Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:48 AM
10 replies, 1763 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
 10 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 100% In from wisconsin-Bernie 56.6 Clinton 43.1 (Original post) |
Robbins | Apr 2016 | OP |
| ChairmanAgnostic | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
| LaurenG | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
| Robbins | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
| yourpaljoey | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
| jeff47 | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
| LaurenG | Apr 2016 | #8 | |
| bkkyosemite | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
| Land of Enchantment | Apr 2016 | #9 | |
| Else You Are Mad | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
| Dragonfli | Apr 2016 | #10 |
Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #1)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:55 AM
5. they sure like to create their own reality
Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #1)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:58 AM
6. Now I get it: the more Bernie wins... the more he loses!
Response to ChairmanAgnostic (Reply #1)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:03 PM
7. Well, Sanders did not win 147% of the vote, so clearly it is a massive loss.
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:53 AM
3. Yes this keeps happening..who can explain this.
Response to bkkyosemite (Reply #3)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:26 PM
9. All I can reason is she won the 4th congressional district (Milwaukee)
|
and so she gets delegates based on population? It seems odd to me too and I usually look at Wiki maps like this one....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016  |
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:53 AM
4. From what I am told ..
|
This really was a win for Hillary & not Sanders.
|
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:05 PM
10. are you sure they are not counting Superman delegates with super powers? /nt
