JoanofArgh
JoanofArgh's JournalQAnoners Cheer Trump's Text Alert Test, See It As a Step Towards Martial Law
Believers in QAnona conspiracy theory based on a series of internet clues posted by an anonymous character named Q that posits a world in which Trump and the military are engaged in ceaseless, secret war with globalist Democratic pedophilesthink the text could mark the start of The Storm, a fantastical MAGA dream in which Trumps political enemies will be arrested and tried at military tribunals.
That is how we will receive orders if all else fails, wrote one QAnon believer on the 8Chan internet forum. We are the next generation Minutemen! Standing by Sir!
SO HAPPY! wrote another. THANK YOU 45!
The text itself was as mundane as a nation-wide emergency test could be. While it came to phones as a Presidential Alert, it wasnt sent out by Trump. FEMA controls the system.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/qanoners-cheer-trumps-text-alert-test-see-it-as-a-step-towards-martial-law
Did anyone else get this?
https://twitter.com/jimmykimmel/status/1047552325668065280Omg, Christian Bale as Dick Cheney in the official trailer for movie "Vice"
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1047494241125974017Oh, FFS! APNewsBreak: Trump's EPA moving to loosen radiation limits
WASHINGTON (AP) The Trump administration is quietly moving to weaken U.S. radiation regulations, turning to scientific outliers who argue that a bit of radiation damage is actually good for you like a little bit of sunlight.
The governments current, decades-old guidance says that any exposure to harmful radiation is a cancer risk. And critics say the proposed change could lead to higher levels of exposure for workers at nuclear installations and oil and gas drilling sites, medical workers doing X-rays and CT scans, people living next to Superfund sites and any members of the public who one day might find themselves exposed to a radiation release.
The Trump administration already has targeted a range of other regulations on toxins and pollutants, including coal power plant emissions and car exhaust, that it sees as costly and burdensome for businesses. Supporters of the EPAs new radiation guidance argue the governments current no-tolerance rule for radiation damage forces unnecessary spending for handling exposure in accidents, at nuclear plants, in medical centers and at other sites.
This would have a positive effect on human health as well as save billions and billions and billions of dollars, Edward Calabrese, a toxicologist at the University of Massachusetts, said in 2016. He was to be the lead witness at a congressional hearing Wednesday on EPAs push for what it calls transparency in science.The proposed rule would require regulators to consider various threshold models across the exposure range when it comes to dangerous substances.
https://apnews.com/6a573b6b020e453c90ecd5e84aa23f57?utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&__twitter_impression=true
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHome country: USA
Current location: Charlotte, NC
Member since: Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:15 AM
Number of posts: 14,971