Ghost Dog
Ghost Dog's JournalBecause of a headline at a web site?
Publisher: It's finding the center of your story, the beating heart of it, that's what makes a reporter. You have to start by making up some headlines. You know: short, punchy, dramatic headlines. Now, have a look, (pointing at dark clouds gathering in the sky over the ocean) what do you see? Tell me the headline....
Protagonist: HORIZON FILLS WITH DARK CLOUDS?
Publisher: IMMINENT STORM THREATENS VILLAGE.
Protagonist: But what if no storm comes?
Publisher: VILLAGE SPARED FROM DEADLY STORM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headline
Now, the heart of the news bin story might or might not have a pulse. It asserts what some unspecified source "expects" See DU thread.
The article makes no reference to GMO nor to non-GMO.
The immediate cause of the algae bloom is described as:
And the article informs us that:
The flow used to go south to the Everglades, and now this is a man-made, criminal disaster, Mr. Perry said. They, as in the state and federal government, say they cant send the water south, but they can. This is an absolute atrocity that they are allowed to continue this in the name of agriculture. This is the worst Ive ever seen it.
The 2016 sugar harvest was the longest on record because of rain delays, making it also one of the most profitable on record, resulting in 2.15 million tons of sugar. Under Mr. Scott, the board of the South Florida Water Management District failed in 2015 to carry out a plan to buy roughly 47,000 acres of land from U.S. Sugar south of Lake Okeechobee that would have acted as a reservoir for the lakes runoff.
The political leadership has not been putting the demand on the agencies to fix the problem, Mr. Perry said. This water was never meant to go east and west it was meant to go south....
which doesn't well fit your agenda here?
Accurate, thanks. But I should point out this infringes DU rules:
When participating on the Democratic Underground discussion forums, members are expected to follow our forum rules, listed below...
...
Legal/Administrative
Respect copyrights
Excerpts from copyrighted sources must be no more than four paragraphs and include a link to the source. See our DMCA Copyright Policy for more information.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
The 'liberal' in 'neoliberal' means not the social and political liberalism
DU usually represents. It's economic liberalism: laissez-faire, deregulated to the point if possible of unregulated (hence the important role 'offshore' jurisdictions play), with a strong admixture of cronyism and Straussian neo-imperialist neocon enablement & enforcement thrown in.
$20 per dose, the back of the neck stuff? Hmm...
Much cheaper here... I guess I could supply that by mail out of the Canary Islands for under $12.
Would that make a small- business plan?
U.K. Told to Double Scale of Co2 Cuts to Meet Climate Goal
... Have to dig the headline's typically potentially rabble-rousing spin (although this is Bloomberg, not a Murdoch/Dacre tabloid). Who dares infringe our sacred superior sovereignty, telling UK government and people what do do? F'ing EU. Leave!
Uh, nope. It's a UK government-appointed advisory committee telling dickhead pols what has to be done to avoid utter catastrophe. As the article explains, but what percentage of the deliberately dumbed-down actually read beyond the kneejerker headline?
More honest headline: Energy Ministry: UK must Double Scale of Co2 Cuts to Meet Climate Goal
... Energy Secretary Amber Rudd on Thursday endorsed a recommendation for the U.K. to slash carbon dioxide emissions by 57 percent between 2028 and 2032. The governments official climate adviser said current policies only deliver about 53 percent of the reductions needed, and the vote to leave the European Union will further complicate environmental policies.
The recommendation in an annual progress report by the Committee on Climate Change indicates the tough decisions Prime Minister David Camerons successor faces. Britain already has cut emissions 38 percent from the 1990 baseline used in the calculations, leaving environmental groups seeking deeper cuts in greenhouse gases increasingly at odds with industry and consumers who are demanding cheaper power. The vote on the EU adds another dimension.
Leaving the EU will require the reassessment of some existing and proposed policies but does not change the need for the U.K. to play its role in reducing emissions, said John Gummer, the chairman of the committee, who is also known as Lord Deben since his elevation to the upper chamber of Parliament.
The committee was established by the government to advise ministers on policy and will produce a detailed analysis on the impact of the vote to leave the EU in the autumn. That decision may lead to the scrapping or weakening of some Brussels-led green policies, such as new car emissions standards, the EU Emissions Trading System and laws on waste and harmful fluorinated gases, the committee said...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-30/u-k-told-to-double-scale-of-pollution-cuts-to-meet-climate-goal
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: Canary Islands Archipelago
Home country: Spain
Member since: Wed Apr 19, 2006, 01:59 PM
Number of posts: 16,881