Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
demmiblue
demmiblue's Journal
demmiblue's Journal
October 1, 2018
... you become more like yourselfand that can be a problem.
Kavanaugh in 2015: A Judge Must Keep "Emotions in Check" and Not Be a "Political Partisan"
...
In 2015, Kavanaugh gave a speechentitled The Judge as Umpireat Columbus Law School at Catholic University. It was during this event that he now-infamously said, What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep. But later in the speech, Kavanaugh explained the importance of judicial temperament. He described the attributes required for a good judge: to have the proper demeanor, to keep our emotions in check, to be calm amidst the storm, to demonstrate civility. And Kavanaugh added, Dont be a jerk.
Heres what he said.
...
Also in that 2015 speech, Kavanaugh made another key point: First and most obviously, a judge cannot be a political partisan. A jurist, he added, must avoid any semblance of partisanship. At the hearing, Kavanaugh did not demonstrate the ability to put aside partisanship.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/10/kavanaugh-in-2015-a-judge-must-keep-emotions-in-check-and-not-be-a-political-partisan/
In 2015, Kavanaugh gave a speechentitled The Judge as Umpireat Columbus Law School at Catholic University. It was during this event that he now-infamously said, What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep. But later in the speech, Kavanaugh explained the importance of judicial temperament. He described the attributes required for a good judge: to have the proper demeanor, to keep our emotions in check, to be calm amidst the storm, to demonstrate civility. And Kavanaugh added, Dont be a jerk.
Heres what he said.
To be a good judge and a good umpire, its important to have the proper demeanor. Really important, I think. To walk in the others shoes, whether it be the other litigants, the litigants in the case, the other judges. To understand them. To keep our emotions in check. To be calm amidst the storm. On the bench, to put it in the vernacular, dont be a jerk. I think thats important. To be a good umpire and a good judge, dont be a jerk. In your opinions, to demonstrate civility. I think thats important as well. To show, to help display, that you are trying to make the decision impartially and dispassionately based on the law and not based on your emotions. That were not the bigger than the game .Theres a danger of arrogance, as for umpires and referees, but also for judges. And I would say that danger grows the more time youre on the bench. As one of my colleagues puts it, you become more like yourselfand that can be a problem.
...
Also in that 2015 speech, Kavanaugh made another key point: First and most obviously, a judge cannot be a political partisan. A jurist, he added, must avoid any semblance of partisanship. At the hearing, Kavanaugh did not demonstrate the ability to put aside partisanship.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/10/kavanaugh-in-2015-a-judge-must-keep-emotions-in-check-and-not-be-a-political-partisan/
... you become more like yourselfand that can be a problem.
September 30, 2018
The launch of Windows 95:
https://twitter.com/EdwardKaye4/status/1045968904940605441
September 29, 2018

http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/editorial-cartoons/editorial-cartoon-sept-29-2018-245696/
EDITORIAL CARTOON: Sept. 29, 2018 (Bruce MacKinnon) (upon request: trigger warning)

http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/editorial-cartoons/editorial-cartoon-sept-29-2018-245696/
September 29, 2018

https://twitter.com/JillWineBanks/status/1045803741499314176
Jill Wine-Banks pin tonight:

https://twitter.com/JillWineBanks/status/1045803741499314176
September 28, 2018
Ha: "The Collegian is Hillsdale Colleges weekly student newspaper. The paper delivers local, campus, and national news that is written, photographed, and videoed by Hillsdale students. The Collegian is the oldest college newspaper in Michigan."
I'm sure Mr. Abbo ruffled quite a few feathers... this is Hillsdale, after all!
An opinion piece from The Collegian:
Elect Gretchen Whitmer: Michigan needs effective leadership
The test of a civilization is the way it cares for its most vulnerable. These words, written by novelist Pearl Buck, provide the ultimate lense through which we should view politics.
When evaluating candidates, the most important thing to look for is accountability. In some countries, politicians reflect the citizenry attitude; in the United States, however, our political system follows demands of the wealthy and politically engaged class. This aristocracy controls vast amounts of capital and have much to gain through influencing electoral politics, often at the expense of the most vulnerable. While no Michigan gubernatorial candidate completely reflects the public and their interests, Democratic candidate Gretchen Whitmers proposals offer more relief than Republican Bill Schuettes.
If Schuette and the Republicans successfully defend right-to-work legislation, which bans certain union contracts, the woking class will continue to become more vulnerable. Wages among blue-collar workers will continue to fall as union strength does.
