Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leftcoastmountains

(2,968 posts)
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:55 PM Oct 2015

EXCLUSIVE: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillary

because 'the women in charge' want it that way

-snip-
The Democratic National Committee is 'clearing a path' for Hillary Clinton to be its presidential nominee because its upper power echelons are populated with women, according to a female committee member who was in Las Vegas for Tuesday's primary debate.

Speaking on the condition that she isn't identified, she told Daily Mail Online that the party is in the tank for Clinton, and the women who run the organization decided it 'early on.'

The committeewoman is supporting one of Hillary's rivals for the Democratic nomination, and said she spoke freely because she believes the former Secretary of State is benefiting from unfair favoritism inside the party.

Clinton aims to be the first female to occupy the Oval Office, and 'the party's female leaders really want to make a woman the next president,' the committeewoman said, rattling off a list of the women who she said are the 'real power' in the organization.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3273404/Democratic-National-Committeewoman-says-party-clearing-path-Hillary-women-charge-want-way.html

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EXCLUSIVE: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillary (Original Post) leftcoastmountains Oct 2015 OP
Shocked, I'm shocked I tell you! Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #1
Great find! leftcoastmountains Oct 2015 #7
I am an older woman and I have to tell you I could kick everyone roguevalley Oct 2015 #16
That was one of the greatest reasons why I began to question a broadbrush support for Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #17
We'll see where this goes JackInGreen Oct 2015 #2
If you can't Faux pas Oct 2015 #3
More and more - sorry, but they can do that without my vote. djean111 Oct 2015 #4
Beyond shameful...but not surprising either. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2015 #8
It's disgusting. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #13
The party's female leaders have tunnel vision. hedda_foil Oct 2015 #5
Not all of them are blindly backing Hillary jfern Oct 2015 #21
True. hedda_foil Oct 2015 #22
Well, duh. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #6
Duh. That's been obvious since 2012, but confirmation always helps. Go, Bernie! merrily Oct 2015 #9
If they cared about us they would have convinced Warren to run dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #10
On one hand, it wouldn't surprise me. winter is coming Oct 2015 #11
The Daily Mail is not a reliable source nxylas Oct 2015 #12
Neither is the National Enquirer, but they broke the Edwards' scandal. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #25
And when it does, other sources will pick it up nxylas Oct 2015 #29
AS I recall, it took the 'other sources' a couple of weeks to pick up on Edwards. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #31
And with good reason nxylas Oct 2015 #33
they're ready for Maggy olddots Oct 2015 #14
This election should be considered a referendum on the direction of the party. pa28 Oct 2015 #15
They just sealed their fate. I REFUSE to vote for unethical, cheating, sleazy, rotten politicians. in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #18
It is unfortunate that so few Democrats have courage of conviction and are unwilling to withhold YabaDabaNoDinoNo Oct 2015 #24
They're fine with that too. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #27
It's all well and good to SAY that "they deserve what they get", but woodsprite Oct 2015 #30
I'd say they'll make out just fine under Hillary or Jeb. Or even Donald, really. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #32
Another thought...stealing the election for Hillary VOIDS BERNIE'S PROMISE NOT TO RUN AS AN in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #19
I don't think he'd do it. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #28
Not at all surprising, but maybe this will help more people realize what's going on jfern Oct 2015 #20
I want the best candidate that will support women and Hillary just isn't it. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #23
This is a true..... Blus4u Oct 2015 #26
Hideous. These people aren't democratic; they're oligarchic. senz Oct 2015 #34
DWS Needs to Go Bernin4U Oct 2015 #35

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
16. I am an older woman and I have to tell you I could kick everyone
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:07 PM
Oct 2015

of these women in the balls. There is nothing different in their fucking attitude than men doing the SAME THING! FUCK THEM FOR THEIR UNDEMOCRATIC BULLSHIT!

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
17. That was one of the greatest reasons why I began to question a broadbrush support for
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:21 PM
Oct 2015

the feminine movement. Especially when I came across a group of local good ole gals who were just as bad, if not worse than the good ole boys. Because of those experiences, I support specific feminine causes, and selectively applaud feminine leadership. Absolutely not interested in women who play the same dirty pool games.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
13. It's disgusting.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:25 PM
Oct 2015

This is the same shit DWS has been pulling in Florida, where the State Party is a dysfunctional mess. In my Congressional District in 2014, a registered Dem candidate was forced to withdraw to clear the path for DWS's latest 'pet', who filed last minute. The candidate forced to withdraw cited concern for the safety of his family, due to the threats he received. DWS's candidate, recently switched from R to D (natch), shortly after filing deadline withdrew when it was found out he'd blatently lied on his resume. So there was no Democratic candidate on the ballot in a winnable district.

hedda_foil

(16,372 posts)
5. The party's female leaders have tunnel vision.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:04 PM
Oct 2015

The fact that they're hot for Hillary to be president is blatantly obvious.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
21. Not all of them are blindly backing Hillary
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 09:45 PM
Oct 2015

The commiteewoman in the article doesn't and neither does DNC vice chair Tulsi Gabbard.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
6. Well, duh.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:09 PM
Oct 2015

It's been pretty obvious DWS and minions have been trying to rig the nomination. Us prole voters don't matter, it's what THEY want. I don't think a first woman president carries any status when democracy has to be suspended to achieve it. And it's a slap in the face to the first woman president who does achieve it on merit. Obama achieved a first on merit, without rigging the process in his favor. Hillary should have done the same.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
10. If they cared about us they would have convinced Warren to run
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:15 PM
Oct 2015

A bunch of corporatists using identity politics to sell their New Dem wares to the people. Obama, black pesident. Hillary, woman president. Castro is lined up next, latino president.

