HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Democrats 2020 » Sanders 2020 (Group) » ''seems new results enter...
Bernie Sanders You are in the Sanders 2020 Group. Only members who have selected Bernie Sanders as their preferred Democratic presidential candidate are permitted to post in this Group.

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 06:51 PM

''seems new results entered many likely Sanders results in Polk County as Deval Patrick or Steyer''










etc.

9 replies, 359 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
Reply ''seems new results entered many likely Sanders results in Polk County as Deval Patrick or Steyer'' (Original post)
Donkees Feb 5 OP
Uncle Joe Feb 5 #1
Nanjeanne Feb 5 #2
CentralMass Feb 5 #3
Nanjeanne Feb 5 #4
Billsmile Feb 5 #5
Billsmile Feb 5 #6
Nanjeanne Feb 5 #7
Donkees Feb 5 #8
Nanjeanne Feb 5 #9

Response to Donkees (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 07:06 PM

1. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread Donkees.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Donkees (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 07:11 PM

2. They took over 500 from Bernie and also about 60 from Warren and a handful

from Klobuchar. Only Pete and Biden received more than reported. Then they gave the date i say, “taken”, votes to Patrick and Steyer.

Odd to say the least but it makes me really question every single precinct total.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Donkees (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 07:15 PM

3. If it walks like a duck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Donkees (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 07:39 PM

4. And more votes taken from Sanders and Warren too and given to non viable

candidates like Steyer and Patrick.










Really Sanders and Warren should get together and formally ask for a complete review of every district compared to paper trail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Donkees (Original post)



Response to Donkees (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 09:48 PM

7. And another fuck up




Look how stupid it is.

They show Pete with 52 in final alignment and he gets 0.56 SDE

Sanders gets 50 in final alignment and he gets 0.28 SDE

But Warren gets 27 in final alignment and they award her 0.56 SDE - same as Pete

Now that’s some interesting math right there!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nanjeanne (Reply #7)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:08 PM

8. They mentioned early on that the satellite caucus #'s get tallied last, by some percentage formula

so that might explain the 'math' (?)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Donkees (Reply #8)

Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:13 PM

9. This isn't a satellite caucus. It's nothing to do with any other precinct except the one

I posted that had 51 for Pete and 50 for Sanders and almost half that for Warren. But they allocated the same % to Warren and Pete and much less to Bernie. That’s just a fuck up. SDEs are allocated by final alignment. Just look at the photo from the whiteboard at the actual caucus and you can see the real SDE allotment.

The Iowa DNC is so stupid that they forgot to switch the final alignment even though they switched the SDE so Sanders got less.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread