Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
babylonsister
babylonsister's Journal
babylonsister's Journal
April 21, 2020
This is from March 30 but no less disgusting.
Kushner Squeezes Tenants While Lining Up for Bailout Money
Despite eviction bans in New York, the real-estate firm owned by the president’s son-in-law is telling tenants to pay up.
by Alexander Sammon
March 30, 2020
snip//
New York has locked down, operating under a shelter-in-place order for over a week. Numerous businesses and restaurants have shuttered, resulting in scores of layoffs. The Jacob Javits Convention Center has been transformed into a massive makeshift hospital. With untold thousands of people out of work, and the first of the month approaching, that sets up an impending crisis for a city of nearly ten million people where roughly two-thirds are renters: What happens if they can’t make rent?
That question is also on the minds of the city’s landlords, who are facing down the possibility of losing the monthly rent checks they’d otherwise expect to receive. Some landlords have offered rent forbearance to their tenants amid the escalating economic crisis. But others, like official White House son-in-law Jared Kushner, whose Kushner Companies owns over 30 buildings just in the East Village neighborhood of Manhattan, are not feeling so generous.
According to reporting from Mother Jones, verified by the Prospect, Westminster Management, a subsidiary of Kushner Companies that is responsible for more than 20,000 apartments across six states, has spent the past handful of days sending residents in New York City’s East Village neighborhood new notices about rent collection. The flyer, which featured no mention of the rapidly evolving coronavirus crisis, encourages them to use a new online platform to pay their impending rent check, rather than delivering payments in person. That new portal accepts e-check or money order, as well as credit or debit card payments, for a fee. “There has been no forbearance mentioned to them,” said Brandon Kielbasa, director of organizing and policy at the Cooper Square Committee, a local tenants’ rights group. “Many are concerned about how they will afford their rent.”
But the absence of an offer of forbearance goes beyond stinginess. Because of an executive order from New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, all tenants, both residential and commercial, are protected under a state eviction moratorium that is in effect until at least June 20. Meanwhile, New York Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks announced a suspension on court eviction proceedings, which, despite some early confusion, means that no new eviction cases are being brought before the courts until at least late April.
That means that Kushner Companies has no grounds or recourse to evict its tenants, whether or not they pay rent on April 1. Instead, the company is using repeated notices (tenants were sent multiple alerts over the past few days) in an attempt to badger low-information renters, those unaware of the state’s ban on evictions, into paying them in full.
more...
https://prospect.org/coronavirus/kushner-squeezes-tenants-while-lining-up-for-bailout-money/?fbclid=IwAR2ee1S6BqH8fiuNT4zQBbOIouZTwQoq2vpeqwO1zxL4aI4SUb4H3rqjKlE#.Xp34W0s2qAw.facebook
Kushner Squeezes Tenants While Lining Up for Bailout Money
This is from March 30 but no less disgusting.
Kushner Squeezes Tenants While Lining Up for Bailout Money
Despite eviction bans in New York, the real-estate firm owned by the president’s son-in-law is telling tenants to pay up.
by Alexander Sammon
March 30, 2020
snip//
New York has locked down, operating under a shelter-in-place order for over a week. Numerous businesses and restaurants have shuttered, resulting in scores of layoffs. The Jacob Javits Convention Center has been transformed into a massive makeshift hospital. With untold thousands of people out of work, and the first of the month approaching, that sets up an impending crisis for a city of nearly ten million people where roughly two-thirds are renters: What happens if they can’t make rent?
That question is also on the minds of the city’s landlords, who are facing down the possibility of losing the monthly rent checks they’d otherwise expect to receive. Some landlords have offered rent forbearance to their tenants amid the escalating economic crisis. But others, like official White House son-in-law Jared Kushner, whose Kushner Companies owns over 30 buildings just in the East Village neighborhood of Manhattan, are not feeling so generous.
According to reporting from Mother Jones, verified by the Prospect, Westminster Management, a subsidiary of Kushner Companies that is responsible for more than 20,000 apartments across six states, has spent the past handful of days sending residents in New York City’s East Village neighborhood new notices about rent collection. The flyer, which featured no mention of the rapidly evolving coronavirus crisis, encourages them to use a new online platform to pay their impending rent check, rather than delivering payments in person. That new portal accepts e-check or money order, as well as credit or debit card payments, for a fee. “There has been no forbearance mentioned to them,” said Brandon Kielbasa, director of organizing and policy at the Cooper Square Committee, a local tenants’ rights group. “Many are concerned about how they will afford their rent.”
But the absence of an offer of forbearance goes beyond stinginess. Because of an executive order from New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, all tenants, both residential and commercial, are protected under a state eviction moratorium that is in effect until at least June 20. Meanwhile, New York Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks announced a suspension on court eviction proceedings, which, despite some early confusion, means that no new eviction cases are being brought before the courts until at least late April.
That means that Kushner Companies has no grounds or recourse to evict its tenants, whether or not they pay rent on April 1. Instead, the company is using repeated notices (tenants were sent multiple alerts over the past few days) in an attempt to badger low-information renters, those unaware of the state’s ban on evictions, into paying them in full.
more...
https://prospect.org/coronavirus/kushner-squeezes-tenants-while-lining-up-for-bailout-money/?fbclid=IwAR2ee1S6BqH8fiuNT4zQBbOIouZTwQoq2vpeqwO1zxL4aI4SUb4H3rqjKlE#.Xp34W0s2qAw.facebook
April 21, 2020
How Health Care Investors Are Helping Run Jared Kushner’s Shadow Coronavirus Task Force
Companies in their portfolios have a clear financial stake in how Trump handles the crisis.
Pema Levy
Last year, private equity firms spent tens of millions to to defeat bipartisan legislation reining in surprise medical bills that can send unsuspecting patients into debt. In December, Congress buckled to the industry’s pressure and failed to limit predatory billing practices of many institutional health care investors—especially private equity firms, which have aggressively moved into the health care space over the last decade.
Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe—one such private equity firm that has generated big investor returns by following the industry playbook of buying up health care practices, loading them with debt, and charging patients more—controls companies that spent hundreds of thousands lobbying against the bill and helped fund a coalition of private equity-backed medical groups that spent $4 million to block the legislation. And last month, one of the firm’s top executives joined a shadow task force convened by Jared Kushner to help run the Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.
He’s in good company. When Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, assembled the group, he did not turn to experts in crisis management or public health. Instead, he enlisted people with experience in the business of health care—not necessarily medical experts, but particularly those who worked on finance side and were adept at making money off the health care industry. Some who were invited to join from inside the government’s ranks were former investors and entrepreneurs in the health space, including a former roommate of Kushner’s. But members of the shadow working group who come from outside government work at or run companies that have a clear financial stake in how the government handles the crisis and doles out contracts, spending, and bailout funding.
Because of the way the group has been assembled and run, the outsiders, unlike government employees, have not had to disclose any such potential conflicts, submit to ethics determinations about recusals, nor to divest from any financial arrangements that could influence their decisions. Moreover, because Kushner’s group is operating on private phones and email accounts without regard for federal transparency requirements governing advisory committees, there’s less insight into whether or not they are using their positions to make money for themselves or their companies.
The secrecy and clear conflicts of interest are in line with the group’s overall operations. The first report of its existence, published by the Washington Post in mid March, revealed that members were working out of offices at the Department of Health and Human Services headquarters, including representatives from UPS and FedEx. Kushner’s team has significant influence inside the official coronavirus task force run by Vice President Mike Pence, including a subgroup working on supply chain issues. According to NBC News, FedEx has been chartered, possibly at twice the cost that taxpayers would incur using military planes, to move supplies needed in the response. Reports show that Kushner’s team has sowed confusion at HHS and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by pushing aside bureaucrats and existing procedures in favor of their preexisting personal and business contacts. “Jared and his friends decided they were going to do their thing,” a senior government official involved in the pandemic response told NBC. “It cost weeks.”
more...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/04/jared-kushner-nat-turner-coronavirus-conflicts-of-interest/
How Health Care Investors Are Helping Run Jared Kushner's Shadow Coronavirus Task Force
How Health Care Investors Are Helping Run Jared Kushner’s Shadow Coronavirus Task Force
Companies in their portfolios have a clear financial stake in how Trump handles the crisis.
Pema Levy
Last year, private equity firms spent tens of millions to to defeat bipartisan legislation reining in surprise medical bills that can send unsuspecting patients into debt. In December, Congress buckled to the industry’s pressure and failed to limit predatory billing practices of many institutional health care investors—especially private equity firms, which have aggressively moved into the health care space over the last decade.
Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe—one such private equity firm that has generated big investor returns by following the industry playbook of buying up health care practices, loading them with debt, and charging patients more—controls companies that spent hundreds of thousands lobbying against the bill and helped fund a coalition of private equity-backed medical groups that spent $4 million to block the legislation. And last month, one of the firm’s top executives joined a shadow task force convened by Jared Kushner to help run the Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.
He’s in good company. When Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, assembled the group, he did not turn to experts in crisis management or public health. Instead, he enlisted people with experience in the business of health care—not necessarily medical experts, but particularly those who worked on finance side and were adept at making money off the health care industry. Some who were invited to join from inside the government’s ranks were former investors and entrepreneurs in the health space, including a former roommate of Kushner’s. But members of the shadow working group who come from outside government work at or run companies that have a clear financial stake in how the government handles the crisis and doles out contracts, spending, and bailout funding.
Because of the way the group has been assembled and run, the outsiders, unlike government employees, have not had to disclose any such potential conflicts, submit to ethics determinations about recusals, nor to divest from any financial arrangements that could influence their decisions. Moreover, because Kushner’s group is operating on private phones and email accounts without regard for federal transparency requirements governing advisory committees, there’s less insight into whether or not they are using their positions to make money for themselves or their companies.
“There are serious questions about how the Trump and Kushner families use the presidency to benefit themselves,” says Jordan Libowitz, a spokesman for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group whose experts say Kushner’s shadow group is violating federal record-keeping and transparency laws. “We don’t know how involved family business ties are to any of this. We don’t know all the members of the task force or who they’re talking to. We don’t know how people are pushing their own financial interests.”
“That isn’t to say that Jared’s doing something nefarious here,” Libowitz adds. “It is to say that if he were, this is how he would do it.”
“That isn’t to say that Jared’s doing something nefarious here,” Libowitz adds. “It is to say that if he were, this is how he would do it.”
