It's jaw-dropping to see what people will believe in these elections. I know they're dirty and full of lies and slander and accusations - but goddamn -- people can research, Google, read, and deduce and question. But .... they don't. They just swallow it whole.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Is same reason our form of government is bad. IT is run by people like Clinton that want power and luxury and screw the rest. On paper communism seems alright but in reality it sucks because some people in power will be corrupt.
Triana
(22,666 posts)... doesn't answer the question in the OP. How can Bernie simultaneously be a dictatorship-loving communist AND a Koch Bros (big capitalist) ally as Hillary and her supporters have claimed?
EmperorHasNoClothes
(4,797 posts)Just like that commie socialist dictator Muslim atheist Kenyan Obama.
Donkees
(31,391 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)The right wingers have attacked him with both of those labels.
eridani
(51,907 posts)If public goods are bad, there should not be such a thing as public education. If you grow up in a house with a library and your parents can afford tutors, then you get an education. Otherwise you don't deserve one. If you want retired people with no kids at home to pay for school bonds, you are just shilling for "free stuff." College tuition used to be free in quite a few states. Those who want it to be so again are just more parasites shilling for "free stuff."
I like my Marxist fire department quite a bit. It is paid for by the government stealing a lot of money from people who have never had fires. The more your property is worth, the more property taxes you have to pay to support it. That would be "from each according to his abilities." But they don't send a truck out unless you have a fire. That would be "to each according to his need."
Every single industrialized country in the world treats health care as a public good, with lots of different ways of paying the bills. Here it's like an iPod. If you have money or good insurance you get it. Otherwise you can fuck off and die, which is nothing but what sick, useless parasites deserve.
And then there's all that physical infrastructure--roads, airports, dams. Be grateful for our interstate highway system. Ike paid for it with a 90% top marginal tax rate, so if we ever had to replace it, we couldn't. And if you don't have a car, why should you pay for highways you can't drive on anyway?
It is the nature of socialist public goods that
1. Everyone pays, regardless of usage.
2. They are usually free at the point of service.
How would private enterprise even exist without massive investment in public infrastructure?
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)You look at some of the things FDR/LBJ put into place and they are some of the most popular aspects of the government. Social Security, FDIC, Medicare. These socialist programs have landslide level support from the public and yet a lot of the public doesn't realize that they are examples of socialism. Pretty sad how ignorant our society is.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)for this. (I can't add link from phone.) In article about how she lost the debate. It's in the Daily 202.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)They're basically trying to poison the pool so that Clinton doesn't look so toxic.
I called one of Team Hill's more prolific posters on it early in the cycle, pointing out that I'm a Socialist, so I should know if someone is in my camp or to my right. They couldn't believe I was such a non-believer in Capitalism, it was like I was some sort of unicorn...which means they don't honestly believe anyone like that actually exists, let alone Bernie being one.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)(One of my pro-Bernie fans on Twitter uses this as her icon. I think she's being ironic. LOL.)
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Clinton's campaign is throwing everything they have at him, even if the attacks don't really line up from an ideological standpoint. So he's a right winger supported by the Kochs and Karl Rove? Wait, no. He's a communist who supports dictators in Cuba and elsewhere. Massive disconnect in logic between these two attacks.