20score
20score's JournalThey Really, Really Care!
Its a new dawn. Our government has struck the perfect balance between freedom and security. This may have been twelve or more years in the making, but now we know the government cares enough to let us make our own mistakes, while still watching every move we make. You know its the right thing to do; because what could be more American than all three branches of government united against privacy? Well, in the New America, anyway. They worry about us. So, like a concerned parent, they check all our web searches, track our movements, store our emails, monitor our phone records, keep track of what we read, buy, who we know, where we go and what we watch. Forever. But yet they dont go sticking their noses in where they dont belong Like Credit Default Swaps. Now thats caring.
Sometimes people are just dont know whats good for them. Thats why state and local governments are joining the federal government in tracking where we go and when we go there. License plate readers are on the tops of many police cars, taking pictures of all the cars they encounter, where and when they were there - and they are coming to your neighborhood soon. Its all stored in central data bases to be accessed by dozens of government agencies, for any purpose. Congress and the Bush Administration got one thing right. They knew George Orwells 1984 wasnt a warning, it was a blueprint. With the added, and not inconsequential benefit of being a great big money-maker for the right companies. We can be thankful that some on the left have finally caught on!
Total Information Awareness was very unpopular when it was introduced ten years ago. But, people much more powerful and richer than the average person knew it was the right thing to do. There is a time to treat the average person like an adult and let them learn from their own mistakes. Such as when they are signing mortgage papers. But they cant be trusted to spy on themselves - even though they may do a decent job on FaceBook. So, Total Information Awareness is here under different names. And its important to denigrate those who would challenge these programs, or even make us aware of them. (Its possible they make not like whats being done, even when its for their own good.)
As most will know, when the power of the state is challenged by trouble-makers they call themselves whistle-blowers, people of conscience and journalists those trouble-makers need to be silenced. A tried and true method is the ad hominem. Take the journalist causing problems right now for the administration. Even though many of the things being said about Glenn Greenwald arent true, the important thing is that someone said them. Just as the main stream media knows, when one person says, these are the facts and another person says, no, these are it is vital not to fact check the information, the key is to allow people to repeat what theyve heard. Its the patriotic way to run a news outfit. And our news outfits have been patriotic for years. (Bush didnt bring us the Iraq War by himself, you know.)
A very important aspect to all the cameras, facial recognition software, storing of all our data, predictive software for future crimes, and total observation which gets better every year is not just so people will censor themselves and watch what they say and do (and to know if someone is protesting the corporations or the government). Or even for possible control in the years to come. Its freedom. People still need to be free. And our government knows no one is actually free unless money can be made. Thats where real freedom comes in. All three branches of government are united on this front, too.
Nothing essential to freedom will change. If you are paying big bucks to a congressman or senator, you know your phone call will be returned every time. And you know that in America, a legislator or regulator will earn their money. They know they dont work for some tree-hugging, wacko that whines every time someones water is set on fire. No, they work for you! If you offer a seven figure job to someone once theyre out of public service, then its understood that money comes after a job well done while theyre in public service. See, its all good.
Now we need to come together as good citizens and attack those who embarrassed our leaders.
(Even though we already knew about it But it was bad to bring it up And the people who told us about it are traitors And we need to have this conversation But those who told us about this are more important than the programs And it kept us safe And its legal anyway But hurt national security Did I say this is nothing new?)
Squirrel!
When Leaders Go Wrong.
It divides us. This holds true for small and large groups, parties and countries. Some stay loyal to the leader or leaders, and others to their own ethics. Of course the reasons for a person taking one position over another are varied. Some positions are better thought out than others, some see a greater good in following the leader, even when a deeply held belief is tossed aside. And others just follow the tide. But what holds true in most cases, is that division happens when a president or leader does the wrong thing, and that person is most culpable for any fallout - even though his or her followers are responsible for their own misguided words and actions.
This is addressing topics that go against values and principles that a particular group espouses, not the everyday give and take of normal politics. When people caught on to the lies behind the Vietnam War, the country was separated into those who supported and those who opposed the war. When the Bush Administration started a war on false pretenses, the country was divided. People switched parties when the Republicans embraced discrimination in the 1960s. And now the left is fighting over wholesale spying. Its not to excuse in any way those who would sellout values supposedly held by most Americans, but Obama set the ball rolling when he sold out the values he said he possessed.
