Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

babylonsister's Journal
babylonsister's Journal
May 14, 2019

No Iran threat in Syria or Iraq, top British officer says, contradicting US


No Iran threat in Syria or Iraq, top British officer says, contradicting US
Deputy commander of anti-Isis coalition rebuts White House justification for sending troops
Julian Borger in Washington
Tue 14 May 2019 13.32 EDT


The top British general in the US-led coalition against Isis has said there is no increased threat from Iranian-backed forces in Iraq or Syria, directly contradicting US assertions used to justify a military buildup in the region.

Maj Gen Christopher Ghika, who is a deputy commander of Operation Inherent Resolve, the coalition conducting counter-terrorist operations against Isis in Iraq and Syria, was repeatedly questioned by reporters about the threat from Shia militias in Syria and Iraq, cited by US officials over the past week as justification for speeding up the deployment of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Gulf and for sending B-52 Stratofortress bombers and an anti-aircraft battery to the region.

“No – there’s been no increased threat from Iranian-backed forces in Iraq and Syria,” Ghika said in a videolink briefing from Baghdad to the Pentagon. “We’re aware of that presence, clearly. And we monitor them along with a whole range of others because that’s the environment we’re in. We are monitoring the Shia militia groups. I think you’re referring to carefully and if the threat level seems to go up then we’ll raise our force protection measures accordingly.”

The general’s comments are likely to heighten concerns that fabricated or exaggerated intelligence may be being used by administration hawks led by the national security adviser, John Bolton, to further the case for war against Iran, in a manner reminiscent of the buildup to the Iraq invasion.

more...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/14/no-iran-threat-in-syria-or-iraq-says-top-british-officer-in-defiance-of-us?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2W7bhXnzPPbFvFFYInclZL8phweMwwHmhjouqgCV544Cpuf_Z0aMuP1FQ#Echobox=1557856318
May 14, 2019

Rank-and-file House Democrats urge 'second look' at impeachment


Rank-and-file House Democrats urge 'second look' at impeachment
Some members of the House Judiciary Committee think “stronger tools” are needed to force the Trump administration to comply with requests.
May 14, 2019, 2:21 PM EDT
By Heidi Przybyla and Alex Moe


WASHINGTON — Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee have grown increasingly impatient with President Donald Trump’s attempts to block their Russia investigation. And now, some of them are urging the use of “stronger tools,” including impeachment proceedings, in order to strengthen their access to documents and witnesses, according to several lawmakers who spoke with NBC News.

Attorney General William Barr has resisted committee demands to release special counsel Robert Mueller’s full and unredacted Russia report to Congress and said he will not appear before the committee, which planned to use staff lawyers to question him.

In the past week, Trump has said he does not want Mueller to testify before the committee, although he said that decision is ultimately up to Barr, and sought to withhold classified portions of the report from Congress by invoking “executive privilege.”

“The obstruction stuff the president’s engaged in now is causing people to give this a second look,” Rep. David Cicilline, a committee Democrat from Rhode Island, said about impeachment.

“Whatever you think about the findings in the report itself, the blanket defiance of lawfully issued subpoenas and refusal to cooperate with constitutionally required oversight is — in and of itself — basis for impeachment,” Cicilline said in an interview.


He also noted that “contempt of Congress” was the third article of impeachment against President Richard Nixon. A formal impeachment inquiry would strengthen Congress’ hand in the court system, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who sits on the committee, said.

“The more that the president denies us, the ordinary lawful demands for witnesses and documents, the more unified we are,” Raskin told reporters, calling Trump “the most impeachable president in the history of the United States.”


more...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/rank-file-house-democrats-urge-second-look-impeachment-n1005496
May 14, 2019

Trump's resistance to congressional oversight had a very bad day in court


Trump’s resistance to congressional oversight had a very bad day in court
Turns out, there are still some federal judges who care what the law says.
Ian Millhiser
May 14, 2019, 1:41 pm


Judge Amit Mehta is the anti-Scalia. Calm and unfailingly polite. Honest about his concerns and seemingly quite open to the arguments of legal counsel. The hearing Mehta held Tuesday in Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform featured none of the posturing that characterizes so many Supreme Court hearings.