The secrecy and clear conflicts of interest are in line with the group’s overall operations. The first report of its existence, published by the Washington Post in mid March, revealed that members were working out of offices at the Department of Health and Human Services headquarters, including representatives from UPS and FedEx. Kushner’s team has significant influence inside the official coronavirus task force run by Vice President Mike Pence, including a subgroup working on supply chain issues. According to NBC News, FedEx has been chartered, possibly at twice the cost that taxpayers would incur using military planes, to move supplies needed in the response. Reports show that Kushner’s team has sowed confusion at HHS and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by pushing aside bureaucrats and existing procedures in favor of their preexisting personal and business contacts. “Jared and his friends decided they were going to do their thing,” a senior government official involved in the pandemic response told NBC. “It cost weeks.”
more...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/04/jared-kushner-nat-turner-coronavirus-conflicts-of-interest/
April 21, 2020
Coronavirus
Why Trump’s Coronavirus Optimism Isn’t Working
When FDR projected optimism in the depths of the Great Depression, it was based on candor and competence. Trump is trying to mimic it, but his own lies undermine him.
By Richard Stengel
April 20, 2020
On a blustery March morning, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt stood behind a podium on the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to give his inaugural address, America was in the depths of the Great Depression. Most banks were shuttered, millions had lost their life savings, and about a quarter of Americans were unemployed. It was a dark moment. FDR sought to project optimism, but it was optimism seasoned with candor. Though the best known line in that speech occurs in the fifth sentence of the opening paragraph, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,” the second sentence declares, “This is preeminently the time to speak the truth.” In that brief opening paragraph of 153 words, he mentions not only “truth,” but “candor,” and “frankness.”
The projection of optimism is a hallmark of great leaders, and FDR might have been our greatest model of that presidential virtue. But from the first he was clear that in times of crisis, optimism also required realism—realism in the form of honesty about the nature of the challenge itself. He understood that to engage a whole nation, he could not sugarcoat the task ahead. Optimism had to be earned. In President Donald Trump’s efforts to project optimism, he has been anything but candid and honest. To simply say, “We see light at the end of the tunnel,” without facts or data to back it up, is not optimism but dissembling. Optimism unaccompanied by realism is hollow. Trump’s optimism is more like that of the classic American species, “the confidence man,” the swindler who sells you a bill of goods and then moves on to the next sucker. Moreover, his optimism always seems self-serving, as though it is more about people rewarding him for being upbeat than how he is grappling with the crisis itself. As FDR said in the third paragraph of his inaugural address, “Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.”
FDR’s projection of optimism was also rooted in morality and ethics. This is true of almost all American presidents. In his inaugural he criticizes greed (“the falsity of material wealth”), saying that American restoration depends on the extent to which “we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.” This is contrasted with Trump’s complete lack of a moral or ethical call to duty, and his repeated declaration that we must “reopen the economy,” without citing any moral value to that other than an increase in the GDP or the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It is more about his obvious disappointment that “the greatest economy in the history of our country” (a ridiculously false claim, by the way) is under siege by a virus.
snip//
FDR also projected optimism by being unruffled in the face of crisis. With his cigarette holder pointed upward like the trajectory of a rising graph, his V-for-victory salute, his jaunty smile, he projected a never-let-them-see-you-sweat confidence. FDR wore pounds of steel braces to give a speech or get in or out of a car, but would never ever project self-pity. Eleanor Roosevelt said of her husband that even after he had been struck with polio, “I never heard him complain.” Trump, on the other hand, seems to make himself the primary victim of the pandemic, as though it was aimed directly at him. No matter the crisis, he is always the first casualty. Instead of talking about the real victims—those who are ill and those who have died—he spends much of his daily press conferences blaming and accusing others for failures that are attributable to him. FDR had his own grievances with the press, and once complained that he thought 85% of the press was against him. But he would never let the public see him wounded by the press or publicly label them “the enemy of the people.”
Part of the reason presidents attempt to project optimism is so Americans will feel confident in their government. Roosevelt was also intent on changing the perception of government from a distant and indifferent bystander to a direct means of support for people in trouble. Roosevelt said the public welfare was the great duty of the state, and he attempted to give people confidence in the federal government. That has been difficult for Trump to do. From his boasting that avoiding taxes was the “smart” thing to do to his offhand remark last month that the federal government was “not a shipping clerk,” his disdain for the idea that government has a role in the public welfare has been painfully obvious. Trump is a manifestation of three decades of Republicans running against government. His understanding of federalism is minimal, and he tasks the states with jobs that should be carried out by the administration. Now, when he wants people to trust government to do the right thing, he has a hard time making that argument. You can project cheap optimism and unsupported confidence as much as you want, but reality is a stubborn thing. Ultimately—and particularly in a crisis—confidence in a leader comes from one thing: competence.
Richard Stengel: Why Trump's Coronavirus Optimism Isn't Working
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/04/why-trump-coronavirus-optimism-isnt-workingCoronavirus
Why Trump’s Coronavirus Optimism Isn’t Working
When FDR projected optimism in the depths of the Great Depression, it was based on candor and competence. Trump is trying to mimic it, but his own lies undermine him.
By Richard Stengel
April 20, 2020
On a blustery March morning, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt stood behind a podium on the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to give his inaugural address, America was in the depths of the Great Depression. Most banks were shuttered, millions had lost their life savings, and about a quarter of Americans were unemployed. It was a dark moment. FDR sought to project optimism, but it was optimism seasoned with candor. Though the best known line in that speech occurs in the fifth sentence of the opening paragraph, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,” the second sentence declares, “This is preeminently the time to speak the truth.” In that brief opening paragraph of 153 words, he mentions not only “truth,” but “candor,” and “frankness.”
