Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

seabeckind

seabeckind's Journal
seabeckind's Journal
December 31, 2013

I was a war baby.

What bothers me so much about what has been happening is the absolute theft of all the inherent wealth that was built into our country, from magnifcent buildings, city infrastructure, energy, communications...

all stolen in some MBAs dream of value extraction.

Like the art in the Detroit museum. Some gop thief wants to steal the people's treasure and sell it to his friends to pay off a loan to his other friends.

In the 80s I lived a mile or so frm a major rail corridor that paralleled the old National highway. We, the people, had bought all the right of ways and signed leases.

In the space of one administration Reagan gave it away. If we are to do HSR, we'd have to buy it back.

December 30, 2013

I don't think it works that way.

No employer has any incentive to change their current wage unless they are forced to. You can't drive wages up by pushing from the bottom, it has to be pulled from up above.

What made the midde class advance was that big employer in town who had positions at tiers from common laborer clear thru skilled up to mgmt levels. There was an established career path and people could advance inside the company.

The bottom tier was usually more than the prevailing wage in the area because the employer valued loyalty and paid for it. There was quite an investment in even the lowest worker.

Add in the deferred compensation in pensions and benefits and that one large employer drove the whole economy of the town. Any other employer had to offer similar benefits to retain their better people.

Then there were the unions that guaranteed that the big employer couldn't start lowballing and use the threat of terminations. That union also guaranteed that the employer couldn't point to the next town over that was offering non-union job at a lower wage and using that as an extortion threat to force the lower wages at the current location.

(Picked up the economic model name the other day for that...beggar-thy-neighbor or race-to-the-bottom).

Then we lost the unions as the outsourcing took away the town's big employer and blamed the union (f'in lie).

So now, where's there to go? Our labor is like the battered wife who has no alternative.

That's wht the democratic platform should be fighting to fix. Get rid of that disgusting right-to-work at the federal level by using the NLRB and NLRA. That's what was promised long ago when that Taft-Hartley screwjob happened.

December 21, 2013

Another example of the laissez faire society

We are failing in every part of our society where a coordinated effort is needed that transcends individual corporate or personal interests.

Pick one...any one. Communications, transportations, energy, education, finance. Overall, the commons.

As Dakota points out above, profit in each interest overrides the common good.

The corporations have gotten stronger than our gov't.

One area I keep bumping into is discourse. We have none, no medium to have an in-depth dialog. Hell, we can't even have a decent intelligent debate between our politicians.

December 17, 2013

Facebook and "social" media

I'm sorry if I might be putting this comment in the wrong place (claiming ignorance). I'm sure others have noticed what I did and may have already pointed it out, but...ignorace again.

A few week ago I began posting on our local rag...actually an outlet for the gop in Indiana. I guess espousing liberal views in opposition to the gop admin isn't accepted very well around here. Here's what I just posted to my facebook account.

"Later today I will be terminating (as much as possible) my FB acct. If my political views and comments have caused any problems for anyone, I am very sorry. I didn't realize how the ignorati exploit the FB system. I noticed that my problems with the star started right after I pointed out that the Indiana Policy Review (started by Pence) has been sending LTEs pushing his position. I guess voicing liberal ideas is a big no-no, especially when they can be justified.

Jimmy asked about the NSA and privacy. I trust the NSA with my personal info much more than FB. The Privacy Act is directed at people who divulge your stuff. FB, OTOH, encourages you to show personal stuff and makes it visible to the world if you aren't very careful. It errs to the divulge side.

I'd gotten some nasty messages from those who disagree with my positions, not based on those positions, but personal. I'm glad now that I didn't show any personal info, like my name and DOB. BTW, that reluctance is what was used against me to remove me from the star. In order to reactivate I have to go to FB with a picture of my ID. As if. Especially since there's no way that guarantees a react on the star.

What makes all this so much worse is that so many public forums have started using FB for their postings. It makes it easier because they don't need staff for admin but it then allows a spotlight to be shined on anyone who might disagree with the party line. Just like long ago during the labor movements where the guy who could be identified was targetted. I noticed that so many forums have taken up that right wing argument...the one that says you should stand behind your position.

We have laws in this country to protect us from our gov't. We have no such laws to protect us from "private" gov'ts.

Take care...there're some real nasty, ignorant people out there"


And here are a couple of sample comments, the first to a article about Pence pushing for Bein to relocate to Indiana (http://www.indystar.com/story/money/2013/12/15/gov-pence-indiana-vying-for-boeing-airplane-facility/4033217/):

"While I applaud any opportunity to bring good, well-paying jobs to Indiana, let's pretend for a minute that Pence is giving our taxpayer dollars to a private company to buy jobs for us. But you see, that's not pretend. That's reality.

Now let's look at the issue. Right now Boeing is in negotiations with WA to see what kind of concessions (tax-free operations) they can get. It's not going well for them. WA close to saying...if you're not going to contribute to pay for our infrastructure, maybe we might be better off you don't contribute somewhere else.

Second point. Boeing got the same deal some years ago in SC. SC jumped all over the opportunity and gave them all kinds of stuff...including free job training. But that deal just might be running out. Kinda like when Comcast says you incentive just ended and your rate just went up $30/month. Difference between us and Comcast and Boeing and SC is that they aren't dealing with a monopoly. They can have the "right-to-work" states bid against each other.

BTW, this corporate relocation tactic is being used all over. Even here...

Ok, last point. From Pence's viewpoint it's a win-win. He gets to point to all these jobs he created (bought - with our money) and help him get reelected.

When the free incentive period ends and Boeing leaves us another empty factory, Pence will be running for Pres.

Sorry I couldn't fit it on a bumper sticker. I'm aware of the attention deficit."


and one about the economic benefits of early education (http://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/readers/conversations/2013/12/13/economic-benefits-of-preschool-are-clear/4016929/):

"Wow, 2 different editorials from the Policy network that hit right at the same time and both pushing the Pence agenda.

In 2008 Pence said, "I was part of, what we called the seed corn Heritage Foundation was spreading around the country in the state think tank movement. We actually called our little foundation in Indiana the Indiana Policy Review Foundation, very much as a homage to Policy Review Magazine of Heritage, and we modeled on the state level what Heritage had done before."

Go figure.

But as I pointed out in another propaganda LTE, the question isn't whether a good pre-school environment is beneficial. We know it is. That is a given.

The question is: What is the best way to spread our very limited taxpayer dollars to benefit the most in need and in the best way possible.

Vouchers for a few? I think not."


If you follow those links you won't see the comments.

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: Indiana
Home country: USA
Current location: Indianapolis
Member since: Thu Dec 8, 2005, 10:45 PM
Number of posts: 1,957
Latest Discussions»seabeckind's Journal