Unions have played a large part in American politics and the economy for over 100 years, and since their conception, establishment politicians have made an effort to undermine or destroy them. Right-to-work laws??adopted by 27 states, including Michigan??are just the latest attempt. But by now, its overwhelmingly clear that right-to-work results in lower pay across the board.
http://hillsdalecollegian.com/2018/09/elect-gretchen-whitmer-michigan-needs-effective-leadership/
The test of a civilization is the way it cares for its most vulnerable. These words, written by novelist Pearl Buck, provide the ultimate lense through which we should view politics.
When evaluating candidates, the most important thing to look for is accountability. In some countries, politicians reflect the citizenry attitude; in the United States, however, our political system follows demands of the wealthy and politically engaged class. This aristocracy controls vast amounts of capital and have much to gain through influencing electoral politics, often at the expense of the most vulnerable. While no Michigan gubernatorial candidate completely reflects the public and their interests, Democratic candidate Gretchen Whitmers proposals offer more relief than Republican Bill Schuettes.
If Schuette and the Republicans successfully defend right-to-work legislation, which bans certain union contracts, the woking class will continue to become more vulnerable. Wages among blue-collar workers will continue to fall as union strength does.
Unions have played a large part in American politics and the economy for over 100 years, and since their conception, establishment politicians have made an effort to undermine or destroy them. Right-to-work laws??adopted by 27 states, including Michigan??are just the latest attempt. But by now, its overwhelmingly clear that right-to-work results in lower pay across the board.
http://hillsdalecollegian.com/2018/09/elect-gretchen-whitmer-michigan-needs-effective-leadership/
Ha: "The Collegian is Hillsdale Colleges weekly student newspaper. The paper delivers local, campus, and national news that is written, photographed, and videoed by Hillsdale students. The Collegian is the oldest college newspaper in Michigan."
I'm sure Mr. Abbo ruffled quite a few feathers... this is Hillsdale, after all!


September 28, 2018
Jeff Flake Announces Retirement from Humanity
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)In an announcement that many saw coming, Senator Jeff Flake, of Arizona, announced on Friday that he would retire from humanity, effective immediately.
Speaking to reporters at the Capitol, Flake said that the demands of being a human being had taken their toll, and that it was time to move on.
Having empathy and compassion for other human beings has been a thoroughly draining experience, he said. I for one am ready for something new.
Flake said that, before making his decision, he consulted with others who had retired from humanity years earlier, such as Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, and Donald Trump.
They all fully supported my decision, he said. Its great to be one of them now.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/jeff-flake-announces-retirement-from-humanity?mbid=social_twitter
Speaking to reporters at the Capitol, Flake said that the demands of being a human being had taken their toll, and that it was time to move on.
Having empathy and compassion for other human beings has been a thoroughly draining experience, he said. I for one am ready for something new.
Flake said that, before making his decision, he consulted with others who had retired from humanity years earlier, such as Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, and Donald Trump.
They all fully supported my decision, he said. Its great to be one of them now.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/jeff-flake-announces-retirement-from-humanity?mbid=social_twitter
September 28, 2018
https://twitter.com/ella_nilsen/status/1045686401864540160
House Dem women protesting in the Senate Judiciary committee meeting today include...
House Dem women protesting in the Senate Judiciary committee meeting today include @RepJayapal, @RepBarbaraLee @RepJudyChu @JacksonLeeTX18, @janschakowsky, @NydiaVelazquez and many more. I also think I see @RepJerryNadler in the back?


https://twitter.com/ella_nilsen/status/1045686401864540160
September 28, 2018
https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1045677040626749442
LA Times: We asked experts in sexual trauma whether Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's testimony was...
We asked experts in sexual trauma whether Dr. Christine Blasey Fords testimony was consistent with the research findings and clinical observations they have made or encountered in their own work. Heres what they told us:
Patricia Resick, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, Duke University: "She said she doesnt remember where it took place. That rings true because until you know you are in danger, there is no reason to remember everyday details."