If you only paid attention to Judge Mehta’s tone, you’d think he was being nice to Trump’s lawyers.

But the substance of the hearing was a disaster for Trump’s efforts to resist congressional subpoenas digging into his finances. At one point, Mehta warned that, under Trump lawyer William Consovoy’s sweeping legal theory, congressional investigations into Watergate would have been unconstitutional. At another, the judge suggested that Congress might have the inherent power to investigate the president in order to inform the public of potential misconduct.

Judge Mehta did ask probing questions of Doug Letter, the lawyer defending a subpoena from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, but the bulk of those questions seemed to be probing how Mehta would write an opinion ruling against Trump — not who should actually prevail.

Nothing is certain until Mehta releases his opinion (and, even then, that opinion will need to survive appeal). But Judge Mehta appears likely to rule in favor of congressional oversight. More importantly, he seems likely to rule quickly, making it more difficult for Trump to prevent oversight by simply running out the clock.

more...

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-congressional-oversight-subpoena-court-ruling-judge-amit-mehta-567ce7ce78fd/
May 14, 2019

House Panel Investigates Obstruction By Trump Lawyers

https://politicalwire.com/2019/05/14/house-panel-investigates-obstruction-by-trump-lawyers/

House Panel Investigates Obstruction By Trump Lawyers
May 14, 2019 at 3:43 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard


“The House Intelligence Committee is investigating whether lawyers tied to President Trump and his family helped obstruct the panel’s inquiry into Russian election interference by shaping false testimony,” the New York Times reports.

“The line of inquiry stems from claims made by the president’s former personal lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, who told Congress earlier this year that the lawyers in question helped edit false testimony that he provided to Congress in 2017 about a Trump Tower project in Moscow. Mr. Cohen said they also dangled a potential pardon to try to ensure his loyalty.”
May 14, 2019

"Choice 👏🏼 fucking 👏🏼 matters 👏🏼."

Sent to me by my sister...


I had just had our fourth baby. I was at my 6 week checkup when I asked for a referral to have my tubes tied. I was 28 and had 4 kids. The doctor told me no. I was too young. “What if you want kids later on?”

Um. I’m done. “But what if you divorce and want a baby with your new partner?”

Ummmm. I’m 28 with 4 kids- I’M DONE. “Sorry, I just can’t in good conscious let you make such an irrational decision when you are so young.” I remember going home and telling my husband, “that was the strangest appointment I’ve ever been too. He told me I wasn’t able to decide when I was finished having babies?!” I shook it off, not realising the IMPACT that would have on me a mere 20 months later.

Imagine, being in the mentality that you are finished having children, you just attempted to have your tubes tied to be denied, then to find out your pregnant.

Choice 👏🏼 fucking 👏🏼 matters 👏🏼.
Women’s 👏🏼 rights 👏🏼 matter 👏🏼

Do you see the irony here? You can’t have your tubes tied. You can’t have an abortion. You can’t you can’t you can’t you can’t....my choice to have a baby matters. My choice to an abortion matters. My choice to have my tubes tied matters. My choice to give up my baby for adoption matters. My choice to use my body as a sacred vessel for surrogacy matters. My choice is also YOUR choice. When one is removed they all are removed.
So, for all the women who are told they are under 30 and unable to have a tubal ligation, then find themselves pregnant and unable to have a legal abortion- I see you.

To all the women who enjoy sex and get pregnant and are unable to have a legal abortion- I see you too.

To the 16 year old girl who had sex ONE TIME without a condom and got pregnant and doesn’t have access to a legal abortion- I see you too babe.

Choice. Humans rights. Birth rights.
Consent. Respect. It all matters.
May 14, 2019

They did their time. They regained the vote. Florida is taking it away again.


