Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Pete Buttigieg You are in the Buttigieg 2020 Group. Only members who have selected Pete Buttigieg as their preferred Democratic presidential candidate are permitted to post in this Group.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 04:16 PM Sep 2019

Bloomberg analysis of Buttigieg health plan

I already posted this link in a reply to a post in Democratic Primaries on universal health care, but thought it might be useful to folks to see it here, too:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-09-19/buttigieg-s-health-plan-gets-one-big-thing-right

One crucial difference — and not just with Biden’s plan — is that Buttigieg’s proposal explicitly calls out hospital and provider prices as a critical driver of health care costs. His plan would cap out-of-network provider charges at double what Medicare would pay for the same service. Many providers charge substantially more than that, but even Democratic presidential candidates tend to avoid the issue and focus on easier political targets like insurers and drugmakers. Out-of-control prices are an inevitable consequence of America’s confusing mash-up of private employer coverage, public plans and individual insurance options. Fragmentation reduces negotiating power and makes it extremely difficult to bargain effectively with providers, especially as hospitals consolidate.
. . .
Even candidates like Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders who call for “Medicare for All,” which would require steeper and more widespread provider cost cuts, don’t go out of their way to talk about the issue. Provider prices came up only a few times across five Democratic debates in which health care received sustained airtime. It’s a touchy subject, considering the large number of people employed by health providers and their relative popularity among voters.

Buttigieg’s willingness to openly address the issue is a refreshing step forward in the health policy debate and boosts the appeal of his plan. His proposal would retain many of the current system’s flaws, even with the addition of a public option. But the cap has the chance to improve matters substantially. On top of cutting outlier prices, it would bolster negotiating leverage for the public option and private plans by making it less lucrative for providers to refuse to join insurance networks. It could bring the cost of insurance and care down and expand access in a less disruptive manner.

In many ways, his plan still falls far short of single-payer options. Medicare for All could do far more to bring costs down by folding people with private insurance into a national plan and would provide substantially more generous coverage to many more people. The cost of such a plan and voter concerns about eliminating private coverage means it’s not guaranteed to pass even if Democrats take back the White House and Senate. In that light, it’s refreshing to have a more moderate alternative that at least acknowledges and attempts to tackle one of the health system’s biggest issues.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bloomberg analysis of Buttigieg health plan (Original Post) MBS Sep 2019 OP
Thank you for posting this interesting and important bit of analysis, my dear MBS. CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2019 #1

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,308 posts)
1. Thank you for posting this interesting and important bit of analysis, my dear MBS.
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 06:15 PM
Sep 2019

It gets into some of the nitty gritty that other plans lack. And I need to read stuff like this!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Buttigieg 2020»Bloomberg analysis of But...