Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Yorkie Mom
Yorkie Mom's Journal
Yorkie Mom's Journal
May 1, 2019
Here is the 2nd letter Mueller sent to Barr
Here is Mueller's full March 27 letter to Bill Barrit's actually the SECOND letter Mueller sent, following one on March 25, the day after Barr released his 4page memo. Mueller asked Barr to release the intro and summary enclosed in each volume of the report. Barr decided not to.
https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1123589709396103169
https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1123589709396103169
May 1, 2019
Source: New York Times
WASHINGTON The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, pushed Attorney General William P. Barr twice to release more of his investigative findings in late March after Mr. Barr outlined the inquirys main conclusions in a letter to Congress, citing a gap between Mr. Barrs interpretation and Mr. Muellers report, according to a letter released on Wednesday.
The letter, from Mr. Mueller, revealed deep concern about how Mr. Barr handled the initial release of the special counsels findings.
Mr. Muellers office first informed the Justice Department of their concerns on March 25, a day after Mr. Barr released his letter clearing Mr. Trump but declined to release the special counsels findings themselves.
We communicated that concern to the department on the morning of March 25, Mr. Mueller said in a second letter to Mr. Barr two days later. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation.
... snip
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/mueller-letters-barr.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
There were 2 Mueller letters? Developing story from NYT
Mueller Pushed Twice for Barr to Release Report's SummariesSource: New York Times
WASHINGTON The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, pushed Attorney General William P. Barr twice to release more of his investigative findings in late March after Mr. Barr outlined the inquirys main conclusions in a letter to Congress, citing a gap between Mr. Barrs interpretation and Mr. Muellers report, according to a letter released on Wednesday.
The letter, from Mr. Mueller, revealed deep concern about how Mr. Barr handled the initial release of the special counsels findings.
Mr. Muellers office first informed the Justice Department of their concerns on March 25, a day after Mr. Barr released his letter clearing Mr. Trump but declined to release the special counsels findings themselves.
We communicated that concern to the department on the morning of March 25, Mr. Mueller said in a second letter to Mr. Barr two days later. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation.
... snip
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/mueller-letters-barr.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
May 1, 2019
Here it is: Letter Special Counsel Mueller sent to AG Barr
House Judiciary has just received a copy of the letter Special Counsel Mueller sent to AG Barr
https://twitter.com/AlexNBCNews/status/1123583403121680385
https://twitter.com/AlexNBCNews/status/1123583403121680385
May 1, 2019
Rick Wilson: There's some bad blood in the water for this to be leaking now.
https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1123382195937214464
The Mueller graf in my new piece was added literally seconds after it posted and seconds before we went to press, and the more I contemplate the leak, the more interesting I find it.
Ask yourself why this is leaking now, kids.
There's some bad blood in the water.
The Mueller graf in my new piece was added literally seconds after it posted and seconds before we went to press, and the more I contemplate the leak, the more interesting I find it.
Ask yourself why this is leaking now, kids.
There's some bad blood in the water.
May 1, 2019
Updated with video:
AG Barr exposed for lying to the US Senate.
https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler/status/1123378879178133504
I note with interest AG Barrs 4/10 Senate testimony.
Q: Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion?
A: I dont know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.
Now it appears that Mueller objected in this 3/27 letter.
I note with interest AG Barrs 4/10 Senate testimony.
Q: Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion?
A: I dont know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.
Now it appears that Mueller objected in this 3/27 letter.
Updated with video:
April 30, 2019
New York Times has an article up as well.
https://twitter.com/maddow/status/1123368003503054848
Updated article MUELLER SPEAKS: Mueller told the AG Barr that the depiction of his findings failed
Mueller told the attorney general that the depiction of his findings failed to capture context, nature, and substance of probe
By Washington Post Staff
April 30 at 7:07 PM
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of Muellers work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.
At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.
Days after Barrs announcement , Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Muellers work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.
The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this offices work and conclusions, Mueller wrote. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.
