
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:17 PM
at140 (5,808 posts)
My dream candidate exists - and her name is Elizabeth Warren
If I was going to invent a dream candidate, she would be grounded in small-town, rural or heartland America but able to hold her own in the citadels of power on the coasts. She would comfort the afflicted with the same passion with which she afflicts the comfortable, and she would understand the causes of those afflictions and have good ideas about how to remedy them. She would be moved by compassion but wouldn’t ask us to rely on compassion; she would have tangible strategies for widening our distribution of income, healthcare, education and opportunity, and she would be smart about the intersections of race, gender, class and the rest.
Warren doesn't just frighten billionaires – she scares the whole establishment Robert Reich Read more She would have been around long enough to remember that since the 1980s the government has dismantled a lot of systems that made us more safe and more equal, and she’d be fresh enough to imagine new ways out of the consequences of that catastrophic dismantling. Also she would have to be funny and have big plans to address climate change. OK, she already exists, and I’m talking about Elizabeth Warren. She is, to me, a better candidate for president than I ever expected we’d have. My dream candidate would’ve been a woman of color with all these qualities, and my dreamiest dream candidate would be a woman of color with Medusa hair who could turn the entire Republican Senate to stone with a glance, but Warren is who’s left in the race, and she is magnificent, and superheroes from Megan Rapinoe to Roxane Gay agree. Also, she pretty much turned Wells Fargo’s CEO into stone in a 2016 Senate banking committee hearing, more than a decade after she became one of the most outspoken experts telling Wall Street why it’s vicious and half a decade after she endorsed Occupy Wall Street. The strength of her candidacy is shown by how she’s made it to the front of the race despite misogyny from across the political spectrum, the wrath of the billionaires pouring money – and themselves – into the race, and the smears and distortions of the mainstream media. Really I see her as a combination of three superpowers: wonkiness, radicalness and what for lack of a better term I would call Big Structural Mom Energy. The wonkiness is how she set new standards in primary campaigns with those famous plans – far more detailed, with the costs accounted for, than was usual before she arrived. The depth with which she understands the economic system – taxes, banks, bankruptcies, credit cards, home and student loans, redlining – is the depth with which she can change it. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/31/2020-dream-candidate-elizabeth-warren-democrats
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
18 replies, 1215 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
at140 | Jan 2020 | OP |
question everything | Jan 2020 | #1 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #2 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #4 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #5 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #7 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #12 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #14 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #16 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #17 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #18 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #6 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #8 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #9 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #10 | |
Demsrule86 | Jan 2020 | #11 | |
Skya Rhen | Jan 2020 | #13 | |
at140 | Jan 2020 | #15 | |
FM123 | Jan 2020 | #3 |
Response to at140 (Original post)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:40 PM
question everything (43,735 posts)
1. It is sad that the former Sanders' supporters shifted to her: same ideas but a Demcorat
and now, it is reported, many shifted back to Sanders.
Why do people think that someone who has never been a Democrat - except to exploit the Vt. Senate race - has actively campaigned against Democrats including wishing for a primary challenge to Obama in 2012, should be the nominee I will never understand. And I fear the consequences. ![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to at140 (Original post)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:41 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
2. This has been posted over and over...and in 1980 Warren was a Republican...so I don't get much of
this. She is not my dream candiate...she is OK but I won't support her in a primary only a general...and none of her super powers may included electability...she has very little AA support...an important Democratic constituency.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #2)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:23 PM
at140 (5,808 posts)
4. Elizabeth has charisma and personality and energy
but more than that I really like her agenda which is to take on big banks and Wall Street who are running our lives and control the politicians.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Reply #4)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:35 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
5. I have serious reservations about what taking on all of this might do to our economy...particularly
banks. I believe in regulation but not everything she wants to do...I think it could hurt the economy.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #5)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:41 PM
at140 (5,808 posts)
7. Banks do not create wealth, they use wealth
only true wealth creators are mining, farming, manufacturing and to a small extent applied research.
All other parts of economy can not exist if there is lack of wealth creation. For example when I was growing up in pre-independence India, it was a poor country because the British rulers had moved majority of manufacturing to Britain. So we had doctor's but not enough patients who could afford to pay their bills. ![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Reply #7)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 11:30 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
12. Banks give loans and mortgages...one of which I recently got...banks are important ...it is this
sort of thing...which I consider kind of out there that gives me pause with Warren. We agree about manufacturing but Warren 's plan isn't good. Her idea is to improve working conditions overseas that she thinks will help here...it won't.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #12)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 10:26 AM
at140 (5,808 posts)
14. The problem is NOT all banks, just the behemoth large ones...
The neighborhood and local banks do excellent service to people. The very large banks created those MBS bonds (mortgage backed securities) which was the catalyst for the real-estate crash and recession. Those large banks take unwise risks and if they fail, they are bailed out with the excuse they are too large to fail.
What Warren wants to do is place stringent restrictions on those large banks, so they operate with prudence instead of risky ventures to make bigger profits. Warren is exactly right and knows more on this issue and has more determination to get something done, than all other candidates combined. ![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Reply #14)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:59 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
16. And f'ing with them...could very well bring the economy down.
I don't know...the idea of breaking up this or that...not on board...regulation yes.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #16)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:38 PM
at140 (5,808 posts)
17. Economy has never come down because of a company breakup
One of the largest companies in United States was broken up by the government into several smaller companies. The company was AT&T. After breakup, the separate units became more competitive and things became more efficient.
Same thing happens if a company goes bankrupt. The infra structure gets bought by others, employees get hired by the takeover outfit, and things run more efficiently. What does bring the economy down is allowing giant companies to do risky schemes and if the scheme fails you have a giant problem. That is exactly what the large banks did causing housing meltdown. ![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Reply #17)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:45 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
18. I remember 2008...very well. I am against much of what Sanders and Warren say...I believe in
regulated banks and corporations and personal and business banking needs to be separated. And Stocks need to be held for a certain number of days, weeks...not sure, but we will figure it out...Warren's plans first of all won't happen and could damage the economy.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to at140 (Reply #4)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:39 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
6. I miss the charisma and the personality...I just don't get it. I would voter for her happily in a
general however...and hope I was wrong and that she wins.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #6)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:47 PM
at140 (5,808 posts)
8. Charisma is not all that complicated.
It is when a person is able to infuse energy in the audience, makes the audience love the speech maker.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Reply #8)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:58 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
9. Idon't lover her or her speeches...I don't feel it and I have watched them. She is a worthy
candidate but I think she is able to speak to those already on her side and the rest not so much. I would vote for her in a general but ...it is not a falling in love kind of thing...not being mean...I don't get her appeal.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #9)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 04:32 PM
at140 (5,808 posts)
10. I understand, and please note that
having charisma does not mean you can win every vote. But a charismatic candidate will cause his/her followers to walk through broken glass to go to the voting booth.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Reply #10)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 09:44 PM
Demsrule86 (62,074 posts)
11. I don't see her charisma...but should she be the nominee...I would walk barefoot through broken
glass to vote for her in the general.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #11)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 12:55 AM
Skya Rhen (2,701 posts)
13. You're not the only one who doesn't see it...
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #11)
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 10:29 AM
at140 (5,808 posts)
15. Yeah none of the Biden supporters can see it
because they are against everyone whose name is not Biden.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Undecided |
Response to at140 (Original post)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:49 PM
FM123 (9,676 posts)
3. Great article from the Guardian!
This one sentence spoke volumes: At the heart of her campaign is kindness as an emotion, as a value – and as a basis for policy.
![]() primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden |