HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » nationalize the fed » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2

nationalize the fed

Profile Information

Member since: Wed Mar 12, 2014, 08:47 AM
Number of posts: 2,169

About Me

Help Nationalize the Federal Reserve- It is the progressive thing to do. Why is the Public Currency not a Public Utility? http://www.progressivegazette.com/2013/12/nationalize-federal-reserve.html And Tax Speculation- why does Wall Street pay no sales tax?

Journal Archives

Environmentalists Uncover Documents Revealing Feds Quietly Permitted Gulf Fracking

The federal government has been permitting offshore fracking in the Gulf with no site-specific analysis of the threats to imperiled species or the environment.

Alternet, Sabrina Canfield July 8, 2016

Federal regulators quietly gave the green light to more than 1,200 oil company fracking operations in the Gulf of Mexico between 2010 and 2014, according to documents environmentalists obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

At least 630 wells were fracked along the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama during that four-year period, and more than 76 billion gallons in fracking waste were dumped into the Gulf in 2014 alone, the documents show.

They were obtained as part of an agreement between the federal government and the Center for Biological Diversity to settle a lawsuit challenging the government's failure to disclose documents under the FOIA detailing the scope of offshore fracking.

The center in turn shared the data obtained with Courthouse News Service.

Shell, ConocoPhillips, Chevron and BP are among the companies fracking in the deep waters off the Gulf Coast, according to a separate document, which was obtained by Al Jazeera and placed online...snip
Read More: http://lwww.alternet.org/environment/environmentalists-uncover-documents-revealing-feds-quietly-permitted-gulf-fracking

Drill Baby Drill!

Posted by nationalize the fed | Mon Jul 11, 2016, 08:02 PM (3 replies)

More Tesla Autopilot crashes surface; NHTSA to investigate another

Green Car Reports.com by John Voelcker, July 7, 2016

With details about a fatal May 7 crash of a Tesla Model S operating on Autopilot continuing to garner news coverage, more crashes with Autopilot engaged appear to be surfacing.

Most notably, the NHTSA has said it will investigate a crash on Friday, July 1, in which a Tesla Model X ran off the road and rolled over.

The owner says it was operating on Autopilot, but Tesla Motors issued a statement yesterday saying its data showed no signs of that.

The emergence of more crashes, some of which had been discussed on Tesla owner forums, was reported yesterday by The Wall Street Journal.

From the Tesla Motors Club Forums:
Another Model X crash, driver says autopilot was engaged

One such case involved a Model S owner whose Autopilot had driven the car along an Interstate highway for 17 minutes when he began to review some papers.

When he looked up, his car was heading straight for a truck parked in his lane. He swerved, but hit the truck. The car was totaled....snip
Read More: http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1104865_more-tesla-autopilot-crashes-surface-nhtsa-to-investigate-another

Related: UK Guardian: Elon Musk's self-driving evangelism masks risk of Tesla autopilot, experts say

Tesla’s ambitious futurism has earned it loyal fans – but after the death of a driver using autopilot, some say the company should be more explicit about limitations...snip

...But in January, just a few months after he chastised drivers for “some fairly crazy videos on YouTube” of hands-free hijinks, Musk told reporters that the Model S was “probably better than humans at this point in highway driving”. Before the updated autopilot was released, he said that the car was “almost able to go [between San Francisco and Seattle] without touching the controls at all”.

In April, he distracted fans and reporters from the news of a recall of 2,700 Model X SUVs with a joking tweet comparing autopilot to the video game Mario Kart.

Talulah Riley, Musk’s wife, shared and deleted an Instagram video of herself driving on the highway between Los Angeles and San Diego without holding the wheel...snip
MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/02/elon-musk-self-driving-tesla-autopilot-joshua-brown-risks

Tesla's Model S Autopilot is AMAZING!

Posted by nationalize the fed | Sun Jul 10, 2016, 02:28 AM (8 replies)

Nuclear Power: Totally Unqualified to Combat Climate Change

Rinaldo S. Brutoco September 14, 2014

An Open Letter from the World Business Academy to leading climatologist Dr. James Hansen regarding his advocacy of nuclear power as a solution to global warming.

My colleagues and I at the World Business Academy have followed climate activism for many years and its on-going campaign to restrain the coal and oil industries. Research, congressional testimony, and activism by numerous climatologists to address climate change has brought this very real global threat into the public consciousness and set the stage to develop a strategy for preserving human civilization as we know it. A December 2013 study, “Assessing ‘Dangerous Climate Change’: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature,” has further articulated a higher, more urgent imperative for immediate climate remediation.(1)...snip

...It is our contention that those who tout nuclear power as a carbon-free solution to global warming are missing the forest and the trees. First, the forest: nuclear power plants continuously emit low levels of cancer-causing strontium-90 radiation during “normal” operations, and higher levels when there are serious problems such as the continuing leakage of radioactive water from the tsunami-damaged reactors at Fukushima, or the radiation leak that lead to the instantaneous closure of the San Onofre nuclear reactor in Southern California in January 2012(8). Today, even as radiation levels surge in Japan, media pundits discuss the dangers of radiation as if radiation sickness were limited to instances in which people experience nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, or death. This is false. A host of studies show that radioactive emissions of deadly strontium-90 during nuclear plants’ routine operations increase cancer rates among those who live near the plants, especially in women and children.(9) (See Appendix A, Average Strontium-90 in U.S. Baby Teeth, 1954-2013.)

Working with leading researchers in the field, the Academy commissioned its own health study examining the impact on the local population from Strontium-90 emissions occurring at the Diablo Canyon nuclear facility.(10) By examining publicly available health data broken out by zip code, a stark trend emerged: the local population in the hot zone has been getting sicker every year the plant has been operating. Our study demonstrates the urgent need for sincere investigation into the effects of the radioactivity released by the 100 active nuclear power plants in the US and the many hundreds more around the globe. But while we think nationally and globally, we intend to continue to act locally to rid our state of this nuclear nemesis.

Next, the trees: Nuclear power plants are not “carbon free.” They do not emit carbon or other greenhouse gases as they split atoms during the fission process, but their carbon footprint must be assessed on the basis of their complete nuclear fuel life cycle. Significant amounts of fossil fuel are used indirectly in mining, milling, uranium fuel enrichment, plant and waste storage construction, decommissioning, and ultimately transportation and millennia-long storage of waste. There is plenty of carbon in that footprint that is rarely acknowledged, computed, or mediated. In addition, the nuclear industry’s false refrain that nuclear power plants have no carbon footprint is an attempt to obscure the fact that nuclear power plants’ radiation footprint is far more lethal than the carbon footprint of any other industry. Additionally, the industry’s rhetoric masks the astronomical costs for thousands of years of storage that could be better invested in rapidly developing renewable fuels with a zero carbon footprint like solar, wind, geothermal, and Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion, which don’t carry harmful, let alone lethal, side effects....snip

Read More: https://worldbusiness.org/nuclear-power-totally-unqualified-to-combat-climate-change/

Related: Renewable energy versus nuclear: dispelling the myths
By Mark Diesendorf on 22 April 2016

Don’t believe the spurious claims of nuclear shills constantly putting down renewables, writes Mark Diesendorf. Clean, safe renewable energy technologies have the potential to supply 100% of the world’s electricity demand – but the first hurdle is to refute the deliberately misleading myths designed to promote the politically powerful but ultimately doomed nuclear industry

Nuclear energy and renewable energy (RE) are the principal competitors for low-carbon electricity in many countries. As RE technologies have grown in volume and investment, and become much cheaper, nuclear proponents and deniers of climate science have become deniers of RE.