The projection of optimism is a hallmark of great leaders, and FDR might have been our greatest model of that presidential virtue. But from the first he was clear that in times of crisis, optimism also required realism—realism in the form of honesty about the nature of the challenge itself. He understood that to engage a whole nation, he could not sugarcoat the task ahead. Optimism had to be earned. In President Donald Trump’s efforts to project optimism, he has been anything but candid and honest. To simply say, “We see light at the end of the tunnel,” without facts or data to back it up, is not optimism but dissembling. Optimism unaccompanied by realism is hollow. Trump’s optimism is more like that of the classic American species, “the confidence man,” the swindler who sells you a bill of goods and then moves on to the next sucker. Moreover, his optimism always seems self-serving, as though it is more about people rewarding him for being upbeat than how he is grappling with the crisis itself. As FDR said in the third paragraph of his inaugural address, “Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.”
FDR’s projection of optimism was also rooted in morality and ethics. This is true of almost all American presidents. In his inaugural he criticizes greed (“the falsity of material wealth”), saying that American restoration depends on the extent to which “we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.” This is contrasted with Trump’s complete lack of a moral or ethical call to duty, and his repeated declaration that we must “reopen the economy,” without citing any moral value to that other than an increase in the GDP or the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It is more about his obvious disappointment that “the greatest economy in the history of our country” (a ridiculously false claim, by the way) is under siege by a virus.
snip//
FDR also projected optimism by being unruffled in the face of crisis. With his cigarette holder pointed upward like the trajectory of a rising graph, his V-for-victory salute, his jaunty smile, he projected a never-let-them-see-you-sweat confidence. FDR wore pounds of steel braces to give a speech or get in or out of a car, but would never ever project self-pity. Eleanor Roosevelt said of her husband that even after he had been struck with polio, “I never heard him complain.” Trump, on the other hand, seems to make himself the primary victim of the pandemic, as though it was aimed directly at him. No matter the crisis, he is always the first casualty. Instead of talking about the real victims—those who are ill and those who have died—he spends much of his daily press conferences blaming and accusing others for failures that are attributable to him. FDR had his own grievances with the press, and once complained that he thought 85% of the press was against him. But he would never let the public see him wounded by the press or publicly label them “the enemy of the people.”
Part of the reason presidents attempt to project optimism is so Americans will feel confident in their government. Roosevelt was also intent on changing the perception of government from a distant and indifferent bystander to a direct means of support for people in trouble. Roosevelt said the public welfare was the great duty of the state, and he attempted to give people confidence in the federal government. That has been difficult for Trump to do. From his boasting that avoiding taxes was the “smart” thing to do to his offhand remark last month that the federal government was “not a shipping clerk,” his disdain for the idea that government has a role in the public welfare has been painfully obvious. Trump is a manifestation of three decades of Republicans running against government. His understanding of federalism is minimal, and he tasks the states with jobs that should be carried out by the administration. Now, when he wants people to trust government to do the right thing, he has a hard time making that argument. You can project cheap optimism and unsupported confidence as much as you want, but reality is a stubborn thing. Ultimately—and particularly in a crisis—confidence in a leader comes from one thing: competence.
April 21, 2020
"He Wouldn't Call Up Obama, Clinton, or Even Bush During This Crisis"...
From the Magazine
May 2020
“He Wouldn’t Call Up Obama, Clinton, or Even Bush During This Crisis”: Trump’s Cold War With the Former Presidents
In an exclusive excerpt from her new book, Team of Five, Kate Andersen Brower reveals why Donald Trump will be left out of the world’s most elite fraternity.
By Kate Andersen Brower
Illustration by Mike Tofanelli
April 21, 2020
snip//
Former presidents used to help each other in times of crisis. Trump has made that impossible. He has not spoken with Obama or Clinton since his inauguration more than three years ago (aside from a brief hello and goodbye to Obama during George H.W. Bush’s funeral in December 2018). In fact, the only substantive conversation he and Obama have had was during the customary visit Trump made to the Oval Office two days after he won the 2016 election. He has been criticizing him ever since. “I didn’t like the job that he and Biden did,” Trump said at a Fox News Town Hall in March. “I didn’t like the position they put us in.” Seeking to justify his administration’s bungled response to the novel-coronavirus outbreak in America, he attacked Obama, tweeting that his handling of the 2009 H1N1 swine flu was “a full scale disaster, with thousands dying, and nothing meaningful done to fix the testing problem…” Contrast that with John F. Kennedy, who called on all three of his living predecessors to ask for their help during the Cuban Missile Crisis. A year and a half earlier, after the Bay of Pigs disaster, Kennedy had reached out to the man he’d just defeated, Richard Nixon, and to his Republican predecessor, Dwight D. Eisenhower. He knew he could not afford to be too proud to ask for help. “No one knows how rough this job is until after he has been in it a few months,” Kennedy confessed to Eisenhower.
Ronald Reagan sent Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Carter to Anwar Sadat’s 1981 Cairo funeral during a sensitive global moment that could have precipitated more violence. And then there’s the way the former presidents supported George W. Bush after 9/11, and how George H.W. Bush and Clinton traveled the world together, seeking help after the tsunami in Asia, and in their leadership roles raising money after Hurricane Katrina. They became near-constant companions, doing interviews together and even traveling with George W. as part of the American delegation to Pope John Paul II’s 2005 funeral in Rome. “Come on,” Bush senior implored Clinton. “It will be better with you along.” Nicknamed “the A-team” in the press, they became like father and son. Time made them Partners of the Year in its 2005 Person of the Year issue. After seeing how powerful the Clinton-Bush team was, President Obama dispatched George W. Bush and Clinton to Haiti to raise awareness and funds after the devastating 2010 earthquake. This kind of teamwork and camaraderie now seems unthinkable and almost quaint.
