Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

Emrys's Journal
Emrys's Journal
November 15, 2022

The accusations of "raging antisemitism" gained more currency in the US than in the UK,

which is why it's an absolute waste of time trying to talk about them and the Labour Party during the Corbyn era on a US-dominated forum starting from the sort of groundbase of belief typified by your reply.

But to waste just a little of my time, right-wing factions within Labour weaponized a number of issues to muddy the name of Corbyn and the vast influx of supporters his time as leader brought the party, and literally worked to sabotage Labour's prospects in the run-up to the last election, and our media and yours lapped it up wholesale.

Some time spent on Google yourself would probably be more useful if you really want to understand the situation and its development, as the severely sceptical are unlikely to believe any I supply, but here's just a few:

London School of Economics study "Journalistic Representations of Jeremy Corbyn in the British Press": https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/research/research-projects/representations-of-jeremy-corbyn

Media Reform Coalition report "Labour, Antisemitism and the News: A Disinformation Paradigm": https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Labour-anti-semitism-and-the-news-EXEC-SUM-FINAL-PROOFED.pdf

Scottish Daily Record: "Secret Scottish-based office led infowars attack on Labour and Jeremy Corbyn: Explosive leaked documents passed to the Sunday Mail reveal the organisation’s Integrity Initiative is funded with £2million of Foreign Office cash and run by military intelligence specialists": https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/foreign-office-funds-2m-infowars-13707574

Monthly Review report "Anatomy of a Propaganda Campaign: Jeremy Corbyn’s Political Assassination" (includes a section on the antisemitism accusations and the fact that Labour's record on that issue was no worse, and probably slightly better, than the Tories' and that of the general population, as has been borne out by a number of reputable academic studies): https://monthlyreview.org/2022/02/01/anatomy-of-a-propaganda-campaign-jeremy-corbyns-political-assassination/

For some sort of balance and a more or less Establishment overview, a BBC article: "A guide to Labour Party anti-Semitism claims": https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45030552

I'm not a Labour supporter, BTW, haven't been for decades, and have a history of being critical of Corbyn on this board for my own reasons.

Whatever, what we're left with is a Labour Party under Starmer that's very vocally hell-bent on following the Tory Party down some very dark sociocultural holes (like its stance on immigration) and avoiding addressing some of the main issues that have made the UK such a disaster zone (particularly Brexit).

November 7, 2022

I would know next to nothing about the Ukraine conflict without Twitter.

What I did know would likely be days old, filtered editorially, of questionable accuracy, and in too great quantity to sift through within a news cycle. Some of the Ukrainian accounts I read regularly are actual people on the ground there (as verified from a number of sources for the best part of a year). Some of them include journalists who can go into greater granular detail than they can in whatever mainstream outlets they have and can update in real time if they want to. Their tweets also give a sense of who they are and what their experiences are like that no ossified, static medium could.

I would have a very warped view of my home country Scotland's politics without Twitter. 99%+ of its media are owned by entities outside Scotland, and all have agendas that mean I have to hold my nose in any search for anything resembling plain facts about the country, its governance and the quest among a significant proportion of its population for independence. It would be easy to feel powerless and isolated in those circumstances. I don't, because I can read selected accounts' output that impresses on me daily that I'm most definitely not alone and shares information I would have great trouble finding elsewhere, or at all.

That's just two examples out of many fields in my own experience.

Thing is, when I first ventured onto Twitter, it was weird and overwhelming. I didn't even have an account at first, so I didn't have access to a timeline or Twitter pals or any of the tools that Twitter uses to bring new users into the fold.

You're stalled at that stage. There's no reason for you to go further if you don't want to. Its no skin off my nose or anybody else's who does use Twitter and finds worth in it on a daily basis. But kindly quit looking down your nose at those of us who do, because it's unnecessarily obnoxious.

This endless succession of threads, usually from people who have little experience of Twitter and no interest at all in learning more because they dismiss it out of hand, seemingly berating those of us who do for our choice among the vast information stream we all have access to nowadays, gets really tired.

Use the media and the internet and these forums however you want to. And let those of us who do find useful information on Twitter on a regular basis and drag it back here to share carry on doing so without the constant timewasting griping.

If it's a post of mine, there'll usually be fair warning that it involves Twitter. Unless DU decides to ban Twitter content from DU, it's not going away.

Probably tl;dr, but you asked a question. There's an answer.

November 6, 2022

Twitter Blue just launched, and it's ... going really well so far [Contains Twitter]

Twitter Blue is trending in the UK, at least. My curiosity got the better of me and I'm a great fan of recursiveness and all things meta, so I checked the top few tweets. Here's a wee sample from the first 20 or so.

https://twitter.com/guicane/status/1589001927538659329
Daniel Sinclair
@_DanielSinclair

Ok so they launched the new Twitter Blue features, but they forgot to change the IAP price from $4.99, and the Verified feature doesn’t actually work. The New banner takes you no where.




Gui
@guicane

It says it’s available in the UK but there’s no sign of it in the updated app


https://twitter.com/emilycrockett/status/1588890347245309952
Elon Musk
@emilycrockett

I can't wait until Twitter Blue drops and THE PEOPLE have a say!

Specifically the people who are trolls.

Who will now get to credibly impersonate a celebrity for the LOW LOW PRICE of $8/month!!!


This guy's bio says he's a Tesla investor:
https://twitter.com/SawyerMerritt/status/1588960868917968896
Sawyer Merritt
@SawyerMerritt

BREAKING: Twitter has officially launched the revamped Twitter Blue for $7.99/month in select countries.

Not all features are live yet. Some are coming later. Looks like the blue verified checkmark is now part of Twitter Blue, but as a Blue user I’m not seeing a checkmark yet.


https://twitter.com/GergelyOrosz/status/1588981510916276224
Gergely Orosz
@GergelyOrosz

On one end, impressive that this new, verified feature got built and shipped in a week, people working 84 hour weeks.

On the other: it doesn’t work.

I’m a Twitter Blue subscriber. The new app tells me I now have a verified checkmark. But I don’t.

Fast work, but sloppy work.



https://twitter.com/reckless/status/1589039688316510209
nilay patel
@reckless

Reminder to everyone doing Twitter Blue subscriber and revenue math that Apple takes 30 percent of every subscription for the first year whee


https://twitter.com/Sabuuchi/status/1588970559391440897
Sabuuchi
@Sabuuchi

It would really suck if people bought Twitter Blue with the sole intention of uploading entire episodes of TV shows to get the host in trouble for negligently enabling copyright infringement.

Surely a lack of proper content ID systems and stripped moderation team wont hurt this.


To be fair, one guy is delighted because he posts animation videos, and with his new blue tick and all, he's now posted a 10-minute video, but nobody got time for that. Well, OK, surprisingly, 999 repliers seemed to have, but he's using the surge in interest to spam the first few reply slots with links to assorted tat and paraphernalia and invite folks to "follow our YT channel we post videos there almost daily". So he's paid Musk his yearly sub to post a longer video than he'd normally share on Twitter, and one person in the replies I looked at before I totally lost interest has invoked @Downloaderbot. Somebody hasn't quite thought through the economics of all this, maybe it's me.

Happy days. I'm just going to back away from all this now and let it simmer. More at the link in the first sentence up top if anyone's interested.

OOPS. ETA I forgot to include this one:
https://twitter.com/Win98Tech/status/1588993204619288576
Win98 Tech Support
@Win98Tech

Twitter Blue is apparently rolling out so just getting this ready to go

November 2, 2022

Where should libraries go if Twitter becomes a wasteland?

Elon Musk has bought Twitter, he’s all but guaranteed to make terrible decisions about how to run it, and high-profile users are already leaving the platform due to the already-significant increase in hate-speech and misinformation. Of course this has wider implications for the world at large, but where does it leave libraries seeking to connect with users on the platform? Should we stay, or find a new home?

tl;dr - in a way it doesn’t matter what we want to do, we have to follow the lead of our communites. If they stay put then so should we; if they fragment then it becomes a lot more complicated.
...
SHOULD WE SIMPLY LEAVE TWITTER ON PRINCIPLE?

Ultimately, my view is that libraries leaving Twitter on principle is self-defeating and too selective. Facebook is so incredibly problematic and has been for at least a decade, so if we’re leaving Twitter we should probably be leaving FB, right? And they own Instagram so we should leave that too. Which means we’re left with TikTok, which is hardly a bed of ethical roses and is especially problematic around data.

