This week, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is introducing the Medicare for All Act of 2019. A companion bill of the same name has already been introduced in the House by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA). Thats good news for the country. Unfortunately, these bills are facing opposition from what, for some people, will be an unexpected direction.
(Snip)
Why would that be so? The term was crafted by Sanders, Jayapal, and their allies to describe a single-payer system, administered by the government, with no copayments or deductibles, and without the participation of private insurers.
To be sure, the ideas frenemies have added to the chaos. A variety of watered-down alternatives to Medicare for All have been proposed, most with names that sound like Medicare for All: Medicare X, Medicare Extra for All, Medicare for America
(Im still waiting for a proposal called I Cant Believe Its Not Medicare for All!)
These plans are Medicare for All decoys. They claim to resemble Medicare for All, at least in their outcomes, but theyre not. Each depends on some naive combination of employer cooperation, insurance company goodwill, smart shopping, and Rube Goldberg-like fiscal contraptions. Each would continue to force working Americans to spend thousands of dollars on premiums, copays, and deductibles, at a time when most families say theyd have trouble finding $1,000 to cover an emergency.
https://www.alternet.org/2019/04/its-imperative-for-progressives-to-refuse-any-healthcare-plan-besides-medicare-for-all-heres-why/#.XK5l8OkI97x.twitter