More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2019/04/30/mueller-told-the-attorney-general-that-the-depiction-of-his-findings-failed-to-capture-context-nature-and-substance-of-probe/?utm_term=.971a08d66bec
By Washington Post Staff
April 30 at 7:07 PM
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of Muellers work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.
At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.
Days after Barrs announcement , Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Muellers work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.
The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this offices work and conclusions, Mueller wrote. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.
More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2019/04/30/mueller-told-the-attorney-general-that-the-depiction-of-his-findings-failed-to-capture-context-nature-and-substance-of-probe/?utm_term=.971a08d66bec
New York Times has an article up as well.
https://twitter.com/maddow/status/1123368003503054848
Mueller Objected to Barrs Description of Russia Investigations Findings
WASHINGTON Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, wrote a letter in late March to Attorney General William P. Barr objecting to his early description of the Russia investigations conclusions that appeared to clear President Trump on possible obstruction of justice, according to the Justice Department.
The letter adds to the growing evidence of a rift between them and is another sign of the anger among the special counsels investigators about Mr. Barrs characterization of their findings, which allowed Mr. Trump to wrongly claim he had been vindicated.
... snip
A central issue in the simmering dispute is how the publics understanding of the Mueller report has been shaped since the special counsel ended his investigation and delivered his 448-page report on March 22 to the attorney general, his boss and longtime friend. The four-page letter that Mr. Barr sent to Congress two days later gave little detail about the special counsels findings and created the impression that Mr. Muellers team found no wrongdoing, allowing Mr. Trump to declare he had been exonerated.
...snip
In once instance, Mr. Barr took Mr. Muellers words out of context to suggest that the president had no motive to obstruct justice. In another instance, he plucked a fragment from a sentence in the Mueller report that made a conclusion seem less damaging for the president.
More: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/us/politics/mueller-barr.html
WASHINGTON Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, wrote a letter in late March to Attorney General William P. Barr objecting to his early description of the Russia investigations conclusions that appeared to clear President Trump on possible obstruction of justice, according to the Justice Department.
The letter adds to the growing evidence of a rift between them and is another sign of the anger among the special counsels investigators about Mr. Barrs characterization of their findings, which allowed Mr. Trump to wrongly claim he had been vindicated.
... snip
A central issue in the simmering dispute is how the publics understanding of the Mueller report has been shaped since the special counsel ended his investigation and delivered his 448-page report on March 22 to the attorney general, his boss and longtime friend. The four-page letter that Mr. Barr sent to Congress two days later gave little detail about the special counsels findings and created the impression that Mr. Muellers team found no wrongdoing, allowing Mr. Trump to declare he had been exonerated.
...snip
In once instance, Mr. Barr took Mr. Muellers words out of context to suggest that the president had no motive to obstruct justice. In another instance, he plucked a fragment from a sentence in the Mueller report that made a conclusion seem less damaging for the president.
More: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/us/politics/mueller-barr.html
April 22, 2019
Mitch McConnell's Brother-in-Law is deep in Trump-Russia
Has anyone else seen this Reddit thread?
Jim Breyer is married to "shipping executive and philanthropist Angela Chao, the youngest sister of Elaine Chao." Wiki
There is way too much info and documentation to post, but here is a taste.
It's worth the time to click on the Reddit thread.
Mitch McConnell's Brother-in-Law One of the Masterminds of Trump-Russia
Jim Breyer, Mitch McConnell's brother-in-law, Facilitates Russias Takeover of Facebook through Yuri Milner
In 2005 Jim Breyer, a partner at Accel Partners, invested $1 million of his own money into Facebook and gained a seat on the board (1).
In Feb 2009 Jim Breyer visited Russia with a number of other Silicone Valley investors. While there, Yuri Milner, a Russian tech entrepreneur who founded DST with close ties to the Kremlin, hosted a dinner to cap the entire event (2). As one Moscow source put it:
DST has the backing of the big boys at the top in the Kremlin, which is why it will go from strength to strength (5)
Milner found out Breyer liked Impressionist art and took him to Russians Hermitage Museum to view Matisse paintings otherwise closed off to the public. Three months later Yuri Milners DST invested into Facebook at a bloated value. (2)
... snip
Jim Breyer and Rupert Murdoch
Then in Nov 2010 Jim Breyer invested into Artsy.net, run by Rupert Murdochs then-wife, Wendi Deng, and Russia oligarch Roman Abramovichs then-wife, Dasha Zhukova. Jared Kushners brother, Josh, also invested in the fledgling company (1).
