It used to be thought that a university campus was a place where youd be exposed to a lot of different ideas, DeSantis said during a bill signing ceremony. Unfortunately, now the norm is, these are more intellectually repressive environments. You have orthodoxies that are promoted, and other viewpoints are shunned or even suppressed.
Read more: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2021/06/florida-students-faculty-will-declare-political-views-prevent-liberal-indoctrination
"Oh, so you mean like in sociology; you have functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory; and now they're only teaching one of those things and not even talking about the other two at all?"
"No, not like that."
"Oh! So in studies of evolution, you mean they're only teaching gradualism OR punctuated equilibrium and not having discussions of both, while they both have merit?"
"Uh... no, we're not talking about that."
"OH! You mean they're stifling the "is the universe explained by quantum mechanics or general relativity" debate in physics and have come down on the side of one and are refusing to talk about the other at all? Those jerks!"
"... no, no."
"OK, so in the college restrooms, they have now cruelly decided to put all the toilet paper under instead of over? Those totalitarians!"
"Oh... so by 'different ideas', you mean...
Ali Alexander believes that he has prophetic abilities: I think one of my spiritual gifts is that I am a seer. I do think that is one of my spiritual gifts. I have an uncanny ability to either flirt with prophecy or be endowed with prophecy.
Finally, Shane Vaughn remains outraged that Democrats are being elected to the U.S. Senate and is now demanding that the 17th Amendment be repealed.
And they "found out" what happens when you do that.
It was one of the biggest wins in the Democrats Inflation Reduction Act: For the first time, Medicare will be empowered to negotiate the cost of some of the most expensive prescription medications with the pharmaceutical industry. Democrats have worked on this issue for nearly three decades, but Big Pharmas lobbyists successfully stood in the way. This year, Democrats succeeded anyway. (And) Republicans arent just eager to undo the breakthrough policy, they dont mind admitting that this is a GOP goal.
Republican Rep. Morgan Griffith of Virginia told Axios, in reference to the Democratic policy measure, If the courts havent gotten to it beforehand, yeah weve got to do our job and try to defend the Constitution. Republican Rep. Buddy Carter of Georgia replied yes when asked if he backed repeal of the drug pricing law.
Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, is retiring, but he nevertheless added, I would imagine that will be a top priority for Republicans in the new session.
In the coming days and weeks, if Democrats warn voters that a GOP majority would make prescription medications more expensive, the warning will be rooted in fact.
Republicans Playing Doctor, always a bad idea.
If she's trash, then clearly you don't want her trash money, right? And if that money is all good legal tender, then clearly you don't want anyone's trash money.
Let's start using the language hospital administrators understand if they don't want to stand up to red states.
The association did not name the hospitals but said its received complaints that hospitals, administrators and their attorneys may be prohibiting doctors from providing medically appropriate care in some situations, The Dallas Morning News reported.
The letter, sent Wednesday to the Texas Medical Board, cited several examples in which medical care was delayed.
In one case, a central Texas hospital reportedly told a physician not to treat an ectopic pregnancy until it ruptured, the letter said. An ectopic pregnancy, which occurs when a fertilized egg attached outside of the uterus, is not viable.
* 10 year old girl gets pregnant and Republicans deny it happened
* Oops it happened! And now Republicans want to prosecute the doctor who provided the girl an abortion because she didn't notify authorities. Oops! She went by the book.
So just a month into our post-Roe political landscape and it is already a minefield? Nah, don't believe those liberal lies. I'm sure it will never happen to you, your daughter, your sister, your partner, etc.
You'll never be called a liar and a hoax on national TV.
You'll never have your medical information leaked out to the world.
You'll never be in legal danger if you performed the abortion or helped perform the abortion.
All just a fluke. This will never happen ever again. Sure.
I don't want one of these "precious lives" to just end up as some interchangeable cog of meat in an uncaring and unfair economic system that serves to exist the pleasures of billionaires, and nobody wants that, right?
So this is a very rough draft that I'm just spitting out here so please bear with me:
* Paying 100% of your employees well over the minimum wage (150% maybe?)
* Giving robust and generous benefits (Healthcare, vacation, sick leave, maternity leave, bereavement, tuition reimbursement, commuting reimbursement, etc.)
* Providing 100% of your employees with opportunities for growth in terms of wage, position, and personal development
Then you are simply not entitled to:
* Tax cuts
* Government contracts
* Non-compete clauses
* Putting up job ads in government job assistance portals
* And more
And we don't need to wait for a bill to pass, this doesn't need to be a far off dream, we don't need to say "But we don't have the votes", we can start on some of these things today.