So do we leave all of them on principle? You could certainly make a case for it - but I don’t think most of us will because it would destroy our ability to interact with our communities. So if the answer is ‘no we’re not leaving all of them,’ then leaving just Twitter seems like a misstep: if you’ll forgive the extended metaphor, it’s like cutting off your unethical nose to spite your face, when the cheeks, eyes, chin and mouth are equally guilty.

https://www.ned-potter.com/blog/where-should-libraries-go-if-twitter-becomes-a-wasteland
November 2, 2022

Magnetic north, true north and grid north align over GB for first time

As expert map readers will know, when you’re out and about navigating with a compass, there is a difference between magnetic north (where the compass points) and grid north (the vertical blue grid lines shown on OS maps).

The difference between magnetic north and grid north is often referred to as ‘grid magnetic angle’ and it not only varies from place to place, but changes with time. This needs to be taken into account when navigating with a map and compass.

In 2014, for the first time in Great Britain since the 1660s, magnetic north moved from being to the west of grid north to the east. The change started in the very south-west corner of Britain and will slowly progress across the whole country over the next 12 to 13 years. We wrote a blog on the progress of alignment between magnetic and grid north in Britain back in 2019, which you can read here.

Now, there is a third line about to come into alignment – true north. This is the direction of lines of longitude that all converge at the north pole.

On a map projection like the transverse Mercator projection used for the British National Grid, the longitude lines curve away from the straight grid lines. This is called ‘convergence’. The amount of curvature varies across the grid area, except at one line. A transverse Mercator projection has a “central meridian” line where a chosen longitude aligns with a vertical eastings grid line. For the National Grid this central meridian line is 2°W or 400000m E.

The changing direction of magnetic north is now approaching this ’magic line‘ so all three will briefly be in alignment. Due to the magnetic north direction being skewed relative to the central meridian and the fact that it is moving, the triple alignment point will move up the central meridian.


The 'magic line' as it passes through Great Britain



https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/newsroom/blog/magnetic-true-grid-north-align-over-great-britain?fbclid=IwAR35Zekr-NXZQTg1-E_VUkZ1adtTErUn_CtVllJfS8IG6PnhKNGR2fvNN_o
November 2, 2022

I edit books. The Oxford comma is much misunderstood.

Nowadays, rather than having strict house styles, most book publishers are flexible about matters of style, like the Oxford comma, because they want to minimize costs resulting from changing what an author's submitted for publication. Generally, if what an author's done is consistent, or thereabouts, we'll standardize it throughout a chapter or whole book.

The Oxford comma means something different in book publishing than it does in everyday chatter.

It means the comma after the penultimate item in a list is obligatory in all cases.

It's nothing to do with making sense of a sentence by fiddling with the punctuation, that comma's just always there. The Oxford University Press explains why it adopted this practice:

Given that the final comma is sometimes necessary to prevent ambiguity, it is logical to impose it uniformly, so as to obviate the need to pause and gauge each enumeration on the likelihood of its being misunderstood – especially since that likelihood is often more obvious to the reader than the writer.

https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/256035


Translated from the somewhat flowery English: to save time spent by copy-editors deciding in every case whether there should be a comma after the penultimate item in a serial list, it's easier to just always use it, so that's what OUP imposes. And that's what a publisher means when they instruct us to standardize on using the Oxford comma or not.

This cuts out nuance, as in the examples people often give when arguing in the Oxford comma's favour, because that comma is not optional. But it saves time, and time is money.

So there you go: all those arguing for the Oxford comma have been doing it wrong all along. According to the Oxford University Press, anyway.
October 31, 2022

No, Elon and Jack are not "competitors." They're collaborating.

Elon Musk’s deal to buy Twitter has been met with surprise, derision, and gnashing of teeth — and an overwhelming amount of well-intentioned but poorly-informed commentary and analysis.

As someone who has followed the company closely since its inception and has had a chance to talk in depth about technical topics with Jack Dorsey and the company’s other founders over the years, I have a different view.