They did their time. They regained the vote. Florida is taking it away again.
“It’s not what the people voted for. It’s not what people supported. It’s heartbreaking.”
Addy Baird
May 14, 2019, 8:00 am


Coral Nichols will be eligible to vote again when she is 188 years old. That’s the estimate, at least, if she pays the state of Florida $100 per month to satisfy her nearly $190,000 debt.

Nichols is one of 1.4 million people with felony convictions in Florida who had their right to vote restored last fall following the passage of Amendment 4, a victory that marked one of the most significant expansions of the right to vote in the United States in the last century.

“It was completely amazing,” Nichols said, recalling when the ballot initiative passed in November. “We had all worked so hard, and we had all believed that the people in the state of Florida believed in second chances.”


Many activists and experts argue that Amendment 4 was self-executing, meaning that once it was passed by voters, the measure would be put into effect, no questions asked.

But Republicans in the state legislature last week passed a new bill making regaining the vote conditional on having first fully repaid any outstanding fines and fees — including ones not related to their felony conviction.

Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) has said he will sign the bill into law in the coming days. When he does, it could keep people like Nichols from the ballot box for the rest of their lives.

more...

https://thinkprogress.org/fines-and-fees-returning-citizens-affected-d2f30f0ec2b6/
May 14, 2019

Satellite Images Show No Visible Damage to 'Sabotaged' Saudi Ships

https://www.thedailybeast.com/saudi-ships-satellite-images-show-no-visible-damage-to-sabotaged-saudi-vessels?ref=home

Satellite Images Show No Visible Damage to ‘Sabotaged’ Saudi Ships
Jamie Ross


Saudi Arabia rang alarm bells this week with claims that two of its oil tankers were “sabotaged” and sustained “significant damage”—but now questions are being asked after satellite images showed the vessels have no major visible damage. Details of the alleged attacks on two Saudi, one Norwegian, and one Emirati oil tankers on Sunday are still hazy. One U.S. official told the AP that the U.S. military believes Iran or Iranian allies used explosives to blow holes in the ships. But the scale of the alleged sabotage is far from clear. Video showed one targeted Saudi tanker still afloat without any apparent damage, and satellite images provided to the AP showed no visible major damage from above. The suspicion that Iran was behind the alleged attacks has already stoked tensions in the Middle East and beyond. Asked at the White House about the incident Monday, President Donald Trump said: “It’s going to be a bad problem for Iran if something happens.”


*************************************

Making it up as they go?

https://www.axios.com/iran-military-troops-john-bolton-1d4a714c-ea52-483f-b392-2ac2af01f423.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic&fbclid=IwAR0OSX_hqp5qJyg06Y9DB3t-pUf547XcSwqQTgsGyKfKd-JkWs2Eyhcx9JM


Zachary Basu48 mins ago
NYT: Pentagon presented plan to deploy 120,000 troops in case of Iran escalation

snip//

The big picture: Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have been warning of an unspecified "escalating threat" from Iran in recent weeks, after receiving intelligence from Israel about a possible Iranian plot to attack U.S. interests in the region. Trump told reporters today that he’d been “hearing little stories about Iran,” adding: “If they do anything, they will suffer greatly.”

Saudi Arabia on Monday announced that two Saudi tankers were damaged by an "act of sabotage" over the weekend in the Gulf, without identifying any suspects. Iran’s foreign ministry distanced itself, calling the incident “worrisome” and “regretful."

Later on Monday, AP and other media outlets cited an anonymous U.S. official as saying an "initial assessment is that Iranian or Iranian-backed proxies" were responsible.
May 14, 2019

Trump Tower Is One of NYC's Least Desirable Buildings

womp womp

https://politicalwire.com/2019/05/14/trump-tower-is-one-of-new-yorks-least-desirable-buildings/


Trump Tower Is One of NYC’s Least Desirable Buildings
May 14, 2019 at 6:45 am EDT By Taegan Goddard


Bloomberg: “For anyone who owns a unit in the tower, the past two years have been brutal. Most condo sales have led to a loss after adjusting for inflation, property records show. Several sold at more than a 20% loss. By contrast, across Manhattan, just 0.23% of homes over the past two years sold at a loss.”

