Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. I assume those apply in a general way to all groups
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jul 2016

What I was really interested was whether the BERNIE SANDERS GROUP was going to go forward focusing on Sanders Movement.

The reason I'm wondering is that from the primary season it's fairly clear that the movement was a target of ridicule and hostility. Having the discussion within a protected group would shelter discussions from recreational trolling and other intentional disruption.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
3. My guess is once Bernie formally leaves the Dem party Skinner will close it down
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jul 2016

Probably within minutes, if not seconds.

Bernie will no longer be a Dem and it will be an easy reason to shut this down

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. I hadn't seen that, but reading it, it appears to have a mixed message.
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 07:31 PM
Jul 2016

Why would he speak of what 'we' (first person plural) need many changes in the DNC, if he doesn't consider himself inside the party? Yet, it's true he positioned his stated 'independence' inside the democratic caucus.

I've always seen "the movement" as something that was based in the democratic party for practical reasons just as his candidacy was.

It's also important to his attempt to get followers to run for office. They need a party structure, just like Bernie did, to facilitate them moving through the mechanics of that process.

I'll just have to be patient and see how this plays out.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
8. I think there may be some complicated nuance in this.
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 07:37 PM
Jul 2016

I'll need to hear more from Sanders.

Personally I think pissing on Dems would be detrimental to candidates under the banner of the movement. It would force the movement up against the same barriers that have held back the development of the greens in the US.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
12. I don't think so. I think he would have stayed Dem if nominated or elected as a Dem, but he did not
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 05:34 AM
Jul 2016

get the nom. The leaves him reverting to the Senate, where he was elected as an Indie. He is not breaking trust with the people of Vermont who voted for him, any more than he broke trust after saying he would not run as a third party spoiler.

Donkees

(31,376 posts)
9. This info was covered weeks ago in video interviews posted in this forum. Here is an ...
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 07:41 PM
Jul 2016

"ask the administrators" link concerning the question:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/125911256

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
10. I hadn't read that Sanders was disaffiliating the party I'm so sorry to have wasted bandwith
Thu Jul 28, 2016, 08:45 PM
Jul 2016

of your forum with a question about whether 'Our Revolution' was going to be discussed here.

I guess it won't be by me.


Again thanks and a thousand pardons for wasting your bandwidth

Donkees

(31,376 posts)
13. "Vermont has nonpartisan registration. There is no option to affiliate with a political party...
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 08:57 AM
Jul 2016

on the voter registration form." Vermont has open primaries. Someone from Vermont could explain the affiliation situation better.

In essence Bernie filed FEC forms in order to run as a Democrat for president. He did say he would finish his term as the independent Vermont voters selected. Currently he is still working with the Democratic Party championing the progressive agenda.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. What will be allowed is not determined by consensus of this group.
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 05:29 AM
Jul 2016

AFAIK, juries no longer know if a post is in a group or not, so "protected" groups are now no longer protected groups, just groups. You will be juried by the same standards that apply in the main forums.

The limits of what will be allowed, as always, depends on alerts, juries and, forbanning of a long-time poster or review of a flagged account, on an admin. IOW, it's anybody's guess and you take your chances.

The new TOS did say something specific about discussing Bernie in terms of what he was seeking from the Party.

I am sure we can praise Bernie, because he is supporting Hillary. I would steer clear of all criticism of Hillary.

If you have specific questions, Skinner is the one to ask.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Q: In its continuance, wi...