Former presidents typically don’t initiate calls to the sitting president to offer their help because it could come across as meddling. But two people close to George W. Bush say that Bush is open to a call from Trump, even though there is no love lost between the two men. They haven’t spoken at any length since two phone calls during the confirmation of controversial Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, who had worked in the Bush White House. One former top Trump official who knows both men well said that if Trump were to call on Bush for help during this pandemic, Bush would “swallow hard, and he would help however he can for the good of the nation. That’s the kind of person he is.” But Trump’s doing that is nearly inconceivable. “His ego and his dismissal of the former presidents are all part of his mindset,” this person said on the condition of anonymity. “Early on I was shocked by some of the things he said about the former presidents. It’s not pretty. In my lifetime I haven’t seen a president so self-centered,” adding, “It is ironic that Trump doesn’t hesitate to call up strongmen autocrats like Putin and Erdoğan—who are not our friends—but he wouldn’t call up Obama, Clinton, or even Bush during this crisis.”
Given all of this, it is hard to imagine that, whenever he does leave the White House, Trump will receive a warm welcome into the club. He has accused his immediate predecessor of wiretapping his office ahead of the 2016 election and called his most recent Republican predecessor’s foreign policy the worst in history. He perpetually notes that his relationships with other world leaders are better than those of former presidents. But have the years he’s spent in that awe-inspiring office given him empathy for what his predecessors went through? “No,” he replies flatly. Unlike most of the men who came before him, who aged prematurely and struggled with insomnia while in office, often pacing the halls of the White House in the dead of the night, overwhelmed by the gravity of the position, Trump said he has no trouble sleeping.
more...
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/04/trumps-cold-war-with-the-former-presidents
April 20, 2020
Sorry, Trump. You can't fire the GAO, and it's investigating what you do with COVID-19 money
Joan McCarter
Daily Kos Staff
Monday April 20, 2020 · 11:17 AM EDT
Impeached president Donald Trump has rampaged through the ranks of inspectors general attempting to provide some kind of check on his corruption. Thankfully for the nation, there's one watchdog agency outside of his reach, and it’s already on the job of auditing what his administration is doing with the $2 trillion Congress handed it in the coronavirus emergency CARES Act.
The General Accountability Office (GAO) is an arm of Congress, and thus Trump can't touch it. "We're moving forward very quickly," Angela Nicole Clowers, chief of the GAO’s healthcare unit, told Politico. "We're an existing institution and have a lot of institutional knowledge about all these programs. It gives us sort of a leg up." All these programs being those that have been given big chunks of money to spend. By the end of this month, senior investigators say, it will have opened at least 30 CARES Act investigations.
Audits and reviews will include the Trump administration's "handling of coronavirus testing" and "distribution of medical equipment." So that should prove interesting. It will also review the administration's response to food supply problems, nursing home infections, and how the various emergency loans and cash distribution has been handled. Here's the good part: "The office is required under the new law to brief Congress every month and issue a bimonthly public report on its findings."
That's not to say that Trump will try to obstruct the GAO, but it does come into this with an additional $20 million from the CARES Act to conduct its oversight of the administration. "Within GAO, we have everyone from policy analysts or public policy people like myself," Clowers said, "we have nurses, we have scientists, we have engineers, we have lawyers. You sort of name an occupation, we have 'em."
It’s already begun, insuring into a tip that a coronavirus cash payment went to an account of someone who died in 2019. "Thankfully, that family was nice enough to return the fund," Howard Arp, the office's fraud unit chief said. "That then causes us to start asking questions. How could that happen? What control was missed? That is already starting." That could happen because the IRS is sending checks to accounts of people who filed taxes in 2018 or 2019—it's not going to automatically know who's dead if the account hasn't been closed out. More of those checks to dead people are going to happen, and it would likely take some kind of intervention from the Treasury department to force banks to act.
The main obstacle they see, Arp and Clowers said, is that the GAO won't be able to be onsite to investigate. Normally, "we go observe, we touch, we feel, we see," Clowers told Politico. "Right now, we're not able to do that, […] but we're leveraging technology to the extent we can."
Sorry, Trump. You can't fire the GAO, and it's investigating what you do with COVID-19 money
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/4/20/1938843/-Sorry-Trump-You-can-t-fire-the-GAO-and-they-re-investigating-what-you-do-with-COVID-19-moneySorry, Trump. You can't fire the GAO, and it's investigating what you do with COVID-19 money
Joan McCarter
Daily Kos Staff
Monday April 20, 2020 · 11:17 AM EDT
Impeached president Donald Trump has rampaged through the ranks of inspectors general attempting to provide some kind of check on his corruption. Thankfully for the nation, there's one watchdog agency outside of his reach, and it’s already on the job of auditing what his administration is doing with the $2 trillion Congress handed it in the coronavirus emergency CARES Act.
