March 15, 2015

If GMOs Are So Great, Then Label Them.

I don't care what other people decide to feed their families

I DO care what I feed MY family.

There appears to be an effort to force people to eat what they have decided they do not want to eat.

That effort is coming from pro-GMOers.

So all I want to say is: Feed your family what you want.

Don't tell other people what they should feed their families.

If your product is so great and you are worried that people are not buying it because you refuse to label it, then just go ahead and label it and your problem will be solved.

It seems simple to me.

Eat what you want, the rest of us will eat what we want.

Why are we being bombarded with promotions for GMOs that they still refuse to label?

March 13, 2015

The Swedish Prosecutor Lied As Charged. Admits No Legal Impediment to London Interview w/Assange.

Under heavy criticism, worldwide AND from within the Swedish Government itself, Prosecutor Marianne Ny tries to cover the lie she has been telling for nearly four years now, claiming NOW that she is concerned the statute of limitations will run out on some of the allegations.

Well, YES, so why did she refuse to do this right away? Why did she lie and claim there was a Legal Impediment to doing so?

Marianne Ny's name will go down in infamy for her egregious cooperation with those who had a vested interest in silencing the press.


For years, the Swedish Prosecutor and those who were part of the plot to silence Wikileaks and Julian Assange made the false claim that they could not file charges against Assange without taking the 'final step' under Swedish Law, an interview with the accused and falsely claimed that interview could only be conducted in Sweden.

That was an outright LIE.

Never mind that Assange had tried to obtain that interview while in Sweden, staying longer than he intended while the Prosecutors repeatedly put off that interview.

Never mind either than Assange DID speak to the Swedish Police, something that was constantly ignored by the propagandists whose mission was certainly NOT the facts, but to smear someone personally when they could not contradict the facts released by Wikileaks, a Whistle Blowing Web Site.

And also do not forget that the first Prosecutor threw out the case after which this prosecutor was installed in order to overturn that decision.


For years, people interested in the FACTS, stated over and over again that there was NO LEGAL IMPEDIMENT to the Prosecutor interviewing Assange in London.

And for years, they were told they were wrong.

Clearly they were RIGHT.



One other thing to remember about this particular Prosecutor.

She spent her career insisting that any case related to sex crimes, MUST BE PROSECUTED INSTANTLY, as quickly as possible for the sake of the women involved.

Why, then did she LIE about this CASE? Clearly the interests of the women were no longer her concern.

So what WAS her concern if it wasn't the women?

I think most people around the globe figured that out a long time ago.

From as far back as 2010 people around the world knew this whole thing was nothing more than a smear campaign intended to silence the press.

Here's an example of the many articles that were on to the scam that long ago:

Marianne Ny: Making an arse of Swedish law



The shameful treatment of Whistle Blowers throughout this era will also go down in history.