HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » pnwmom » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68

pnwmom

Profile Information

Member since: Mon Jan 30, 2006, 06:07 PM
Number of posts: 103,169

Journal Archives

Hillary raised 37M for the quarter; 112M for the year. Not including

additional funds she raised for the party and other Democrats.

Has Bernie been raising money for other Democrats? Because no Democratic President will succeed was well as s/he should unless we take back Congress.

http://kutv.com/news/nation-world/clinton-campaign-says-it-raises-37m-in-4th-quarter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign said Friday it raised $37 million in the past three months and more than $112 million in all of 2015 to support her bid for the Democratic nomination.

Clinton's team also said she raised $18 million for the Democratic National Committee and state Democratic parties nationwide in the fourth quarter, putting her total haul for the past three months at $55 million. The fundraising for the DNC and state parties is aimed at helping Clinton in the general election should she win her party's nomination.

Clinton's fourth-quarter amount exceeded the $28 million she raised in the three months that ended Sept. 30. Heading into the January sprint toward the leadoff Iowa caucuses on Feb. 1, Clinton's campaign said it has nearly $38 million in cash on hand.

"Thanks to the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have joined together and powered this historic campaign, we are now heading into Iowa and New Hampshire with the resources we need to be successful," campaign manager Robby Mook said in a statement. Clinton's campaign had set a goal of $100 million for the primary in 2015.

SNIP

Because of her SS detail, Hillary CAN'T fly like Bernie or Martin. So quit pretending she can.

If Bernie gets the SS protection I think he should get, he'll have to go through the same thing she does.

And flying on a private jet, when she does it, is less disruptive to other passengers on a commercial plane. Who wants to have to give up their seat to a SS person?


http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/even-when-flying-the-public-clinton-keeps-it-private

Clinton does not fly the commercial the way you fly commercial. Thanks to strict security concerns, Clinton is insulated from the public from the moment she arrives at one airport to the time she leaves the second one. And even when trapped in a metal tube in the sky with fellow passengers, there are few opportunities for public interaction.

While the insulation is largely outside of Clinton’s control and determined by the Secret Service, it underscores the logistical difficulties Clinton will have in connecting with ordinary voters on her second campaign.

On Tuesday afternoon in Dubuque, Iowa, a few dozen passengers waited for their routine American Airlines flight to Chicago, one of only three flights scheduled from the tiny airport that day. Suddenly, a small motorcade pulled up, just outside the floor-to-ceiling windows that separate the airport’s only gate from the tarmac.

SNIP


With a bulkhead in front of her, a window to her right, and trusted aide Huma Abedin between her and the aisle, Clinton donned sunglasses and looked at her BlackBerry as passengers boarded.

The seats around were filled by Secret Service agents, and then campaign staff further back. No one approached her during the short flight.

SNIP

The Power to Make Secrets out of the Public Record: "Retroactive classification."

This is the issue with many of Hillary's emails as Secretary of State, but it effects people across the government and all those who deal with them.

http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9475&context=penn_law_review

DO YOU HAVE TO KEEP THE GOVERNMENT’S SECRETS?

RETROACTIVELY CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS,
THE FIRST AMENDMENT,
AND THE POWER TO MAKE SECRETS OUT OF THE PUBLIC RECORD

By Jonathan Abel, Fellow, ConstitutionalLawCenter, StanfordLawSchool.


Now you see it. Now you don’t.

This is not a magician’s incantation. It is a description of retroactive classification, a little-known provision of U.S. national security law that allows the government to declassify a document, release it to the public, and then declare it classified later on. Retroactive classification means the government could hand you a document today and prosecute you tomorrow for not giving it back. Retroactive classification can even reach documents that are available in public libraries, on the Internet, or elsewhere in the public domain.

The executive branch has used retroactive classification to startling effect. The Department of Justice, for example, declassified and released a report on National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping only to declare, years later, that the report was once again classified. The journalist who had received the report was threatened with prosecution if he did not return it. Retroactive classification has also targeted government documents revealing corruption in Iraq, violence in Afghanistan, and mismanagement of the national missile defense program. In each of these cases, the government released a document in an unclassified form through official channels—not through a leak—and then turned around to classify it.

This practice would be troubling enough if it actually removed the document from the public domain. But in the Internet Age, once a document is released to the public, it is often impossible for the government to retrieve it. While retroactive classification does not remove the document from the public domain, where our enemies can access it, retroactive classification does remove the document from the public discourse,prohibiting members of Congress, government auditors, and law-abiding members of the public from openly discussing it.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68