The General Accountability Office (GAO) is an arm of Congress, and thus Trump can't touch it. "We're moving forward very quickly," Angela Nicole Clowers, chief of the GAO’s healthcare unit, told Politico. "We're an existing institution and have a lot of institutional knowledge about all these programs. It gives us sort of a leg up." All these programs being those that have been given big chunks of money to spend. By the end of this month, senior investigators say, it will have opened at least 30 CARES Act investigations.
Audits and reviews will include the Trump administration's "handling of coronavirus testing" and "distribution of medical equipment." So that should prove interesting. It will also review the administration's response to food supply problems, nursing home infections, and how the various emergency loans and cash distribution has been handled. Here's the good part: "The office is required under the new law to brief Congress every month and issue a bimonthly public report on its findings."
That's not to say that Trump will try to obstruct the GAO, but it does come into this with an additional $20 million from the CARES Act to conduct its oversight of the administration. "Within GAO, we have everyone from policy analysts or public policy people like myself," Clowers said, "we have nurses, we have scientists, we have engineers, we have lawyers. You sort of name an occupation, we have 'em."
It’s already begun, insuring into a tip that a coronavirus cash payment went to an account of someone who died in 2019. "Thankfully, that family was nice enough to return the fund," Howard Arp, the office's fraud unit chief said. "That then causes us to start asking questions. How could that happen? What control was missed? That is already starting." That could happen because the IRS is sending checks to accounts of people who filed taxes in 2018 or 2019—it's not going to automatically know who's dead if the account hasn't been closed out. More of those checks to dead people are going to happen, and it would likely take some kind of intervention from the Treasury department to force banks to act.
The main obstacle they see, Arp and Clowers said, is that the GAO won't be able to be onsite to investigate. Normally, "we go observe, we touch, we feel, we see," Clowers told Politico. "Right now, we're not able to do that, […] but we're leveraging technology to the extent we can."
April 20, 2020
Democrats’ momentum puts Senate majority in play
Republicans are still favorites to keep the chamber, but Democrats' possible path to flipping the Senate is clearer now.
By JAMES ARKIN
04/20/2020 04:30 AM EDT
Republicans started this election cycle as heavy favorites to keep their Senate majority, with a lineup of elections mostly in red-tinted states and GOP incumbents favored over a slate of relatively unknown and untested challengers.
Now, nearly six months out from the election, Democrats are making them sweat.
Republicans are still more likely than not to maintain control, but Democrats strengthened their hand with a slate of challengers raising massive sums of money in races that represent the heart of the battle for the majority, putting control of the Senate within reach. Republicans remain modest favorites to keep the Senate, with incumbents holding cash advantages in most competitive races and several offensive targets potentially cushioning their majority.
But GOP leaders are bracing for a slog. Steven Law, president of the super PAC Senate Leadership Fund and a top ally to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, said in a recent interview there is a sense among donors and allies that it could be a “challenging election from top to bottom.”
more...
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/20/democrats-momentum-senate-majority-in-play-194415
Democrats' momentum puts Senate majority in play
Democrats’ momentum puts Senate majority in play
Republicans are still favorites to keep the chamber, but Democrats' possible path to flipping the Senate is clearer now.
By JAMES ARKIN
04/20/2020 04:30 AM EDT
Republicans started this election cycle as heavy favorites to keep their Senate majority, with a lineup of elections mostly in red-tinted states and GOP incumbents favored over a slate of relatively unknown and untested challengers.
Now, nearly six months out from the election, Democrats are making them sweat.
Republicans are still more likely than not to maintain control, but Democrats strengthened their hand with a slate of challengers raising massive sums of money in races that represent the heart of the battle for the majority, putting control of the Senate within reach. Republicans remain modest favorites to keep the Senate, with incumbents holding cash advantages in most competitive races and several offensive targets potentially cushioning their majority.
But GOP leaders are bracing for a slog. Steven Law, president of the super PAC Senate Leadership Fund and a top ally to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, said in a recent interview there is a sense among donors and allies that it could be a “challenging election from top to bottom.”
“The sense is that, no matter what else happens, we've got to hold the Senate majority. And it's not a given,” Law said. “There's just a broad front to defend, and it's going to take a lot of resources and a lot of hard work to do it.”
more...
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/20/democrats-momentum-senate-majority-in-play-194415
April 20, 2020
Posted on Mon, Apr 20th, 2020 by Jason Easley
Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler Request Investigation Into AG Barr
House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees Chairmen Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler have requested an Inspector General investigation into William Barr.
Schiff and Nadler sent a letter to Department of Justice’s Acting Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility Jeffrey Ragsdale and Inspector General Michael Horowitz stating:
Barr has deserved investigation and many would say impeachment since he took over as Attorney General. Barr has turned his position into acting as Trump’s personal attorney, as he has been involved with squashing the Mueller investigation, trying to get dirt on Joe Biden, and has personally taken overseeing and shutting down investigations that involve Trump or his family.
An IG investigation into Barr is long overdue. Even during the time of a pandemic, the duties of congressional oversight should not cease.
Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler Request Investigation Into AG Barr
https://www.politicususa.com/2020/04/20/adam-schiff-and-jerry-nadler-request-investigation-into-ag-barr.htmlPosted on Mon, Apr 20th, 2020 by Jason Easley
Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler Request Investigation Into AG Barr
House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees Chairmen Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler have requested an Inspector General investigation into William Barr.
