Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

markpkessinger's Journal
markpkessinger's Journal
April 5, 2022

All of the talk of holding Putin accountable for war crimes is just that: talk

All the talk by Biden and others of holding Putin accountable for war crimes before the International Criminal Court (ICC) is just that: talk. Although the U.S. was heavily involved in the promulgation of the Rome Statute, the treaty that created the ICC, the U.S., during the Bush administration, refused to ratify it. Under Obama, there was initially hope that he would be more supportive of the ICC, but he, too, undermined it for fear that American service personnel could be held responsible for war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. And under Trump, there was no support at all for the work of the ICC.


From a 2014 memorandum issued by President Obama, quoted at https://justiceinconflict.org/2014/02/04/unfortunate-but-unsurprising-obama-undermines-the-icc/`:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and consistent with section 2005 of the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act of 2002 (22 U.S.C. 7424), concerning the participation of members of the Armed Forces of the United States in certain United Nations peacekeeping and peace enforcement operations, I hereby certify that members of the U.S. Armed Forces participating in the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali are without risk of criminal prosecution or other assertion of jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court (ICC) because the Republic of Mali has entered into an agreement in accordance with Article 98 of the Rome Statute preventing the ICC from proceeding against members of the Armed Forces of the United States present in that country.


[emphasis added]

If President Biden wants the ICC to hold Putin accountable, he will first have to reverse the policy of his three predecessors. Accountability must apply to U.S. leaders and service personnel as well as to those of other countries.

I long for the day when the U.S. is willing to practice what it preaches, when it will hold its soldiers and leaders accountable to the very same standards it expects those of other countries to abide by. But I am not optimistic that I will live to see that day. Far too many Americans are far too wedded to the childish notion that our men and women in uniform never do anything wrong -- that the U.S. represents the "good guys" in every situation -- and to the equally idea that underlies it, namely, American Exceptionalism. (In that respect, it must be said that we are not so very different from those Russian citizens we see on the news who refuse to believe that their Russian soldiers could possibly be doing anything wrong in Ukraine, are we?)
March 29, 2022

This is far and away the best statement I've seen on the Will Smith/Chris Rock brouhaha . . .

Posted on Facebook:

Father Nathan Monk

A few years back, I found a lump in my chest. When I decided to talk about what was happening publicly, it was terrifying. Somehow that made it real. A friend of mine reached out to me right after that because her cancer had just come back, and she was starting chemo again. She was losing her hair for the second time. We met for drinks to talk about it. She told me about how she didn’t feel beautiful anymore. About how she wasn’t sure she could do this again. “Maybe it’s time to just check out.” Before I could even respond, an acquaintance of ours walks up and says, “Hey, baldy!” And rubbed her head.
We both laughed. It wasn’t funny.

I suppose we laughed because that’s what a lot of us do in uncomfortable situations where we don’t know how to stand up for ourselves.

A few weeks later, right before I got my test results, I was out with Tashina and some friends. They were trying to cheer me up and convince me everything would be okay. A friend of ours walked up and made a joke about how he would probably come to my funeral if the cancer got me. Then he said, “if for nothing else to hit on your newly single wife.”

In both of these situations, I saw red. My heart was pounding outside of my chest. I could feel my hands turning into a fist. I wanted to do something violent.

I didn’t.

But the feeling was there. There have been countless situations where people have made jokes at someone else’s expense that made me want to react. Sometimes I’ve stood up against those people with words. Sometimes I’ve sat silently with fear or anger.

Tonight, as I watched Will Smith go through those range of emotions, I felt a lot of empathy. He laughed at the joke that wasn’t funny. I’ve been there. He made a choice that I can understand, even if I don’t think it was the right choice. I think it would have been better if he had used his words instead of his fist. I think it would have made a bigger impact if he had found just the exact right words to say, but he didn’t.

However, I think if we are all honest with ourselves, we’ve had moments where that’s what we wanted to do, even if we didn’t.

