=*= NYTimes ARIZONA Primary Results/Link - 99% in - Bernie now has 30 delegates 39.9% =*=

[Donkees]

Last edited Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:20 PM - Edit history (14)

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/arizona

[Donkees]

1. kick

[dana_b]

2. this one scares me

it seems like more crap is going on. Purged voter rolls, voting on ballots - I forget the name - preliminary? Something like that. Anyway, it's for when they can't find your name on the roll. Some places have run out of ballots... seems really suspicious and on top of being a closed primary, I don't think this bodes well for Bernie.

[Donkees]

3. Provisional ballots, this election seems a messy process. Stay positive...

[PatrynXX]

20. would figure they called it for Hillary

only 4 % reporting though smh hate it when the media does that I smell lawsuits

[dana_b]

26. must be the exit polls

damn closed primaries

[PatrynXX]

41. if they can figure out the exit polls

they can't even figure out what the voter is signed up for.. smh No wonder John McCain keeps winning there. Nobody knows who's a republican democrat or independent.

[FourScore]

48. CNN said there were no exit polls. n/t

[Old Crow]

47. How the HECK do you call an election with 4% of the vote tallied?

And people still in line to vote?

Talk about exit polls all you want, but 4%?! This smells to high heaven.

[dana_b]

4. 61-36%, with 41% reporting, Hillary winning

from CNN

[LongTomH]

5. It's less than 1% 1 0f 1,322 precincts

[New Earth]

6. TYT keeps saying 41% too.

But NYT site says it's only at 1%. Confusing.

[DebDoo]

40. The important 1% have spoken, the rest don't matter

[Loudestlib]

7. Yeah he can't come back from that.

[jillan]

9. No -41% of 1 precinct

[bernbabe]

10. Can't be

it is showing 200,000 votes in.

[jillan]

11. Yep - here ya go

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/arizona

[New Earth]

12. why in the world does TYT keep saying it's 40-50% in?

[jillan]

13. Stupid - CNN is saying the same thing. Here is the link.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/arizona

[New Earth]

15. ugh

I hope you're right. I love TYT but they're killing me right now with this confusing info.

[bernbabe]

19. Over 200,000 votes in can't be only 4%

[jillan]

14. Bernie TV was saying the same thing and they finally figured it out.

[LiberalArkie]

31. 1 of 1322 precincts reporting (<1%) Huffpost

Delegates Votes %
Clinton
40 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 194,453 60.5%
Sanders
16 •••••••••••••••• 118,842 37.0%

[dana_b]

39. but they've called it!!

fuckers

[Donkees]

43. Now it's back to 2%

[jillan]

8. Don't freak - there are people still in line!! People haven't voted yet.

[dana_b]

16. not freaking but this is going to make things a lot more crucial

like Washington state.

[New Earth]

18. AP just called it for Hillary

I'm so confused

[LongTomH]

21. Dammit! NYT hasn't updated since their 4% reporting numbers!

[Donkees]

22. Reload and it went back to 1% (?)

[LongTomH]

23. Something is seriously fucked!!!!

[dana_b]

38. yep -

hmmm... I wonder why??

[New Earth]

24. apparently NYT is not updating as fast as the others

http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/az/

CNN seems to be more up to date.

[jillan]

25. This makes me mad because people in Az are still waiting in line to vote....now they will go home.

That's not right.

[dchill]

28. It's shameful.

Less than 10 min after showing a line all the way around the block in Phoenix waiting to vote, they are calling it for Hillary. This is a known cause of vote suppression.

SHAME.

[jillan]

30. This is! It could mean Bernie will lose delegates tonite.

[dchill]

33. I believe that's the idea...

Don't you?

[Lorien]

27. According to NYT, Only 15 of 1,322 precincts have reported in

many have hundreds of people still in line WAITING TO VOTE. Calling anything at this point is either irresponsible journalism, or attempted election theft.

[DeadLetterOffice]

32. Time is running backward...

Five minutes later and we're back to 1 precinct (0%) reporting... but they're leaving it called for Hillary and haven't changed the vote counts. WTF?

[dana_b]

37. something wrong is going on

I think you know what I mean

[Donkees]

44. It went back up to 2%

[New Earth]

34. That's why I've been so confused

Either someone somewhere is bullshittting us or NYT is very far behind. CNN site has it at 71%.

http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/az/

[bkkyosemite]

36. That's ridiculous.

[desmiller]

29. The more likely she becomes nominee,

The more i lick my chops. A strong sense of vengeance is boiling in me, and getting stronger as Bernie loses delegates.

[jillan]

35. Agreed! Completely.

[Califonz]

52. Every vote for Hillary in the primary is like a vote for Trump in the general

Or so it would seem from the November matchup polling.

But Hillbots just LA-LA-LA-I-CAN'T-HEAR-YOU and drive the Democratic Party off the cliff.

[New Earth]

45. TYT is 'uncalling' Arizona

They finally heard about all the people still waiting in line and acknowledged the websites that are only reporting 2+%. I think more out of respect for people still voting, but still...

[Donkees]

46. It's at 9% now...

[bernbabe]

49. I don't see how CNN can be at 71%, even looking at their own page

[Donkees]

50. NYTimes is @ 21% now

[hrmjustin]

51. 71% of the expected votes not precincts.

[bernbabe]

53. Well

the votes keep increasing but the 71% hasn't changed for a long time...

[hrmjustin]

54. Because the election day voye is coming in slow.

most of that 29% is election day numbers.

[Donkees]

55. 43% now

[dana_b]

56. I tweeted the phone numbers that were listed for the SOS

and for the Dems in Az, and well over 100 people retweeted me. They are going to get an earful from these folks - thankfully!!

[in_cog_ni_to]

57. Thank you! And they should get an earful.

This is unconscionable!

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

[Donkees]

58. 22 delegates for Bernie now

[Donkees]

59. kick for update