It should be a given that the degrees of wrongdoing in the examples given are vastly different. But the basic form is the same and the damage done will be long term much longer than the term of a U.S. president.
I see no caveats in the 4th Amendment that allows blanket spying on all Americans, all the time:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
How can any person pretend that there is probable cause to spy on all of us? Its indefensible.
This Administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand. I will provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to track and take out the terrorists without undermining our Constitution and our freedom.
That means no more illegal wire-tapping of American citizens. No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. No more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are.
Candidate Obama, August 2007.
Have to call bullshit on Schieffer and the post. Very Rovian.
1. MLK and Rosa Parks were not whistle-blowers, they were civil rights leaders. Big difference.
2. Schieffer has never done anything that can come close to the type of bravery that Snowden has shown. Until he does, then this is a childish attack. No one has a right to push someone else into position they would never occupy themselves.
3. More Rovian attacks. I am ashamed at some on the left. Snowden is not the issue, government spying and the loss of privacy is.
4. Unless people supported Big Brother under Bush and Obama, their opinion is useless.
"A Massive Surveillance State": Glenn Greenwald Exposes Covert NSA. Democracy Now!
To those who supported this type of government spying during the Bush administration and have turned against it under Obama, you are right for the wrong reasons, and owe the country an apology for allowing this to get worse for years. To those who challenged government spying under Bush and now support it, you are wrong for the wrong reasons and need to re-awaken your ideals. Youre hurting the country and ironically hurting the party you are trying to help. The hypocrisy is extremely obvious to everyone but you, and it will be used as a political weapon against the left
for many years to come.
And thanks to all those involved in bringing this to light, both in the media and to the whistle-blowers. (Although this shouldn't surprise anyone, it's finally getting coverage.)
Rep. Stephen Fincher: “If the Poor Want Their Children to Eat… Sell them as Slaves.”
Appearing on Fox News, Tennessee Representative Stephen Fincher addressed the charges of hypocrisy and callousness leveled at him by Democrats, again quoting the Bible to justify his positions. Leviticus 25-45, the children of the strangers that do live among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land and they shall be your possession. And whats stranger than poor people? Am I right? Right? He said grinning and raising his hand for a high-five, which was answered quickly by a smiling Eric Bolling.
The controversy started two weeks ago while a debate was taking place in the House Agriculture Committee over $4.1 billion in cuts to the food stamp program, now known as SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Stephen Fincher made his position clear that the government should not be in the business of feeding children or helping the poor, quoting the Bible for added emphasis. For even when we were with you, we gave you this command: Anyone unwilling to work should not eat. (The quote is actually about warning people against waiting for the second-coming, not as a justification to deny food to those in need.) The callousness is evident to anyone; the hypocrisy became obvious when it was found out that Mr. Fincher has taken millions from the government personally. The $3.5 million he has collected for his farm in subsidies, is from programs that he supports and has voted to increase funding for.
Look, Im a Christian and Im far better than those atheists on the other side of the aisle who want to use the government to feed the poor, Stephen Fincher said to the Fox panel. Thats how Hitler and Stalin started out - feeding the poor. But Im not heartless at all; its all about tough-love. And its also a win-win situation. We all know God wants to help the rich and powerful, or they wouldnt be rich and powerful, he said to the beaming and nodding hosts on The Five. Thats why the government should give more money to people like me who know how to spend it. We could buy the poor people and then we would be obligated to feed them
if they work hard enough. After a thoughtful pause. Ill say it again, this is other peoples money that Washington is appropriating and spending. It should go to me.
I have to say thank you on so many levels Steve, said Greg Gutfeld. Not only for figuring out how to feed those douche-bags, and for trying to bring back slavery, but as a comedian too. I have so many hungry children and slavery jokes Im dying to tell
See, thats why right-wing humor works, its
its gettable!
Tell your big news, Andrea K. Tantaros said. Were all just dancing around it.
Okay, heres my plan. Im going to introduce a bill next week. It will eliminate food stamps and give that money to well-off white Christian males, and legalize the buying and selling of those who cant feed themselves. Its called, The American Patriots Love of God and Country, bill.
Im a Democrat and I love this bill! Bob Beckel announced. What could be better than helping the wealthy and the poor at the same time?
Profile Information
Gender: MaleMember since: Fri Jul 4, 2008, 02:39 PM
Number of posts: 4,769