YoungDemCA
YoungDemCA's JournalHow the American Right claims the mantle of democracy - even as it undermines democratic practices
Found this article by political scientist and social activist Jean Hardisty (1945-2015) on how the modern American Right dresses itself in populist, "everyman" small-d democratic trappings, which means a lot of working and middle class (white) Americans are persuaded to vote for politicians and parties that support the interests of the super-wealthy.
snip:
To become a mass-based social and political movement, however, the New Right needed to attract a following outside of the Republican Party. Republicans have for decades had a reputation as the party of white country club members and big business. But at various times it has successfully painted itself as the party of the common man, especially during the anti-communist hysteria of the 1950s. Another instance was the courtship by President Richard Nixons Vice President, Spiro Agnew, of the silent majority. Agnew claimed that most inactive voters were conservative and were best represented by conservative Republicans. Two constituencies were available for the New Rights recruitment: voters who had supported the presidential candidacy of George Wallace, the white supremacist Democratic governor of Alabama who is sometimes called the father of the conservative movement, and conservative Christian evangelicals across the country.
In recruiting these new constituencies, the New Rights leaders struck an aggressively populist tone, despite an agenda that served the interests of business and the wealthy. As Chip Berlet describes in his book, Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort, [T]he grievances of many White middle- and working-class people-both a legitimate sense of injury and angry scapegoating generated by the erosion of traditional privileges-could be harnessed to benefit wealthy elites and intensify disempowerment and inequality for millions of people. [10] As is so often true of right-wing populism, rhetoric about the people masks the interests of the ruling class.
Full article: http://www.jeanhardisty.com/writing/articles-chapters-and-reports/rights-for-some-the-erosion-of-u-s-democracy/
Russia says it’s bombing ISIS in Syria. It’s actually bombing their enemies (Vox).
snip
This shouldn't be surprising. Russia is in Syria to prop up Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, Moscow's ally. The main threat to Assad is not ISIS, which the Syrian leader has often tolerated, but rather Syria's non-ISIS rebels including al-Qaeda's Syrian franchise as well as more moderate rebel groups. These rebel groups (along with the Kurds in Syria's north) are also ISIS's main enemies in Syria.
snip:
Both Assad and Putin win, in other words, if the West is forced to choose between Assad and ISIS in Syria. Which is part of why Russian airstrikes appear to be targeting ISIS's enemies in Syria under the pretext of targeting ISIS.
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423229/russia-bombing-isis-syria
80% of Republican voters approve of George W. Bush's Presidency.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/georgew-bush-jeb-bush-poll_5604456fe4b00310edfa78d0In all likelihood, the other 20% don't think he was enough of a right-wing asshole.
A couple of observations from an African-American pastor friend of mine...
Recently, I had lunch with a friend of mine who is an African-American pastor (though not at a congregation or denomination that is predominately black). Among the topics we discussed included politics, white privilege, and the experience of black Americans and other PoC in the Age of Obama.
Something that my friend pointed out to me is that for many white conservatives, it is important to refer to President Obama with claims like "He's not our President!", because for them, he's the BLACK President, not OUR President. This way of "Othering" President Obama, combined with Birtherism and other racist memes, is a method of denying him legitimacy - and consequently, denying black Americans any power (real or symbolic) in the US.
Another point my friend made is that Barack Obama's election in 2008 (and reelection in 2012) was a slap in the face to those Republicans who for several decades were counting on the Southern (White) Strategy, or the strategy of "maxing out" the white vote, to keep winning the Presidency. Obama proved that a black Democrat can not just win the Presidency, but win the Presidency even while losing a solid majority of the white vote nationally. The GOP is all too aware of this reality; hence, the doubling down on Voter ID laws and other draconian voting restrictions (at the state level in particular) and the Roberts Court's striking down of parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. They recognize that America's days as a white-majority country are numbered, and so they are doing their damnedest to cling to their political and social power - even rewriting the rules of the "game" to continue their hold on power.
Anyway, it was an interesting and enlightening conversation.
Jeb Bush's "free stuff" remark in South Carolina is a racist dog whistle
Some data-driven analysis from the Washington Post:
snip:
Yes, the Affordable Care Act is new, but much of the new coverage under Obamacare is an expansion of Medicaid, which is 50 years old. There's the (rather grotesque) meme of the "Obamaphones" -- basically reduced-cost or free cell phones for poor Americans. But "Obamaphones" are really "Reaganphones," having been introduced in 1985. And food stamps themselves date back to the '60s.
Aha!, you might think. The '60s are when African Americans started voting Democratic! Well, about that.