Can I show you something?
This a job description that simply should not exist IMHO, it's down to half a dozen now, it used to be a hundred on any given day. You want to know the reason why it's down to half a dozen now?
So don't tell me there's nothing we can do, because that would be lying to my face and denying my personal experiences.
No more "cheap labor"
No more "unskilled labor"
I don't want to hear these things and "greatest economy", "billionaires", "superpower", etc. in the same sentence or in the same paragraph for that matter. I didn't want to hear it yesterday, not today, and definitely not tomorrow.
I'm done with these contradictions. You should be too.
compare that to what they said about the SCOTUS in the past...
Their respect for the judicial branch and proclaiming it to be a sacred institution is what we in sociology call an "invented tradition", I'm old enough to remember when the "other side of the aisle" considered them to be "nine black-robed tyrants", let's look at the footage, shall we?
James was among a chorus of far-right and Christian nationalist activists looking forward to using the SCOTUS decision to implement their theocratic agenda. Not satisfied with simply removing the right to abortion protected in Roe, theyre eager to pass a total abortion ban, dismantle the right to same-sex marriage, and institute their ultraconservative version of Christianity on others. They see an ally in the Supreme Court, and theres reason to believe that theyre right.
And conservatives in the past:
First of all, we have to understand how the Constitution works, the president is required to carry out the laws of the land, the laws of the land come from the legislative branch, Carson said. So if the legislative branch creates a law or changes a law, the executive branch has a responsibly to carry it out. It doesnt say they have the responsibility to carry out a judicial law.
The recent leak was an attempt to publicly intimidate justices and undermine the integrity of the Courtall while putting lives at risk, the main sponsor, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, said in a statement.
My bill holds leakers accountable and takes away any hopes of profiting off their crimes.
Marco Rubio, a co-sponsor, said: You shouldnt receive a badge of honor or financial reward for leaking confidential documents from one of our nations most sacred institutions - you should face serious penalties.
And conservatives in the past:
DeLay lamented that people dont understand the constitution. We havent taught our children now for three or four generations what the Constitution is, and the separation of powers, and what our Founding Fathers had in mind as this brilliant understanding of how you can limit government and limit the tyranny put on us through people or oligarchies.
Because of this supposed constitutional ignorance, DeLay claimed, right now, the American people dont understand that the Supreme Court, when it makes a ruling, its just an opinion if no one enforces that ruling. The Supreme Court doesnt have a police force; the Supreme Court doesnt have an army; the Supreme Court doesnt have people that can enforce their ruling. Therefore, if conservatives stand up to them and invoke the Constitution, then we dont have to accept a ruling on marriage that redefines marriage. And thats basically what this ad is all about. Were sending a message to the Supreme Court that, number one, its illegal that they have this case before them; its not in their jurisdiction.
Proving his Constitutional prowess, DeLay argued that its not in their authority to write law by ten unelected, unaccountable people, lawyers, and if this is a red line that were drawing. If they rule against marriage, we will all defy them.
And conservatives in the past:
Congress needs to resist this judicial activism. One way to constitutionally check the courts is with measures like the Pledge Protection Act sponsored by Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) and another way is Cong. John Hostettlers (R-IN) Public Expression of Religion Act (PERA). Finally, we can give a fair up or down vote to judicial nominees like William J. Haynes.
Now, even as the House vote on the anti-gay marriage amendment looks to fail, Human Events endorses a court-stripping bill to circumvent the Constitution on the issue of marriage:
Unfortunately, the (marriage) amendment failed in the Senate last month, receiving only 49 votes. It is also destined to fail in the House: In the last Congress, it received only 227 votes, more than 60 shy of the super-majority needed. But there is a way Congress can act this year to protect state marriage laws from activist liberal judges. Rep. John Hostettler (R.-Ind.) has proposed a bill that would strip all federal courts, including the Supreme Court, of jurisdiction to hear any challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
A story in 5 chapters:
I want the SCOTUS to have protection from the right-wing bent that Republicans have forced onto it and have made it a political court.
I don't think that is extremism to want the SCOTUS to have protection from the right-wing.
Profile InformationMember since: Sat Mar 20, 2004, 10:37 AM
Number of posts: 34,679
- 2023 (19)
- 2022 (52)
- 2021 (43)
- 2020 (41)
- 2019 (80)
- 2018 (37)
- 2017 (53)
- 2016 (7)
- 2015 (3)
- 2014 (6)
- 2013 (17)
- 2012 (28)
- 2011 (2)
- December (2)