Meanwhile, at that other progressive site

[TexasTowelie]

they already used the b-word and the c-word to describe Warren:

https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/vindictive-republican-lizzie-warren-trashing-bernie-sanders-tonight-looks-like-lizzie-is-really-pissed-that-bernie-is-going-to-beat-her-ass-in-massachusetts/

What a unifying message!

It appears that a Sanders/Warren ticket won't sit well with some.

[DonaldsRump]

1. Am feeling the Burn....the Biden Burn! n/t

[OhZone]

12. Me 3

[jimfields33]

27. Glad I never went to that site

Never will.

[Hortensis]

39. :) It's for the sorts you can imagine just fine from a distance.

I've only gone there because I knew some people from here who once posted seemingly sensibly but disappeared down that rabbit hole in 2016 and found a home there.

What they were posting caused me to go read about extremism to understand what happened to them, which has become a growing, serious concern for our nation on both far left and right. It's not just individuals whose tendencies to extremism are being encouraged to take over as they become increasingly become increasingly detached from reality, but whole groups that become more extreme as they react together. For those who recognize names, it's not just somewhat weird but a sad place to visit.

[Kahuna7]

48. What's it going to take for DU to give us a like button? Liked. nt

[relayerbob]

2. Holy crap

That's not "progressive" at all. That's *deplorable*

[highplainsdem]

7. +1,000,000. Horrifying posts there.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

3. Juicebox revolutionaries and sanctimonious ratf*ckers, as Rick Wilson says.

[NCProgressive]

4. That other site can be safely ignored altogether

[TwilightZone]

5. There are only a couple dozen of them left.

They should probably just be ignored.

[radical noodle]

6. No, they're all in for bernie/tulsi

[MontanaMama]

8. Make that Bernie/Tulski.

The truth about all that will come out.

[blm]

34. Heheh

[MH1]

9. Which "other progressive site"?

The link in your post does not go to a progressive site.

[TwilightZone]

10. This would be true.

[blue-wave]

13. How very true!

[TexasTowelie]

14. I'm being polite using the "p-word" since that's what they claim they are. nt

[NurseJackie]

30. You know they've got to be simply THRILLED to get a mention and a link on DU!

PS: What kind of shit software are they using to run their site?

[blm]

41. ✔️

[blue-wave]

11. Well, it appears as though

they have every intention of living up to their nasty reputation.

Go Joe Go!!!

[brooklynite]

15. That's why they have Tulsi...

[Newest Reality]

16. Woah!

I am not a mind your manners person, but that's sounds like displaced anger in a dumpster. What's the point, catharsis and projection because you can get away with it?

I am pleased that we at DU have far more decorum and respect for each other, despite the heat we generate at times. We should all note that and consider how noisy some places are.

[IronLionZion]

17. They're deplorable, not progressive

[Cha]

18. Of course that "progressive" site is so pissed off

at Elizabeth.. and using their ugly words..

I salute her.. Telling it like it is..

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[Maru Kitteh]

19. They're still cackling and squawking over there?

Thought they was dead.

.
,
,
,
,

Just went in for a drive by. Now I have to go all the way downstairs again and get some disinfectant and eye bleach.

[TexasTowelie]

20. I really didn't mean to do that to you.

Lo siento.

[Maru Kitteh]

47. It's okay, all forgiven TT

[blm]

21. Bernie camp online is demanding Warren drop out. They blame her

for everything now.

[TexasTowelie]

22. Well, you know

it's all rigged!

There has to be someone to bash and blame.

[jimfields33]

28. She's got work to do in her homestate

That would be embarrassing for her to lose it on Tuesday.

[blm]

32. Well, some people bought the Sanders spin that only he can bring

the structural needed even though the ONLY person in the race who actually did the heavy lifting on the research, formation of remedies, and building the infrastructure needed to implement the system is......Elizabeth Warren.

Some audiences prefer to hear the list of problems shouted at them.

Some audiences appreciate those who have the competency to actually do the work that addresses the problems.

[jimfields33]

37. That is an excuse

[blm]

45. It is the truth.

[Gothmog]

50. Warren calling Bernie Sanders a massive failure. Fails to get things passed

This will be fun to watch

Link to tweet

[betsuni]

23. The ones who swore up and down they'd voted for her if she ran because

they'd vote for a woman "just not THAT woman," and the second Warren announced they morphed her into THAT woman and the insults and disinformation flowed again.

[spooky3]

26. +1000

[Gothmog]

24. I remember the idiots on that site being happy about the booing of John Lewis

[SidDithers]

25. LOL. Segami...

I see he still hasn't FIGURED out how to USE capital LETTERS.