Some fall for it and call it progress, I call it the same old bull with a new face.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
11. On one hand, it wouldn't surprise me.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:15 PM
Oct 2015

On the other hand, it's the Daily Mail.

On the third hand (I'm an alien), I keep thinking of Princess Leia saying, "The more you tighten your grasp, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

"Clearing a path" for Hillary is likely to backfire.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
12. The Daily Mail is not a reliable source
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:19 PM
Oct 2015

I don't doubt that the party establishment is in the tank for Clinton, but I'd like to hear it from a source other than the only British newspaper that was allowed to be sold in Mussolini's Italy. And the whole "run by women" thing has a distinct whiff of MRA about it.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
25. Neither is the National Enquirer, but they broke the Edwards' scandal.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 07:59 AM
Oct 2015

Sometimes the truth pops up in the strangest places.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
29. And when it does, other sources will pick it up
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 09:37 AM
Oct 2015

I see no reason to believe anything that either the Daily Heil or the National Enquirer says unless it's corroborated elsewhere just because the latter once managed to sandwich a genuine news story in between "Elvis found on Moon" and "Bible prophecy proves that world will end next Thursday, around lunchtime".

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
31. AS I recall, it took the 'other sources' a couple of weeks to pick up on Edwards.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 01:05 PM
Oct 2015

For about that long, people were still 'pooh pooh'ing it.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
33. And with good reason
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 02:02 PM
Oct 2015

Again, getting one story right doesn't suddenly turn the National Enquirer into a reliable source.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
15. This election should be considered a referendum on the direction of the party.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:47 PM
Oct 2015

Hillary is the perfect figurehead for a corporate funded party and it's not surprising the top dogs would want to maintain the status quo and (more importantly) their future seven figure private sector jobs in play.

Bernie should start talking about this issue in his stump speech and start framing this primary as a referendum on the future of the Democratic party.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
18. They just sealed their fate. I REFUSE to vote for unethical, cheating, sleazy, rotten politicians.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 09:17 PM
Oct 2015

I'm done. If Bernie has the election stolen by CORRUPT DWS and her CORRUPT committee, she can have Jeb Bush in the WH. They deserve what they get.

Most of the 83 Million Millennials will never for for a corrupt, rotten, thieving politician either. Democrats are not going to win without millennials and Bernie supporters. That's just a fact. They have a choice to have a fair election or steal it. They choose to play dirty? So will I and everyone I know that supports Bernie.

Yeah, 8 years of Jeb will be fun, won't it?

 

YabaDabaNoDinoNo

(460 posts)
24. It is unfortunate that so few Democrats have courage of conviction and are unwilling to withhold
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 04:31 AM
Oct 2015

their vote for the DWS back candidates if we did we would have a better quality of Democrat these days.

But why Jeb why not the Donald, he would be more fun as POTUS and everyday President Trump would be good for saying or doing something stupid.

Personally I don't care who is POTUS if Bernie does not win because it won't matter the end result will be identical.


Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
27. They're fine with that too.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 08:18 AM
Oct 2015

If they can't get Hillary, the Republican is the next best choice with them.

Having Hillary or a Republican in the White House maintains the status quo. Bernie gets in, he tilts over the apple cart, and gives them a big headache, at least while he's in office. But 4 years probably amounts to a few trillions of dollars of 'damage' to the oligarchs.

woodsprite

(11,911 posts)
30. It's all well and good to SAY that "they deserve what they get", but
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 09:47 AM
Oct 2015

WE'RE the ones that have to live with it, and I'm not willing to let that happen if I can help it. The politicians could care less, matter of fact, they'd probably make out better financially if Jeb or Trump won because most ARE part of the top percent.

I feel that if we just let that happen, than we're being totally irresponsible, and truthfully just as narrow-minded and useless as we feel Cruz, Carson, Trump, Jeb, etc. are.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
32. I'd say they'll make out just fine under Hillary or Jeb. Or even Donald, really.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 01:07 PM
Oct 2015

We've seen this show before. The rich get richer under any corporate candidate, no matter which side of the aisle.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
19. Another thought...stealing the election for Hillary VOIDS BERNIE'S PROMISE NOT TO RUN AS AN
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 09:23 PM
Oct 2015

INDEPENDENT.

See how much DWS and her Corrupt little committee likes THAT!

jfern

(5,204 posts)
20. Not at all surprising, but maybe this will help more people realize what's going on
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 09:43 PM
Oct 2015

It's clear that Bernie must fight the DNC and the media as well as the Hillary campaign.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
23. I want the best candidate that will support women and Hillary just isn't it.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 03:10 AM
Oct 2015

I don't want my kids sent to die in a war so a candidate can prove she is tough.

I want someone that will support my kids right to marry whomever they want, get a good job at decent wages, not be imprisoned for youthful indiscretions, retire at an age and with a pension that will allow them some time to enjoy retirement and most of all to survive in an environmentally friendly atmosphere.

I want Bernie!

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
34. Hideous. These people aren't democratic; they're oligarchic.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 03:03 PM
Oct 2015

They do not respect the right of their fellow Americans to freely choose the person we want to lead our country. They want to force their choice onto the rest of us -- as if we don't count.

This is so ugly, so disrespectful of the people of this country and the value and significance of the system of governance (democracy!) that our founders intended.

They are profoundly arrogant and crooked.

Please, fellow Democrats, rise up against this corrupt little group!

(I am so glad to see this news item here. The Front Page thread was locked! I have to leave now but want to thank leftcoastmountains for putting it here.)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»EXCLUSIVE: Democratic Nat...