Tracey J. Shors, distinguished professor of behavioral & systems neuroscience at Rutgers University: "In our studies, we show that women with sexual violence experience often have many symptoms of anxiety and depression and trauma"
"But we do tend to remember stressful events. We do this because we need to use those memories to help us survive now and in the future. Memories are not there just for reminiscing they are vital for our survival"
Sherry Hamby, director of the Life Paths Appalachian Research Center: "She gave one of the most credible accounts I have ever heard from a victim"
Kevin Swartout, associate professor of psychology at Georgia State University, on Brett Kavanaugh's testimony: "He demonstrated a great deal of hostility during the hearing, especially toward some of the female senators on the committee"
"The results of hundreds of studies to this point suggest that levels of hostility toward women, which includes a drive to exert power over women, are positively related with levels of sexual violence"
Patricia Resick, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, Duke University: "She said she doesnt remember where it took place. That rings true because until you know you are in danger, there is no reason to remember everyday details."
Tracey J. Shors, distinguished professor of behavioral & systems neuroscience at Rutgers University: "In our studies, we show that women with sexual violence experience often have many symptoms of anxiety and depression and trauma"
"But we do tend to remember stressful events. We do this because we need to use those memories to help us survive now and in the future. Memories are not there just for reminiscing they are vital for our survival"
Sherry Hamby, director of the Life Paths Appalachian Research Center: "She gave one of the most credible accounts I have ever heard from a victim"
Kevin Swartout, associate professor of psychology at Georgia State University, on Brett Kavanaugh's testimony: "He demonstrated a great deal of hostility during the hearing, especially toward some of the female senators on the committee"
"The results of hundreds of studies to this point suggest that levels of hostility toward women, which includes a drive to exert power over women, are positively related with levels of sexual violence"
https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1045677040626749442
September 28, 2018
The Ford-Kavanaugh Hearings Will Be Remembered as a Grotesque Display of Patriarchal Resentment
There was, in Brett Kavanaughs Trumpian performance, not even a hint of the composure one would think a potential Supreme Court Justice would have carefully cultivated.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh is almost certainly going to be appointed the next member of the Supreme Court of the United States. Whatever Christine Blasey Ford said in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, and whatever Kavanaugh said in his, and however credible and convincing either one seemed, none of it was going to affect this virtual inevitability. The Republicans, if they stick together, have the necessary votes. A veneer of civility made it seem as if the senators were questioning Ford and Kavanaugh to get to the truth of whether Kavanaugh, as a drunk teen-ager, attended a party where he pinned Ford to a bed and sexually assaulted her, thirty-six years ago. But thats not what the hearing was designed to explore. At the time of this writing, composed in the eighth hour of the grotesque historic activity happening in the Capitol Hill chamber, it should be as plain as day that what we witnessed was the patriarchy testing how far its politics of resentment can go. And there is no limit.
Dressed in a blue suit, taking the oath with nervous solemnity, Ford gave us a bristling sense of déjà vu. Why suffer through the annihilation if its not going to matter? Ford had told the Washington Post when she first went public with her allegations. With the word annihilation she conjured the spectre of Anita Hill, who, in her testimony against Clarence Thomas, in 1991, was basically berated over an exhausting two-day period, and diagnosed, by the senators interrogating her, with erotomania and a case of man-eating professionalism. Fords experienceshaped by the optics of the #MeToo moment, by her whiteness and country-club rootswas different. The Republicans on the committee, likely coached by some consultant, did not overtly smear Ford. Some pretended, condescendingly, to extend her empathy. Senator Orrin Hatch, who once claimed that Hill had lifted parts of her harassment allegations against Thomas from The Exorcist, called Ford pleasing, an attractive witness. Instead of questioning her directly, the Republicans hired Rachel Mitchell, a female prosecutor specializing in sex crimes, to serve as their proxy. Mitchells fitful, sometimes aimless questioning did the ugly work of softening the Republican assault on Fords testimony. Ford, in any case, was phenomenal, a witness and expert in one, and it seemed, for a moment following her testimony, that the nation might be unable to deny her credibility.
Then Kavanaugh came in, like an eclipse. He made a show of being unprepared. Echoing Clarence Thomas, he claimed that he did not watch his accusers hearing. (Earlier, it was reported that he did.) I wrote this last night, he said, of his opening statement. No one has seen this draft. Alternating between weeping and yelling, he exemplified the conservatives embrace of bluster and petulance as rhetorical tools. Going on about his harmless love of beer, spinning unbelievably chaste interpretations of what was, by all other accounts, his youthful habit of blatant debauchery, he was as Trumpian as Trump himself, louder than the loudest on Fox News. He evaded questions; he said that the allegations brought against him were revenge on behalf of the Clintons; he said, menacingly, that what goes around comes around. When Senator Amy Klobuchar calmly asked if he had ever gotten blackout drunk, he retorted, Have you? (He later apologized to her.)