... snip
Jim Breyer, Blackstone Group, and Saudi Arabia
In 2011 Schwarzman was named to the board of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (2), headed by Kirill Dimitriev.
In June 2016, during Trumps presidential campaign, Jim Breyer met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin-Salman, or MBS (8). The next month Breyer joined the board of Blackstone Group (1) alongside Stephen Schwarzman and Jacob Rothschild (3). In the past Blackstone Group had loaned Kushner Companies a combined $400 million over multiple projects (7). In the 2018 election cycle, Schwzarman donated $5 million to the pro-McConnell superPAC, Senate Majority PAC (13).
Jacobs brother, Nat, is business partners with both Oleg Deripaska (4), Rupert Murdoch, and Dick Cheney (5). Nat is also a major investor in Glencore, one of the purchasers of Rosneft stock detailed in the Steele Dossier (6), and RusAl.
In January 2017, Breyers business partner at Wickr, Erik Prince, was introduced to Dimitriev by MBSs emissary, George Nader, and the Crown Prince of the UAE (10).
On October 22, 2018, three weeks after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, when most American investors were spooked away from Saudi Arabia, Jim Breyer showed up at an MBS-hosted Saudi business summit alongside Kirill Dimitriev of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (9). That same day, MBS pledged $20 billion for Blackstone Group's new infrastructure fund (11) to fund Elaine Chao's $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan (12). Elaine Chao, Mitch McConnells wife and Jim Breyer's sister-in-law, is Trump's Secretary of Transportation.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RussiaLago/comments/a34y7i/mitch_mcconnells_brotherinlaw_one_of_the/?st=JURLTHB7&sh=7f0c77a2&depth=2
Jim Breyer, Mitch McConnell's brother-in-law, Facilitates Russias Takeover of Facebook through Yuri Milner
In 2005 Jim Breyer, a partner at Accel Partners, invested $1 million of his own money into Facebook and gained a seat on the board (1).
In Feb 2009 Jim Breyer visited Russia with a number of other Silicone Valley investors. While there, Yuri Milner, a Russian tech entrepreneur who founded DST with close ties to the Kremlin, hosted a dinner to cap the entire event (2). As one Moscow source put it:
DST has the backing of the big boys at the top in the Kremlin, which is why it will go from strength to strength (5)
Milner found out Breyer liked Impressionist art and took him to Russians Hermitage Museum to view Matisse paintings otherwise closed off to the public. Three months later Yuri Milners DST invested into Facebook at a bloated value. (2)
... snip
Jim Breyer and Rupert Murdoch
Then in Nov 2010 Jim Breyer invested into Artsy.net, run by Rupert Murdochs then-wife, Wendi Deng, and Russia oligarch Roman Abramovichs then-wife, Dasha Zhukova. Jared Kushners brother, Josh, also invested in the fledgling company (1).
... snip
Jim Breyer, Blackstone Group, and Saudi Arabia
In 2011 Schwarzman was named to the board of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (2), headed by Kirill Dimitriev.
In June 2016, during Trumps presidential campaign, Jim Breyer met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin-Salman, or MBS (8). The next month Breyer joined the board of Blackstone Group (1) alongside Stephen Schwarzman and Jacob Rothschild (3). In the past Blackstone Group had loaned Kushner Companies a combined $400 million over multiple projects (7). In the 2018 election cycle, Schwzarman donated $5 million to the pro-McConnell superPAC, Senate Majority PAC (13).
Jacobs brother, Nat, is business partners with both Oleg Deripaska (4), Rupert Murdoch, and Dick Cheney (5). Nat is also a major investor in Glencore, one of the purchasers of Rosneft stock detailed in the Steele Dossier (6), and RusAl.
