Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Quixote1818
Quixote1818's Journal
Quixote1818's Journal
December 3, 2016
Be quiet Sarah! Don't let anyone know that Republicans don't really believe in free market capitalism!
Snip:
But she goes onto to blast the deal as crony capitalism" and an example of the "hallmark of corruption" and "socialism."
When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent, Palin wrote. Then, special interests creep in and manipulate markets. Republicans oppose this, remember?
Instead, we support competition on a level playing field, remember? Because we know special interest crony capitalism is on big fail.
Just ahead of Trumps formal announcement of the deal at the Carrier plant in Indianapolis on Thursday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Carrier would receive $7 million in tax breaks over 10 years in order to keep the 1,100 jobs in Indiana.
More: http://thehill.com/homenews/news/308575-palin-slams-crony-capitalism-after-trump-seals-carrier-deal
Palin slams Trump Carrier deal as 'crony capitalism'
Be quiet Sarah! Don't let anyone know that Republicans don't really believe in free market capitalism!
Snip:
But she goes onto to blast the deal as crony capitalism" and an example of the "hallmark of corruption" and "socialism."
When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent, Palin wrote. Then, special interests creep in and manipulate markets. Republicans oppose this, remember?
Instead, we support competition on a level playing field, remember? Because we know special interest crony capitalism is on big fail.
Just ahead of Trumps formal announcement of the deal at the Carrier plant in Indianapolis on Thursday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Carrier would receive $7 million in tax breaks over 10 years in order to keep the 1,100 jobs in Indiana.
More: http://thehill.com/homenews/news/308575-palin-slams-crony-capitalism-after-trump-seals-carrier-deal
December 3, 2016
The Daily Show - President-Elect Trump's Conflicts of Interest
This is really well done!
December 2, 2016
Snip:
Tensions between India and Pakistan have intensified, which leaves the United States in an awkward position. The Obama administration has made a concerted effort to strengthen U.S./India ties, while also delicately maintaining financial support for Pakistan.
Note, however, that President Obama is the first American president to ever visit India twice during his term, while Obama has not set foot in Pakistan.
Trump, who probably isnt aware of the diplomatic balancing act, apparently signaled to Sharif a very different U.S. posture towards Pakistan up to and including a presidential visit to the country.
If Trump does go to Pakistan, it risks alienating Indian allies. If Trump doesnt visit after telling Sharif he would, it will further complicate an already difficult Pakistani relationship. And I cant wait to hear what this means: I am ready and willing to play any role that you want me to play to address and find solutions to the outstanding problems.
Electing a president who doesnt know what hes doing carries real consequences.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-has-bizarre-conversation-pakistani-leader
Trump has bizarre conversation with Pakistani leader
Snip:
Tensions between India and Pakistan have intensified, which leaves the United States in an awkward position. The Obama administration has made a concerted effort to strengthen U.S./India ties, while also delicately maintaining financial support for Pakistan.
Note, however, that President Obama is the first American president to ever visit India twice during his term, while Obama has not set foot in Pakistan.
Trump, who probably isnt aware of the diplomatic balancing act, apparently signaled to Sharif a very different U.S. posture towards Pakistan up to and including a presidential visit to the country.
If Trump does go to Pakistan, it risks alienating Indian allies. If Trump doesnt visit after telling Sharif he would, it will further complicate an already difficult Pakistani relationship. And I cant wait to hear what this means: I am ready and willing to play any role that you want me to play to address and find solutions to the outstanding problems.
Electing a president who doesnt know what hes doing carries real consequences.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-has-bizarre-conversation-pakistani-leader
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: New Mexico
Member since: Mon Dec 1, 2003, 03:42 PM
Number of posts: 28,929