Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member


CorporatistNation's Journal
CorporatistNation's Journal
December 21, 2015

Bernie Explains DNC Data Breach and Hillary Says "We Should Just Move on..."

We Want ALL The Facts FIRST Hillary!

VIDEO: "Bernie Sanders Explains DNC Data Breach"

hint (Note Hillary Sign on front of DNC NGP VAN Bus) WTF? What more do ya need to see??? DNC In Da TANK fer Hillary!!

Hillary suggests that "We just Move on because the American people are not interested in this..." NOT TRUE Hillary...


How Come Nobody From NGP Has Been Fired???

THEN and ONLY THEN (After We Know All of The Facts...) THEN... WE CAN "Move on!"

From SALON: “Debbie Wasserman Schultz decision to breach the DNC contract, under which she is bound, in order to smear Sanders was opportunistic.

The contract required written notice of termination and a 10-day grace period to cure any alleged default. Clearly the DNC was in violation, not Sanders.

Because the contract put the onus for securing data on the DNC, it was liable for the breach as well. But the issue was bigger than mere contract law or political dirty tricks.

In suspending the vital operations of a presidential campaign, Schultz trespassed on the right of all citizens to FREE and FAIR elections. :

Democrats could ill afford to be seen condoning her actions. Nor could they afford to pay her bills. If she acted without authority she’d be liable for damages, but only if the party was as swift and honorable in dealing with her, as Sanders was in dealing with Uretsky.

The party also had to ponder the sworn depositions Sanders might now take regarding such delicate matters as who Schultz spoke to about her decision to impale him.”


December 11, 2015

DFA "PUMPING" Hillary in On-Line Member Vote... ONLY One Vote and Dean Endorsement First! REVISED

YOUR Thoughts as you read THIS.... When we are talking "Progressive," this "pump" by DFA for Hillary strikes me as something just short of underhanded while being also just plain out of line with the reality of Hillary Clinton's political compass... as DFA founder Howard Dean uses the organization that he founded as his platform to try and Skew this member vote for Hillary...

How is Dean DFA "Endorsement" FAIR to Bernie and for that matter O'Malley as well in what is supposed to be an above board on line DFA Membership Vote? Does "Fairness" even matter... to YOU?

How does it strike you? Only one vote per member and you cannot change it later... So Dean ENDORSES Hillary in FIRST Email!!!

We all understand that Howard Dean has evolved since he ran for POTUS and is a whole lot less "progressive" than he may once have been. It is something less than democratic for Dean through DFA to try and persuade DFA members to slip their vote to Hillary in order to avoid a BLOWOUT WIN for Bernie and is in my mind... "CHEAP" on the part of BOTH DFA and Howard Dean!

Doesn't Hillary have ENOUGH HELP from MSM PROPAGANDA 24/7?

Let's call out DFA AND Howard Dean on this...

The point of this post was.... Members only have ONE chance to VOTE and cannot change it!!!

Howard Dean "Pumps" for Hillary in FIRST email so Hillary gets the FIRST Shot at the Membership thus improving her odds of a better score with the membership due to Dean influence coupled with first email to membership...

When Hillary talks about being "Progressive" most importantly she is no where near "progressive" on ECONOMIC Issues related to her close relationship with Wall Street.

Hillary has not been responsible in her decision making when it comes to FOREIGN Policy

e.g., Recently Advocating for a No Fly Zone over Syria in last debate ... Voting affirmatively with George W. Bush to invade Iraq in 2002...

Inattention to detail, poor management and/or Delegation of Responsibilities regarding the Benghazi Libya episode must be considered when critiquing Secretary Clinton's tenure at State, at a minimum .

Competence is lacking in this regard as well as judgement when Hillary is compared to her Democratic Primary competitors in this vital "Commander in Chief" issue .

Excerpts w/ annotation and points to ponder...

"As you make your decision about who Democracy for America will endorse to be our next president, I want to share a few words about my choice: Hillary Clinton."

"Hillary Clinton is the candidate who shares our progressive values on issues like climate change, immigration reform, and LGBT rights -- and she has the experience and ability to turn those values into policies that will help Americans."

Funny... Where is any mention of PROGRESSIVE ECONOMIC POLICIES by Hillary?

How does Hillary differ on the social/climate issues cited by Governor Dean above from O'Malley and Sanders?

Is Hillary even as good even on these Social/Climate issues as her opponents?

Howard again...
"In the 25 years I've known Hillary Blah, Blah, Blah...

Howard is neglecting to mention her debt to Wall Street...

[uCan we say $105 $MILLION$?

State Department... No Fly Zone over Syria... Can you say ...Non Stop Ticket to WW III?

Howard again...
"That's enough from me -- read on to see what Hillary has to say about why your vote matters to her. Thanks for your commitment to this process, and to our democracy."

***Nothing to address the corrupt political system that passes for "democracy" which is completely beholden to the Oligarchy, Corporate America, Corporate Media and Wall Street. Does not Senator Sanders make an issue of this?

Then again doe we not all agree that Senator Sanders owes $ZERO$ to Wall Street?

THIS is the problem that coupled with an "Establishment" engineered ignorance of a great percentage of the American people the public buy in is facilitated by the most sophisticated propaganda machine in history.

- Howard

Gov. Howard Dean, Founder
Democracy for America

------- Forwarded message --------
FROM: Hillary Clinton
SUBJECT: Your vote

"I want to thank you for your involvement in Democracy for America, and for taking the time to be thoughtful and engaged in our democracy. I'm excited for all that we're going to accomplish together during the course of this campaign, and I'm really looking forward to all the good we can do if I'm elected president.

I've said before that I'm a progressive who likes to get things done. So I want to talk to you about the things I'd like to accomplish in the White House.

First, I'll work to make sure all Americans are treated fairly -- continued....

I'm going to raise wages for the middle class. ($12.50 Max vs Sanders/O'Malley $15.00) I believe this is the defining challenge of our time. I'm the only Democrat in this race who's pledged not to raise taxes on families making less than $250,000 per year. "

Who among the remaining Democratic candidates in the race has stated that they would raise taxes on those earning under $250,000?

Questions arise as to the continuing relevance of Social Security and Medicare if she has the "watch."

Hillary... "Finally, I want to make sure that my term in office would ensure a strong progressive legacy for decades to come... "

Very much in doubt based on her record...

Hillary... "I take a backseat to no one when you look at my record in standing up and fighting for progressive values. "

NOT including $ECONOMIC$ values/fairness/taking on the Corporate Oligarchy... as Wall Street must be repaid!

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to earn your support. I promise that if I'm elected, I'll keep working for it every single day I'm in office.

With deep appreciation,

- Hillary
June 19, 2015

I Cannot Say Sternly Enough... I TOLD YA Soooo!

Now we have ALL been HAD... PERMANENTLY!

Profile Information

Name: Timmi Mac
Gender: Do not display
Home country: USA
Current location: USA
Member since: Fri Jun 6, 2014, 06:24 PM
Number of posts: 2,546

Journal Entries

Latest Discussions»CorporatistNation's Journal