Jada has been open about her health struggles for a long time now. It’s been part of the public discourse, and the joke Chris Rock made was in poor taste. It was ableist and cruel. It was the definition of punching down, and that makes it not a joke but bullying.
As I’ve watched some of the public discourse happening, I think there are a lot of things at play here all at once.

First, two things can be wrong at the same time. Will Smiths' reaction was wrong, but so was Chris Rock’s joke. We can’t lose sight of how wrong what Chris said was just because his wrong was met with another wrong.

When that acquaintance made that joke to my friend, my fear was that she would think this was the final justification for her to choose to no longer life here with us anymore. That was what we were discussing, and then she was met with a cruel joke. At that moment, I was so angry. I made a different choice than Will did at that moment. But we have no idea the conversations that have happened privately between them. Life is not always easy.

I also think racism is playing a huge part in this. I’ve seen so many comments that have made me cringe. You could see it on Denzel Washington’s face; you could see it in Tyler Perry’s reaction, and in the words of Diddy. They knew instantly how public perception was going to be. And I’m seeing it in many of the comments.

I’ve also seen a lot of comments justifying hatred toward Will and Jada because they are open about the non-monogamous structure of their relationship. As if that has anything to do with this? How consenting adults construct their relationship is none of anyone's business. It certainly doesn’t justify cruelty.

Ultimately, they are famous, and people love to imagine that with fame comes entitlement to their existence. But they are just human beings dealing with pain like everyone else.

I wish Will had just used his words, but he didn’t. He will have to deal with the consequences of that, just as Chris must face the consequences of his cruel joke. But I’m really sad to see some of the exterior conversations happening around this unfortunate situation. I think everyone should take a real step back and realize how cringe it is when you use phrases like, “he should have acted like a professional.” Professionalism has been weaponized against the Black community for a long time. I’ve seen folks make commentary about what Jada should do to conceal her baldness. Let me tell you, right now, Black women's hair has been weaponized too. So let’s just not.

Two wrongs happened tonight.

Chris Rock made a cruel and ableist joke.

Will Smith chose hands instead of words.

But one wouldn’t have happened without the other. Be mindful that even though Jada and Will are rich and powerful and will likely never hear your words about them. But someone you love who is struggling with their body does near you. They hear you loud and clear. And maybe it’s time the whole world gets a metaphorical slap to the face as a reminder that punching down is never okay.

In moments like this, I’m reminded of the Terry Pratchett quote, “Satire is meant to ridicule power. If you are laughing at people who are hurting, it's not satire; it's bullying.”
March 23, 2022

I was a little disappointed that Judge Jackson agreed to recuse herself . . .

. . . in an affirmative action case involving Harvard. Mind you, I'm not suggesting that her recusal is inappropriate. But I wish she had said something like this:

Senator, the Court at present has no coherent recusal policy, other than the self determinations of individual justices. As a result, we saw Justice Scalia refuse to recuse himself in a case involving a hunting buddy, and Justice Thomas has sat on cases involving political organizations with which his wife has been closely involved. If and when the justices of the Supreme Court come up with a coherent recusal policy that applies to all justices equally, independent of their self determinations as to their ability to remain impartial, I will happily abide by it. Until then, I will make my own recusal decisions as and when those cases come before me, the same as all of the other justices on the Court.


And yes, I understand why she didn't say that. But hey, a guy can dream, can't he?
November 19, 2021

Vials labeled "Smallpox?" Merck owes the public an immediate explanation of this!

Vials were found in the freezer of a Merck lab in Montgomery County, PA that were labeled "Smallpox," and their contents appeared to be intact. There are only two facilities in the world that are authorized to have copies of the smallpox virus: the CDC headquarters in Atlanta, and a lab in Russia. Merck has "declined to comment." From NBC:

Vials labeled 'smallpox' found by lab worker cleaning freezer in Pennsylvania
by Elisha Fieldstadt

[ . . . . ]

The frozen vials "were incidentally discovered by a laboratory worker while cleaning out a freezer in a facility that conducts vaccine research in Pennsylvania," a CDC spokesperson said in a statement to NBC News.