In January 2017, Breyers business partner at Wickr, Erik Prince, was introduced to Dimitriev by MBSs emissary, George Nader, and the Crown Prince of the UAE (10).
On October 22, 2018, three weeks after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, when most American investors were spooked away from Saudi Arabia, Jim Breyer showed up at an MBS-hosted Saudi business summit alongside Kirill Dimitriev of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (9). That same day, MBS pledged $20 billion for Blackstone Group's new infrastructure fund (11) to fund Elaine Chao's $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan (12). Elaine Chao, Mitch McConnells wife and Jim Breyer's sister-in-law, is Trump's Secretary of Transportation.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RussiaLago/comments/a34y7i/mitch_mcconnells_brotherinlaw_one_of_the/?st=JURLTHB7&sh=7f0c77a2&depth=2
April 20, 2019
Klobuchar: "A president persuading a person to commit perjury would be obstruction. Is that right?"
Klobuchar: "A president persuading a person to commit perjury would be obstruction. Is that right?"
Barr: "Yes."
Klobuchar: "You also said that a president or any person convincing a witness to change testimony would be obstruction. Is that right?"
Barr: "Yes."
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1086114743922905089
Barr: "Yes."
Klobuchar: "You also said that a president or any person convincing a witness to change testimony would be obstruction. Is that right?"
Barr: "Yes."
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1086114743922905089
April 19, 2019
An amazing document. Mueller report tagged, categorized, & searchable!
.@AxiosVisuals stayed up all night tagged EVERY SINGLE paragraph in the Mueller report to create this searchable experience
https://twitter.com/LazaroGamio/status/1119311562781667328
https://twitter.com/LazaroGamio/status/1119311562781667328
Explore a detailed view of the Mueller report
The Axios Visuals team pored over the Mueller report and categorized each passage of the text to note what events, people, organization and places are mentioned. We ended up categorizing over 2,500 bits of text, and found over 400 unique entities.
How it works: Want to see how many times former White House counsel Don McGahn pops up? Or the part where Mueller tosses the ball to Congress? Use the search tool and you can find anything you need. (Except the redacted parts. Sorry.)
https://www.axios.com/explore-a-detailed-version-of-the-mueller-report-5f7cab5b-9c53-46bc-abaa-bd6b7b3e6d66.html
The Axios Visuals team pored over the Mueller report and categorized each passage of the text to note what events, people, organization and places are mentioned. We ended up categorizing over 2,500 bits of text, and found over 400 unique entities.
How it works: Want to see how many times former White House counsel Don McGahn pops up? Or the part where Mueller tosses the ball to Congress? Use the search tool and you can find anything you need. (Except the redacted parts. Sorry.)
https://www.axios.com/explore-a-detailed-version-of-the-mueller-report-5f7cab5b-9c53-46bc-abaa-bd6b7b3e6d66.html
April 19, 2019
BREAKING: Top House and Senate Democrats REJECT A.G. Barr's offer to view a less-redacted version
BREAKING: Top House and Senate Democrats REJECT A.G. Barr's offer to view a less-redacted version of Mueller's report, calling the conditions too strict and demanding broader access for more lawmakers.
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1119334073871273984
Barr had offered to let the Gang of Eight (Pelosi, Schumer, McCarthy, McConnell and Intel Committee leaders), along with Judiciary Committee leaders see the less-redacted version. But Dems say more members on the relevant committees need to see it to make informed judgments.
Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler subpoenaed for the report earlier Friday, a well as all its underlying evidence.
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1119334968700878848
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1119334073871273984
Barr had offered to let the Gang of Eight (Pelosi, Schumer, McCarthy, McConnell and Intel Committee leaders), along with Judiciary Committee leaders see the less-redacted version. But Dems say more members on the relevant committees need to see it to make informed judgments.
Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler subpoenaed for the report earlier Friday, a well as all its underlying evidence.
https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1119334968700878848
Profile Information
Member since: Mon Nov 8, 2004, 09:21 PMNumber of posts: 16,420