Ghost Dog
Ghost Dog's JournalHere's Edward Snowden on this subject, since it comes to this:
One way would be to listen to the person who should know all about this stuff: Edward Snowden. This is what he said earlier today on Twitter:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-25/snowden-explains-how-get-bottom-who-hacked-democrats
I'm suggesting there might be more like this in the offing:
http://nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
... As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium Ones chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock...
... The New York Timess examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book Clinton Cash. Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.
Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundations donors...
It would be well to be prepared.
Economist Michael Hudson on Neocon Neoliberalism Vs Trump's Righteous Populism
HUDSON: Well, Krugman has joined the ranks of the neocons, as well as the neoliberals, and they're terrified that they're losing control of the Republican Party. For the last half-century the Republican Party has been pro-Cold War, corporatist. And Trump has actually, is reversing that. Reversing the whole traditional platform. And that really worries the neocons....
... So in terms of national security, he wanted to roll back NATO spending. And he made it clear, roll back military spending. We can spend it on infrastructure, we can spend it on employing American labor... In economic policy, Trump also opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the TTIP trade and corporate power grab [inaud.] with Europe to block public regulation... And when he wrote this, quote, Trump is decimating the things Republicans stood for: NATO, entitlement reform, in other words winding back Social Security, and support of the corporatist Trans-Pacific Partnership. So it's almost hilarious to see what happens. And Trump also has reversed the traditional Republican fiscal responsibility austerity policy, that not a word about balanced budgets anymore. And he said he was going to run at policy to employ American labor and put it back to work on infrastructure. Again, he's made a left runaround Hillary. He says he wants to reinstate Glass-Steagall, whereas the Clintons were the people that got rid of it.
And this may be for show, simply to brand Hillary as Wall Street's candidate. But it also seems to actually be an attack on Wall Street. And Trump's genius was to turn around all the attacks on him as being a shady businessman. He said, look, nobody knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it...
... So this is really the class war. And it's the class war of Wall Street and the corporate sector of the Democratic side against Trump on the populist side...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-24/michael-hudson-exposes-2016s-real-class-war-krugmans-neocon-neoliberalism-vs-trumps-
I'm posting this in the interest of reflection and discussion at DU on how best to counter this Trumpian strategy.
Humans are deeply irrational; Trump is a master in the powers of persuasion
with the type of personality that loves not only the challenge of game strategy, but also the thrill of overwhelming the competition. It is the sport of meticulously plotted domination.
To win against this, what strategies and tactics will become necessary?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2016/03/21/donald-trump-will-win-in-a-landslide-the-mind-behind-dilbert-explains-why/
Does anyone know if Trump plays chess, go, or similar?
For the answer to your question, start here:
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/jul/15/clean-energy-wont-save-us-economic-system-can
Clinton needs to roll out a radical ten-year plan
to make America great again through sustainable infrastructure development jobs.
Sustainable in the context of climate change and the consequences of all the other resource-use inefficiencies and dangerous contamination everywhere.
Some of that will ring bells in the referenced demographics, I think.
May says won't trigger EU divorce until UK-wide approach agreed
May made the comment after meeting First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, head of the pro-independence Scottish government which says pro-EU Scots should not be dragged out against their will and has been looking at ways to keep Scotland in the bloc...
https://m.yahoo.com/w/legobpengine/finance/news/first-trip-uk-pm-may-084556535.html?.b=index&.cf3=Jumbotron&.cf4=1&.cf5=Reuters+-+UK+Focus&.cf6=%2F&.ts=1468594300&.intl=gb&.lang=en-gb
Ok. So does this mean that, without SNP approval, UK will not trigger the article & leave EU???
Obama extends visit to US military base on 1st visit to Spain
... The US military base at Rota is home to 2,846 US military personnel and 2,610 relatives. No US president has ever stopped there, even though the base has been operating for the last 63 years.
Obamas agenda is still likely to include meetings with King Felipe VI, acting Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy and several members of the opposition...
http://elpais.com/elpais/2016/07/08/inenglish/1467984723_526677.html
Britain is changed utterly. Unless this summer is just a bad dream (Ian McEwan)
Or it happened another way. We Kremlinologists can only guess at whats being turned over in the clubs of St James or the farmhouses of Oxfordshire. But we do know that what all sides are calling the greatest political crisis of our generation is a creature imagined into being by the Conservative party alone. It, not Ukip, offered the referendum; it fought it, it won as well as lost it. For such services, for the mayhem and poison that followed and are clouding the leadership contest, we should now be watching it shredded by an effective, eloquent opposition. But by their silence Corbyn and his troubled, paranoid court have delivered us, in effect, and for the time being, into a one-party state, and not the Leninist version certain courtiers dream of.
Now you watch on helplessly as your prime minister is chosen. It is, of course, constitutionally correct that you have no say in the matter. But its hard to shake off that below-stairs feeling. We can do no more than gossip round the kitchen table. The butler has a theory, and so does the second chambermaid. Even boots knows all about tactical voting. Our first-naming paradoxically measures our distance from events. Is Boris biding his time, or is he truly finished? What does it tell us about the party, post 2008, that Andrea, an ex-banker hostile to the minimum wage, could soon be prime minister? Was Theresas reticence during the referendum campaign astute and tactical? Or merely an expression of her character? Or is she the remainers mole? Can we believe that the chancellor isnt plotting? We hear footsteps above our head more comings and goings. But who?
You might cling to the butlers mole theory even as you worry that your hopes are loosening your grip on reality: the powerful faction that wanted to remain, and whispered flattery and enticements in Goves ear, has cleared the field of Johnson, the other sides most powerful contender, and eased one of its own into place as PM. The exit negotiations begin and are inevitably protracted in a game with such stacked odds. Our European friends, watching their own backs, will not be offering kindly terms. Only a fool would want to invoke the dread article too soon...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/09/country-political-crisis-tories-prime-minister
EU’s 27 leaders minus Cameron to look for reset in September
(Slightly edited).Soon to be shorn of the blocs second (now third)-largest economy and buffeted by a rising tide of anti-EU sentiment from Paris to Warsaw, the 27 national leaders will meet knowing that Britains vote to leave forces them to weigh change to win back citizens support. They just cant agree on what that should look like...
... The dividing lines have been between different actors on different issues -- north and south on financial and economic issues, east and west on asylum and migration, Sandro Gozi, undersecretary for European affairs in Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzis government, said in a phone interview. The last thing we need is new dividing lines.
Is Italy Europe's Next Big Problem?
From German insistence on fiscal rigidity and the legacy of austerity, to economic sanctions on Russia, relations with Turkey and the biggest refugee crisis since World War II, Europes political fault lines run deep and tension has been building for years. Rival camps and further flashpoints on the horizon mean the struggle to reset the European Union could get messy...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-06/brexit-trauma-stalks-eu-as-leaders-brace-for-more-shocks-to-come
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: Canary Islands Archipelago
Home country: Spain
Member since: Wed Apr 19, 2006, 01:59 PM
Number of posts: 16,881