Here’s a series of common questions regarding the deal and the relationship between Dorsey and Musk about which I see the most errors and misconceptions.

https://davetroy.medium.com/no-elon-and-jack-are-not-competitors-theyre-collaborating-3e88cde5267d


The article, from a Twitter near-insider who specializes in combating disinformation in tech, is interesting food for thought about what Musk apparently thinks he's trying to do - and the author thinks will end disastrously - and how Jack Dorsey is not Musk's rival.
October 29, 2022

It might be ineresting to compare Twitter sources, but it looks like you have it well covered.

For anyone else who might be interested, here are a few of mine I check out regularly.

Here's Josh Marshall's Ukraine Twitter list (I don't check out this one that often, but it includes some I do, like Anders Åslund, Ukraine Weapons Tracker, Julia Davis (who we've discussed), The Kyiv Independent, Illia Ponomarenko etc.): https://twitter.com/i/lists/1494877848087187461

Individual accounts (mainly aggregators unless they're individuals' names):

The Dead District (based in Georgia) - https://twitter.com/TheDeadDistrict
Glasnost Gone - https://twitter.com/GlasnostGone
NEXTA - https://twitter.com/nexta_tv
Oryx - https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop
News of Ukraine - https://twitter.com/uasupport999
Russia Vs World - https://twitter.com/RussiaVsWorld_
ТРУХА English - https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews
Euromaidan Press (can get a bit over-excited, depending who's staffing it) - https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress
BlueSauron - https://twitter.com/Blue_Sauron
Trent Telenko - https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko
Phillips P. OBrien - https://twitter.com/PhillipsPOBrien
Visegrád 24 - https://twitter.com/visegrad24
Thomas C. Theiner - https://twitter.com/noclador
WarMonitor - https://twitter.com/WarMonitor3
Rob Lee - https://twitter.com/RALee85
Jason Jay Smart - https://twitter.com/officejjsmart
Jay in Kyiv - https://twitter.com/JayinKyiv
ZMiST - https://twitter.com/ZMiST_Ua

I could draw the individual ones together in a Twitter list, but I think it would be duplicative (and overwhelming!). I check out different ones on different days, depending on mood and the type of info I'm after.

October 28, 2022

Twitter's good for some things - even after Musk took over

https://twitter.com/JessicaLBurbank/status/1586013006923603969
Jessica (Ka) L. Burbank, MPA
@JessicaLBurbank

Well @elonmusk now owns this place so here’s a warm welcome to him and his fans

[Twitter video]


I'm not up for fact-checking this video, but it was worth clicking through to see the Musk fan meldowns in the replies.
October 27, 2022

How the U.K. Became One of the Poorest Countries in Western Europe

Britain chose finance over industry, austerity over investment, and a closed economy over openness to the world.

The past few months have been rough for the United Kingdom. Energy prices are soaring. National inflation has breached double digits. The longest-serving British monarch has died. The shortest-serving prime minister has quit.

You probably knew all of that already. British news is covered amply (some might say too amply) in American media. Behind the lurid headlines, however, is a deeper story of decades-long economic dysfunction that holds lessons for the future.

In the American imagination, the U.K. is not only our political parent but also our cultural co-partner, a wealthy nation that gave us modern capitalism and the Industrial Revolution. But strictly by the numbers, Britain is pretty poor for a rich place. U.K. living standards and wages have fallen significantly behind those of Western Europe. By some measures, in fact, real wages in the U.K. are lower than they were 15 years ago, and will likely be even lower next year.

This calamity was decades in the making. After World War II, Britain’s economy grew slower than those of much of continental Europe. By the 1970s, the Brits were having a national debate about why they were falling behind and how the former empire had become a relatively insular and sleepy economy. Under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s, markets were deregulated, unions were smashed, and the financial sector emerged as a jewel of the British economy. Thatcher’s injection of neoliberalism had many complicated knock-on effects, but from the 1990s into the 2000s, the British economy roared ahead, with London’s financial boom leading the way. Britain, which got rich as the world’s factory in the 19th century, had become the world’s banker by the 21st.

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/10/uk-economy-disaster-degrowth-brexit/671847/

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Current location: Scotland
Member since: Mon Sep 7, 2009, 12:57 AM
Number of posts: 7,233
Latest Discussions»Emrys's Journal