Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumAnd the Washington Post throws another racist stink bomb out there
Be forewarned, this is a doozy
Why did Bernie Sanders dominate Saturday? Caucuses in states with smaller black populations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/27/why-did-bernie-sanders-dominate-saturday-caucuses-in-whiter-states/
I'm sure the swarm will be all over it.
Autumn
(45,041 posts)dogman
(6,073 posts)Are they different than others? Is there a proscribed voting method that they are not adhering to? This guy is an ass.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Let them debate it among themselves.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)White: 25%
POC: 50%
Multiracial: 25%
(numbers rounded off)
If Clinton had won those states, would that have neutralized the argument? In short, a white person voting for Clinton doesn't hint of racism, but voting for Sanders does? The last time I looked both were white.
Is it just, maybe, possible that people voted for Sanders because they think he's the better choice? Nah, gotta be racism
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)No matter who is doing it, race baiting is disgusting.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Impedimentus
(898 posts)It was once a great and respected newspaper; now it's a billionaire's play toy.
FEEL THE BERN - 2016
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Billionaire Jeff Bezos must be getting worried that he'll have to pay his tax bill if Bernie wins
http://www.taxjusticeblog.org/archive/2013/08/washington_post_owner_jeff_bez.php
Merryland
(1,134 posts)but Philip Bump, who wrote this story, also did a hack job on Bernie a couple of weeks ago. They'll be attacking Bernie right on through his inauguration.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)They seem to have turned into just another click-bait source.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)who's the next clickbait empire that'll go down for their wayward ways?
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)A person is a person, a vote is a vote. No more political analysis in regards to race and gender.
People have mixed ethnicity anyway. People have mixed gender. It is a ridiculous and outdated view to analyze voters by groups.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)I'm sick of being defined by labels. Yes, they're part of me, but the parts do not add up to the whole.
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)"To be persuasive, we must be believable; to be believable, we must be credible; to be credible, we must be truthful."
-Edward R. Murrow
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)Is the paragon of diversity, and all people who vote for her are champions of diversity.
Voting for the Jewish guy with a strange accent on the other hand is double plus mega racist.
paulthompson
(2,398 posts)I just posted this in a Primaries forum thread about this Post article, but I'll post it here too. Note how the Post article doesn't mention California at all, because it doesn't fit the spin.
It's true that Sanders has done especially poorly with Black voters. However, only 6.7% of California's population is Black.
I think it's all going to come down to California. Anything is possible if Sanders has a big win there.
It's true that Sanders has done less well with Latino voters, and California has a lot of Latino voters. But there are states where he's gotten about 50% of the Latino vote, like Nevada and Illinois. In the latest California poll, he's losing the Latino vote by about 55% to 35%, which already is not that bad. He also has been doing very well with Asian American voters (as Hawaii showed last night), and there are a lot of those in California.
If he can improve his numbers with Latinos and win White and Asian Americans by big amounts, he could easily have a landslide win in California without improving his numbers with the relatively small percentage of Black voters in that state at all.
Surprisingly, Sanders isn't doing that well with White voters in California, only winning them by about 5% in the latest poll. Judging by other states, those numbers are likely to shift massively in his favor. He's won 90% of the White vote in some states.