“The commercial portion of the building has been struggling for months to find tenants for more than 42,000 square feet of vacant office space, despite advertising rents well below the area’s average, listings and data from real estate brokers show.
May 14, 2019

NYT: Pentagon presented plan to deploy 120,000 troops in case of Iran escalation

https://www.axios.com/iran-military-troops-john-bolton-1d4a714c-ea52-483f-b392-2ac2af01f423.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic&fbclid=IwAR0OSX_hqp5qJyg06Y9DB3t-pUf547XcSwqQTgsGyKfKd-JkWs2Eyhcx9JM


Zachary Basu48 mins ago
NYT: Pentagon presented plan to deploy 120,000 troops in case of Iran escalation


At the direction of national security adviser John Bolton, acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan last week presented top White House national security officials with a plan to send up to 120,000 troops to the Middle East in the event that Iran "attack American forces or accelerate work on nuclear weapons," the New York Times reports.

Details: The plan was reportedly presented during a meeting about the Trump administration's broader Iran policy, attended — among others — by Bolton, CIA director Gina Haspel, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats. It's unclear if President Trump has been briefed on the details of the plan, which did not call for a land invasion of Iran, but requested a similar number of troops involved the U.S.' 2003 invasion of Iraq, per the Times.

The big picture: Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have been warning of an unspecified "escalating threat" from Iran in recent weeks, after receiving intelligence from Israel about a possible Iranian plot to attack U.S. interests in the region. Trump told reporters today that he’d been “hearing little stories about Iran,” adding: “If they do anything, they will suffer greatly.”

Saudi Arabia on Monday announced that two Saudi tankers were damaged by an "act of sabotage" over the weekend in the Gulf, without identifying any suspects. Iran’s foreign ministry distanced itself, calling the incident “worrisome” and “regretful."

Later on Monday, AP and other media outlets cited an anonymous U.S. official as saying an "initial assessment is that Iranian or Iranian-backed proxies" were responsible.
May 13, 2019

Congressman Calls For Steve Mnuchin To Be Jailed If He Doesn't Hand Over Trump's Tax Returns

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/05/13/congressman-calls-for-steve-mnuchin-to-be-jailed-if-he-doesnt-hand-over-trumps-tax-returns.html?fbclid=IwAR35UwLUK6_sTkVkNxfu_Zy8Q7w2GXtKR5aeeATMQkPLge5ipFhtoUxv13Y

Posted on Mon, May 13th, 2019 by Jason Easley
Congressman Calls For Steve Mnuchin To Be Jailed If He Doesn’t Hand Over Trump’s Tax Returns


Pascrell said on MSNBC’s The Beat with Ari Melber, “I believe that the Justice Department should first fine the two persons that we’re talking about, Mr. Mnuchin and Mr. Rettig. And I would increase the penalties. And by the way, if they say no all the way, then I’d put them in jail all the way. That’s the law of the land. I don’t want to act as judge and jury here, which the trump administration has done many times on. But I’ll tell you what the law is. The law is on our side. And I can’t wait.”

Video @ link:

Calls are growing for Trump officials to be jailed

Over the weekend, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) called for the jailing of Trump administration officials who are stonewalling investigations, ““We should consider the power of inherent contempt, an old doctrine that allows the Congress itself to issue a summons, arrest warrant to an official and demand they appear at a congressional hearing, be subject to fines, to jail time. I think we ought to explore contracting with area correctional institutions, provide additional support to the sergeant in arms, so the White House knows we’re serious.”

House Democrats are running out of patience. The calls are getting louder from the Democratic caucus for stronger action to be taken. Fines are a good first step because we all know that Trump won’t actually pay the fines of those who are covering for him. Democrats are building a strong case against this administration for widespread obstruction.

In order to get this administration to comply, Democrats will either need to win court cases or take action like the Congress members are suggesting.

It might be necessary for Democrats to lock them up.

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Hometown: NY
Home country: US
Current location: Florida
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 09:54 PM
Number of posts: 171,042
Latest Discussions»babylonsister's Journal