There was, in this performance, not even a hint of the sagacity one expects from a potential Supreme Court Justice. More than presenting a convincing rebuttal to Fords extremely credible account, Kavanaughand Hatch, and Lindsey Grahamseemed to be exterminating, live, for an American audience, the faint notion that a massively successful white man could have his birthright questioned or his character held to the most basic type of scrutiny. In the course of Kavanaughs hearing, Mitchell basically disappeared. Republican senators apologized to the judge, incessantly, for what he had suffered. There was talk of his reputation being torpedoed and his life being destroyed. This is the nature of the conspiracy against white male powerthe forces threatening it will always somehow be thwarted at the last minute.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-ford-kavanaugh-hearings-will-be-remembered-for-their-grotesque-display-of-patriarchal-resentment?mbid=social_twitter
Judge Brett Kavanaugh is almost certainly going to be appointed the next member of the Supreme Court of the United States. Whatever Christine Blasey Ford said in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, and whatever Kavanaugh said in his, and however credible and convincing either one seemed, none of it was going to affect this virtual inevitability. The Republicans, if they stick together, have the necessary votes. A veneer of civility made it seem as if the senators were questioning Ford and Kavanaugh to get to the truth of whether Kavanaugh, as a drunk teen-ager, attended a party where he pinned Ford to a bed and sexually assaulted her, thirty-six years ago. But thats not what the hearing was designed to explore. At the time of this writing, composed in the eighth hour of the grotesque historic activity happening in the Capitol Hill chamber, it should be as plain as day that what we witnessed was the patriarchy testing how far its politics of resentment can go. And there is no limit.
Dressed in a blue suit, taking the oath with nervous solemnity, Ford gave us a bristling sense of déjà vu. Why suffer through the annihilation if its not going to matter? Ford had told the Washington Post when she first went public with her allegations. With the word annihilation she conjured the spectre of Anita Hill, who, in her testimony against Clarence Thomas, in 1991, was basically berated over an exhausting two-day period, and diagnosed, by the senators interrogating her, with erotomania and a case of man-eating professionalism. Fords experienceshaped by the optics of the #MeToo moment, by her whiteness and country-club rootswas different. The Republicans on the committee, likely coached by some consultant, did not overtly smear Ford. Some pretended, condescendingly, to extend her empathy. Senator Orrin Hatch, who once claimed that Hill had lifted parts of her harassment allegations against Thomas from The Exorcist, called Ford pleasing, an attractive witness. Instead of questioning her directly, the Republicans hired Rachel Mitchell, a female prosecutor specializing in sex crimes, to serve as their proxy. Mitchells fitful, sometimes aimless questioning did the ugly work of softening the Republican assault on Fords testimony. Ford, in any case, was phenomenal, a witness and expert in one, and it seemed, for a moment following her testimony, that the nation might be unable to deny her credibility.
Then Kavanaugh came in, like an eclipse. He made a show of being unprepared. Echoing Clarence Thomas, he claimed that he did not watch his accusers hearing. (Earlier, it was reported that he did.) I wrote this last night, he said, of his opening statement. No one has seen this draft. Alternating between weeping and yelling, he exemplified the conservatives embrace of bluster and petulance as rhetorical tools. Going on about his harmless love of beer, spinning unbelievably chaste interpretations of what was, by all other accounts, his youthful habit of blatant debauchery, he was as Trumpian as Trump himself, louder than the loudest on Fox News. He evaded questions; he said that the allegations brought against him were revenge on behalf of the Clintons; he said, menacingly, that what goes around comes around. When Senator Amy Klobuchar calmly asked if he had ever gotten blackout drunk, he retorted, Have you? (He later apologized to her.)
There was, in this performance, not even a hint of the sagacity one expects from a potential Supreme Court Justice. More than presenting a convincing rebuttal to Fords extremely credible account, Kavanaughand Hatch, and Lindsey Grahamseemed to be exterminating, live, for an American audience, the faint notion that a massively successful white man could have his birthright questioned or his character held to the most basic type of scrutiny. In the course of Kavanaughs hearing, Mitchell basically disappeared. Republican senators apologized to the judge, incessantly, for what he had suffered. There was talk of his reputation being torpedoed and his life being destroyed. This is the nature of the conspiracy against white male powerthe forces threatening it will always somehow be thwarted at the last minute.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-ford-kavanaugh-hearings-will-be-remembered-for-their-grotesque-display-of-patriarchal-resentment?mbid=social_twitter