The strategies and tactics of RE deniers are very similar to those of climate science deniers. To create uncertainty about the ability of RE to power an industrial society, they bombard decision-makers and the media with negative myths about RE and positive myths about nuclear energy, attempting to turn these myths into conventional wisdom. In responding to the climate crisis, few countries have the economic resources to expand investment substantially in both nuclear and RE. This is demonstrated in 2016 by the UK government, which is offering huge long-term subsidies to nuclear while severely cutting existing short-term subsidies to RE...snip

Myth 8: Nuclear energy emits no or negligible greenhouse gas emissions.

Neither nuclear energy nor most renewable technologies emit CO2 during operation. However, meaningful comparisons must compare whole life-cycles from mining the raw materials to managing the wastes. Nuclear physicist and nuclear supporter Manfred Lenzen found average life-cycle emissions for nuclear energy, based on mining high-grade uranium ore, of 60 grams of CO2 per kilowatt-hour (g/kWh), for wind of 10–20 g/kWh and for natural gas 500–600 g/kWh...snip


...The pro-nuclear and anti-RE myths disseminated by nuclear proponents and supporters of other vested interests do not stand up to examination. Given the political will, RE could be scaled up long before Generation 3 and 4 nuclear power stations could make a significant contribution to electricity supply.
Read More: http://reneweconomy.com.au/2016/renewable-energy-versus-nuclear-dispelling-the-myths-48635

Nuclear Power: A Mistake in Search of a Mission
Posted by nationalize the fed | Tue Jul 5, 2016, 05:28 PM (2 replies)

BBC Panorama: Why We Voted to Leave--Britain Speaks

Adrian Chiles goes home to the West Midlands to meet Leave voters from both sides of the political divide and find out why Britain voted for Brexit.

He discovers an unlikely alliance of young and old, wealthy and non-wealthy, white and non-white, who all share a belief that their views have not so far been listened to by mainstream politicians. Adrian learns about their lives and their concerns about immigration, jobs and feeling excluded from the benefits of an increasingly globalised world. He also meets Remain voters who blame the Breixters for pushing Britain into crisis.

As the nation reels from the fallout of the Referendum result, Adrian's journey across the region shows just how divided Britain has become.

Watch Online (UK IP's) http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07k7m4x/panorama-why-we-voted-to-leave-britain-speaks

Listen to some of the people that actually voted instead of the Establishment for a different point of view. Of course, some (many?) people didn't like the programme at all.

Youtube (While it lasts): Why We Voted to Leave Part 1

Part 2

BBC Panorama online http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006t14n

Posted by nationalize the fed | Tue Jul 5, 2016, 12:00 AM (3 replies)

Tell-all book alleges that Facebook is rife with sexism and run like a "North Korean cult"

TechSpot By Rob Thubron on July 1, 2016

Facebook may seem like a cool place to work, and Mark Zuckerberg can come across as quite likable and approachable. But according to a tell-all book by an advertising manager that was fired by the company, both these assumptions are far from the truth.

Antonio Garcia Martinez has released a book today called “Chaos Monkeys: Obscene Fortune and Random Failure in Silicon Valley." In it, he alleges that working for the social network was like being in a North Korean-style cult with Zuckerberg taking the role of the unquestioned leader.

It’s claimed that Zuckerberg had a tendency to explode and swear at staff, leading to them nicknaming him “the little emperor.” Martinez also claims that the CEO has a KGB-like internal police force called “the Sec,” which monitored every move staff made.

"We had slogans on the walls, we were all wearing a uniform," he told CBS This Morning. "It all felt very North Korean or Cuban, almost. And so in that moment, I just realized... the motive force in history, which is one egomaniac's twitchy drive and then the common man's desire to be part of a compelling story -- which is what we were, we just were bit players in Zuckerberg's story."

The former employee claims that Zuckerberg possesses a stare that “borders on the psychopathic.” In one extract, Martinez writes how...
Read More: http://www.techspot.com/news/65429-tell-all-book-alleges-facebook-rife-sexism-run.html

Chaos Monkeys: Obscene Fortune and Random Failure in Silicon Valley

According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

(Redacted Friend's Name): What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

Posted by nationalize the fed | Mon Jul 4, 2016, 06:17 AM (20 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2