Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumSanders vs. Clinton: Who Has the Best Plan for College Students?
http://www.nationofchange.org/2015/10/02/sanders-vs-clinton-who-has-the-best-plan-for-college-students/The Sanders plan provides tuition-free public higher education to every qualified student. The Clinton plan does not.
The Sanders plan treats higher education the same way we have treated other forms of education in the past: Every young person who studies hard and succeeds in school should be able to get the education they need. By contrast, the Clinton plan charges tuition to middle-class students, using an as-yet unspecified formula based on a familys income.
The Clinton approach is unnecessarily complicated.
The Clinton plan is unnecessarily complicated and difficult to administer. It leaves a number of key questions open to manipulation by future politicians, such as: What are the thresholds for paying part of the tuition? Whats a reasonable percent of family income to pay into the program?
Compare that to the simplicity and safety of a program like Social Security, which is run at very low administrative cost. If you qualify for its benefits, you receive them. We dont means test Social Security and we shouldnt. We shouldnt do it for a public higher education, either.
The Clinton plan holds political risk.
The principles behind the Clinton plan seem closer to some of the Republican candidates ideas than they do to those of great Democratic presidents like Franklin D. Roosevelt. Candidate Chris Christie, for example, wants to cut Social Security benefits for Americans earning more than $80,000.
Another conservative group, the Concord Coalition, proposed that Social Security benefits be cut for any family whose annual income exceeds $40,000 per year and that includes both Social Security benefits and the cash value of their Medicare protection!
Thats the problem with ideas like these. Once the door is open, theres always the possibility that politicians will use them to shift costs to the middle class.
The Clinton plan also requires middle-class students to work as well as study, something their wealthier peers wont be required to do.
The Clinton plan also forces students who receive financial aid to work 10 hours a week, in addition to keeping up with their coursework.
College is a time for study and achievement. It can also be competitive. Students who are forced to comply with Clintons 10-hour-per week work requirement which is one-fourth of a full-time job will carry a heavy burden of time and effort. Wealthy students wont share that burden because their parents are paying full tuition.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 442 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders vs. Clinton: Who Has the Best Plan for College Students? (Original Post)
eridani
Oct 2015
OP
+1 Support for lifelong learning and an educated populace is dangerous for the establishment. nt
Live and Learn
Oct 2015
#4
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)1. Bernie
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)2. Kicked and recommended!
The objective is a highly educated workforce. Bernie's plan meets this objective.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)4. +1 Support for lifelong learning and an educated populace is dangerous for the establishment. nt
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)3. And where are all these jobs?
I know plenty of college students that would love to find a job that will work with their schedule. Is Clinton going to manufacture these jobs?
No requirements should be required for wanting to learn.