Larry Ogg
Larry Ogg's JournalSaying less government is best, is not a myth, it's an outright lie...
Although..., without government, there would still be three classes of people...
There would be the filthy rich / .001 percent who own and control everything...
There would be the working class / slaves and cannon fodder, i.e. the expendable poor...
And there would be the super poor whose value has been all but spent, and they will be treated as such,
and meet an uncivil and early death.
The problem is not big government; the problem is that the kind of people government was supposed to guard against,
(pathological lairs, criminals and psychopaths), have covertly usurped the power of government for their own benefit, and if their not above the law, or king of the hill, they will seek to destroy government relentlessly, and lying is a means to that end.
In the short run, the only beneficiaries of less government, would be those who seek to destroy it, and if the predator dominated human race makes it to the long run..., life would never be good for the working class...
Ironically, not only would the religious right reject the founding fathers and their beliefs...
They would also reject the one they claim to be followers of, i.e. Christ.
Anyone who has read the story will remember that religious leaders and followers were given a choice. They could spare the life and set free a serial killer psychopath who had no conscience at all, or they could spare the life and set free the pure symbol of conscience, i.e. the one they called Christ.
The moral of the story is that when given a choice, you can bet that the diminished and lacking conscience of right wingers will invariably choose to give evil a free rain, while opposing good deeds and work of conscience.
After much research, I have come to the conclusion that those who are Anti-conscience are, in religious terminology, the Antichrist.
Blurring the Psychopath with Sociopath and switching attributes is a common mistake.
Sociopath is more like a common ally cat dodging cars and chasing mice in broad daylight, compared to the psychopath, they are much easier to spot if you know what to look for.
Whereas Psychopath is like a rare panther, hiding in the shadows waiting to strike its unsuspecting prey who will never see what’s coming until it is way to late. They are very difficult to spot, even the experts who know what to look for are not above being fooled into the Psychopaths trap.
When and if a union of evil exists between the two, Psychopath will almost always ends up being the puppet master, and Sociopath the subservient puppet. But then, by some miracle, the alley cat might get lucky and defeat the panther. But as a rule, the Sociopath will bow to the Psychopath or one of them is going to die. And if I were a betting man, I would have to be a naive fool not to put my money on the master of human evil incarnate, i.e. the Psychopath.
Psychopaths are notorious at claiming that,
the exact opposite of the truth is actually the truth.
Unfortunately, this type of pathological lying is intended to warp the minds of unsuspecting idiots.
You can find proof of how well it works, just by looking at the size of the Republican Party.
It's a given that a small percent of children are genetic psychopaths.
Unfortunately, most problem children are the products of dysfunctional families, subcultures, and or brain damage due to trauma or substance abuse, or a culture that is influenced by psychopaths, etc. Plus conscience develops and grows with nurture and age, so one shouldn’t be surprised by the lack of it in children, many of whom will grow up to be compassionate and caring adults.
Keep in mind that problems of conscience can surface in a normal person well after a normal childhood, or any time during conception and the end of a life.
So people, who would otherwise have a genetically normal conscience are changed by the external environment, and can experience a lost or diminished conscience. It's like being born with great vision, only to loose it later in life, which means sociopaths remember what conscience is, and psychopaths haven't a clue. Furthermore, conscience is a variable in normal people, which goes from too much to none. And the loss of conscience in normal people is what you call a “Sociopath”, which should not be confused with a “Psychopath”.
The rule is that Psychopathy is inherited, and Sociopathy is acquired. And Sociopathy is acquired in two ways, one being brain damage…, i.e. from trauma or harmful substances such as drugs and or other toxins. The second way of acquiring Sociopathy is distorted language and or reality. For instance, think of a culture where people are erroneously taught that they must kill or be killed (this could be a culture of barbaric cannibals, life in the ghetto, or the normal people who work on Wall Street, trying to preserve their jobs by conforming to the whims of their psychopath department heads or CEO). These people can qualify as being, what people like Robert Hare describe; “Sociopaths are the product of subculture”.
Pot meet kettle… I was thinking the exact same thing. Well almost…
If it serves their interest, the guilty have no problem scapegoating blame off their selves and onto others who are also guilty.
Republicans, who are blind to their own malevolence, lead the way when it comes to being out of touch with the needs of ordinary citizens, and they are masters at and have no problem using the... "Shift the blame game."
Democrats on the other hand, can at least show a little chivalry and honor amongst thieves, and they are more likely to subscribe to the idea that... "People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones."
Beneficiaries of a corrupt monetary system would be hard-pressed to levy justice upon it...
If a fair and just monetary system did exist, socially adjustments according wealth would be a thing of the past, and social adjustments according to ability and conscience would be the norm.
Liberals would become the caretakers of Democracy and peace would break out throughout the world...
In the meantime, conservatives, conservative extremist, and banksters - due to underdeveloped regions of the brain - would be seen as suffering from a form of delusional psychoses that predisposes them to act and think like barbaric Neanderthals, to a lessor and greater degree respectively.
So would Hillary jail the Banksters...? Not in a million years!
And the people they control are given millions of dollars in order to buy M$M celebrity status...
They in affect, hand pick the greater and lesser evils that they want all of us debt slaves to vote for, and because it cost a fortune to get elected, they have the advantage of weeding out the ones they don't want us to vote for.
And because of that, over time, the masses have been reduced to fighting over witch is better, to be hung with a blue rope or to be hung with a red rope.
Even the word "Propaganda" is a little too soft when your talking about...
deliberate psychological warfare, brainwashing, and mass deception.
Adding to that, there are many deceptive techniques used by corporate media that is Textbook Psychopathy.
Unfortunately, even though Fox News is the worst offender, it isn't the only fraud within the M$M, it just Taylor makes a fictitious reality that appeals to the most illiterate, naive, and psychologically clueless elements of our society; i.e. the ones you can fool all of time, aka the most conservative Authoritarian extremist / Republicans.
Profile Information
Member since: Sat May 27, 2006, 12:54 PMNumber of posts: 1,474