Schiff and Nadler sent a letter to Department of Justice’s Acting Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility Jeffrey Ragsdale and Inspector General Michael Horowitz stating:
We write to request that you investigate whether recent public statements by Attorney General William Barr regarding former Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (ICIG) Michael Atkinson violated applicable Department of Justice (DOJ) policies and rules of professional conduct.
In a televised interview on April 9, 2020, Mr. Barr blatantly mischaracterized Mr. Atkinson’s conduct and DOJ’s own actions relating to the complaint filed last summer by an Intelligence Community whistleblower. The complaint detailed President Trump’s efforts to coerce Ukraine to announce a politically-motivated investigation of his rival in the 2020 presidential election. Mr. Barr’s remarks followed the President’s admission on April 4 that he fired Mr. Atkinson in retaliation for Mr. Atkinson’s handling—in accordance with the law—of the whistleblower complaint. The House of Representatives’ investigation independently confirmed the whistleblower’s account of the President’s abuse of power, for which the President was subsequently impeached. Mr. Barr’s misleading remarks appear to have been aimed at justifying the President’s retaliatory decision to fire Mr. Atkinson.
…..
Moreover, Mr. Barr’s recent remarks are part of a disturbing pattern of misrepresenting facts and falsely alleging misconduct by other government officials in order to defend the President’s own misconduct. In the year since Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Mr. Barr has persistently sought to mislead the American public in an effort to undermine the Special Counsel’s investigation and findings, as well as those of the Department’s own Office of Inspector General. Indeed, a federal judge recently examined Mr. Barr’s “lack of candor” and concluded that Mr. Barr “distorted the findings in the Mueller Report,” which “cause[d] the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump.”
….
Public confidence in our system of justice depends on the integrity, fairness, and impartiality of DOJ’s leadership. It is, therefore, imperative that the Attorney General be held to the same high standard expected of all Department personnel, particularly in matters involving the President’s own interests. We appreciate your prompt attention to this request.
In a televised interview on April 9, 2020, Mr. Barr blatantly mischaracterized Mr. Atkinson’s conduct and DOJ’s own actions relating to the complaint filed last summer by an Intelligence Community whistleblower. The complaint detailed President Trump’s efforts to coerce Ukraine to announce a politically-motivated investigation of his rival in the 2020 presidential election. Mr. Barr’s remarks followed the President’s admission on April 4 that he fired Mr. Atkinson in retaliation for Mr. Atkinson’s handling—in accordance with the law—of the whistleblower complaint. The House of Representatives’ investigation independently confirmed the whistleblower’s account of the President’s abuse of power, for which the President was subsequently impeached. Mr. Barr’s misleading remarks appear to have been aimed at justifying the President’s retaliatory decision to fire Mr. Atkinson.
…..
Moreover, Mr. Barr’s recent remarks are part of a disturbing pattern of misrepresenting facts and falsely alleging misconduct by other government officials in order to defend the President’s own misconduct. In the year since Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Mr. Barr has persistently sought to mislead the American public in an effort to undermine the Special Counsel’s investigation and findings, as well as those of the Department’s own Office of Inspector General. Indeed, a federal judge recently examined Mr. Barr’s “lack of candor” and concluded that Mr. Barr “distorted the findings in the Mueller Report,” which “cause[d] the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump.”
….
Public confidence in our system of justice depends on the integrity, fairness, and impartiality of DOJ’s leadership. It is, therefore, imperative that the Attorney General be held to the same high standard expected of all Department personnel, particularly in matters involving the President’s own interests. We appreciate your prompt attention to this request.
Barr has deserved investigation and many would say impeachment since he took over as Attorney General. Barr has turned his position into acting as Trump’s personal attorney, as he has been involved with squashing the Mueller investigation, trying to get dirt on Joe Biden, and has personally taken overseeing and shutting down investigations that involve Trump or his family.
An IG investigation into Barr is long overdue. Even during the time of a pandemic, the duties of congressional oversight should not cease.
April 20, 2020
Jane Goodall hopes pandemic creates movement 'of people who've never before breathed clean air in cities'
By John Bowden - 04/20/20 03:58 PM EDT
British primatologist and conservationist Jane Goodall said that she hopes a global movement of people calling for clean air will result from the global coronavirus outbreak, which has emptied cities of traffic.
In an interview with The Associated Press ahead of the launch of her new documentary, Goodall explained that images of cities such as Los Angeles with pristine skylines due to reduced smog levels could inspire Americans and others to have more respect for their environment.
Goodall went on in the interview to call for wealthier people to recognize that they will need to live less lavishly in order to preserve the Earth's natural resources in a sustainable manner.
more...
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/493734-jane-goodall-hopes-pandemic-creates-movement-of-people-whove-never
Jane Goodall hopes pandemic creates movement 'of people who've never before breathed clean air in c
Jane Goodall hopes pandemic creates movement 'of people who've never before breathed clean air in cities'
By John Bowden - 04/20/20 03:58 PM EDT
British primatologist and conservationist Jane Goodall said that she hopes a global movement of people calling for clean air will result from the global coronavirus outbreak, which has emptied cities of traffic.
In an interview with The Associated Press ahead of the launch of her new documentary, Goodall explained that images of cities such as Los Angeles with pristine skylines due to reduced smog levels could inspire Americans and others to have more respect for their environment.
"Hopefully we should emerge wiser [after the coronavirus pandemic ends]," Goodall told the AP.
