Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumWhen establishment types complain about us having purity tests...
You're goddamn right we have purity tests. We want politicians who work for US, not the lobbyists or the political elites. Anyone who criticizes others for purity tests of politicians have no backbone and no standards for how our political system should function.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Clinton could do literally anything and her loyal fans would figure out how to rationalize it.
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)goes over the edge and creates perception problems that disintegrates public support. Frankly, I think this is the reason why neo-liberals think they have to compromise so much.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)And sadly that's enough for some.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)There's always a social justice carrot used to curry public support for something that results in the same failures.
i.e.: They claim that they deregulated the mortgage process so that the poor could get loans, which was disingenuous because they were also stripping the U.S.A. of good paying jobs with their trade bills. And to reward their cronies they approve public infra-structure, ensuring that tax dollars go to their cronies, or Republicans they need to appease.
What a mess.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)that we actually experience that outmoded feeling of compassion, believe in taking an ethical approach (ethical - how out of date is that!) in our views and actions, and don't believe that the ends justify the means. All us dumbos who reject "pragmatist" politics ("pay to play" . Because we're not Machiavellian cynics, we must think we're better than everyone else - yeah, that must be it! Elitist dumbos! That whole "you're so holier than thou" line of criticism is ridiculously transparent. Any psychoanalyst would agree that it says so much more about the accuser than the accused.
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)they say that you must be privileged enough to have these views. I am a minority millennial who's been disadvantaged from the start, but yeah I must have a special privilege I guess.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Repubs are good at that. They all say they make 100k+ and are afraid of losing it. They have the privilege and something to lose, so they back a corrupt system. They then blame us for it.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I've had to learn ever skill imaginable just to survive. I now live on $703 a month SS.
You can bet your bottom dollar, that each and ever one who spits out that line, is far more interested in protecting their own special privilege.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and presumably it'll trickle down
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)It will only zoom its way to an offshore account or into a phoney charitable foundation.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)But purity tests on party and procedure?
hedda_foil
(16,371 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)It's questions asked in a job interview. We have the obligation to reference a candidate complete resume.
Personally speaking, I'm not looking for a noble to lead me, but a person of noble character to serve the people.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I see nothing resembling noble character in Hillary Clinton.
However, Bernie Sanders fits the bill for me.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)the one who is demanding blind loyalty accusing the other of a purity test. Neo con specialty, the mind job. They are especially adept at pissing off the left to derail focus.
Response to RepubliCON-Watch (Original post)
felix_numinous This message was self-deleted by its author.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Not lawyers turned politicians to suckle at the teat of the gravy train corporate swine.