Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
kristopher
kristopher's Journal
kristopher's Journal
September 1, 2013
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Report-Nuclear-Received-4-Times-More-Subsidies-in-CA-Than-Solar?utm_source=Daily&utm_medium=Headline&utm_campaign=GTMDaily
That's the Nuclear Industry engaging in Data Trimming again...
Data trimming is the act of excluding relevant data to obtain a more favorable analysis. It is the lynchpin of the nuclear industry's strategy for lying about their product.
Report: Nuclear Received 4 Times More Subsidies Than Solar in CA
Federal dollars per new megawatt-hour for distributed solar are infinitely lower.
HERMAN K. TRABISH: AUGUST 28, 2013
Californias nuclear energy industry has received four times more federal support than the states distributed solar builders over a period six times as long, according to a new report.
Californias nuclear power suppliers have benefited from over $8.21 billion (in 2012 dollars) in subsidization over the last half century, according to the report Ask Saint Onofrio: Finding What Has Been Lost in a Tale of Two Energy Sources by Nancy E. Pfund and Noah W. Walker of Silicon Valley venture capital firm DBL Investors.
Distributed solar systems, they found, have earned $2.17 billion in tax credits or direct payments through 2012 from the federal investment tax credit (ITC) and the 1603 Treasury Grant programs, which began in 2007.
The 56-year-old Price-Anderson Acts liability protection for nuclear plant operators and tax breaks for the decommissioning trust fund earnings together account for an estimated $164.1 million in annual federal support.
The legislators who passed the Price-Anderson Act expected it to sunset after ten years, yet it is authorized through 2020, Pfund, DBLs Managing Partner, observed. Federal subsidies were necessary and highly effective for the early growth of the nuclear industry, she explained. But they have become a perpetuity.
...
The return on taxpayers investments are starkly different, the report noted. The 2,200-megawatt San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station failed in 2011 and was permanently taken offline this year. Attempted repairs have cost ratepayers $670 million, and a further $4.1 billion will be passed on to them for decommissioning.
...
Report: Nuclear Received 4 Times More Subsidies Than Solar in CA
Federal dollars per new megawatt-hour for distributed solar are infinitely lower.
HERMAN K. TRABISH: AUGUST 28, 2013
Californias nuclear energy industry has received four times more federal support than the states distributed solar builders over a period six times as long, according to a new report.
Californias nuclear power suppliers have benefited from over $8.21 billion (in 2012 dollars) in subsidization over the last half century, according to the report Ask Saint Onofrio: Finding What Has Been Lost in a Tale of Two Energy Sources by Nancy E. Pfund and Noah W. Walker of Silicon Valley venture capital firm DBL Investors.
Distributed solar systems, they found, have earned $2.17 billion in tax credits or direct payments through 2012 from the federal investment tax credit (ITC) and the 1603 Treasury Grant programs, which began in 2007.
The 56-year-old Price-Anderson Acts liability protection for nuclear plant operators and tax breaks for the decommissioning trust fund earnings together account for an estimated $164.1 million in annual federal support.
The legislators who passed the Price-Anderson Act expected it to sunset after ten years, yet it is authorized through 2020, Pfund, DBLs Managing Partner, observed. Federal subsidies were necessary and highly effective for the early growth of the nuclear industry, she explained. But they have become a perpetuity.
...
The return on taxpayers investments are starkly different, the report noted. The 2,200-megawatt San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station failed in 2011 and was permanently taken offline this year. Attempted repairs have cost ratepayers $670 million, and a further $4.1 billion will be passed on to them for decommissioning.
...
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Report-Nuclear-Received-4-Times-More-Subsidies-in-CA-Than-Solar?utm_source=Daily&utm_medium=Headline&utm_campaign=GTMDaily
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Dec 19, 2003, 02:20 AMNumber of posts: 29,798