"I think there will be greater awareness of how we brought this pandemic on ourselves and that people will change. I hope there’s a groundswell of enough millions of people who’ve never before breathed clean air in cities, who’ve never been able to look up at night and see a clear sky with twinkling stars," she continued. "I hope that they’ll be enough of them to eventually force big business and politicians to ... stop carrying on with business as usual."
"I think there will be greater awareness of how we brought this pandemic on ourselves and that people will change. I hope there’s a groundswell of enough millions of people who’ve never before breathed clean air in cities, who’ve never been able to look up at night and see a clear sky with twinkling stars," she continued. "I hope that they’ll be enough of them to eventually force big business and politicians to ... stop carrying on with business as usual."
Goodall went on in the interview to call for wealthier people to recognize that they will need to live less lavishly in order to preserve the Earth's natural resources in a sustainable manner.
"Already, in some cases, we’re using up natural resources before nature can replenish them," Goodall explained. "So we cannot expect to survive very far into the future unless we make some change. ... We have to learn to do with less in the wealthier sections of society. Most of us have far more than we actually need."
"We need a different way of thinking about things. We need to realize that unlimited economic development on a world with finite natural resources and growing human populations can’t work," she said.
"We need a different way of thinking about things. We need to realize that unlimited economic development on a world with finite natural resources and growing human populations can’t work," she said.
more...
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/493734-jane-goodall-hopes-pandemic-creates-movement-of-people-whove-never
April 20, 2020
A watchdog out of Trump's grasp unleashes wave of coronavirus audits
The Government Accountability Office is moving quickly to conduct oversight — and it's got more protection than other Trump targets.
By KYLE CHENEY
04/20/2020 04:30 AM EDT
Lawmakers handed President Donald Trump $2 trillion in coronavirus relief — and then left town without activating any of the powerful new oversight tools meant to hold his administration accountable.
But with little fanfare, Congress’ independent, in-house watchdog is preparing a blizzard of audits that will become the first wide-ranging check on Trump’s handling of the sprawling national rescue effort.
And even as Trump has gone to war against internal watchdogs in his administration, the Government Accountability Office remains largely out of the president’s grasp because of its home in the legislative branch.
The GAO has quickly taken advantage of its perch, exploring the early missteps inherent in launching a multitrillion-dollar law that touches every facet of American life. By the end of April, at least 30 CARES Act reviews and audits — "engagements," per GAO lingo — are expected to be underway, according to interviews with senior investigators.
Topics will range from the government’s handling of coronavirus testing to its distribution of medical equipment, and from the nation’s food supply to nursing home infections and any missteps in distributing the emergency cash payments that began landing in millions of Americans’ bank accounts this week. The office’s top fraud investigator said it’s already received a complaint about a check landing in the account of a deceased person.
more...
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/20/watchdog-trump-coronavirus-audits-192272
A watchdog out of Trump's grasp unleashes wave of coronavirus audits
A watchdog out of Trump's grasp unleashes wave of coronavirus audits
The Government Accountability Office is moving quickly to conduct oversight — and it's got more protection than other Trump targets.
By KYLE CHENEY
04/20/2020 04:30 AM EDT
Lawmakers handed President Donald Trump $2 trillion in coronavirus relief — and then left town without activating any of the powerful new oversight tools meant to hold his administration accountable.
But with little fanfare, Congress’ independent, in-house watchdog is preparing a blizzard of audits that will become the first wide-ranging check on Trump’s handling of the sprawling national rescue effort.
And even as Trump has gone to war against internal watchdogs in his administration, the Government Accountability Office remains largely out of the president’s grasp because of its home in the legislative branch.
The GAO has quickly taken advantage of its perch, exploring the early missteps inherent in launching a multitrillion-dollar law that touches every facet of American life. By the end of April, at least 30 CARES Act reviews and audits — "engagements," per GAO lingo — are expected to be underway, according to interviews with senior investigators.
Topics will range from the government’s handling of coronavirus testing to its distribution of medical equipment, and from the nation’s food supply to nursing home infections and any missteps in distributing the emergency cash payments that began landing in millions of Americans’ bank accounts this week. The office’s top fraud investigator said it’s already received a complaint about a check landing in the account of a deceased person.
“We’re moving forward very quickly,” said Angela Nicole Clowers, chief of the GAO’s health care unit. “We’re an existing institution and have a lot of institutional knowledge about all these programs. It gives us sort of a leg up.”
more...
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/20/watchdog-trump-coronavirus-audits-192272
April 20, 2020
Democrats Tighten Grip on House Majority
April 19, 2020 at 8:18 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard
Democrats Tighten Grip on House Majority
https://politicalwire.com/2020/04/19/democrats-tighten-grip-on-house-majority/Democrats Tighten Grip on House Majority
April 19, 2020 at 8:18 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard
“Recruitment flops and lackluster fundraising have weakened Republicans’ chances in over a dozen competitive House districts, leaving them with an increasingly narrow path back to power,” Politico reports.
“Though GOP strategists feel confident they will see some gains this cycle, the latest fundraising reports out last week painted a bleak picture of their odds of netting the 18 seats needed to recapture the House, particularly with campaigning frozen by a global pandemic.”
“Though GOP strategists feel confident they will see some gains this cycle, the latest fundraising reports out last week painted a bleak picture of their odds of netting the 18 seats needed to recapture the House, particularly with campaigning frozen by a global pandemic.”
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: NY
Home country: US
Current location: Florida
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 09:54 PM
Number of posts: 171,057