The contents appeared to be intact, and the CDC is partnering with law enforcement to investigate, the agency said.

“The laboratory worker who discovered the vials was wearing gloves and a face mask. There is no indication that anyone has been exposed to the small number of frozen vials. We will provide further details as they are available," the spokesperson said.

Smallpox was eradicated in the 1970s, but vaccines still exist in case of an outbreak, according to the CDC. Once a person develops a smallpox rash, the vaccine cannot protect them. About 3 in 10 people with smallpox die.

NBC Philadelphia reported that the vials were found at a Merck facility in Montgomery County, about 30 miles northwest of Philadelphia. Only two facilities in the world are supposed to have doses of the virus: CDC's Atlanta headquarters and a Russian lab.

[ . . . . ]
October 30, 2021

There needs to be a major public pressure campaign against Carlson's sponsors!

We need to somehow get a list of which corporate sponsors are planning on running ads during the planned Carlson program. The last thing most of them want is to be at the center of public controversy. If we do this quickly, we might be able to head this off!

September 17, 2021

John Shelby Spong, liberal Episcopal bishop and LGBTQ advocate, dies at 90

One of the great lights of progressive Christianity died earlier this week.

John Shelby Spong, liberal Episcopal bishop and LGBTQ advocate, dies at 90

The Right Rev. John Shelby Spong, a liberal theologian and former bishop who shook up the modern Episcopal Church, championing the inclusion of women and LGBTQ people in the clergy while promoting a nonliteral interpretation of scripture, died Sept. 12 at his home in Richmond. He was 90.

[ , , , , ]

As a theologian, he was known for questioning some of Christianity’s fundamental doctrines, including the virgin birth, the resurrection of Jesus and the existence of miracles. Those views infuriated Christian leaders who labeled him a heretic, although he was part of a long tradition of theologians who argued that taking the Bible literally was to miss the truth behind its teachings.

[ . . . . ]

Bishop Spong later expanded his ministry to encompass the fights for gender equality and LGBTQ rights. Soon after he arrived at the Diocese of Newark in 1976 as bishop coadjutor, a steppingstone to bishop, the diocese became one of the first to ordain women to the priesthood. In 1989, he ordained the first openly gay man to the Episcopal priesthood, the Rev. Robert Williams, who had written to Bishop Spong after reading his book “Living in Sin? A Bishop Rethinks Human Sexuality.”

[ . . . . ]

Before he was consecrated bishop coadjutor, Bishop Spong served for 20 years as a priest in North Carolina and Virginia. As rector of St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in Richmond — also known as the Cathedral of the Confederacy because it was where Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis once worshiped — he took down the Confederate flag that flew above the building. In the mid-1970s, he invited a rabbi to speak, leading to a picket line of fundamentalist Christians who insisted he try to baptize his Jewish visitors.


Requiescat in pace, dear Bishop!
September 7, 2021

Where the hell is the Justice Department and Merrick Garland on McCarthy and 11 other Republicans?

Trying to intimidate telecomm companies into not complying with subpoenas issued by the Jan. 6 Commission is a clear violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505, which states:

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


So why the hell are AG Garland and the Justice Department just standing by and allowing them to do this?
September 1, 2021

The news media hasn't really taken notice of this, but . . .

. . . In the midst of what has been, so far, the most difficult period for the Biden administration, President Biden has managed not only to (a) carry out the largest evacuation effort in history from a hostile foreign country, (b) fend off a relentless stream of overblown, negative criticism by the media of that effort, and (c) quietly and competently move FEMA resources and personnel into place in advance of a major hurricane! I heard one Louisiana parish official say yesterday that he "couldn't be happier with the response by the federal government."

Quite a contrast, I'd say, to the fiasco that was Trump's response to Maria, or Bush's abysmal response to Katrina 16 years ago! This is what real leadership -- and competent governance -- looks like!

August 25, 2021

Just saying . . .

Profile Information

Member since: Sat May 15, 2010, 04:48 PM
Number of posts: 8,394
Latest Discussions»markpkessinger's Journal