Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 04:17 PM Dec 2019

Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang teeter on debate bubble

Politico

Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang could get more airtime than ever to introduce themselves to America with just one more poll — or they could spend the December debate sitting at home.

Right now, six candidates — four white men and two white women — are set to take the stage for the Democratic primary debate co-hosted by POLITICO and PBS NewsHour on Dec. 19: Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders, Tom Steyer and Elizabeth Warren. Gabbard and Yang are not among them, with only one week left before qualification closes.

For both Gabbard and Yang, being excluded from the debate stage could starve their long-shot campaigns of the oxygen that comes with the nationally televised platform — which has helped sustain their small-dollar fundraising and marginal poll numbers — as the rest of the field continues to winnow.

But if one or both qualify, they are likely to get greater shares of the speaking time than ever before. No debate thus far has included fewer than 10 candidates — and even if both Gabbard and Yang qualify, this one would include just 8 participants.


It's because they're minorities!!! What possible reason could people have to not support them otherwise?
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang teeter on debate bubble (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2019 OP
Time to snowybirdie Dec 2019 #1
Fingers crossed... 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2019 #2
You want Gabbard in the debate? Renew Deal Dec 2019 #5
Did I say what they were crossed for? 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2019 #7
lol, good point Renew Deal Dec 2019 #10
;) 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2019 #12
No, but I knew.. Cha Dec 2019 #8
LOL 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2019 #11
their campaigns are starved because they cannot attract interest nt msongs Dec 2019 #3
I REALLY don't want to watch Gabbard pushing RW and Trumpist talking points. hlthe2b Dec 2019 #4
I'm hoping they miss out. W_HAMILTON Dec 2019 #6
this-"It's because they're minorities!!!". Wow irisblue Dec 2019 #9
I took it customerserviceguy Dec 2019 #14
Inane Horizens Dec 2019 #13
Sarcasm, please! n/t customerserviceguy Dec 2019 #15
Of course you had to add the sarcasm. redqueen Dec 2019 #16
 

snowybirdie

(5,223 posts)
1. Time to
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 04:22 PM
Dec 2019

stop the amateurs in the race. The dilettantes in the race need to step back. It's getting serious.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
5. You want Gabbard in the debate?
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 05:17 PM
Dec 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

50 Shades Of Blue

(9,975 posts)
7. Did I say what they were crossed for?
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 06:06 PM
Dec 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

50 Shades Of Blue

(9,975 posts)
11. LOL
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 06:15 PM
Dec 2019

If there were a hole in the bottom of my bottom most candidate tier, you would still need a powerful telescope to make out either of those two.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

msongs

(67,394 posts)
3. their campaigns are starved because they cannot attract interest nt
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 05:09 PM
Dec 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
4. I REALLY don't want to watch Gabbard pushing RW and Trumpist talking points.
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 05:14 PM
Dec 2019

If Yang makes it, fine by me. Gabbard just needs to go the hell away. I'm sure her favorite network will snap her up to attack the Dems each night.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

W_HAMILTON

(7,862 posts)
6. I'm hoping they miss out.
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 05:19 PM
Dec 2019

But I'm guessing there will be at least one crappy poll from New Hampshire where the MOE is like 8% and they both just barely meet the threshold and squeak in.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

irisblue

(32,967 posts)
9. this-"It's because they're minorities!!!". Wow
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 06:13 PM
Dec 2019

I am surprised by your statement here brooklynite.
Just wow

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
14. I took it
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:46 PM
Dec 2019

as being sarcastic.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Horizens

(637 posts)
13. Inane
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 07:48 PM
Dec 2019

"It's because they're minorities!!!"

That's, perhaps, the most inane, absurd, baseless comment I've ever read here on DU.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
16. Of course you had to add the sarcasm.
Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:48 PM
Dec 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yan...