Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

Honeycombe8's Journal
Honeycombe8's Journal
June 20, 2018

Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President

Source: CNN

Washington (CNN)Donald Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen has signaled to friends that he is "willing to give" investigators information on the President if that's what they are looking for, and is planning on hiring a new lawyer to handle a possible indictment from federal prosecutors.

"He knows a lot of things about the President and he's not averse to talking in the right situation," one of Cohen's New York friends who is in touch with him told CNN. "If they want information on Trump, he's willing to give it."

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/19/politics/michael-cohen-criminal-lawyer-guy-petrillo/index.html



He also wants Trump to pay his legal bills.

So much for the guy who "would take a bullet" for Trump. Bullets are one thing. Legal bills and prison are other things, apparently, to the #1 fan of Trump.
June 20, 2018

I'm guessing the govt has lost track of where, and who, all these immigrants' children are.

I betcha. Knowing how incompetent this administration is. So many kids, so many immigrants. One agency assigning numbers to the children. Different agencies & depts not recording those same numbers. Matching the numbers to the children. I bet that in a lot of cases they have no idea where a particular person's child is.

June 20, 2018

How did the country handle the illegal immigrants up to now?

What did the U S do with the children of illegal immigrants picked up at the border? The adults were taken to court, I guess? Or an ICE processing center? Then what?

I heard that the U S DID pick up children and put them in holding areas, if they were unaccompanied by parents. For their own safety. Beyond that, I don't know. Anyone know?

June 18, 2018

Happy Father's Day?

"https://twitter.com/JamesMartinSJ/status/1008336985692532736

Heartbreaking...a father and young son hugging each other.

Father Martin is a Priest, who I think was recently in a CNN story recently about Catholic leaders speaking out about the family separation.

https://twitter.com/JamesMartinSJ/status/1008507728929738752

June 17, 2018

MSNBC to start its own streaming service

This may have been posted before, but I didn't see it.

It's being reported that MSNBC is planning on launching a standalone streaming service this year.

Recently Fox News announced plans to launch a standalone streaming service for cord cutters. Now it looks like MSNBC will follow Fox News’s lead by launching their own cord cutting service.

According to a report from Variety, MSNBC is hiring staff to help create the new streaming service. This new service will be made up of original programs created specifically for the new streaming service. While some hosts from MSNBC News will be on the network, don’t look for live streams of your favorite MSNBC programs.

https://www.cordcuttersnews.com/msnbc-is-planning-on-launching-a-standalone-streaming-service-this-year/

I was excited about this until I read that it won't have my favorite MSNBC programs. Here's what the article says about that:

So why is Fox News and MSNBC just not offering a live feed of their current cable networks? Sources say that both Fox and NBC don’t want to upset cable networks who are paying big dollars to carry the news networks. It looks like Fox and NBC both see original content as a way to reach cord cutters without endangering their lucrative deals with cable companies. So if you still want access to MSNBC’s cable feed you will still need a service like Sling TV.


Still, this could be interesting. I'll be watching for it, since I'm a cordcutter.
June 16, 2018

Catholic Bishops: Trump's immigration policies are immoral

Leading US Catholic bishops have escalated their criticism of the Trump administration's immigration policies, calling new asylum-limiting rules "immoral" and rhetorically comparing the crackdown to abortion by saying it is a "a right to life" issue.

One bishop from the US-Mexico border region reportedly suggested "canonical penalties" - which could refer to withholding the sacrament of Communion - for Catholics involved in implementing the Trump policies.

The comments came as the US Conference of Catholic Bishops - the organising body of bishops - gathered for a biannual meeting in Fort Lauderdale. The topics of migration and asylum have long been a focus for the US church; more than 50 per cent of US Catholics under the age of 30 are Latinos.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-immigration-catholic-bishops-moral-us-mexico-border-a8399016.html

AND

Conservative religious leaders who have long preached about the sanctity of the family are now issuing sharp rebukes of the Trump administration for immigration policies that tear families apart or leave them in danger.

The criticism came after recent moves by the administration to separate children from their parents at the border, and to deny asylum on a routine basis to victims of domestic abuse and gang violence.

Some of the religious leaders are the same evangelicals and Roman Catholics who helped President Trump to build his base and who have otherwise applauded his moves to limit abortion and champion the rights of religious believers.

The Rev. Franklin Graham, a son of the famed evangelist the Rev. Billy Graham and an outspoken defender of President Trump, said in an interview on Tuesday on the Christian Broadcasting Network, “I think it’s disgraceful, it’s terrible to see families ripped apart and I don’t support that one bit.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/us/trump-immigration-religion.html

Supporters of Trump's admin. on immigration seem to be narrowing down. Maybe this is a good sign, that some are beginning to say no, this is immoral, this is disgraceful.


June 15, 2018

So when is Trump going to pardon Manafort?

He'll need to pardon Manafort before Manafort panics and flips. I read that it's possible, now, that Manafort will spend the rest of his life in jail, since he's not out on bail, anymore.

But if he pardons him NOW, he can only pardon him for witness tampering. Not for the main issues that will be prosecuted.

So...can Trump pardon him AGAIN, if he's found guilty for money laundering or the myriad other legal issues he has?

Trump doesn't care about people. So his only interest in pardoning Manafort is to prevent him from flipping. But now that he's incarcerated before the main event, this could be tricky.

June 14, 2018

Trump embraces candidate with racist ties



Unbelievable. I don't know I keep saying "unbelievable," because it's all so believable.
June 14, 2018

DOJ report gives Trump the ammo he needs for his "deep state" wacko conspiracy theory

Per CNN:

Except that the report also includes an August 2016 text message exchange between FBI lawyer Lisa Page and FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was intimately involved in not only the Clinton email investigation but also the FBI inquiry into Russia interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign.

Here it is: (bolding is mine)

PAGE: "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"

STRZOK: "No. No he won't. We'll stop it."

Those seven words are what Trump and his allies will seize on -- casting them as definitive proof that the "deep state" not only didn't want him to win but was actively working to keep him from the White House.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-text-message-ig-report/index.html

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that Peter Strzok has some 'splain' to do to the FBI Director.

The White House has already seized on it.

During Thursday's press briefing, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said, "The President was briefed on the IG report earlier today and it reaffirmed the president's suspicions about Comey's conduct and the political bias among some of the members of the FBI."


I worked in a professional office for many years. We knew that when we sent emails to each other related to the matters we were working on, we needed to keep it professional, neutral or pro-client, and nothing we'd be embarrassed about, or our employer would find embarrassing, if the client saw the email. We might SAY things to each other...but in an email about something we were working on? Never. We knew that office emails weren't private, and could be seen by someone at some time.

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Hometown: LA
Member since: Sat Feb 10, 2007, 12:29 PM
Number of posts: 37,648

Journal Entries

Latest Discussions»Honeycombe8's Journal