...voted 4 to 2 to HIDE THE THREAD?!
Seriously, I thought the level of intelligence was a little higher here at DU.
4 on the the jury voted to HIDE an OP which was an original work of the Poster.
Stupid decision, made by seriously satire-challenged nitwits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021178522
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Poster has not given actual link and has posted far above the limit for copyrighted material.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Aug 22, 2012, 11:08 AM, and the Jury voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: I agree with alerter.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: Alerted for: The person who sent the alert wrote: "Poster has not given actual link and has posted far above the limit for copyrighted material."
The link doesn't go to the interview and may well be over the limit for material posted. I suggest correcting these two things.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: Complaint is correct, but A quick google search )in general, and within michellemalkin.com) shows that this post is a complete fabrication. (possibly email chain letter sort of thing). Not appropriate for our site
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I do not think that DU needs to worry about Copyright infringement, since the post is satire, written by the poster, so he owns the Copyright. Come on, Alerter, it's not that difficult to discern that this is satire.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Interview should be abbreviated, and linked.