Black support for Democrats coincided with civil rights actions:
Not to mention corporate tax breaks and so on. Corporations do spend money to ensure tax breaks, but it's safe to assume that in many cases the savings from tax breaks are far larger than the money spent lobbying Congress or contributing to campaigns. Call it "low-cost stuff."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/09/25/why-jeb-bushs-free-stuff-argument-about-black-voters-is-so-off-the-mark/
#WalkingWhileFemale **HOF thread**
A friend of mine shared this experience on Facebook:
Me: *steady glare at him*
Guy: "Hey fuck you, that's a compliment you bitch!"
#?walkingwhilefemale
One of my friend's comments:
I would like to add that this kind of thing happens to me 3-5 times a week, depending on how often I go outside. I've been keeping it to myself up until now, but decided recently to start posting these interactions to show what it is like to walk while female. Please share your own experiences as well!! Awareness leads to action
.....
Pretty universal experience among women, particularly young women.
Speak out, speak up, and call it out. This kind of behavior toward women is unacceptable. And it's not just because women are women, it's because women are human beings, deserving of respect. No one is entitled to any one else's body.
"Do your part."
In honor of National Voter Registration Day:
Do your part.
-U.S. Representative John Lewis, D-GA.
How racial inequality in American society contributes to poorer health outcomes for PoC
Some information from Stanford professor Donald Barr here:
"A principal determinant of access to health care in the United States is the availability of health insurance. As is the case with health status, those from lower SES groups in the United States also have worse access to health care, based on this econmic fact of life. However, a growing body of research has shown that, even when people have the same level of health insurance and are treated for the same disease by the same physicians and hospitals, those from minority racial or ethnic groups often get worse care - either not receiving care when appropriate or receiving care that is lower in quality."
Barr, D. A. (2014). Health disparities in the United States: Social class, race, ethnicity, and health. JHU Press. p. xiv-xv
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8kZjBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=food+health+america+social+class&ots=-52kOxj5GI&sig=0S-wRKOY8IA6cqlR8BA1w_vI1JE#v=onepage&q&f=false
I should note that in Chapter 4 of this book, Donald Barr introduces the concept of allostatic load, which he defines as "the physiologic response to the stress of being in a position of social disadvantage, which over a period of years can result in physiologic injury and illness" (p.xiv).
Other stuff:
From the CDC website:
- African Americans in 2009 had the largest death rates from heart disease and stroke compared with other racial and ethnic populations; these disparities in deaths were also found across age groups younger than 85 years of age.
- From 2007-2010, the largest prevalence of hypertension was among adults aged 65 years and older, African American adults, US-born adults, adults with less than a college education, adults who received public health insurance (18- 64 years old) and those with diabetes, obesity, or a disability, compared with their counterparts. The percentages of African American and Hispanic adults who had control of high blood pressure were lower than among white adults.
snip:
African Americans in 2009 had the largest death rates from homicide among all racial and ethnic populations. Rates among African American males were the largest across all age groups.
African American adults in 2010 had the largest HIV infection rate compared with rates among adults of other racial and ethnic populations. Prescribed HIV treatment among African American adults living with HIV was less than among white adults.
In 2010, a larger percentage of Hispanic and African American adults aged 18-64 years were without health insurance compared with white and Asian/Pacific Islander counterparts.
snip:
snip:
http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/populations/REMP/black.html
As always, free to share your thoughts, comments, or even stories.
The better question is how do we reduce inequality within the profession
The pay distribution of professors mirrors that of many other professions these days: a relatively small number of higher-paid professors, and a larger - and growing - number of lower-salary, non-tenured professors (or assistant/adjunct professors or "lecturers" whose jobs have few benefits.
That's the way of the world these days. Quite unfortunately, IMHO. This is why we need a much stronger public safety net and potentially, a significant restructuring/revamping of the capitalist economy.
GOP bill to defund Planned Parenthood moving along in the House
Status: Referred to Committee on Jul 21, 2015
This bill was assigned to a congressional committee on July 21, 2015, which will consider it before possibly sending it on to the House or Senate as a whole.
The House Majority Leader indicated on Sep 14, 2015 that this bill may be considered in the week ahead.
This bill is scheduled for the following committee meetings:
Sep 16, 2015 7 p.m. House Committee on Rules
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr3134?utm_campaign=govtrack_email_update&utm_source=govtrack/email_update&utm_medium=email
From the same page:
The one Democratic cosponsor is conservaDem Dan Lipinski from the Chicago area. Other than him, this is entirely the work of the GOP.
Profile Information
Gender: MaleHometown: CA
Home country: USA
Member since: Wed Jan 18, 2012, 11:29 PM
Number of posts: 5,714