Sid

[Squinch]

29. They always were a classy lot. I do notice some of our old friends coming back for

visits lately, though.

ETA: I did click the link. Once upon a time that looked like a fairly professional site. Now it looks like a high school club's website. Only not so well put together.

[vlyons]

31. On Tues, I shall vote for Biden, not Warren

Warren is really my preferred choice, but she doesn't seem to be gaining traction. I dread all the RW commie-pinko baiting if Sanders is the nominee. I know the RWers will just pour on the commie-pinko scare if Sanders is the nominee.

[blm]

33. It depend what state you're in. Biden needs Warren to be strong in

some states to keep Sanders delegate numbers down.

[vlyons]

38. I'm in Texas

and believe me this bible thumping state is not going to award electoral votes to either Sanders or Warren come Nov. Once you get out of the metropolitan areas of Dallas, Houston, Austin, El Paso, and San Antonio, it's Baptists and MAGAts in the rural areas.

[jimfields33]

40. Again why does Biden need so much help?

He can’t seem to get the job done himself. Why is that? He really should have it the easiest since he’s the most well known. The entire party is having to drag him to nomination. That’s unprecedented.

[blm]

43. Well, Sanders used Biden &Pete's attacks on Warren last fall to

bring her numbers down, and I don’t recall concerns then as Sanders numbers rose.

[jimfields33]

46. Last fall? Lol

Good grief. We’re talking actually voting period now.

[showblue22]

60. Why did Bernie spend 50 million in Iowa?

[jimfields33]

61. To win which he did.

[showblue22]

62. No he didn't.

[TexasTowelie]

63. Bernie didn't win Iowa. nt

[Ninga]

36. Warren deserves your vote.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/opinion/sunday/elizabeth-warren-2020.html?referringSource=articleShare

[blm]

42. This is so true, and it tees me off when Sanders camp spreads the lie that

Only Sanders cares and will do something after decades of ranting about it, when Elizabeth has PROVED that she has the research, the remedies, the plans, and the ability to build the infrastructure to implement the policies needed.

Sanders has been cribbing from her hard work for years and has the lesser informed believing he is the answer.

Fer chrissakes, if he HAD the ability to do it, he would have - he does not.

[wyldwolf]

35. People on DU used to ask me why I put "progressive" in quotes. There is a great example why.

[mcar]

44. I recall many of them saying they wish she had run in 2016

rather than the eeeevil Hillary.

Guess their claim of "I want a woman president, just not THAT woman" was so much BS.

[Gothmog]

49. sanders supporters are upset

Link to tweet

?s=20

[cwydro]

51. So why post that here?

More power to you if you like visiting that crap site, but most of us have no interest in it.

Just wanted to let us know that women are being called names somewhere? Not news to most of us, dude.

[TexasTowelie]

52. With over fifty responses to this thread,

it appears that at least some people are interested about what is said over there--even you clicked on this thread.

[cwydro]

53. It's nice to know you enjoy reading over there.

Interesting.

I clicked on your thread to see what site you were referencing.

I don’t consider that trash pile to be “progressive “ in any way. Bad choice on my part to click. Should have known based on prior posts.

[TexasTowelie]

54. I don't frequent the site, but I was curious to their reaction to the primary loss last night.

It never hurts to know what other people think.

You can always put me on ignore if you don't want to read my posts.

Thanks for kicking the thread.

[cwydro]

55. Here, kicking it again. No need to explain yourself.

I have no one on ignore.

It’s good to know who is who here.

Have fun over there!

Same name? Or a different one? I got an interesting pm about that...

[TexasTowelie]

56. If you are asking if I'm a member there, then the answer is no.

I never signed up at that site and if I did I would have been banned almost immediately.

I'm amused that anybody thinks that my posts and opinions are worthy of exchanging personal messages, but I'll attribute that to people being curious about me just as I was curious about what was being said at JPR.

If it make you feel better, you have also been the topic of some interesting pm exchanges.

[cwydro]

57. Aw, I'm so touched, towel.

[TexasTowelie]

58. Yes, I felt exactly the same way when you mentioned that I was the topic of somebody else's

personal messages. It's not going to affect or influence me in any manner so why did you feel it was so important to mention it in your earlier post? Is someone desperate about what I'm posting?

[showblue22]

59. This is a quote from someone over there that calls themselves Satan

"I didn't refuse to vote for Hillary Clinton because any goddamned Russian told me to. I refused to vote for her because she is a warmongering, election stealing, Goldman Sachs fellating, Republican WHORE"